Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun 11;73(1):49–62. doi: 10.1086/376547

Table 2.

PAvgRnk and Pord Values for Models 1–3[Note]

Weighted analyses
Unweighted analyses
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Place Bin PAvgRnk Pord Bin PAvgRnk Pord Bin PAvgRnk Pord Bin PAvgRnk Pord Bin PAvgRnk Pord Bin PAvgRnk Pord
1 9.2 .006 .497 14.3 .003 .309 14.3 .006 .544 9.2 .009 .685 2.6 .014 .829 14.2 .011 .751
2 10.3 .008 .267 18.2 .013 .478 18.2 .015 .557 1.4 .016 .583 14.2 .016 .605 18.2 .018 .647
3 1.4 .013 .191 2.6 .036 .841 8.6 .037 .850 19.4 .021 .465 14.3 .017 .334 18.3 .019 .406
4 19.4 .017 .144 8.1 .044 .809 7.6 .043 .803 18.1 .038 .698 18.3 .023 .294 11.3 .025 .355
5 9.3 .026 .195 8.6 .045 .672 18.3 .048 .727 10.3 .046 .685 18.2 .027 .209 14.3 .040 .552
6 17.2 .031 .143 5.6 .051 .588 11.3 .054 .658 18.2 .057 .719 5.1 .038 .293 20.1 .045 .456
7 18.2 .031 .057 18.3 .061 .631 20.1 .058 .572 18.3 .059 .595 1.8 .041 .203 21.2 .052 .454
8 18.1 .033 .026 5.1 .065 .547 14.2 .059 .420 5.5 .062 .468 21.2 .042 .107 7.5 .056 .357
9 14.3 .043 .049 21.2 .075 .582 12.4 .064 .354 17.2 .070 .469 3.6 .047 .088 2.6 .056 .214
10 18.3 .055 .091 7.6 .079 .483 21.2 .071 .333 1.8 .070 .325 8.1 .049 .047 1.8 .057 .124
11 6.4 .060 .070 9.3 .080 .342 5.6 .073 .230 9.3 .073 .236 7.5 .059 .065 12.4 .059 .074
12 10.2 .075 .153 14.2 .100 .572 11.1 .079 .212 20.4 .083 .269 8.6 .069 .081 7.6 .059 .036
13 18.4 .082 .138 2.6 .082 .151 12.3 .091 .259 20.4 .074 .067 8.6 .064 .024
14 12.4 .094 .200 9.3 .085 .102 3.4 .092 .170 5.6 .080 .060 20.4 .093 .194
15 5.1 .097 .140 7.5 .095 .117 11.3 .085 .051
16 18.4 .097 .070 9.2 .087 .029
17 2.9 .091 .021

Note.— Shown are PAvgRnk and Pord values for all bins with PAvgRnk values <.1 in each analysis, sorted by their overall place in the order of average ranks for that analysis. P values <.05 and the associated bin labels are shown in boldface italic type.