Skip to main content
. 2003 Aug 12;73(3):591–600. doi: 10.1086/378157

Table 2.

MAPH, Microsatellite, SQ-FISH, and Cytogenetic Analyses of a Subset of Individuals[Note]

MAPH Analysisa
Microsatellite EPEV-1 Analysis
SQ-FISH Analysisb
Sample nd SPAG11(probe H) DEFB4a(probe G) DEFB4b(probe F) Other 8pe β-Defensin–ClusterCopy Number Genotype ApproximateDosage Ratio BAC 51D11 Signal Intensity Ratio YAC HTY3020 Signal Intensity Ratio β-Defensin–ClusterAlleles G-BandCytogeneticAnalysisof 8p23.1 EVc
Family 1:
 I:2 4 ND 12 ± 1.6 10 ± .54 2.0 ± .19 11 169,182,184,188 1:2:7:1 ND ND Yes
 II:3 2 ND 10 ± 1.2 9.1 ± .59 2.0 ± .49 9 169,182,184 2:1:6 ND ND Yes
 II:5 3 3.4 ± .18 4.0 ± .21 3.0 ± .18 1.7 ± .11 4 169,184,188 1:2:1 ND ND No
 II:8 4 ND 8.9 ± .41 8.8 ± .61 1.9 ± .30 9 169,182,184 2:1:6 1:3.9 (2.4–6.3) 1:7.6f (5.5–10) 1, 8 Yes
 II:11 2 ND 12 ± 2.8 10.3 ± 1.7 2.2 ± .39 11 169,182,184 4:2:5 ND ND Yes
Family 2:
 I:1 2 8.8 ± .01 11 ± 0.27 8.1 ± .55 2.3 ± .19 9 182,184,186,188 3:4:1:1 ND 1:2.8 (1.9–4.1) 2, 7 Yes
 I:2 4 4.5 ± .23 4.3 ± .31 4.4 ± .38 2.1 ± .26 4 169,182,184,190 1:1:1:1 ND 1:1.3 (1.1–1.7) 2, 2 No
 II:2 4 9.3 ± .66 9.4 ± .89 8.6 ± .35 2.2 ± .49 9 169,182,184,186 1:4:3:1 1:2.4 (1.6–3.5) 1:3.2 (2.1–4.7) 2, 7 Yes
 III:3 4 9.1 ± 1.8 9.8 ± .74 10 ± 1.1 2.1 ± .13 9/10 169,182,184,186 1:3:3:2 1:3.0 (2.1–4.4) 1:3.5f (2.8–5.2) 2, 7 Yes
Family 3:
 I:1 5 4.4 ± .42 4.2 ± .36 4.4 ± .29 2.1 ± .10 4 182,184,188,190 1:1:1:1 1:1.6 (1.3–2.0) 1:1.3f (1.1–1.5) 2, 2 No
 I:2 3 ND 14 ± 3.4 12 ± .16 2.3 ± .78 12 169,182,184,186,188 1:1:8:1:1 1:2.1 (1.9–2.3) 1:1.9f (1.5–2.4) 4, 8 Yes
 II:1 3 12 ± 1.2 11 ± .65 13 ± .29 2.1 ± .89 12 169,182,184,188 1:2:8:1 1:2.8 (2.2–3.7) 1:2.3f (1.5–3.4) 4, 8 Yes
Unrelated individuals:
 J1 5 2.0 ± .096 2.0 ± .14 2.0 ± .11 2.0 ± .15 2 169
 N005 5 3.0 ± .28 2.5 ± .33 3.1 ± .44 1.9 ± .28 3 169, 186 1:2
 N008 5 3.4 ± .42 3.2 ± .27 3.3 ± .25 1.8 ± .10 3 182,186,188 1:1:1
 N015g 5 4.6 ± .25 3.9 ± .13 5.4 ± .48 1.9 ± .35 5 169,184,186,188 2:1:1:1
 N025 3 6.5 ± .85 7.3 ± .85 7.1 ± .85 2.0 ± .13 7 169,182,184,186 2:1:2:2
 N029 3 5.1 ± .34 5.6 ± .19 6.2 ± .34 2.0 ± .36 6 169,184,186, 190 1:3:1:1
Chimpanzeeh 1 4.1 ND 4.2 2.1 ± 1.0 4 169
Gorillah 1 1.4 ND 2.5 1.9 ± 1.2 2 186

Note.— ND = not determined.

a

Dosage per diploid genome ± 95% confidence limits, with J1 or N005 as the standard reference.

b

Mean ratio (95% confidence limits).

c

Yes = presence of an 8p23.1 EV chromosome; No = normal chromosome 8.

d

Number of independent MAPH tests.

e

Excluding DEFA1.

f

Using YAC 820b4.

g

Heterogeneity of repeat unit (P<.01, by t test).

h

The large CIs seen in the gorilla and chimpanzee samples are due to dosage differences in reference subtelomeric probes as compared with humans.