Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 8;25:209. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06807-6

Table 4.

Spindle coding analysis results

Main categories Independent categories Meaning
Individual factors Perceived risks Subjective judgment of individual users on risk characteristics and severity after use.
Perceived benefits Actual benefits experienced by individual users after use.
Willingness to accept technology Individual users’ acceptance of the technology and willingness to use it.
Technical factors Technical barriers Difficulties and problems that users encounter when using ChatGPT.
Technical advantages The leading degree of ChatGPT compared with similar technologies.
Technical ethics The ethical relationship between technology and human and society.
Information factors Information quality Objective evaluation of the content of answers given by ChatGPT.
Information acquisition Users use ChatGPT to obtain the required information.
Environmental factors Usage scenarios Combination of various environmental factors or specific scenarios when using ChatGPT.
Social influence The influence of social factors on users’ decisions and behaviors.
Willingness to use Use positively Accept ChatGPT and have a positive intention to use it.
Use neutrally Unclear attitude towards ChatGPT and the willingness to use it is not obvious.
Use negatively Do not accept ChatGPT and have a negative intention to use it.