Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 10;15(6):4532–4535. doi: 10.1039/d5ra00158g

Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d5ra00158g-u1.jpg
Entry Variation from the standard conditions Yieldb
1 None 78%
2 PC1 instead of PC2 7%
3 4-CZIPN 71%
4 Et3N/KOtBu instead of pyridine Trace
5 MTBE instead of THF 34%
6 DCM instead of MeCN Trace
7 DMSO instead of MeCN 40%
8 DCE instead of MeCN 20%
9 THF instead of MeCN 71%
10 DIPEA instead of HCOOCs N.D.
11 Cs2CO3 instead of HCOOCs 42%
12 In the absence of base Trace
13 In the absence of PC N.D.
14 In the dark N.D.
graphic file with name d5ra00158g-u2.jpg
a

Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were performed with 1 (0.25 mmol), 2 (0.10 mmol), NHC (0.23 mmol), pyridine (0.46 mmol), solvent A (1.5 mL), 15 min; then photocatalyst (0.002 mmol), base (0.2 mmol), solvent B (1.0 mL), blue LEDs at rt for 12 h.

b

Yield determined by 19F NMR using PhCF3 as an internal standard. N.D. = no detection.