Skip to main content
. 2003 Sep 22;73(4):823–834. doi: 10.1086/378594

Table E.

Alu and Satellite Junction Enrichment by Percent Identity of Alignment[Note]

Sequence Identity
90% to <92%
92% to <94%
94% to <96%
96% to <98%
98% to 100%
Junction
Junction
Junction
Junction
Junction
Repeat Fraction(%) No. Control Fraction(%) Enrichment Fraction(%) No. Control Fraction(%) Enrichment Fraction(%) No. Control Fraction(%) Enrichment Fraction(%) No. Control Fraction(%) Enrichment Fraction(%) No. Control Fraction(%) Enrichment
Alu 26.3 252 14.8 1.8-fold 22.4 282 12.5 1.8-fold 17.1 268 11.1 1.6-fold 30.1 310 16.2 1.9-fold 31.7 120 17.4 1.8-fold
Satellite 7.2 67 5.1 1.4-fold 12.2 146 8.0 1.5-fold 5.6 88 2.5 2.2-fold 1.1 19 .6 1.7-fold .3 2 .3 1.0-fold

Note.— Alignments were categorized on the basis of the percent sequence identity. The junction and control fraction were calculated separately for each category of percent-identity, essentially as described in table A (online only). The enrichment compares the relative repeat content of the junction with those of the control regions.