Table 4.
Spindle coding analysis results
| Main categories | Independent categories | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Individual factors | Perceived risks | Subjective judgment of individual users on risk characteristics and severity after use. |
| Perceived benefits | Actual benefits experienced by individual users after use. | |
| Willingness to accept technology | Individual users’ acceptance of the technology and willingness to use it. | |
| Technical factors | Technical barriers | Difficulties and problems that users encounter when using ChatGPT. |
| Technical advantages | The leading degree of ChatGPT compared with similar technologies. | |
| Technical ethics | The ethical relationship between technology and human and society. | |
| Information factors | Information quality | Objective evaluation of the content of answers given by ChatGPT. |
| Information acquisition | Users use ChatGPT to obtain the required information. | |
| Environmental factors | Usage scenarios | Combination of various environmental factors or specific scenarios when using ChatGPT. |
| Social influence | The influence of social factors on users’ decisions and behaviors. | |
| Willingness to use | Use positively | Accept ChatGPT and have a positive intention to use it. |
| Use neutrally | Unclear attitude towards ChatGPT and the willingness to use it is not obvious. | |
| Use negatively | Do not accept ChatGPT and have a negative intention to use it. |