Skip to main content
Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons logoLink to Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons
. 2025 Feb 10;9(6):CASE24298. doi: 10.3171/CASE24298

Gorham-Stout disease of the craniovertebral junction causing basilar impression and Chiari malformation type I: illustrative case

Hashim Syed 1,*, Stephen Glennon 1,*, Nahom Teferi 1,, David Chenoweth 1, Kathryn Eschbacher 2, Polly J Ferguson 3, Yutaka Sato 4, Patrick Hitchon 1, Brian J Dlouhy 1
PMCID: PMC11812442  PMID: 39928929

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gorham-Stout disease (GSD) is an extremely rare osteolytic disorder characterized by resorption of skeletal bone due to aggressive, nonneoplastic lymphatic proliferation.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors report the 14th case of GSD of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ), which resulted in cranial settling, basilar impression, and an acquired Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) in a pediatric patient. A 4-year-old girl initially presented with recurrent symptoms of pharyngitis, bacteremia, and neck pain. She continued experiencing waxing and waning symptoms of fever and neck pain that gradually worsened. At 12 years old, imaging revealed progressively worsening osteolytic changes with bone marrow edema involving the CVJ and subaxial cervical spine with progressive cranial settling, basilar impression, and 14 mm of tonsillar herniation, consistent with an acquired CM-I. She underwent a frontal bone biopsy, which confirmed the diagnosis of GSD. Treatment with sirolimus and bisphosphonates stabilized the osteolysis.

LESSONS

GSD represents a rare group of osteolytic bone disorders with a highly variable clinical course. A high index of suspicion is warranted, as diagnosis can be challenging. Early referral to a specialized center is key, as treatment is directed toward symptomatic management and a multidisciplinary team approach. GSD is another syndrome associated with CVJ bony changes and tonsillar herniation.

https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24298

Keywords: Chiari malformation, Gorham-Stout disease, basilar impression

ABBREVIATIONS: CM-I = Chiari malformation type I, CSF = cerebrospinal fluid, CT = computed tomography, CVJ = craniovertebral junction, GSD = Gorham-Stout disease, IL-6 = interleukin-6, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, RT = radiotherapy.


Gorham-Stout disease (GSD), also known as “vanishing bone disease,” “idiopathic osteolysis,” or “phantom bone disease,” is a rare osteolytic disorder characterized by a slow and insidious resorption of skeletal bone.13 In GSD, endothelial proliferation of lymphatic vasculature causes resorption of the osseous matrix, which composes the functional unit of both cancellous and compact bone.3 Although this disease was first described in the scientific literature in 1838, its etiology remains unclear.4

Typically, GSD affects maxillofacial bones and bones in the upper extremities, shoulder, and pelvis. Involvement of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) is extremely rare and signifies a poorer prognosis due to cervical instability, basilar impression, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, with patients experiencing neurological impairment due to brainstem compression and/or recurrent meningitis.5

Herein, we present the case of a 12-year-old girl with GSD of the CVJ and calvaria who initially presented at 4 years of age with recurrent pharyngitis with bacteremia, neck pain, and headaches. The patient was later diagnosed with GSD after a left frontal bone biopsy was performed, and treatment with bisphosphonate and sirolimus was initiated. This is the 14th published case of pediatric GSD of the CVJ resulting in basilar impression and Chiari malformation type I (CM-I).

Illustrative Case

A 4-year-old girl initially presented with recurrent symptoms of streptococcal pharyngitis with neck pain and headaches. These symptoms were associated with an increase in the prominence of a facial hemangioma over the left periorbital and forehead region. The patient was given intravenous antibiotics over several hospitalizations. The initial hypothesis theorized that the patient’s vascular malformation was serving as a nidus of infection, causing exacerbation of both the facial hemangioma during illness and bacteremia. During one of these hospitalizations, she developed torticollis, which prompted computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine. CT revealed rotatory subluxation of C1 over C2 suspected to be from inflammation in the parapharyngeal tissues (Griesel syndrome; Fig. 1A and B). In addition, MRI revealed a CM-I with 14 mm of tonsillar herniation (Fig. 1C and D). The patient was initiated on oral antibiotics and muscle relaxants for Griesel syndrome, and her torticollis improved. As the patient had only mild Valsalva-induced headaches and nonfocal findings on neurological evaluation, she was followed serially in the neurosurgery clinic for the CM-I. By 7 years old, osteolytic changes were observed at the CVJ, specifically in the clivus, occipital condyles, and C1. This led to cranial settling (Fig. 1EH). Because of these imaging findings and recurrent streptococcus pharyngitis, she was re-evaluated by the infectious disease, immunology, and genetics teams and underwent an extensive workup for congenital/acquired immunodeficiency and other rare genetic syndromes. Her immunology workup was unremarkable, and the genetic workup also revealed no clinically significant chromosomal microdeletions or duplications. Furthermore, the hematological workup was also negative.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Initial presentation parasagittal (A) and axial (B) CT demonstrating rotatory subluxation of C1 on C2 from Griesel syndrome when the patient was 4 years old. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI (C and D) demonstrating the CM-I and tonsillar descent of 14 mm. Midsagittal (E) and parasagittal (F and G) CT demonstrating early osteolytic changes in the clivus, occipital condyle (OC), and C1 (arrows) when the patient was 7 years old. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI (H) revealed slight worsening of the tonsillar descent. Dashed lines (D and H) represent the McRae line, which marks the boundary of the foramen magnum from the basion to the opisthion.

The patient’s headaches and neck pain continued to gradually worsen by the age of 10 years. This led to multiple emergency department visits due to complaints of worsening neck pain and fever with elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate). Her infectious workup was negative. However, MRI of the cervical spine revealed vertebral body contrast enhancement from C1 to C4, and CT demonstrated worsening osteolytic changes at the clivus and occipital condyles (Fig. 2AD), resulting in progressive cranial settling, basilar impression, and fusion of the occipital condyles with C1. Radiographs and CT of the head revealed osteolytic changes in the skull, skull base, and facial bones (Fig. 2E–G). With a bacterial infection ruled out after a lack of improvement with antibiotics, these imaging findings became concerning for GSD. Subsequently, she was maintained in a Miami J collar for concerns of cervical instability. A left frontal skull biopsy was performed to confirm the diagnosis of GSD.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Follow-up imaging when the patient was 10 years old. Midsagittal (A) and parasagittal (B and C) CT demonstrating progressive osteolytic changes in the clivus, OC, and C1 (arrows) now with fusion of the OC to C1. Sagittal MRI (D) of the cervical spine with gadolinium contrast demonstrating worsening of caudal tonsillar descent and progressive bone marrow changes with contrast enhancement involving the CVJ and C1–C4 vertebral bodies (arrow). Note the McRae line (dashed line). Radiograph (E) and bone-window CT images (F) of the skull and skull base (G) demonstrating extensive osteolytic changes of the calvaria, facial bones, and skull. The overall radiological findings were considered diagnostic for GSD.

A bone biopsy was performed with CT Stealth guidance (Medtronic Inc.), targeting a small area of osteolysis in the left frontal bone. Histopathological analysis of the biopsy specimen revealed areas of abnormal thin-walled vessels, with some sections showing many luminal cross-sections of thin-walled vessels interspersed between bony trabeculae, beyond what would be expected in normal bone. The endothelial cells were cytologically bland and were highlighted with CD34 and CD31 immunohistochemical stains. Similarly, a D2-40 immunohistochemical stain highlighted most of the vessels, supporting the possibility of lymphatic differentiation (Fig.3). While the histological feature of this lesion was not specific, given the clinical and radiographic findings, it was thought to be most consistent with an osteolytic angioproliferative process like GSD.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Pathology of the skull bone biopsy. A: Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed a fragment of bone with proliferation of thin-walled vessels between bony trabeculae with cytologically bland nuclei. B: CD31 immunohistochemical staining highlighted the small, endothelial-lined vessels within the angioproliferative lesions. Original magnification ×200 (A) and ×400 (B).

Subsequently, the patient was initiated on treatment with bisphosphonate and sirolimus. However, due to concerns for pain-related side effects, the bisphosphonate infusions were halted after 1 round of treatment, and the patient was started on vitamin D and calcium supplements. Furthermore, her sirolimus treatment was discontinued after a 7-month course due to frequent infections (sinusitis, pharyngitis, otitis media, and COVID pneumonia) and the family’s preference for conservative management with close observation, given her stable clinical examination and stable radiological findings on initial follow-up.

At 13 years old and the last follow-up to date, cervical spine CT and MRI were concerning for continued osteolysis of the upper cervical spine vertebrae with new disruption of the joints at C1–2, C2–3, and C3–4 bilaterally, causing anterolisthesis, worsening kyphosis, and increased tonsillar descent and brainstem compression at the CVJ (Fig. 4). Clinically, however, the patient continued to do well, with slight interval worsening of her mild Valsalva-induced headaches but an otherwise stable neurological examination. Following multidisciplinary discussions, her parents were advised to resume treatment with sirolimus and bisphosphonates, and treatment was prescribed. Control of the underlying osteolytic disease process was deemed necessary prior to any consideration of surgical intervention for decompression and stabilization of the CVJ and upper cervical spine.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Follow-up Imaging when the patient was 13 years old. Midsagittal (A) and parasagittal (B and C) CT demonstrating progressive osteolytic changes in the clivus, OC, and C1–4 (arrows) now with fusion of the OC to C1 and progressive joint disruption at C1–4. Lateral radiograph (D) of the cervical spine demonstrating kyphosis. Sagittal T2-weighted MRI (E) of the cervical spine showing progressive loss of normal cervical lordosis and worsening tonsillar descent, now 22 mm. Dashed line represents the McRae line. There is also an increase in the high T2 signal intensity corresponding to an increase in bone marrow edema now extending to C6. The involvement of the facet joints and emerging anterolisthesis is concerning for cervical instability.

Informed Consent

The necessary informed consent was obtained in this study.

Discussion

GSD, also known as vanishing bone disease, idiopathic osteolysis, or phantom bone disease, is a rare condition characterized by intraosseous proliferation of endothelial-lined lymphatic vessels, resulting in progressive osteolysis and destruction of skeletal bone.13 These osteolytic lesions are not associated with new bone formation or periosteal reaction, distinguishing GSD from other forms of osteolytic disorders caused by inflammation or malignancy.6,7

GSD was first described by Jackson in 1838, and the association of GSD with hemangiomatosis was later well detailed in the seminal paper by Gorham and Stout in 1955.8 Despite the disease’s early description, however, its exact etiology remains to be elucidated.9 The proposed pathological process leading to osteolytic destruction of bone is an aggressive nonneoplastic proliferation of vascular and lymphatic vessels, which leads to the replacement of the osseous matrix with a hypervascular, fibrous, and angiomatous tissue.1 The stimulus leading to this irregular lymphatic vessel proliferation and osteolysis remains speculative, and several theories have been hypothesized.9 Most prominent theories include alterations in local growth factor levels, changes in structural features with unusually wide thin-walled vessels resulting in stasis of blood flow, and the possible role of osteoclasts and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the bone resorption process.1013 Because of the rarity of this condition, descriptions of its epidemiology, clinical presentation, radiological appearance, and appropriate management are limited to case reports and small case series.

GSD can involve any part of the skeleton in the body, but has a predilection to bones in the pelvis, humerus, femur, and maxillofacial structures.14,15 Skull base and CVJ involvement is rare, with around 30 cases of GSD involving the CVJ reported so far.16 Skull base involvement tends to affect multiple cranial bones but is usually centered on the petrous and mastoid temporal bones in most cases.16 When the lesion extends posterior to the temporal bones and involves the CVJ, cervical instability with platybasia, basilar impression, and acquired Chiari malformation can result (Fig. 2). Involvement of the spine and CVJ is associated with a poor prognosis given the risks of neurological compromise from spinal and CVJ instability and brainstem compression.16,17

Epidemiologically, most cases of GSD occur in children and adults younger than 40 years of age, with a slight male predilection.1,16 The disease appears to be nonhereditary, with no attributable genetic mutations identified to date.16 Clinically, the presentation of GSD can vary significantly based on the bones affected and the degree of bone involvement. Symptoms can range from asymptomatic, until insufficiency fracture occurs, to severely disabling neurological impairment, with up to 16% of GSD cases deemed fatal.4 Spinal and CVJ involvement does not usually cause local tenderness but can result in neurological symptoms characterized by bowel/bladder dysfunction, paraparesis, and/or radiculopathy.15 CVJ GSD can also predispose patients to recurrent meningitis from CSF leakage, especially with involvement of the temporal bone or due to CSF-lymphatic fistulas.6,18 The association of GSD with CM-I is very rare, and only 13 cases have been reported in the literature to date.19 Chiari malformation in the setting of GSD is often associated with skull base and temporal bone involvement and ensuing CSF leakage resulting in intracranial hypotension, though a few cases without CSF leakage have been reported. In these cases, acquired Chiari malformation is largely thought to be due to cranial settling and basilar impression due to insufficiency of bones in the CVJ.19 For patients presenting with Chiari symptoms, the diagnosis of GSD is often delayed.19

The patient in this case presented at 4 years of age with persistent neck pain and headaches in the setting of recurrent group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Despite receiving broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics over several hospitalizations, she continued to experience head and neck pain. This is an atypical presentation, as craniofacial and CVJ GSDs are not associated with local tenderness or pain.15 Furthermore, workup during repeated emergency department visits due to persistent pain often revealed fever and elevated inflammatory markers without any infectious focus. This resulted in extensive infectious and immunological workup and suspicion for Griesel syndrome, the nontraumatic subluxation of the atlantoaxial joint due to soft tissue inflammation. Although GSD can present alongside infectious processes such as osteomyelitis and/or septic arthritis, this has rarely been reported.2022 Furthermore, little research has been done to investigate the correlation between immune dysfunction and GSD; it is unknown whether immunological impairment is a risk factor for the development of GSD or whether GSD can induce or precede an impaired immune response. However, a single study by Colucci et al. revealed that monocytes obtained from an adult patient with GSD had immature features and were associated with invasive angiogenesis and osteoclastogenesis both in vitro and in in vivo murine models.23 This patient highlights the importance of maintaining a low threshold for confirmatory testing when considering GSD of the CVJ. Patients can typically present with an accompanying CM-I and the associated symptoms of headaches, nausea, and vomiting. However, it is possible that the initial presentation can mimic infectious or immunological processes. Failure to recognize GSD of the CVJ can have devastating consequences for the patient, leading to delayed diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.

The diagnosis of GSD is based on clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings. Radiologically, given that osteolytic bone lesions encompass a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses, the diagnosis of GSD is often difficult to establish.24 On CT and/or MRI, an extraosseous stage with cortical erosion, adjacent soft tissue involvement, and fibrovascular replacement of bone without periosteal reaction follows an early intraosseous stage with patchy intramedullary and subcortical radiolucencies that coalesce.11 In advanced stages, radionucleotide bone scans exhibit greater absorption but can also appear cold due to resorbed bone.10,25,26 Confirmatory diagnosis is often made with histopathological analysis, after inflammatory, infectious, metabolic, and neoplastic etiologies are ruled out.16 Histopathology specimens demonstrate pathognomonic lymphatic and vascular proliferative changes with the replacement of healthy bone matrix with fibrovascular tissue (Fig. 3).9,24 To facilitate a standardized diagnosis, Heffez et al. suggested 8 criteria for the diagnosis of GSD.27 In our patient’s case, diagnosis was delayed due to the unique patient presentation, which was initially concerning for an infectious etiology, prompting workup for Griesel syndrome. The patient continued to remain febrile and have elevated inflammatory markers as well, which led to genetic and hematological analyses prior to proceeding with more invasive but confirmatory testing. However, the diagnosis was quickly established with a bone biopsy, leading to prompt initiation of appropriate treatment.

The rarity of GSD precludes the establishment of a standardized treatment algorithm. The mainstay of treatment of multifocal disease involves a multimodal approach to slow angiogenesis and bone resorption with systemic treatments targeting antilymphangiogenic and antiosteoclastic pathways.28 Frequently used medications aimed at slowing lymphoproliferation and osteolysis include sirolimus, beta blockers, bisphosphonates, IL-6 inhibition-targeted therapy, and interferon alpha.2

Bisphosphonates have demonstrated efficacy in the medical treatment of GSD, as they decrease bone resorption by interfering with osteoclast activity.2 In addition, there has been accumulating evidence more recently that sirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, may play a role in stabilizing disease progression in GSD.2 Ricci et al. conducted a prospective analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial in which patients with GSD were treated with sirolimus, demonstrating that 60% of the cohort showed at least partial clinical improvement as measured by clinical status and functional impairment assessment.2 Additionally, 1 of the 5 GSD patients in that study demonstrated radiographic improvement, and another reported improvement in bone pain when sirolimus treatment was combined with bisphosphonate infusion.

The other treatment modality aimed at slowing angiogenesis is radiation therapy.10 Radiotherapy (RT) can play a role in treatment-resistant localized lesions and has been demonstrated to halt disease progression, though it carries the risk of delayed adverse effects, especially in pediatric patients.10,29 There have been several case reports of patients with GSD of the CVJ who responded well to treatment with RT, with a dose ranging from 20 to 45 Gy.30 In a review by Roy et al., of patients with GSD of the CVJ who received RT, 10 of the 13 patients demonstrated no local progression after RT.30

The role of surgery in GSD of the CVJ is mainly to treat complications and assumes an ancillary role.5 Serious complications like CSF leakage, spinal instability, or pathological fracture may warrant resection of the affected bone, reconstruction with autologous or allograft bone graft, and instrumentation for stabilization.5 However, even with bone graft reconstruction, lysis of grafted bone can result during phases of activity of GSD unless osteolytic disease is controlled.31 In rare cases of isolated calvarial disease limited to a single site, excision could be offered first line and cranioplasty might be possible.16 Similarly, in cases of CVJ instability, surgical stabilization could be indicated to prevent quadriparesis and death; however, surgical stabilization with instrumentation might be impossible due to the poor quality of adjacent bone and can predispose the patient to instrumentation failure. Hence, in some cases of severe GSD of the CVJ, a long-term custom-made orthosis could be indicated.16 Similarly, suboccipital decompression for CM-I due to GSD of the CVJ is also associated with poor outcomes and continued disease progression.19,32 In a review by Stephens et al., among 12 patients in the literature with GSD of the CVJ and CM-I, 7 underwent suboccipital decompression, and 5 of these patients had disease recurrence due to continued cranial settling, basilar impression, and CSF flow obstruction.19

The clinical course of GSD, after initial presentation, is usually prolonged and progressive but may eventually stabilize.6 The long-term outcome and prognosis of patients with GSD vary based on disease localization and extent of involvement. Most cases of GSD of the CVJ that have been documented in the literature revealed either continued progression or stabilization of the disease after one or more phases of progression, and only one-third of all cases showed an improvement.16 Bone formation rarely takes place, even when the disease stabilizes. Given the paucity of data on the natural history of GSD, it is unclear if stabilization of the disease process is the result of treatment or part of the natural course of a self-limited disease.16 Long-term complications of GSD of the CVJ include CSF leakage, cranial settling, basilar impression, recurrent meningitis, and neurological compromise from compression of the brainstem or upper cervical spinal cord.33,34 These complications might be disabling or lethal even in the setting of treatment (Table 1).6,3541

TABLE 1.

Literature review of all reported cases of CM-I and GSD

Authors & Year Age (yrs)/Sex Location of GSD Sxs Time From Presentation to GSD Dx Tx of CM-I Complication of Op Tx Tx of GSD FU Yrs Since Dx/Outcome
Stephens et al., 202019 5/M Occipital bone, clivus, sphenoid, C1–4, femur, pelvis, sacrum HA, emesis, neck stiffness 33 mos Occipital decompression Craniocervical junction restenosis after decompression Sirolimus & bisphosphonate Alive at 13 mos
Coulter et al., 201426 37/F Occipital bone, clivus, mastoid bilat HA, hearing loss, facial paresthesia 7 mos Occipital decompression Recurrence of compression at craniocervical junction Bisphosphonate
Alive at 9 yrs
Girn et al., 200632 2/F Clivus, occiput, cervical, temporal, pelvis, femur, ribs HA, vomiting, palpable temporal mass 72 mos Occipital decompression None RT, bisphosphonate, halo collar Died at 6 yrs
Costa et al., 201833 8/M Occipital bone, lt mastoid, C1–4 Gait disturbance & spastic tetraparesis 24 mos Occipital decompression None Bisphosphonate & interferon Died of medullary compression secondary to atlanto-occipital dislocation
Jea et al., 200334 4/F Sphenoid, clivus, medial petrous apex, OC, inner ear, C1–4, C6, mandible HA, ear pain, posttympanostomy otorrhea 12 mos Occipital decompression None NS NS
Peragallo & Soares, 201835 14/F Rt petrous temporal, rt mandible HA, unilat hearing loss, papilledema 48 mos Secondary to CSF leak, no surgical decompression performed None Bisphosphonate Alive at 2 yrs
Nagashima et al., 201736
25/F Petrous apex Paresthesia after bacterial meningitis, hearing loss NS Transsphenoid repair of CSF leak None NS Alive at 1 yr
Yoshimoto et al., 201841 19/F Femur, pelvis HAs, grip weakness 132 mos Secondary to intracranial hypotension treated w/ epidural blood patch None Sirolimus, interferon, bisphosphonate Died at 1 yr
Adler et al., 201138 1/F Lumbosacral, pelvis HA NS Occipital decompression Persistent Sxs, later managed w/ several epidural blood patches Interferon, bisphosphonate, vitamin D Alive at 1 yr, recurring postural HAs
Suero Molina et al., 201439 30/M T12, L1, lower ribs, splenic cysts, chylothorax HA Diagnosed w/ GSD at 13 yrs Dural repair of spinal CSF leak, no occipital decompression None Interferon, bisphosphonate, spinal fusion, sirolimus Alive at 12 mos, HAs resolved
Agrawal et al., 200618 25/F Thoracic spine, ribs Fever, fatigue, dysphagia 12 mos Occipital decompression None Vitamin D Fistula repair intact at 6-wk FU
Hughes et al., 201040 4/M Ribs, T2–12 HA, emesis None Decompression None Interferon, bisphosphonate Alive at 1 yr
Xing et al., 20236 20/M Thoracic, lumbar spine HA, nausea, vomiting Diagnosed w/ GSD at 8 yrs No decompression, increased ICP, hypotension treated w/ epidural blood patch Rebound intracranial hypertension treated w/ acetazolamide & mannitol NS Alive at 1 yr
Present case 4/F Upper cervical spine, CVJ, facial bones HA, neck pain, recurrent bacteremia Diagnosed w/ GSD at 9 yrs None None Bisphosphonate, sirolimus, vitamin D Alive at 3 yrs

Dx = diagnosis; FU = follow-up; HA = headache; ICP = intracranial pressure; NS = not specified; OC = occipital condyle; Sx = symptom; Tx = treatment.

Our patient was managed in a multipronged approach consisting of medical therapy with bisphosphonates and sirolimus and spinal stabilization with external cervical orthosis. RT was not offered due to the patient’s young age. Surgical intervention was also deferred due to the presence of adjacent bone softening, lack of debilitating symptoms, and presence of active osteolytic disease.

Observations

We report the 14th case of GSD of the CVJ that was later complicated by cranial settling, basilar impression, and acquired CM-I. The patient initially presented at 4 years of age with recurrent symptoms of pharyngitis, bacteremia, and neck pain and was managed with a long course of antibiotics. She continued to experience waxing and waning symptoms of fever, neck pain, and headaches that gradually worsened despite a negative infectious workup. Follow-up imaging subsequently revealed progressively worsening osteolytic changes with bone marrow edema involving the bones of the CVJ, upper cervical spine, and facial bones with progressive cranial settling, basilar impression, and atlas assimilation. She underwent a left frontal bone biopsy, which confirmed the diagnosis of GSD. She was later initiated on medical treatment with sirolimus and bisphosphonates.

Lessons

GSD represents a rare group of osteolytic bone disorders characterized by progressive osteolysis due to aggressive nonneoplastic lymphatic and vascular proliferation. The clinical course of the disease is highly variable, and a high index of suspicion is warranted, as diagnosis can be challenging. Early referral to a specialized center is key following diagnosis, as treatment and care are directed toward specific symptoms and require a multidisciplinary team approach with a long-term follow-up, given that the natural history of the disease remains unclear.

Disclosures

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: Teferi, Glennon, Sato, Dlouhy. Acquisition of data: Teferi, Syed, Glennon, Chenoweth, Eschbacher, Ferguson, Sato, Dlouhy. Analysis and interpretation of data: Teferi, Glennon, Chenoweth, Ferguson, Sato, Dlouhy. Drafting the article: Teferi, Syed, Glennon, Chenoweth, Dlouhy. Critically revising the article: Teferi, Syed, Chenoweth, Eschbacher, Ferguson, Sato, Hitchon, Dlouhy. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: Teferi, Chenoweth, Eschbacher, Ferguson, Hitchon, Dlouhy. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Teferi.

Correspondence

Nahom Teferi: University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA. nahom-teferi@uiowa.edu.

References

  • 1.Nikolaou VS Chytas D Korres D Efstathopoulos N.. Vanishing bone disease (Gorham-Stout syndrome): a review of a rare entity. World J Orthop. 2014;5(5):694-698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ricci KW, Hammill AM, Mobberley-Schuman P.Efficacy of systemic sirolimus in the treatment of generalized lymphatic anomaly and Gorham-Stout disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66(5):e27614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kiran DN Anupama A.. Vanishing bone disease: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(1):199-203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saify FY Gosavi SR.. Gorham's disease: a diagnostic challenge. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2014;18(3):411-414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Angelini A Mosele N Pagliarini E Ruggieri P.. Current concepts from diagnosis to management in Gorham-Stout disease: a systematic narrative review of about 350 cases. EFORT Open Rev. 2022;7(1):35-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xing QQ Miao M Zhang QW Wu Y He FF.. Gorham-Stout disease affecting the spine with cerebrospinal fluid leakage and Chiari-like tonsillar herniation: a rare case report and review of literature. BMC Neurol. 2023;23(1):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ozeki M Fujino A Matsuoka K Nosaka S Kuroda T Fukao T.. Clinical features and prognosis of generalized lymphatic anomaly, kaposiform lymphangiomatosis, and Gorham-Stout disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(5):832-838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gorham LW Stout AP.. Massive osteolysis (acute spontaneous absorption of bone, phantom bone, disappearing bone); its relation to hemangiomatosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37-A(5):985-1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xiang J Zhong W.. The molecular mechanism of Gorham syndrome: an update. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1165091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dellinger MT Garg N Olsen BR.. Viewpoints on vessels and vanishing bones in Gorham-Stout disease. Bone. 2014;63:47-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Radhakrishnan K Rockson SG.. Gorham’s disease: an osseous disease of lymphangiogenesis? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1131:203-205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee JY, Park C, Cho YP.Podoplanin-expressing cells derived from bone marrow play a crucial role in postnatal lymphatic neovascularization. Circulation. 2010;122(14):1413-1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tanoue N Moedano L Witte M Montague M Lukefahr A Bernas M.. Primary versus trauma-induced Gorham-Stout disease. Lymphology. 2018;51(1):18-27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Choma ND Biscotti CV Bauer TW Mehta AC Licata AA.. Gorham’s syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Med. 1987;83(6):1151-1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang H, Han C, Pang D.Surgical treatment of severe thoracic kyphosis and neurological deficit in a patient with Gorham-Stout syndrome: a case report and literature review. Front Surg. 2022;9:981025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maroufi SF Habibi Z Dabbagh Ohadi MA Mohammadi E Nejat F.. Gorham-Stout disease of skull base leading to cranial settling and rhinorrhea: a case-based review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022;38(4):695-703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Momanu A, Caba L, Gorduza NC.Gorham-Stout disease with multiple bone involvement-challenging diagnosis of a rare disease and literature review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(7):681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Agrawal R Mohammed I Reilly PG.. Duropleural fistula as a consequence of Gorham-Stout syndrome: a combination of 2 rare conditions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(5):1205-1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stephens S Squires L Campbell R Davies J Chaseling R.. Multifocal Gorham-Stout disease associated with Chiari I malformation and recurrent aseptic meningitis: case report and review of literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;72:486-492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Barnes-Saldaña F Venegas-Andrade A Colin-Martínez Ó Lizardo-Rodríguez A García-Romero MT Durán-McKinster C.. Clinical and radiological improvement in Gorham-Stout disease after sirolimus treatment. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2023;80(3):217-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hosoya M Oishi N Nishiyama J Ogawa K.. A case report of Gorham-Stout disease diagnosed during the course of recurrent meningitis and cholesteatoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;49(1):18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aouad P Young NM Saratsis AM Reynolds MA Ryan ME.. Gorham Stout disease of the temporal bone with cerebrospinal fluid leak. Childs Nerv Syst. 2022;38(2):455-460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Colucci S, Taraboletti G, Primo L.Gorham-Stout syndrome: a monocyte-mediated cytokine propelled disease. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(2):207-218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu Y, Zhong DR, Zhou PR.Gorham-Stout disease: radiological, histological, and clinical features of 12 cases and review of literature. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(3):813-823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Johnson PM McClure JG.. Observations on massive osteolysis; a review of the literature and report of a case. Radiology. 1958;71(1):28-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coulter IC Khan SA Flanagan AM Marks SM.. Chiari I malformation associated with Gorham's disease of the skull base. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;116:83-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Heffez L Doku HC Carter BL Feeney JE.. Perspectives on massive osteolysis. Report of a case and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55(4):331-343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ozeki M Fukao T.. Generalized lymphatic anomaly and Gorham-Stout disease: overview and recent insights. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2019;8(6):230-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dunbar SF Rosenberg A Mankin H Rosenthal D Suit HD.. Gorham’s massive osteolysis: the role of radiation therapy and a review of the literature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26(3):491-497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Roy A, Andruska N, Brenneman R.A case of Gorham-Stout disease of the skull base treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021;7(1):100809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Woodward HR Chan DP Lee J.. Massive osteolysis of the cervical spine. A case report of bone graft failure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981;6(6):545-549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Girn HR Towns G Chumas P Holland P Chakrabarty A.. Gorham’s disease of skull base and cervical spine—confusing picture in a two year old. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148(8):909-913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Costa FA Neto OM Gibbon FL Silva GG Alam LA.. Gorham’s syndrome associated with Chiari I malformation and recurrent meningitis without fistula: case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12(5):PD17-PD19. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jea A, McNeil A, Bhatia S.A rare case of lymphangiomatosis of the craniocervical spine in conjunction with a Chiari I malformation. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2003;39(4):212-215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Peragallo JH Soares BP.. Vanishing act: Gorham-Stout disease leading to dynamic cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities. J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38(3):419-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nagashima H Mizukawa K Taniguchi M Yamamoto Y Kohmura E.. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage and Chiari I malformation with Gorham’s disease of the skull base: a case report. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2017;51(5):427-431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Omata T Horie H Kuge S Imura N Nomoto A.. Mapping and sequencing of RNAs without recourse to molecular cloning: application to RNAs of the Sabin 1 strain of poliovirus and its defective interfering particles. J Biochem. 1986;99(1):207-217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Adler F Gupta N Hess CP Dowd CF Dillon WP.. Intraosseous CSF fistula in a patient with Gorham disease resulting in intracranial hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(11):E198-E200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Suero Molina EJ, Niederstadt T, Ruland V.Cerebrospinal fluid leakage in Gorham-Stout disease due to dura mater involvement after progression of an osteolytic lesion in the thoracic spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(6):956-960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hughes BD Grant GA Cummings TJ Fuchs HE.. Disappearing bone disease and Chiari I malformation. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010;46(1):58-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yoshimoto S Takai K Takahashi K Yasui T Taniguchi M.. Intracranial hypotension and hypertension: reversible Chiari malformation due to dynamic cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities in Gorham-Stout disease. Case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;22(5):508-512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons are provided here courtesy of American Association of Neurological Surgeons

RESOURCES