ABSTRACT
Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are an innovative technology that methods with a great possibility to revolutionize the sphere of medicine with the help of integration of human brain and external devices. In this article, we discuss how BCIs can be incorporated into hospitals and civil rehabilitation centers, possibly for rehabilitation, communication, and cognitive treatments. This review aims to discuss the advancement, usefulness, difficulties, and potential in regards to the use of BCIs in healthcare. We describe trends in the development of BCIs from simple experimental paradigms to multimedia advanced devices and their usage in clinical practice: assistive technology in patients with motor disorders, neurorehabilitation of post-stroke patients, and cognitive prosthesis for humans with neurodegenerative diseases. The article also emphasizes on present-day issues including signal quality, comfort level of the users, and the ethical parameter of the technique along with the research going on and future work streams. Thus, by evaluating the modern developments in the field and highlighting the existing problems, this article will try to give a briefing on the current stage of application of BCIs in the sphere of healthcare.
KEYWORDS: Brain computer interface, electrical brain signals, neuroimaging techniques, synchron
INTRODUCTION
BCIs are interfaces developed with the purpose of conveying information between the brain and computers or other devices, without using the peripheral neural or muscular communication channels.[1] It has potential in healthcare through new methods of diagnosis and approaches to the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with neurological and cognitive disorders. As BCIs evolve, their integration into healthcare systems continues to advance, driven by innovations in neuroscience, engineering, and computer science.
EVOLUTION OF TECHNOLOGY AND RELATION TO THE PAST
Early foundations (1960s-1970s)
The conceptual groundwork for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) began in the 1960s, driven by the increasing understanding of brain signals and their potential applications. Early work focused on exploring how brain activity could be harnessed to control external devices.[2]
Initial research
The idea of direct communication between the brain and machines emerged, inspired by advances in neuroscience and computer technology. Pioneering research laid the theoretical foundation for BCIs.[3]
Early BCI systems (1980s-1990s)
EEG Technology Advancements: The 1980s saw significant improvements in EEG technology, enhancing the ability to detect and analyze brain signals with greater precision.[4]
Proof of concept
During the 1990s, early BCIs demonstrated the feasibility of controlling external devices using brain signals. These systems, while limited in functionality, provided critical proof of concept for future developments.[3]
TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS
Improved signal processing and algorithm learning (2000s)
Enhanced Signal Decoding: During the early 2000s, the signal processing and decoding algorithms got enhanced where as the technology got enriched. The improvement of the effectiveness of this technology has been the result of introducing functions with the help of machine learning, which was a significant advancement in the study of BCIs.[5]
Clinical Applications: During this period, BCIs were also applied in the clinic in which they were described as help to people with motor impairment. These applications demonstrated the utility of the BCI for improving the life.[2]
Non-Invasive and Wearable Neuropides Mainly from the year 2010 and onwards
Non-Invasive Technologies: The growth of fresh and improved minimally invasive technologies such as improved EEG, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) are available to complement the use of BCIs by making them more portable and easy to use.[4]
Sophisticated Neural Interfaces: Neural interfaces that include BCI/BI and BMI such as implants or wearable electronics remain areas that has made numerous application opportunities for BCIs to beb discovered.[3]
Consumer Applications: The last decade of the 2010s and the beginning of the 2020s marked the start of BMI technology to be applied on the consumer market for the use in games, productivity improvement, and neurofeedback.[3]
APPLICATIONS IN HEALTHCARE
Neurological disorders
In conditions including epilepsy, Parkinson and stroke diseases, BCIs have been revealed to provide an enormous promise in the treatment of the diseases. In case of epilepsy, BCIs can be used to observe EEG and_fmri of the patient to forecast seizures and even prevent them. It can be very effective in patient safety and quality of life when used in the real-time monitoring.[6] In Parkinson’s disease, electrodes that are coated with a BCI interface and implanted on the brain control deep brain stimulation devices which helps to tame symptoms such as tremors and rigidity. To stroke survivors, BCIs help in motor rehabilitation by exercising neuroplasticity and improving motor training procedures.[7]
Motor impairments
For people with neurological disorders resulting from spinal cord injury or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), for example, BCIs present the chance to regain control over such appliances or even their own extremities. BCIs can help users to control the robotic arm or exoskeletons and increase their volitional movements severalfold.[7] In the same respects, BCIs can help a paralyzed or quadriplegic user control a proxy’s arm and hand to manipulate objects and environments, or help those with locked-in syndrome control an electronic communication aid, thus improving their quality of life and opportunities.[8]
Cognitive disorders
In conditions like dementia the BCI is employed to present the status of the disease development in cognitive disorders like Alzheimer’s. They can also be used for cognitive training, and subsequent cognitive reeducation, which may help mitigate the progression of derived cognitive deficits.[9] In addition, applications of BCIs are under consideration as a means to boost the cognitive abilities of individuals without disorders, strategies that can serve as a role in preventive medicine and mental health.[10]
CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS
Technical challenges
However, several technical challenges have been associated with BCIs which they experience at one time or the other. The biggest issue in related techniques, which include EEG, is that the spatial resolution is low and the recordings are prone to a number of forms of noise.[11] Perhaps there might be improved signal quality of invasive BCIs but then comes problems associated with surgery and implantation.[12] Contemporary sophisticated applications are challenging to execute owing to the requirements of high development of mathematical algorithms; thus, a task such as, for instance, the interpretation of brain signals may be computationally intensive.[13]
Medical and safety issues
Surgical BCIs are invasive, technically meaning that they are likely to cause infection and have as yet unknown long-term effects. Nevertheless, non-invasive approaches are less invasive and thus are associated with lesser risks while invasive techniques are likely to be more effective. There are yet various impacts of using BCIs in the long run, particularly complicated and invasive ones where the long-term is yet to be determined. Still, their use is under study to determine their efficacy and safety in the long run.[14]
Ethical and privacy concerns
BCIs also raise various ethical concern alongside the violation of people’s rights to privacy. A deviation arising from the potential of getting and decoding brain data concerns the privacy of data and individual persons. There is another important issue that should be discussed relates to the issue of informed consent as well as the protection of patients’ data.[15] Also, a risk, such as staking on brain data not being legitimized or modified inappropriately, prescribes intricate ethical issues
Accessibility and cost
The high cost of BCI technology is another significant challenge. Managing the costs of developing and applying BCIs keep them unavailable, especially in instances of limited resources. Furthermore, BCI systems have intricate interfaces that have to be explained to medical doctors and require additional skills for their implementation and the strict framework to support such systems might be rather large.[16] Overcoming these barriers is very important in extending the use of BCIs to more people.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Integration with Artificial Intelligence
AI and BCI technology are promising when they are interlinked. Moreover, with the help of machine learning algorithms, it is possible to increase accuracy in signal analysis and improve the method of BCIs individualization.[17] AI also addresses issues of dynamic and adaptive nature, working with BCI systems to change them in real time for improving the patient’s results.
Advances in neurotechnology
Further advances in neurotechnology are predicted in the development of the electrodes implantable into the brain and the nonintrusive neurosensing techniques; these will only improve the functional capability and safety of BCIs. Advancements in the materials family as well as wireless technology will help in redesigning a BCI system that is easier to wield and more flexible for general use.[7]
Multidisciplinary approaches
This is the reason why the issue of BCI technology should be analyzed and discussed within the frames of such direction. It is necessary to combine the efforts of both researchers and designers of the BCI together with clinicians and ethicists for the purpose of inventing the efficient and ethic BCI. Diverse coordination in this aspect will assist in overcoming existing drawbacks and broadening BCIs usages in medicine.[18]
CONCLUSION
BCIs represent a transformative advancement in healthcare, offering innovative solutions for managing neurological disorders, motor impairments, and cognitive dysfunctions. These cutting-edge technologies are not just creating new ways for people with neurological conditions to interact with the world, but they are also pushing the boundaries of what personalized medicine can achieve. Yet, the journey isn’t without its bumps. We face technical hurdles, ethical dilemmas, and practical challenges that need careful attention. Balancing the promise of BCIs with these real-world issues will be crucial. It’s a task that demands collaboration among researchers, doctors, and policymakers to ensure that these innovations are used responsibly and benefit everyone. Continued research and innovation are essential for addressing these challenges and maximizing the potential benefits of BCIs for patient care and clinical practice. In essence, the future of BCIs in healthcare is bright, filled with opportunities to make a real difference. By tackling current challenges and embracing new possibilities, we can make the most of this technology and improve lives in ways we’re only beginning to imagine.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Nil.
REFERENCES
- 1.Brain-Computer Interface - An overview |ScienceDirect Topics. [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 12]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/brain-computer-interface.
- 2.Birbaumer N, Cohen LG. Brain-computer interfaces: Communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J Physiol. 2007;579:621–36. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MAL. Brain-machine interfaces: Past, present and future. Trends Neurosci. 2006;29:536–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cajigas I, Davis KC, Prins NW, Gallo S, Naeem JA, Fisher L, et al. Brain-computer interface control of stepping from invasive electrocorticography upper-limb motor imagery in a patient with quadriplegia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023;16:1077416. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1077416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MA. Brain-machine interfaces: From basic science to neuroprostheses and neurorehabilitation. Physiol Rev. 2017;97:767–837. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Johnson NN, Carey J, Edelman BJ, Doud A, Grande A, Lakshminarayan K, et al. Combined rTMS and virtual reality brain-computer interface training for motor recovery after stroke. J Neural Eng. 2018;15:016009. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa8ce3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Colucci A, Vermehren M, Cavallo A, Angerhöfer C, Peekhaus N, Zollo L, et al. Brain-computer interface-controlled exoskeletons in clinical neurorehabilitation: Ready or Not? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022;36:747–56. doi: 10.1177/15459683221138751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bergeron D, Iorio-Morin C, Bonizzato M, Lajoie G, Orr Gaucher N, Racine É, et al. Use of invasive brain-Computer interfaces in pediatric neurosurgery: Technical and ethical considerations. J Child Neurol. 2023;38:223–38. doi: 10.1177/08830738231167736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Belkacem AN, Jamil N, Palmer JA, Ouhbi S, Chen C. Brain computer interfaces for improving the quality of life of older adults and elderly patients. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:692. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mak JN, Wolpaw JR. Clinical applications of brain-computer interfaces: Current state and future prospects. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;2:187–99. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2009.2035356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Salahuddin U, Gao P-X. Signal generation, acquisition, and processing in brain machine interfaces: A unified review. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:728178. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.728178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rothschild RM. Neuroengineering tools/applications for bidirectional interfaces, brain-computer interfaces, and neuroprosthetic implants - A review of recent progress. Front Neuroeng. 2010;3:112. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2010.00112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Merk T, Peterson V, Köhler R, Haufe S, Richardson RM, Neumann WJ. Machine learning based brain signal decoding for intelligent adaptive deep brain stimulation. Exp Neurol. 2022;351:113993. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.113993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maiseli B, Abdalla AT, Massawe LV, Mbise M, Mkocha K, Nassor NA, et al. Brain-computer interface: Trend, challenges, and threats. Brain Inform. 2023;10:20. doi: 10.1186/s40708-023-00199-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Livanis E, Voultsos P, Vadikolias K, Pantazakos P, Tsaroucha A. Understanding the ethical issues of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs): A blessing or the beginning of a dystopian future? Cureus. 2024;16:e58243. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stahl BC, Wakunuma K, Rainey S, Hansen C. Improving brain computer interface research through user involvement - The transformative potential of integrating civil society organisations in research projects. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang X, Ma Z, Zheng H, Li T, Chen K, Wang X, et al. The combination of brain-computer interfaces and artificial intelligence: Applications and challenges. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:712. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Burwell S, Sample M, Racine E. Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: A scoping review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18:60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
