Table E.
Sequence Identity |
||||||||||||||||||||
90% to <92% |
92% to <94% |
94% to <96% |
96% to <98% |
98% to 100% |
||||||||||||||||
Junction |
Junction |
Junction |
Junction |
Junction |
||||||||||||||||
Repeat | Fraction(%) | No. | Control Fraction(%) | Enrichment | Fraction(%) | No. | Control Fraction(%) | Enrichment | Fraction(%) | No. | Control Fraction(%) | Enrichment | Fraction(%) | No. | Control Fraction(%) | Enrichment | Fraction(%) | No. | Control Fraction(%) | Enrichment |
Alu | 26.3 | 252 | 14.8 | 1.8-fold | 22.4 | 282 | 12.5 | 1.8-fold | 17.1 | 268 | 11.1 | 1.6-fold | 30.1 | 310 | 16.2 | 1.9-fold | 31.7 | 120 | 17.4 | 1.8-fold |
Satellite | 7.2 | 67 | 5.1 | 1.4-fold | 12.2 | 146 | 8.0 | 1.5-fold | 5.6 | 88 | 2.5 | 2.2-fold | 1.1 | 19 | .6 | 1.7-fold | .3 | 2 | .3 | 1.0-fold |
Note.— Alignments were categorized on the basis of the percent sequence identity. The junction and control fraction were calculated separately for each category of percent-identity, essentially as described in table A (online only). The enrichment compares the relative repeat content of the junction with those of the control regions.