Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 23;21(4):493–499. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2444862

Table 1.

Studies in favor of using TMB as an agnostic biomarker for predicting response to immunotherapy.

Clinical Trial/Study Cancer Type and Studied Therapy Outcome Measure In favor of TMB-H References
Frameshift events predict anti-PD-1/L1 response in head and neck cancer (Hanna et al.) – Head and neck cancer
– Anti – PD-1/L1
Median OS among virus-negative patients TMB-H (>10) > TMB-L (<5)
OS = 20 months > OS = 6 months, respectively
[6]
AtezoTRIBE – Metastatic colorectal cancer
– FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab ± Atezolizumab
Median PFS TMB-H (13.1 months) > TMB-L (11.5 months) [7]
Keynote 158 – Advanced (unresectable and/or metastatic) solid tumors
– Pembrolizumab monotherapy
ORR TMB-H (ORR = 29%) > TMB-L (ORR = 6%) [8]
Assessment of Tumor Mutational Burden and Outcomes in Patients With Diverse Advanced Cancers Treated With Immunotherapy (Aggarwal et al.) – Solid tumors (NSCLC, bladder, head and neck squamous cell cancer …)
– Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 ± anti-CTLA-4
OS TMB-H > TMB-L [HR = 0.72]
Prospective subgroup (TMB status evaluated pre ICI administration) TMB-H > TMB-L [HR, 0.61]
[9]
Checkmate 227 – Stage IV NSCLC
– Nivolumab + Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab monotherapy or chemotherapy alone
PFS Nivo + Ipi: TMB-H (7.2 months) > TMB-L (3.2 months) [10]