Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 13;282(2):647–658. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08935-z

Table 3.

Subjective tinnitus assessment at 0, 3, and 6 months

Time in months Degree Control A Treatment B1 Surgery B2 Hearing aid B3 P value
Subjective intensity
 0 Mild
 N 7 6 7 9 0.820(1)
 % 28.0% 24.0% 28.0% 36.0%
Severe
 N 18 19 18 16
 % 72.0% 76.0% 72.0% 64.0%
 3 No improvement
 N 22 12 1 1 < 0.001*(2)
 % 88.0% 48.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Partial improvement
 N 3 13 11 18
 % 12.0% 52.0% 44.0% 72.0%
Complete improvement
 N 0 0 13 6
 % 0.0% 0.0% 52.0% 24.0%
 6 No improvement
 N 22 7 0 0 < 0.001*(2)
 % 88.0% 28.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Partial improvement
 N 3 14 9 15
 % 12.0% 56.0% 36.0% 60.0%
Complete improvement
 N 0 4 16 10
 % 0.0% 16.0% 64.0% 40.0%
Subjective frequency
 0 Low frequency
 N 8 8 7 8 0.987(1)
 % 32.0% 32.0% 28.0% 32.0%
High frequency
 N 17 17 18 17
 % 68.0% 68.0% 72.0% 68.0%
 3 Complete improvement
 N 0 0 13 6 < 0.001*(2)
 % 0.0% 0.0% 52.0% 24.0%
Low frequency
 N 8 17 11 12
 % 32.0% 68.0% 44.0% 48.0%
High frequency
 N 17 8 1 7
 % 68.0% 32.0% 4.0% 28.0%
 6 Complete improvement
 N 0 4 16 10 < 0.001*(2)
 % 0.0% 16.0% 64.0% 40.0%
Low frequency
 N 12 17 9 14
 % 48.0% 68.0% 36.0% 56.0%
High frequency
 N 13 4 0 1
 % 52.0% 16.0% 0.0% 4.0%
Score of questionnaire
 0 Median (IQR) 52 (29) 56 (27) 54 (27) 56 (41) 0.587(3)
Min–Max 18–64 16–66 18–64 16–66
 3 Median (IQR) 50 (23) 44 (32) 0 (51) 36 (40)
Min–Max 18–62 16–64 0–60 0–60 0.002*(3)
Pairwise comparison P1 > 0.999, P2 = 0.002*, P3 = 0.090, P4 = 0.037*, P5 = 0.614, P6 > 0.999
 6 Median (IQR) 52 (24) 20 (15) 0 (16) 16 (38) < 0.00*(3)
Min–Max 18–64 0–54 0–52 0–50
Pairwise comparison P1 = 0.002*, P2 < 0.001*, P3 < 0.001*, P4 = 0.070, P5 > 0.999, P6 = 0.823

P1(A–B1), P2(A–B2), P3(A–B3), P4(B1–B2), P5(B1–B3), P6(B2–B3)

IQR interquartile range

*Statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05, (1) Chi-square test, (2) Montecarlo test, (3) Kruskal Wallis test