ABSTRACT
Background:
The advent of 3D printing technology has revolutionized orthodontic treatment, enabling the production of customized orthodontic brackets tailored to individual patients. These customized brackets are hypothesized to reduce treatment time and improve clinical outcomes by providing better alignment precision and minimizing the need for adjustments.
Materials and Methods:
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 patients aged 12–25 years requiring orthodontic treatment. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the experimental group (n = 30) received 3D-printed customized orthodontic brackets, while the control group (n = 30) received conventional brackets. Treatment duration, the number of adjustment visits, and the quality of alignment were recorded over an 18-month period. Quality of alignment was assessed using the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) grading system. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test to compare the outcomes between the two groups.
Results:
The average treatment time for the experimental group was significantly shorter, with a mean duration of 14.2 months (SD ± 1.8) compared to 18.6 months (SD ± 2.3) in the control group (P < 0.01). The number of adjustment visits was reduced by 35% in the experimental group (mean = 8 visits) compared to the control group (mean = 12 visits). Furthermore, the quality of alignment, as measured by the ABO grading system, was significantly higher in the experimental group (mean score = 90.5) compared to the control group (mean score = 78.2) (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
The use of 3D-printed customized orthodontic brackets significantly reduces treatment time and improves the quality of orthodontic outcomes compared to conventional brackets. These findings suggest that customized brackets offer a promising approach for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment, potentially leading to better patient satisfaction and reduced clinical workload.
KEYWORDS: 3D printing, American Board of Orthodontics, clinical outcomes, customized orthodontic brackets, orthodontic alignment, orthodontic treatment, treatment time
INTRODUCTION
The field of orthodontics has witnessed significant advancements over the past few decades, with a focus on improving treatment efficiency and patient outcomes. One of the most recent developments in this area is the application of 3D printing technology to create customized orthodontic brackets tailored to individual patient needs. Traditional orthodontic treatment often involves the use of prefabricated brackets, which require multiple adjustments and extended treatment times to achieve optimal alignment.[1] In contrast, 3D-printed customized brackets are designed to fit the unique dental anatomy of each patient, potentially reducing the need for extensive manual adjustments and thereby shortening the overall treatment duration.
Customized orthodontic brackets are fabricated using computer-aided design (CAD) and 3D printing technology, allowing for precise control over bracket placement and angulation.[2] This precision is expected to enhance the effectiveness of tooth movement, leading to better alignment outcomes and improved patient satisfaction.[3] Previous studies have suggested that customized orthodontic appliances can reduce treatment time and improve clinical outcomes, although the evidence is still emerging.[4,5]
The potential benefits of 3D-printed customized brackets are not only limited to improved clinical outcomes but also include a reduction in chairside time for both orthodontists and patients, as well as a decrease in the overall number of adjustment visits required during the treatment course.[6]
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy of 3D-printed customized orthodontic brackets in reducing treatment time and enhancing clinical outcomes. Sixty patients aged 12–25 years, requiring comprehensive orthodontic treatment, were recruited from the Department of Orthodontics at Chhattisgarh Dental College and Research Institute. Patients with Class I malocclusion, good oral hygiene, and no prior orthodontic treatment were included, while those with severe skeletal discrepancies, periodontal disease, or systemic conditions affecting bone metabolism were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n = 30), which received 3D-printed customized brackets, or the control group (n = 30), which received conventional metal brackets. The randomization ensured comparable baseline characteristics between the groups.
Customized brackets for the experimental group were fabricated using digital impressions obtained with an intraoral scanner and designed with CAD software. The brackets were 3D-printed using biocompatible resin and bonded using a precision bonding tray. Both groups followed the same treatment protocol with standard archwire sequences. The primary outcome measure was the total treatment duration, while secondary measures included the number of adjustment visits and the quality of alignment at the end of treatment, evaluated using the ABO grading system. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
RESULTS
The treatment duration was significantly shorter in the experimental group compared to the control group. The mean treatment duration for the experimental group was 14.2 months (SD ± 1.8), while the control group had a mean treatment duration of 18.6 months (SD ± 2.3). The difference in treatment duration between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01).
Number of adjustment visits
The number of adjustment visits required during the treatment was also significantly lower in the experimental group. Patients in the experimental group had an average of 8 adjustment visits (SD ± 1.2) compared to 12 visits (SD ± 1.5) in the control group, showing a 35% reduction in the number of visits (P < 0.01).
Quality of alignment
The quality of alignment at the end of the treatment, as assessed by the ABO grading system, was significantly higher in the experimental group. The mean ABO score for the experimental group was 90.5 (SD ± 4.2), whereas the control group had a mean score of 78.2 (SD ± 5.1) (P < 0.05) Tables 1-3.
Table 1.
Treatment duration
| Group | Mean Treatment Duration (months) | Standard Deviation (SD) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 14.2 | ±1.8 | <0.01 |
| Control group | 18.6 | ±2.3 |
Table 3.
Quality of alignment
| Group | Mean ABO Score | Standard Deviation (SD) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 90.5 | ±4.2 | <0.05 |
| Control group | 78.2 | ±5.1 |
Table 2.
Number of visits
| Group | Mean Number of Adjustment Visits | Standard Deviation (SD) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 8 | ±1.2 | <0.01 |
| Control group | 12 | ±1.5 |
These results demonstrate that 3D-printed customized orthodontic brackets significantly reduced treatment time, decreased the number of adjustment visits, and improved the quality of final alignment compared to conventional metal brackets.
DISCUSSION
The findings from this study suggest that the use of 3D-printed customized orthodontic brackets can significantly enhance the efficiency and outcomes of orthodontic treatment. The experimental group, which received customized brackets, demonstrated a marked reduction in treatment duration, fewer adjustment visits, and improved alignment quality compared to the control group, which was treated with conventional metal brackets. These results align with the growing body of literature that supports the benefits of customized orthodontic appliances in achieving more precise and effective treatment outcomes.[1,2,3]
One of the most significant findings in this study was the reduction in treatment duration observed in the experimental group. The mean treatment time was reduced by approximately 4.4 months compared to the control group, which represents a considerable improvement in treatment efficiency. This reduction can be attributed to the precision with which the customized brackets were designed and placed, allowing for more effective and targeted tooth movements from the outset of treatment. Previous studies have also reported similar reductions in treatment time with the use of customized orthodontic appliances, reinforcing the potential of 3D printing technology to streamline orthodontic treatment.[4,5]
The decrease in the number of adjustment visits observed in the experimental group is another notable outcome. On average, patients with customized brackets required 35% fewer visits compared to those with conventional brackets. This reduction in clinical visits not only benefits the patient by reducing the overall treatment burden but also offers significant advantages for orthodontic practices by improving chairside efficiency and potentially increasing the capacity to treat more patients. The findings of this study are consistent with other research that has shown a decrease in the need for mid-treatment adjustments when using customized orthodontic appliances.[6]
In terms of treatment outcomes, the quality of alignment, as measured by the ABO grading system, was significantly better in the experimental group. The higher ABO scores indicate that the customized brackets facilitated more accurate tooth movements, resulting in better final alignment. The improvement in alignment quality is likely due to the precise customization of bracket placement and angulation, which is difficult to achieve with conventional brackets. Previous studies have highlighted the ability of customized orthodontic appliances to enhance the precision of treatment, leading to superior clinical outcomes.[7]
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the results of this study provide strong evidence that 3D-printed customized orthodontic brackets can significantly reduce treatment time, decrease the number of adjustment visits, and improve the quality of orthodontic outcomes.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Nil.
REFERENCES
- 1.Brown P, Richmond S. An update on the analysis of orthodontic treatment need using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) Dent Update. 2020;47:118–22. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vaid NR. Robotics and 3D technology in orthodontics: Clinical applications. Quintessence Int. 2017;48:659–68. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Grunheid T, Pavlovic A, Larson BE. The effect of 3D printing on orthodontic treatment efficiency and patient experience: A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:490–6. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sachdeva R, Arvind G, Dhakar N. Efficacy of customized orthodontic brackets in reducing treatment time: A randomized controlled trial. J Orthod Sci. 2021;10:157–63. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. A practical method for controlling mandibular incisor alignment and rotation following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;135:578–85. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alford TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK, Eckert GJ, Snyder RJ. Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile®method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:385–91. doi: 10.2319/071810-413.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boyd RL. Complex orthodontic treatment using a new protocol for the lingual technique. J Clin Orthod. 2020;44:119–29. [Google Scholar]