Skip to main content
Horticulture Research logoLink to Horticulture Research
. 2024 Oct 30;12(2):uhae302. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhae302

Brassica vegetables—an undervalued nutritional goldmine

Xiaomeng Zhang 1,#, Qiong Jia 2,#, Xin Jia 3,#, Jie Li 4, Xiaoxue Sun 5, Leiguo Min 6, Zhaokun Liu 7, Wei Ma 8,, Jianjun Zhao 9,
PMCID: PMC11822409  PMID: 39949883

Abstract

The genus Brassica includes six species and over 15 types of vegetables that are widely cultivated and consumed globally. This group of vegetables is rich in bioactive compounds, including glucosinolates, vitamins (such as vitamin C, folate, tocopherol, and phylloquinone), carotenoids, phenols, and minerals, which are crucial for enriching diets and maintaining human health. However, the full extent of these phytonutrients and their significant health benefits remain to be fully elucidated. This review highlights the nutrient compositions and health advantages of Brassica vegetables and discusses the impacts of various processing methods on their nutritional value. Additionally, we discuss potential strategies for enhancing the nutrition of Brassica crops through agronomic biofortification, conventional breeding, and biotechnological or metabolic engineering approaches. This review lays the foundation for the nutritional improvement of Brassica crops.

Introduction

The Brassica genus, belonging to the Brassicaceae family, comprises six economically important crop species: three diploids—Brassica nigra (BB genome), Brassica rapa (AA genome), and Brassica oleracea (CC genome)—and three allotetraploids—B. juncea (AABB genome), Brassica carinata (BBCC genome), and Brassica napus (AACC genome) [1, 2] (Fig. 1). These species, collectively referred to as the “U’s triangle” [5], originated from common ancestors ~24 million years ago and were among the first plants domesticated by humans [6]. Brassicas are primarily classified into three categories based on the parts consumed: oilseeds, vegetables, and condiments (Table 1). The vegetable category primarily includes B. juncea (mustard greens), B. napus (rutabaga), and B. rapa (Chinese cabbage, turnip, mizuna, tatsoi, winter rape, and pak choi), as well as B. oleracea (broccoli, kohlrabi, kale, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, and cabbage mustard). Oilseeds predominantly comprise B. napus (rapeseed), and condiments typically utilize seeds from B. juncea and B. nigra. Given its agricultural and economic significance, Brassica is among the most extensively cultivated and consumed crop groups worldwide. Its production has been expanding over the past decades. In 2022, the production of major Brassica crops—including cabbages, cauliflower, broccoli, mustard seeds, and rape or colza seeds—totaled over 186 million tons, covering ~44 million hectares, with a combined value exceeding 92 billion US dollars (FAOSTAT, 2022) (www.fao.org/faostat/zh). The genus’s significant horticultural relevance has fueled extensive molecular research, uncovering that the genomes of cultivated Brassica species have undergone considerable triplications and chromosomal rearrangements, thus driving their evolution and development [8–11].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

U’s triangle composed of Brassica crops. The images of Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea were taken from [1]; Brassica carinata from [3]; baby mustard (Brassica juncea var. gemmifera) from [4]; and rutabaga (Brassica napus) from Britannica, 2023 (https://www.britannica.com/plant/rutabaga); Other images were modified according to those in the VEER website (https://www.veer.com).

Table 1.

Six Brassica species and their respective vegetablesa)

Brassica species Genome Latin name Common name Other edible way
Brassica rapa A ssp. pekinensis
ssp. chinensis
ssp. rapa
ssp. nipposinica
ssp. narinosa
ssp. oleifera
Chinese cabbage
pak choi
turnip
mizuna
tatsoi
winter rape
oilseed
Brassica nigra B condiment
Brassica oleracea C var. italica
var. botrytis
var. gongylodes
var. acephala
var. capitata
var. gemmifera
var. albiflora
broccoli
cauliflower
kohlrabi
kale
cabbage
brussels sprouts
cabbage mustard
condiment
Brassica napus AC var. oleifera
var. napobrassica
rapeseed/canola
rutabaga
oilseed
Brassica juncea AB var. multiceps
var. gemmifera
var. megarrhiza
var. tumida
leaf mustard
baby mustard
root mustard
stem mustard
condiment
Brassica carinata BC oilseed, condiment

a) Modified from ref. [[1]; [7]]

—, Unknown vegetable or varieties

Brassica crops contribute significantly to human health through dietary intake. As plant-based foods, Brassica vegetables are excellent sources of macronutrients essential for daily nutritional needs (Supplementary Table 1). Some of their metabolites are also closely linked to sensory attributes, such as taste, aroma, and pungency [12–14]. Although most Brassica crops, apart from those used for oil production, are not primary sources of calories due to their low carbohydrate and lipid content, they provide a diverse range of macronutrients, including amino acids, organic acids [13, 15], proteins, soluble sugars, and dietary fibers [16–18] (Supplementary Table 1). Increasing evidence suggests that consuming Brassica vegetables may reduce the risk of chronic diseases, especially various types of cancer, owing to their unique health-promoting phytonutrients [19–22]. Thus, increasing the intake of Brassica vegetables offers a practical and natural method for consumers to improve their health through functional foods, rather than relying on supplements or extracts.

Inadequate intake of essential nutrients, particularly micronutrients, is often a consequence of imbalanced diets with low consumption of vegetables and fruits. This deficiency elevates the risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and various cancers [23–26]. Biofortification, which enhances the nutritional profile of the edible parts of crops, emerges as a notably cost-effective strategy among various methods to increase the nutritional value of staple foods. This approach has been successful in boosting the nutritional value of staple crops [27]. Brassica crops are naturally rich in various bioactive compounds with established health benefits, and are gaining popularity and hold significant potential for nutritional enhancement. This review delves into the bioactive nutrients (phytonutrients) of major Brassica crops and their roles in promoting a healthy diet (Fig. 2). Additionally, we explore biofortification and nutritional enhancement strategies through agronomic practices, conventional cross-breeding, and metabolic engineering of key micronutrients. Ultimately, this review aims to lay the groundwork for the nutritional improvement of Brassica crops, an underestimated nutritional goldmine.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The main phytonutrients in Brassica vegetables and their associated health benefits. AMD, age-related macular degeneration. The images of Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea were modified based on those of [1]. Additional images were adapted from those available on the VEER website (https://www.veer.com).

Phytonutrients and their health benefits

  • 1)

    Glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products

Glucosinolates (GSLs) are sulfur- and nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites derived from amino acids. Brassica vegetables such as cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, broccoli, and cabbage, are primary dietary sources of GSLs [17, 28]. These compounds exhibit considerable structural diversity, which is classified based on the amino acid precursors (Table 2). GSLs are biologically inactive until they are hydrolyzed by specific enzymes called myrosinases, which release various bioactive derivatives including isothiocyanates (ITCs), indoles, and thiocyanates [51]. Among the most noteworthy health benefits of GSLs are their anticarcinogenic properties. Research has consistently shown that consumption of Brassica vegetables is negatively associated with the risk of several cancers, including colorectal, prostate, gastric, and breast cancers [52–54]. The cancer-protective effects of these vegetables are primarily attributed to compounds such as sulforaphane (SFN) [55, 56], erucin [43], benzyl ITC, phenethyl ITC (PEITC) [35], indole-3-carbinol (I3C), and its biologically active dimer, 3,3′-diindolylmethane [29, 57–59], and N-methoxyindole-3-carbinol (NI3C) [46]. These bioactives are derived from the breakdown of aliphatic (glucoraphanin [GRA], glucoerucin [GER]), aromatic (glucotropaeolin [GTP], gluconasturtiin [GNS]), and indolic (glucobrassicin [GBS], neoglucobrassicin [NGBS]) GSLs [7, 46]. Additionally, allyl isothiocyanate, a product of sinigrin (SIN) hydrolysis, induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in drug-resistant cancer cells [32]. Iberverin, a degradation product of glucoiberverin (GIV), shows antineoplastic activities against human hepatocellular carcinoma [41]. Moreover, NI3C acts as a more effective inhibitor of human colon cancer cell proliferation compared to its precursor I3C [46], and SFN has demonstrated antibacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori, a major causative agent of gastric ulcers and cancer [60, 61]. Furthermore, PEITC, which is derived from turnips, exhibits antimicrobial properties against foodborne pathogens such as Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus [48]. However, not all glucosinolate breakdown products from Brassica vegetables are beneficial; some can have anti-nutritional effects. For example, PRO has been reported to cause goiters and other adverse effects on animal nutrition, suggesting that individuals with thyroid disorders should limit their intake of PRO-rich vegetables [62]. Despite these concerns, there is no definitive epidemiological evidence that goitrogenic effects are a major cause of human diseases.

Table 2.

Common and chemical names, hydrolysis products of GSLs commonly found in the family Brassicab)

Common names Abbr. Chemical names of R-groups Hydrolysis products Mainly found in Bioactivity
Aliphatic GSLs
Progoitrin PRO 2(R)-2-Hydroxy-3-butenyl Goitrin Brussels sprouts,
turnip
Decrease thyroid hormone productionc)
Sinigrin SIN 2-Propenyl Allyl ITC Brown mustard,
cabbage
Anticancer activity;
prevents obesity and
insulin resistanced)
Glucoiberin GIB 3-Methylsulphinylpropyl 3-Methylsulphinylpropyl ITC Cabbage Anticarcinogenic activitye)
Gluconapin GNP 3-Buteny 3-butenyl ITC Brussels sprouts,
brown mustard,
broccoli, kale
Anticarcinogenic activityf)
Glucoraphanin GRA 4-Methylsulphinylbutyl Sulforaphane Broccoli Anticarcinogenic activity; decrease risk of various cardiovascular diseasesg)
Glucoraphenin GRE 4-Methylsulphinyl-3-buteny ?
Glucoiberverin GIV 3-Methylthiopropyl Iberverin Cabbage, broccoli Antineoplastic activitiesh)
Glucobrassicanapin GBN 4-Pentenyl 4-pentenyl ITC Broccoli, rapeseed Antibacterial Activityi)
Glucoerucin GER 4-Methylthiobutyl Erucin Chinese cabbage Anticancer activity; anti-inflammatory activityj)
Glucoalyssin GAL 5-Methylsulphinylpentenyl ?
Gluconapoleiferin GNL 2-Hydroxy-4-pentenyl ?
Glucocheirolin GCR 3-Methylsulfonylpropyl ?
Glucoberteroin GBT 5-Methylthiopentyl ? Kohlrabi
Epiprogoitrin EPI 2(S)-2-Hydroxy-3-butenyl ?
Indolic GSLs
Glucobrassicin GBS 3-Indolylmethyl Indole-3-carbinol Almost all Brassicas Anticarcinogenic and antitumorigenic properties; antibacterial activityk)
Neoglucobrassincin NGBS 1-Methoxy-3-indolylmethyl N-methoxyindole-3-carbinol Chinese cabbage,
pak choi, broccoli, cauliflower
Anticancer activityl)
4-Methoxyglucobrassicin 4-MGBS 4-Methoxy-3-indolylmethyl ? Chinese cabbage, cabbage
4-Hydroxyglucobrassicin 4-OHGBS 4-Hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl ? Broccoli
Aromatic GSLs
Gluconasturtiin GNS 2-Phenylethy Phenethyl ITC Turnip Anticancer activity; anti-inflammatory activity; cardio protective activity; antimicrobial activitym)
Glucotropaeolin GTP Benzyl Benzyl ITC Anticancer activity; antibacterial activityn)
Glucobarbarin GBB (S)-2-Hydroxy-2-phenylethyl ?

b) Modified from ref. [[29]; [28]; [30]; [7]]

c) Ref. [31]

d) Ref. [[32]; [33]]

e) Ref. [34]

f) Ref. [[35]; [36]]

g) Ref. [[37]; [38]; [39]; [40]]

h) Ref. [41]

i) Ref. [42]

j) Ref. [[43]; [44]]

k) Ref. [45]

l) Ref. [46]

m) Ref. [[47]; [48]; [49]; [50]]

n) Ref. [[42]; [35]]

?, Unknown specific products

—, Low concentrations in Brassica crops

Different Brassica species exhibit variations in the hydrolysis products of GSLs with anti-cancer activity. For example, I3C is present in nearly all Brassica crops, including pak choi, Chinese cabbage, turnip, broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, kohlrabi, kale, Brussels sprouts, and mustard green [29], whereas SFN, PEITC and erucin are predominantly found in broccoli, turnip, and Chinese cabbage, respectively [30]. Compared to Chinese cabbage “Chiifu”, pak choi “Bras”, yellow sarson Z1 (AA genome), and cabbage (CC genome), the turnip (AA genome) taproots exhibited higher levels of two health-promoting aliphatic GSLs, GRA, and GER [14]. However, the GSL content in 45 turnip varieties varies with plant earliness and habit. Specifically, one extra-late group and one late group turnip variety display the highest total GSL content, indicating their potential as valuable sources of bioactive vegetables [63]. In pak choi, GSL levels are closely related to the growth status of leaves. Compared to sprouts, total indole GSLs, GBS, and NGBS, are significantly higher in mature leaves [64]. In broccoli, the concentration of SFN, a product derived from GRA, peaks at the stage of commercial maturity [65]. The highest levels of GRA are observed at the mature head stage, with a subsequent decrease as flowering begins [66]. A study on the flowering stalk tissues of 107 global rapeseed accessions (comprising 25 spring, 34 winter, and 48 semi-winter accessions) detected seven GSL compounds, indicating continuous variation [67]. In kohlrabi, total GSL content is higher in purple varieties compared to pale green ones. Specifically, GER is found exclusively in purple kohlrabi, with concentrations four times higher in the flesh than in the skin [68]. Additionally, the oval Chinese cabbage cultivar exhibits higher levels of total GSLs, whereas the rectangular cultivar contains higher levels of GBS [69]. In conclusion, the consumption of Brassica vegetables provides greater cancer protection than the general consumption of fruits and vegetables due to their diverse and potent GSL profiles [70].

  • 2)

    Vitamins

Brassica vegetables are an excellent dietary source of antioxidants due to their rich composition of health-enhancing phytochemicals such as vitamin C, various B vitamins, tocopherol, and phylloquinone. Traditionally, citrus fruits have been regarded as the primary source of vitamin C. However, Brassica vegetables can provide up to 50% of the daily recommended intake of vitamin C, depending on dietary preferences across different nations, making them a valuable natural source of this vitamin in human diets [71]. A study examining 27 Brassica varieties found that the concentration of vitamin C varied from 12.9 to 176 mg per 100 g FW [72]. Consuming 100 grams of Brassica vegetables, such as pak choi, broccoli, cabbage, and cauliflower, can meet an adult’s daily recommended intake of 40 mg of vitamin C (Supplementary Table 1). Lower serum levels of ascorbic acid can have severe health implications, such as an increased production of reactive oxygen species, which can elevate the risk of chronic diseases and accelerate aging [73, 74]. Ascorbate, or vitamin C, serves a dual role, functioning not only as an antioxidant that protects cells from oxidative stress but also enhancing iron bioavailability. It achieves this by chelating with ferric iron in the acidic environment of the stomach [75]. Therefore, the substantial vitamin C content in Brassica crops significantly boosts their nutritional value, especially in terms of iron absorption. Epidemiological studies consistently show that dietary intake of vitamin C is linked to a reduced risk of cancer. Importantly, the connection between vitamin C consumption and cancer prevention is stronger when the vitamin is sourced from fruits and vegetables rather than from synthetic supplements like pills or extracts [76–80].

Brassica vegetables are rich in a broad spectrum of B vitamins, with the exception of vitamin B12, which cannot be synthesized by plants (Supplementary Table 1). Folate, also known as vitamin B9, is crucial for human nutrition, and its deficiency can lead to slow growth rates in children and anemia. High concentrations of folate are found in key leafy vegetables of this genus, including cabbage, broccoli, Chinese cabbage, pak choi, and cauliflower [81–83]. Notably, folate levels vary among different cultivars, accessions, and plant parts [83, 84].

Significant concentrations of phylloquinone, a fat-soluble vitamin also known as vitamin K1, are present in various green Brassica vegetables, such as broccoli, kale, green cabbage, and rapeseed [85, 86]. To meet the recommended daily intake of vitamin K, men would need to consume either 158 grams of cabbage or 183 milliliters of canola oil (from B. napus or B. rapa), whereas women would require 118 grams of cabbage or 138 milliliters of canola oil [87]. Research across all genotypes of mustard (Brassica juncea L.), collard (B. oleracea L.), and turnip (B. rapa L.) greens has shown that phylloquinone concentrations are consistent between younger and older leaves, with averages of 435 μg and 459 μg per 100 g FW, respectively [84]. Within these genotypes, however, notable variations exist. For instance, in collard greens, phylloquinone content ranges from 308.7 to 576.9 μg per 100 g FW in younger leaves and from 369.2 to 616.5 μg per 100 g FW in older leaves. Furthermore, turnip greens typically exhibit higher phylloquinone concentrations than most collard genotypes [84]. In choy sum (B. rapa ssp. chinensis var. parachinensis), phylloquinone levels increase during early growth stages—from 377 μg per 100 g FW in microgreens to 433 μg per 100 g FW in seedlings—but decrease to 363 μg per 100 g FW in mature plants [88]. In addition to its critical role in blood coagulation [87], phylloquinone also enhances bone quality by increasing strength and reducing turnover, ultimately lowering fracture rates [89].

Rapeseed (B. napus) oil is a key source of exogenous tocopherols, providing 37–51 mg/100 g of γ-tocopherol and 19–24 mg/100 g of α-tocopherol [90]. In Brassica vegetables, total tocopherol content ranges from 258.2 to 315.4 μg/g dry weight (DW) in broccoli and from 212.9 to 236.6 μg/g DW in cauliflower [91]. Tocopherols, derivatives of vitamin E, naturally occur in a wide variety of plants and vegetable oils. As potent plant-derived antioxidants, they not only promote skin health but also protect against harmful factors such as free radicals and ultraviolet radiation [92].

  • 3)

    Carotenoids and Chlorophylls

Brassica species are rich in carotenoids, compounds known for their health-promoting properties. Carotenoids, an important subgroup of isoprenoids, are widespread in nature and play crucial roles in human health, including antioxidant activity, immune system enhancement, and the well-known provitamin A activity [93]. Among the more than 700 carotenoids synthesized by plants, lycopene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein, zeaxanthin, and α-carotene are the most significant and extensively studied dietary carotenoids. These compounds are present in various Brassica vegetables, though their content and composition vary [94] (Supplementary Table 1). Kale has been identified as having the highest total carotenoid content among vegetables at 13.3 mg per 100 g FW [72]. A detailed study on 33 kale cultivars revealed substantial intraspecific variation in carotenoid concentrations, ranging from 0.5 mg/g DW in wild types to 3.0 mg/g DW in the cultivated American “Champion” variety. Notably, zeaxanthin was the predominant carotenoid in 21 of these cultivars, with the highest concentrations found in the American varieties “Vates” and “Champion”, at 1.6 mg/g and 2.5 mg/g DW, respectively [95]. Crossbreeding appears to enhance carotenoid levels: in four out of five hybrid kale lines, zeaxanthin levels are significantly higher than in their parental lines, although β-carotene and lutein levels are lower, suggesting a strategic advantage of hybridization for boosting specific carotenoids [95]. The content of carotenoids also varies with the color of the vegetable. Guzman et al. [91] investigated various colored varieties of B. oleracea, including broccoli in green and purple, and cauliflower in white, purple, and orange. Notably, only white cauliflower lacked detectable levels of carotenoids. This is consistent with the color properties of carotenoids, underscoring the typical red, yellow, or orange hues associated with these compounds. By contrast, Chinese cabbage varieties with orange-colored inner leaves exhibited higher levels of lycopene-like compounds, such as prolycopene and its isomers, than those with yellow inner leaves ([96]; Zhang et al., 2015; [97]). Additionally, purple kohlrabi contains lower concentrations of carotenoids, such as β-carotene and lutein, compared to its pale green counterpart [68]. In headed cabbage, the levels of carotenoids (including neoxanthin, lutein, violaxanthin, and β-carotene) decrease from the outer to the inner layers [18]. Similar to that observed for vitamin C content, which ranges from 22.45–41.59 mg per 100 g FW, carotenoid content exhibits significant variations among different cultivars of leafy B. rapa subspecies, including pak choi, Chinese cabbage, mizuna, leafy turnip, tatsoi, ranging from 14.44 to 23.00 mg per 100 g FW (Artem’eva and Solov’eva, 2006). Interestingly, rectangular cultivars exhibit higher total carotenoid levels than their oval counterparts [69]. While zeaxanthin is the dominant carotenoid in kale [95], lutein is the most prevalent in Chinese cabbage, followed by β-carotene [69].

Lutein and zeaxanthin, components of the macular pigment, are crucial in preventing age-related macular degeneration, a neurodegenerative disease [98]. Contemporary research has revealed that various natural carotenoids, either alone or combined, play significant roles in cancer prevention. Multicarotenoid blends that include lycopene, α-carotene, β-carotene, and lutein demonstrate potent anti-carcinogenic properties [99]. Further studies reveal that when combined with α-tocopherol, these carotenoids notably reduce liver tumor growth in individuals with liver cirrhosis [99]. Consequently, the consumption of Brassica vegetables rich in carotenoids and tocopherols has reemerged as a biotherapeutic option, providing multiple health benefits by counteracting night blindness, slowing the progression of age-related macular degeneration, and reducing the incidence of lung and liver tumors.

Chlorophylls and their derivatives are pivotal photosynthetic pigments known for their broad spectrum of health-promoting effects, including antigenotoxic, antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-obesogenic, and antimutagenic activities [100]. Chlorophyll levels vary significantly among different subspecies and cultivars of Brassica vegetables. Notably, four out of five hybrid kale lines exhibit lower levels of chlorophyll a and b compared to their parent lines [95]. In addition, all cauliflower types—whether white, purple, or orange—lack chlorophylls, while all three green broccoli types synthesize higher levels of chlorophyll than purple broccoli [91].

  • 4)

    Phenolic compounds

In addition to their rich vitamin and carotenoid contents, the potent antioxidant properties of Brassica vegetables are also attributed to their abundant phenolic composition. Polyphenol micronutrients have garnered increased interest for their protective properties against chronic diseases such as various cancers, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes [101–104]. Flavonoid, a predominant phenolic class in Brassica vegetables, exhibit considerable variation in content across types—from 15.3 mg per 100 g FW in white cabbage to 337.0 mg per 100 g FW in broccoli [105]—and subspecies—from 10.2 mg per 100 g FW in white cabbage to 94.4 mg per 100 g FW in Chinese cabbage [106]. Among 25 B. oleracea varieties, kale was noted to have the highest polyphenol concentration, at 27.0 mg per 100 g FW [72]. Red and green B. oleracea varieties are the richest in total phenolics and flavonoids, whereas white varieties have the lowest concentrations [72].

Anthocyanins, one of the most bioactive polyphenols, are notably abundant in red-pigmented Brassica varieties such as purple cauliflower (Li et al. 2012), red cabbage ([107]; Li et al. 2012), purple pak-choi [108], purple kohlrabi [68], and red curly kale [109]. By contrast, these compounds are present in very low concentrations in white and green Brassica varieties [72]. Specifically, anthocyanins are identified exclusively in the skin of purple kohlrabi, not flesh [68], and their levels decline from the outer to the inner layers in two green cabbage cultivars [18]. Dietary intake of anthocyanins is linked to reduced risks of cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases [101]. Additionally, phenolic fractions from Brassica vegetables have demonstrated antimicrobial effects against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Hydroalcoholic extracts of white cabbage and Brussels sprouts have been shown to inhibit the growth of Listeria monocytogenes [110], and ethanol extracts exhibit similar inhibitory activity against Escherichia coli, B. subtillis, and S. epidermis [111]. Furthermore, compared to pale green kohlrabi, purple kohlrabi exhibits higher levels of total phenylpropanoids [68].

  • 5)

    Minerals

Brassica vegetables are rich sources of essential minerals such as calcium, sodium, selenium, potassium, iron, and sulfur (Artem’eva and Solov’eva, 2006; [18]) (Supplementary Table 1). For instance, calcium levels in these crops range from 22 mg to 254 mg per 100 g FW, with kale exhibiting the highest levels (Supplementary Table 1). The bioavailability of calcium in these vegetables is particularly high due to their low levels of phytic acid and oxalate, compounds known to bind calcium into forms that are not absorbable by the body [112–114]. Additionally, Brassica vegetables are valued for their dietary potassium, which has been shown to help lower blood pressure, particularly in the context of a high-sodium diet [115]. Specifically, B. rapa, such as Chinese cabbage, is an excellent source of bioavailable calcium (averaging 1.40 mg/kg DW) and iron (averaging 558 mg/kg DW) [16]. In cabbage, concentrations of calcium, magnesium, sulfur, iron, and manganese decrease from the outer to inner leaves, whereas potassium and phosphorus are most concentrated in the 10th leaf layer [18]. Kale is distinguished among green leafy vegetables for its rich mineral content, which includes high levels of iron, calcium, potassium, phosphorus, and manganese, as well as notable quantities of zinc and selenium [116]. Despite these nutritional benefits, the consumption rate of kale in the US is relatively low compared to other Brassica vegetables, with per capita fresh intake of less than 0.33 kg per year, a figure that can be even lower in other countries due to varying dietary habits [117]. This limited intake restricts its impact on daily nutrition. Additionally, selenium (Se) has been recognized for its role in protecting against several common cancers, including lung, prostate, and colorectal cancers [118]. Se-containing amino acids might offer greater anticarcinogenic potential than standard sulfur-containing GSLs [119]. Although Se can be toxic to most plants [119], several Brassica vegetables, including canola (B. napus), Ethiopian mustard (B. carinata), broccoli (B. oleracea), Brussels sprouts (B. oleracea), and Indian mustard (B. juncea), are capable of accumulating unusually high levels of Se [70]. For example, broccoli or canola grown in Se-rich soils can accumulate up to 7 μg Se/g DW, significantly higher than the typical 0.1–0.3 μg Se/g DW [70, 120].

  • 6)

    Edible Brassica vegetable parts and their nutritional value

The nutritional value of plant-based foods is heavily influenced by the specific edible parts consumed and the methods of preparation. While most Brassica crops are eaten as fresh leafy vegetables, varieties like purple mustard (B. juncea (L.) Czern.), mizuna (B. rapa L. ssp. nipposinica), red cabbage (B. oleracea L. var. capitata), purple kohlrabi (B. oleracea L. var. gongylodes), and red mustard (B. juncea L. Czern.) are gaining popularity as microgreens. These seedlings are excellent dietary sources of antioxidants, including phylloquinone, ascorbic acid, tocopherols, and carotenoids [121]. For some Brassica crops, the seeds are used for vegetable oil extraction or condiment production. For example, the seeds of B. carinata, B. juncea, and B. nigra are used for mustard and mustard oil production [122]. Rapeseed oil prepared from B. napus is especially valued for its favorable nutritional profile, such as high levels of monounsaturated fatty acids, low levels of saturated fatty acids, and a favorable omega-3 fatty acid composition [123]. Its quality is further enhanced by the presence of phytosterols [123], carotenoids [124], erucic acid [125], choline, and tocopherols. The old cabbage variety B. oleracea L. var. acephala contains 94% unsaturated fatty acids but over 50% erucic acid in its seed oil [126]. Although this oil is rich in beneficial phytochemicals like γ-tocopherol, 11 polyphenol compounds, and 13 different carotenoids, the high erucic acid level raises significant health concerns [126].

Impacts of processing and cooking methods on the nutritional composition of brassica vegetables

Processing methods such as boiling, steaming, stir-frying, and microwaving significantly affect the bioactive compounds (e.g. carotenoids, anthocyanins, and phenolic compounds) available for absorption by the human body [127]. In kale, all these processing methods reduce carotenoid contents but increase total phenolic levels, with steaming yielding the highest antioxidant activity and phenolic content [127]. However, in red cabbage, steaming leads to a 34.6% reduction in phenolic content [127]. A comprehensive study by Diamante et al. [128] investigated the effects of thermal processing—microwaving, boiling, and steaming—on the release of antioxidant compounds, carotenoids, and tocopherols in green, yellow, white, and purple cauliflowers, revealing that the impact of processing is largely independent of genotype. For example, boiling green cauliflower for 20 min resulted in the highest zeaxanthin (89.46 μg/100 g DW) and lutein (1563.71 μg/100 g DW) content [128]. The yellow variety showed the highest total carotenoid content in both raw (10.20 mg/100 g DW) and steamed (12.07 mg/100 g DW) forms, with the latter also exhibiting the highest total carotene levels (11.26 mg/100 g DW). Furthermore, microwaving and boiling purple cauliflower for extended periods retained the highest levels of tocopherols [128].

Phan et al. [129] reported enhanced anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects at the cellular level in red cabbage co-digested with vegetables like baby spinach, carrots, and cherry tomatoes, compared to the digestion of these vegetables individually. Notably, co-digestion of red cabbage with baby spinach was especially beneficial, resulting in high bioaccessible carotenoid levels and demonstrating synergistic effects across all tested bioactivities. These included reduced secretion of cellular interleukin-8 and nitric oxide, as well as enhanced antioxidation [129]. Phylloquinone, a lipophilic compound, is co-extracted with vegetable oils, making them an important dietary source of vitamin K [87]. Interestingly, no significant difference was observed in phylloquinone absorption between consuming fresh or cooked broccoli in meals containing 30% or 45% energy from fat [130]. The antioxidant capacity of Brassica vegetables is affected by processing, with qualitative changes, thermal breakdown, and the leaching of compounds into water during cooking [105]. Therefore, consuming raw Brassica vegetables with a small amount of vegetable oil or fat is the optimal approach to maximize antioxidant nutrient intake.

Biofortification and nutritional enhancement of brassica vegetables

As a group of widely consumed vegetables with increasing popularity, Brassica vegetables have demonstrated their capability and significant potential to contribute to dietary nutrition. Unlike staple crops, these vegetables offer distinct health advantages due to their inherent nutritional benefits. Two emblematic Brassica vegetables kale and broccoli are widely recognized as “superfoods” or “functional foods” due to their exceptional nutritional values [131, 132]. The accumulation of bioactive compounds in these vegetables is influenced by both external factors such as cultivation conditions and internal factors such as genetic variations (Fig. 3). Biofortification—the process of enhancing the mineral and vitamin content in crops—can be effectively pursued through agronomic practices, biotechnological approaches, and plant breeding.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Biofortification and nutritional enhancement of Brassica vegetables achieved through (A) agronomic practices, (B) conventional breeding, and (C) plant biotechnologies. N, nitrogen; S, sulfur; Se, selenium; GM, genetic modification.

  • 1)

    Agronomic biofortification

Agronomic biofortification has been explored extensively in Brassica crops, achieving notable success (Fig. 3A). The density and composition of light profoundly affect plant development, growth, and metabolic profiles, thereby affecting nutritional values. For example, a higher percentage of blue light has been shown to promote the growth of carotenoid-rich sprouts in pak choi (B. rapa ssp. chinensis “Black Behi”) [133]. Specifically, using a combination of blue and white LEDs increases the carotenoid content by ~15%, whereas a combination of red and white LEDs reduces it [133]. Brassica sprouts are becoming increasingly popular as a fresh and nutritious food choice due to their low levels of antinutritional components and high content of dietary fiber and micronutrients [134]. Since Brassica sprouts are commonly cultivated in controlled environments, the growing conditions are crucial in determining their nutritional value. Vale et al. [135] demonstrated that dark conditions enhance the nutritional quality of B. oleracea sprouts, increasing dietary fiber, minerals, and fatty acid contents. Conversely, exposure to light increases the content of selenium, a mineral known for its health benefits. Exposure to enhanced light intensity across various wavelengths (white, red, far-red, and blue) leads to increased pigment accumulation in red Russian kale (B. napus) seedlings, including chlorophyll and anthocyanins. However, these seedlings are particularly sensitive to far-red light, resulting in elevated levels of chlorophyll and anthocyanins even under very low light fluence rates of less than 1 μmol m−2 s−1 [136].

Light conditions also influence glucosinolate content in Brassica vegetables. For instance, far-red light has been found to increase aliphatic GSLs in red Russian kale sprouts, whereas sequential exposures to far-red, red, and blue light, as well as periods of darkness, can alter their metabolic and nutrient profiles [136]. In summary, LEDs offer an effective means to regulate phytonutrient contents, including carotenoids, selenium, chlorophyll, and anthocyanins, in Brassica sprouts. In contrast, a 2-year study comparing conventional and organic cultivation systems found that organically grown fresh cabbage contained significantly lower levels of total flavonoids, total chlorophylls, nitrites, and nitrates. However, organic sauerkraut juice has notably higher levels of total sugars and polyphenols [137]. Interestingly, the total polyphenols in red cabbage, white cabbage, and Brussels sprouts showed no significant differences across three diverse environments: near a steelworks, on an organic farm, and at a market [138]. Interactive effects analysis of N/S-supply on GSLs in two Chinese cabbage cultivars revealed that GSL profiles are primarily influenced by the genetic background of the cultivar, followed by fertilizers [139]. The concentration of sodium chloride (NaCl) also impacts glucosinolate content and composition; 50 mM NaCl, for instance, significantly increases total GSLs, two aliphatic GSLs (GAL and gluconapin, GNP) and two indole GSLs (GBS and NGBS) in pak choi [140]. Pre- and post-harvest practices can further optimize GSL content [141]. When grown in selenium-enriched soils, Brassica species such as Indian mustard (B. juncea), Ethiopian mustard (B. carinata), canola (B. napus), and various B. oleracea vegetables can accumulate selenium at levels significantly above normal, which facilitates the synthesis of active organic selenium compounds, such as seleno-amino acids, from inorganic sources [70, 119, 120]. Enriching the soil with selenium where Brassica vegetables are cultivated can significantly enhance the dietary intake of this crucial mineral. Selenium is absorbed by plants through the sulfur (S) pathway, and studies have shown that a combination of 4 mmol/L sulfur and 100 μmol/L selenium substantially increases the yield of SFN, enhances myrosinase activity, and raises Se-methylselenocysteine levels in broccoli [119, 142, 143].

  • 2)

    Conventional breeding

Biofortification through conventional breeding activities has proven effective, particularly with staple crops [144]. This classical genetic approach can also create new vegetable food sources enriched with high concentrations of natural phytonutrients, achieved through the crossing of cultivars or plants already abundant in these metabolites (Fig. 3B). The vast genetic diversity within the germplasm, natural variations, and breeding populations of Brassica crops distributed globally provide invaluable resources with considerable potential for developing varieties with enhanced nutritional value [145]. An example of such success is the creation of the high-GRA “super broccoli”, which was developed through traditional breeding methods [146]. Additionally, Mageney et al. [95] reported that four out of five hybrid kale lines (B. oleracea var. sabellica) had significantly higher zeaxanthin levels compared to their parent lines, underscoring the potential of crossbreeding to boost carotenoid levels in kale. Furthermore, substantial natural genetic variation and heritability in calcium Ca2+ and Mg2+ levels have been observed in B. rapa and B. oleracea, suggesting that it is feasible to enhance these essential minerals in Brassica vegetables [147].

  • 3)

    Biotechnologies and metabolic engineering

Compared to the prolonged timelines associated with traditional breeding, biofortification through biotechnologies and metabolic engineering offers significant advantages for rapidly enhancing the nutritional value of a wide range of crops [148]. Advances in understanding the mechanistic underpinnings of the biosynthesis, regulation, transport, storage, and degradation of secondary metabolites that confer health benefits have greatly facilitated the development of nutrient-enriched Brassica crops. This process can be expedited using cutting-edge biotechnologies such as CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing [149] (Fig. 3C). Given that the genomes of Brassica species have undergone whole genome triplication, leading to the expansion of gene families and the creation of multiple gene copies, exploring trait diversity in these crops presents more complexity than in simpler models like Arabidopsis [150].

i Glucosinolates

GSLs, key secondary metabolites in Brassica crops, contribute significantly to their nutritional value. The biosynthetic and regulatory pathways of GSLs, as well as related biofortification strategies, have been extensively studied. Miao et al. [151] recently reviewed methods for enhancing GSLs in Brassica crops through metabolic engineering. These methods include the ablation of hydrolysis, modulation of biosynthesis, redirection of metabolic flux, inhibition of transport, and manipulation of regulatory proteins. For example, the overexpression of flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMOGS-OX) genes in turnip notably increases aliphatic glucosinolate levels in transgenic turnip hairy roots [152]. Additionally, BoRHON1, a newly identified RNA-binding protein, acts as an upstream regulator of BoMYB28–3, the principal transcriptional regulator of aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis in cabbage [153]. Overexpression of BoRHON1 in Arabidopsis induces the accumulation of both aliphatic and indolic GSLs [153]. Additionally, omics data analysis revealed that turnip possesses the most functional methylthioalkylmalate synthase (MAM) genes (at least five MAMs), whereas the other Brassica species/subspecies, such as Chinese cabbage, pakchoi, cabbage, and B. nigra, typically contain only 1–3 MAM pseudogenes. This leads to distinct aliphatic GSL profiles in Chinese cabbage and turnip [14]. In broccoli, the role of MAM1 protein in diversifying GSL biosynthesis has been documented [154]. Four BoMAM proteins (BolI0108790, BolI0090270, BolI0088930 and BolI0108770) have been identified as variants of BoMAM1. Notably, overexpression of BoMAM1 (BolI0108790) in broccoli leads to a significant increase in the accumulation of C4-GSLs, including GER, GRA, GNP, and PRO [154]. Additionally, transposable element insertions in one MAM3 gene copy impact long chain aliphatic GSL accumulation in broccoli, cauliflower, and kohlrabi [155]. The silencing of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase (AOP2) genes through RNA interference decreases levels of the detrimental PRO compounds but notably increases contents of the desirable GRA in B. juncea and B. napus seeds [156, 157]. Further, the introgression of non-functional braop2.2 and braop2.3 alleles result in increased levels of beneficial GRAs in B. rapa [158]. Typically, three active AOP2 genes are present in most Brassica species/subspecies, but in B. oleracea, only one of these genes is functional, which may explain the elevated GRA levels observed in this species [14]. Additionally, the non-functionality of BoAOP2 in broccoli accounts for the unique accumulation of two health-promoting GSLs, GRA and glucoalyssin [155]. These findings suggest that gene-editing technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9 could be strategically employed to manipulate AOP2 genes, thus potentially increasing beneficial GRA while reducing harmful PRO compounds in Brassica vegetables [67]. By increasing MAM expression and silencing AOP2, it is possible to enhance the accumulation of anticancer GSLs, including GRA.

ii Carotenoids.

Metabolic engineering offers two primary strategies for enhancing carotenoids in crops: increasing synthesis and storage (“pull”) and reducing degradation (“protect”). A thorough understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved is crucial for devising effective solutions. For instance, higher transcript levels of carotenoid biosynthesis genes such as BrPSY, BrZEP, BrPDS, BrLCYE, BrZDS, BrCHXB, and BrLCYB are correlated with increased carotenoid content in Chinese cabbage [159]. The Or gene enhances the accumulation of carotenoids, particularly β-carotene, by inducing chromoplast formation rather than directly regulating their biosynthesis. This gene causes unpigmented tissues, such as the curd, shoot meristems, pith, and leaf bases, in cauliflower to turn orange, a phenotype also observed in orange Or transgenic potato tubers [160, 161]. Conversely, a recessive mutation in the Br-or gene, a carotenoid isomerase known as BrCRTISO, leads to the development of orange leafy heads, flowers, and cotyledons in Chinese cabbage rich in lycopene-like compounds, specifically prolycopene and its isomers ([96, 162, 163]; Zhang et al., 2015). Natural variations in the BrHISN2 promoter lead to decreased chlorophyll content and a distinct flavor profile in Chinese cabbage with yellow leafy heads, which is preferred by consumers. This phenotype is characterized by lower levels of cellulose, sugar, and soluble protein [164]. In flowering Chinese cabbage (Caixin, B. rapa L. ssp. chinensis var. parachinensis), a 1148 bp deletion in the promoter of the PALE YELLOW PETAL (BrPYP) gene, which encodes a phytyl ester synthase 2 protein, results in pale-yellow petal colors due to reduced levels of esterified carotenoids [165]. Additionally, increased expression of the PSY gene is associated with enhanced carotenoid formation in yellow turnip [166]. These genetic loci present valuable targets for metabolic engineering aimed at boosting carotenoid levels. For example, in B. napus seeds, reducing the expression of lycopene ε-cyclase (ε-CYC) leads to increased levels of total carotenoids, including violaxanthin, β-carotene, lutein, and zeaxanthin, demonstrating the potential for genetic interventions to improve nutritional content [124].

iii Flavonoids.

In kohlrabi, substantial increases in the expression levels of the anthocyanin biosynthetic gene BoF3H and two regulatory genes, BoTT8 and BoPAP2, are observed in the purple skin, leaves, and swollen stems (Zhang et al., 2015). A similar pattern is observed in Chinese cabbage, where the integration of anthocyanin content and gene expression analyses suggests that BrMYB2 and BrTT8 potentially activate anthocyanin biosynthesis in the purple leaves of the heading [167]. In pak choi, the dominant gene BrPur plays a critical role in regulating the accumulation of anthocyanins in the epidermis and adjacent mesophyll cells [108]. Similarly, in purple-leaf mustard (B. juncea), increased transcription of BjPur, which encodes an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, is associated with increased anthocyanin accumulation [168]. Additionally, overexpression of the Arabidopsis Production of Anthocyanin Pigment 1 (AtPAP1) gene in canola results in increased levels of anthocyanins, flavonoids, and phenolics, leading to purple-green leaves and stems [169]. Moreover, in B. napus, the adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase gene is negatively associated with anthocyanin accumulation in leaves, indicating a negative regulatory role [170]. The transporter gene BrTT19, as well as two regulatory genes BolTT8 and BrMYB111, are crucial for anthocyanin production and accumulation in resynthesized B. napus derived from its two diploid parents B. oleracea and B. rapa [171].

Furthermore, BnaPAP2.A7, an ortholog of the B. oleracea anthocyanin activator BoMYB2, imparts purple traits to cauliflower, and its high expression level is crucial for driving anthocyanin biosynthesis in B. napus leaves [172, 173]. Other R2R3-MYB genes, such as BnaC06.PAP2 and BnaA07.PAP2, also contribute to anthocyanin biosynthesis [174]. Finally, the flavonol synthases (FLSs) BnaFLS1–2 and BnaFLS1–1 in B. napus possess activities of the FLS and flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H) enzymes, whereas BnaFLS3–4 and BnaFLS3–3 only exhibit F3H activity, which is essential for flavonol formation [175].

iv Others

Variations in the fatty acid elongase1 (FAE1) gene are closely linked to erucic acid synthesis in Brassica seeds. Specific SNPs/indels (insertions/deletions) in FAE1-A8 and FAE1-C3 are associated with reduced erucic acid content in the seeds of B. napus and B. rapa, respectively [176]. Additionally, overexpression of the orphan gene BrOG1 in Brassica significantly increases the contents of glucose, fructose, and total sugars while reducing sucrose levels [177].

Knowledge gained from studying the biosynthetic pathways of key micronutrients will further facilitate the breeding of nutrient-enriched Brassica crops (Table 3), such as utilizing SNP markers of FAE1 to select for reduced erucic acid content in seeds [176]. Advanced genetic technologies, such as genome editing, offer promising strategies to boost the nutritional value of Brassica crops, thereby supporting the development of healthier food options for a growing global population [180]. For example, enhancing MAM expression while reducing AOP2 expression not only promotes the accumulation of the anticancer GRA but also inhibits the synthesis of harmful PRO. Additionally, leveraging the dominant Or gene in cauliflower and the recessive mutation of Br-or in Chinese cabbage enhances the accumulation of carotenoids in the tissues (e.g. the curd and pith) and orange leafy heads, respectively [96, 160–163, 179]. Furthermore, the upregulation of R2R3-MYB transcription factors has proven to be an effective method for improving anthocyanin synthesis in Brassicas [167, 168, 171–174].

Table 3.

Genes responsible for phytonutrients synthesis or accumulation in Brassica vegetables

Phytonutrients Genes References
Glucosinolates MAMs [14]; [154]; [155]
AOP2s [157]; [156]; [158]; [67]; [14]; [155]
FMOGS-OX [152]
BoRHON1-MYB28 [153]
Carotenoids Or [160]; [161]
BrCRTISO [162]; [163]; [96]; [178]
ε-CYC [124]
BrPYP [165]
PSY [166]
Chlorophylls BrHISN2 [164]
Flavonoids TT8 [179]; [167]; [171]
F3H [179]
PAP2 [178]; [172]; [174]
MYB2 [173]; [167]
Pur [108]; [168]
APR2 [170]
MYB111 [171]
TT19 [171]
FLS1s/3 s [175]
AtPAP1 [169]
Erucic acid FAE1 [176]

Conclusion and perspectives

Including Brassica vegetables in the diet provides a broader and more varied array of phytonutrients compared to pharmaceuticals, including glucosinolates, vitamins (C, tocopherol, folate, and phylloquinone), carotenoids, phenolics, and minerals. It is often overlooked that many medications originate from natural compounds initially found in Brassica foods [80]. Brassica vegetables are considered “functional foods” due to their potential health benefits in preventing chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer [105, 181]. Consequently, the development of fruits and vegetables with enhanced medicinal or nutritional properties is increasingly becoming a major focus of breeding programs [182]. The carotenoid and anthocyanin enhancement strategies in commercial tomato lines provide useful insights into nutritional fortification in vegetables [183, 184]. Orange and purple tomatoes rich in carotenoids and anthocyanins have been successfully developed using both transgenic and conventional breeding techniques [183, 184]. In Brassicas, the genes associated with the accumulation of health-promoting compounds offer opportunities to enhance bioactive nutrients through a combination of conventional breeding and metabolic engineering. Additionally, the use of LEDs (white, blue, far-red) and selenium-enriched cultures provides effective agronomic methods to increase the concentration of phytonutrients in Brassica sprouts. Nevertheless, Brassica vegetables remain a largely untapped reservoir of healthy nutrients that merits further exploration. Ongoing research is essential to unravel the genetic mechanisms behind phytonutrient synthesis and accumulation, which will guide the biofortification and metabolic engineering efforts aimed at boosting the nutritional profile of Brassica crops. Notably, recent studies have discovered novel functional nutrients, such as γ-aminobutyric acid, in Brassica vegetables like Chinese cabbage and B. napus seedlings, which are important for brain plasticity and are linked to neurological and psychiatric disorders [185, 186]. In summary, this review underscores the rich phytochemicals and health benefits of Brassica crops and outlines strategies aimed at enhancing their nutritional value, suggesting a promising direction for future agricultural innovation and dietary health improvements.

Supplementary Material

Web_Material_uhae302
web_material_uhae302.zip (361.5KB, zip)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Yiguo Hong for his critical review and invaluable suggestions that significantly improved manuscript. This work was partially funded by the Innovative Research Group Project of Hebei Natural Science Foundation (grant number C2024204246), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 32372736 and 32330096), the Science and Technology Project of the Hebei Education Department (grant numbers YJZ2024001 and JZX2024001), and the Hebei Natural Science Foundation (grant number C2023204308), the Key Research and Development Program of Hebei (grant number 21326311D-2). We would also like to thank A&L Scientific Editing (www.alpublish.com) for their linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Contributor Information

Xiaomeng Zhang, State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hebei, Collaborative Innovation Center of Vegetable Industry in Hebei, College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, No. 2596 Lekai South Street, Lianchi District, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China.

Qiong Jia, State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hebei, Collaborative Innovation Center of Vegetable Industry in Hebei, College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, No. 2596 Lekai South Street, Lianchi District, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China.

Xin Jia, State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hebei, Collaborative Innovation Center of Vegetable Industry in Hebei, College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, No. 2596 Lekai South Street, Lianchi District, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China.

Jie Li, Department of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.

Xiaoxue Sun, State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hebei, Collaborative Innovation Center of Vegetable Industry in Hebei, College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, No. 2596 Lekai South Street, Lianchi District, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China.

Leiguo Min, State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hebei, Collaborative Innovation Center of Vegetable Industry in Hebei, College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, No. 2596 Lekai South Street, Lianchi District, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China.

Zhaokun Liu, Vegetable Research Institute, Suzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2351 Dongshan Avenue, Linhu Town, Wuzhong District, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215155, China.

Wei Ma, State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hebei, Collaborative Innovation Center of Vegetable Industry in Hebei, College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, No. 2596 Lekai South Street, Lianchi District, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China.

Jianjun Zhao, State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Hebei, Collaborative Innovation Center of Vegetable Industry in Hebei, College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, No. 2596 Lekai South Street, Lianchi District, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China.

Author contributions

X.Z., Q.J., X.J., and X.S. prepared the manuscript. X.Z., Q.J., and X.J. wrote the paper. J.L., L.M., Z.L., W.M., and J.Z. revised the Manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1. Cheng F, Wu J, Cai Cet al. Genome resequencing and comparative variome analysis in a Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea collection. Sci Data. 2016;3:160119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wu J, Liang J, Lin Ret al. Investigation of brassica and its relative genomes in the post-genomics era. Hortic Res. 2022;9:uhac182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Niu Y, Liu Q, He Zet al. A Brassica carinata pan-genome platform for brassica crop improvement. Plant Commun. 2024;5:100725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sun B, Tian YX, Jiang Met al. Variation in the main health-promoting compounds and antioxidant activity of whole and individual edible parts of baby mustard (Brassica juncea var. gemmifera). RSC Adv. 2018;8:33845–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Nagaharu U. Genome analysis in brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japan J Bot. 1935;7:389–452 [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Arias T, Beilstein MA, Tang Met al. Diversification times among brassica (Brassicaceae) crops suggest hybrid formation after 20 million years of divergence. Am J Bot. 2014;101:86–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhu B, Liang Z, Zang Yet al. Diversity of glucosinolates among common Brassicaceae vegetables in China. Hortic Plant J. 2023;9:365–80 [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Al-Shehbaz IA, Beilstein MA, Kellogg EA. Systematics and phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae): an overview. Plant Syst Evol. 2006;259:89–120 [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lagercrantz U. Comparative mapping between Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica nigra indicate the brassica genomes have evolved through extensive genome replication accompanied by chromosome fusions and frequent rearrangements. Genetics. 1998;150:1217–28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lagercrantz U, Lydiate D. Comparative genome mapping in brassica. Genetics. 1996;144:1903–10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Warwick SI, Black LD. Molecular phylogenies from theory to application in brassica and allies (tribe Brassiceae, Brassicaceae). Opera Bot. 1997;97:159–68 [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Liu Z, Fu Y, Wang Het al. The high-quality sequencing of the Brassica rapa 'XiangQingCai' genome and exploration of genome evolution and genes related to volatile aroma. Hortic Res. 2023;10:uhad187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mabuchi R, Tanaka M, Nakanishi Cet al. Analysis of primary metabolites in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) varieties correlated with antioxidant activity and taste attributes by metabolic profiling. Molecules. 2019;24:4282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yin X, Yang D, Zhao Yet al. Differences in pseudogene evolution contributed to the contrasting flavors of turnip and Chiifu, two Brassica rapa subspecies. Plant Commun. 2023;4:100427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jeon J, Lim CJ, Kim JKet al. Comparative metabolic profiling of green and purple pakchoi (Brassica Rapa Subsp. Chinensis). Molecules. 2018;23:1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Artemeva A, Soloveva AE. Quality evaluation of some cultivar types of leafy Brassica rapa. Acta Hortic. 2006;706:121–8 [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Favela-González KM, Hernández-Almanza AY, De la Fuente-Salcido NM. The value of bioactive compounds of cruciferous vegetables (Brassica) as antimicrobials and antioxidants: a review. J Food Biochem. 2020;44:e13414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhao Y, Yue Z, Zhong Xet al. Distribution of primary and secondary metabolites among the leaf layers of headed cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Food Chem. 2020;312:126028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Brennan P, Hsu CC, Moullan Net al. Effect of cruciferous vegetables on lung cancer in patients stratified by genetic status: a mendelian randomisation approach. Lancet. 2005;366:1558–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Herr I, Büchler MW. Dietary constituents of broccoli and other cruciferous vegetables: implications for prevention and therapy of cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:377–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Higdon JV, Delage B, Williams DEet al. Cruciferous vegetables and human cancer risk: epidemiologic evidence and mechanistic basis. Pharmacol Res. 2007;55:224–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kristal AR, Lampe JW. Brassica vegetables and prostate cancer risk: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Cancer. 2002;42:1–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Boeing H, Bechthold A, Bub Aet al. Critical review: vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases. Eur J Nutr. 2012;51:637–63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bradbury KE, Appleby PN, Key TJ. Fruit, vegetable, and fiber intake in relation to cancer risk: findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:394S–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Martin C, Butelli E, Petroni Ket al. How can research on plants contribute to promoting human health? Plant Cell. 2011;23:1685–99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mozaffarian D, Hao T, Rimm EBet al. Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2392–404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li J, Martin C, Fernie A. Biofortification’s contribution to mitigating micronutrient deficiencies. Nat Food. 2024;5:19–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Verkerk R, Schreiner M, Krumbein Aet al. Glucosinolates in Brassica vegetables: the influence of the food supply chain on intake, bioavailability and human health. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:S219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Aggarwal BB, Ichikawa H. Molecular targets and anti-cancer potential of Indole-3-Carbinol and its derivatives. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:1201–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Bell L, Oloyede OO, Lignou Set al. Taste and flavor perceptions of Glucosinolates, Isothiocyanates, and related compounds. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2018;62:e1700990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Felker P, Bunch R, Leung AM. Concentrations of thiocyanate and goitrin in human plasma, their precursor concentrations in brassica vegetables, and associated potential risk for hypothyroidism. Nutr Rev. 2016;74:248–58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jakubikova J, Bao Y, Sedlak J. Isothiocyanates induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and mitochondrial potential depolarization in HL-60 and multidrug-resistant cell lines. Anticancer Res. 2005;25:3375–86 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ahn J, Lee H, Im SWet al. Allyl isothiocyanate ameliorates insulin resistance through the regulation of mitochondrial function. J Nutr Biochem. 2014;25:1026–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Mithen R, Faulkner K, Magrath Ret al. Development of isothiocyanate-enriched broccoli, and its enhanced ability to induce phase 2 detoxification enzymes in mammalian cells. Theor Appl Genet. 2003;106:727–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wu CL, Huang AC, Yang JSet al. Benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) and phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC)-mediated generation of reactive oxygen species causes cell cycle arrest and induces apoptosis via activation of caspase-3, mitochondria dysfunction and nitric oxide (NO) in human osteogenic sarcoma U-2 OS cells. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:1199–209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Arora R, Kumar R, Mahajan Jet al. 3-Butenyl isothiocyanate: a hydrolytic product of glucosinolate as a potential cytotoxic agent against human cancer cell lines. J Food Sci Tech. 2016;53:3437–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Fahey JW, Zalcmann AT, Talalay P. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry. 2001;56:5–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Srivastava SK, Xiao D, Lew KLet al. Allyl isothiocyanate, a constituent of cruciferous vegetables, inhibits growth of PC-3 human prostate cancer xenografts in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24:1665–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Riedl MA, Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D. Oral sulforaphane increases phase II antioxidant enzymes in the human upper airway. Clin Immunol. 2009;130:244–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zhang Y. Allyl isothiocyanate as a cancer chemopreventive phytochemical. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010;54:127–35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhang Y, Du J, Jin Let al. Iberverin exhibits antineoplastic activities against human hepatocellular carcinoma via DNA damage-mediated cell cycle arrest and mitochondrial-related apoptosis. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1326346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Jang M, Hong E, Kim GH. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of 3-butenyl, 4-pentenyl, 2-phenylethyl, and benzyl isothiocyanate in Brassica vegetables. J Food Sci. 2010;75:M412–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Melchini A, Traka MH, Catania Set al. Antiproliferative activity of the dietary isothiocyanate erucin, a bioactive compound from cruciferous vegetables, on human prostate cancer cells. Nutr Cancer. 2013;65:132–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Cho HJ, Lee KW, Park JH. Erucin exerts anti-inflammatory properties in murine macrophages and mouse skin: possible mediation through the inhibition of NFΚB signaling. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:20564–77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kim YS, Milner JA. Targets for indole-3-carbinol in cancer prevention. J Nutr Biochem. 2005;16:65–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Neave AS, Sarup SM, Seidelin Met al. Characterization of the N-methoxyindole-3-carbinol (NI3C)--induced cell cycle arrest in human colon cancer cell lines. Toxicol Sci. 2005;83:126–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Dey M, Ribnicky D, Kurmukov AGet al. In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of a seed preparation containing Phenethylisothiocyanate. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;317:326–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hong E, Kim GH. Anti-cancer and antimicrobial activities of β-phenylethyl isothiocyanate in Brassica rapa L. Food Sci Technol Res. 2008;14:377–82 [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Gupta P, Wright SE, Kim SHet al. Phenethyl isothiocyanate: a comprehensive review of anti-cancer mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1846:405–24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Gwon MH, Im YS, Seo ARet al. Phenethyl isothiocyanate protects against high fat/cholesterol diet-induced obesity and atherosclerosis in C57BL/6 mice. Nutrients. 2020;12:3657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Holst B, Williamson G. A critical review of the bioavailability of glucosinolates and related compounds. Nat Prod Rep. 2004;21:425–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Joseph MA, Moysich KB, Freudenheim JLet al. Cruciferous vegetables, genetic polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases M1 and T1, and prostate cancer risk. Nutr Cancer. 2004;50:206–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kim MK, Park JHY. Cruciferous vegetable intake and the risk of human cancer: epidemiological evidence: conference on ‘multidisciplinary approaches to nutritional problems’ symposium on ‘nutrition and health’. Proc Nutr Soc. 2009;68:103–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Wu QJ, Yang Y, Wang Jet al. Cruciferous vegetable consumption and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1067–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Iahtisham, Ul H, Khan S, Awan KAet al. Sulforaphane as a potential remedy against cancer: comprehensive mechanistic review. J Food Biochem. 2022;46:e13886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Zhang Y, Zhang W, Zhao Yet al. Bioactive sulforaphane from cruciferous vegetables: advances in biosynthesis, metabolism, bioavailability, delivery, health benefits, and applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;1–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ahmad A, Sakr WA, Rahman KM. Anti-cancer properties of indole compounds: mechanism of apoptosis induction and role in chemotherapy. Curr Drug Targets. 2010;11:652–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Firestone GL, Sundar SN. Minireview: modulation of hormone receptor signaling by dietary anti-cancer indoles. Mol Endocrinol. 2009;23:1940–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Sarkar FH, Li Y. Harnessing the fruits of nature for the development of multi-targeted cancer therapeutics. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35:597–607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Fahey JW, Stephenson KK, Wade KLet al. Urease from helicobacter pylori is inactivated by sulforaphane and other isothiocyanates. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;435:1–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Yanaka A, Fahey JW, Fukumoto Aet al. Dietary sulforaphane-rich broccoli sprouts reduce colonization and attenuate gastritis in helicobacter pylori-infected mice and humans. Cancer Prev Res. 2009;2:353–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Griffiths DW, Birch ANE, Hillman JR. Antinutritional compounds in the Brasi analysis, biosynthesis, chemistry and dietary effects. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 1998;73:1–18 [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Cartea ME, Haro A, Obregón Set al. Glucosinolate variation in leaves of Brassica rapa crops. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2012;67:283–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Wiesner M, Zrenner R, Krumbein Aet al. Genotypic variation of the glucosinolate profile in pak choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61:1943–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Omary MB, Brovelli EA, Pusateri DJet al. Sulforaphane potential and vitamin C concentration in developing heads and leaves of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica). J Food Quality. 2003;26:523–30 [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Rangkadilok N, Nicolas ME, Bennett RNet al. Developmental changes of sinigrin and glucoraphanin in three Brassica species (Brassica nigra, Brassica juncea and Brassica oleracea var. italica). Sci Hortic. 2002;96:11–26 [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Gao C, Zhang F, Hu Yet al. Dissecting the genetic architecture of glucosinolate compounds for quality improvement in flowering stalk tissues of Brassica napus. Hortic Plant J. 2023;9:553–62 [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Park WT, Kim JK, Park Set al. Metabolic profiling of glucosinolates, anthocyanins, carotenoids, and other secondary metabolites in kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes). J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:8111–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Park CH, Yeo HJ, Park SYet al. Comparative phytochemical analyses and metabolic profiling of different phenotypes of Chinese cabbage (Brassica Rapa ssp. Pekinensis). Food Secur. 2019;8:587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Keck AS, Finley JW. Cruciferous vegetables: cancer protective mechanisms of glucosinolate hydrolysis products and selenium. Integr Cancer Ther. 2004;3:5–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Pennington JAT, Fisher RA. Food component profiles for fruit and vegetable subgroups. J Food Compost Anal. 2010;23:411–8 [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Kaulmann A, Jonville MC, Schneider YJet al. Carotenoids, polyphenols and micronutrient profiles of Brassica oleraceae and plum varieties and their contribution to measures of total antioxidant capacity. Food Chem. 2014;155:240–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Benzie IF. Evolution of dietary antioxidants. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2003;136:113–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Li Y, Schellhorn HE. Can ageing-related degenerative diseases be ameliorated through administration of vitamin C at pharmacological levels? Med Hypotheses. 2007;68:1315–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Conrad ME, Schade SG. Ascorbic acid chelates in iron absorption: a role for hydrochloric acid and bile. Gastroenterology. 1968;55:35–45 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Chen Q, Espey MG, Krishna MCet al. Pharmacologic ascorbic acid concentrations selectively kill cancer cells: action as a pro-drug to deliver hydrogen peroxide to tissue. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:13604–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Dennison BA, Rockwell HL, Baker SL. Fruit and vegetable intake in young children. J Am Coll Nutr. 1998;17:371–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Domínguez-Perles R, Mena P, García-Viguera Cet al. Brassica foods as a dietary source of vitamin C: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014;54:1076–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Frei B, Lawson S. Vitamin C and cancer revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:11037–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Moreno DA, Carvajal M, López-Berenguer Cet al. Chemical and biological characterisation of nutraceutical compounds of broccoli. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006;41:1508–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. McKillop DJ, Pentieva K, Daly Det al. The effect of different cooking methods on folate retention in various foods that are amongst the major contributors to folate intake in the UK diet. Brit J Nutr. 2002;88:681–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Melse-Boonstra A, Verhoef P, Konings EJet al. Influence of processing on total, monoglutamate and polyglutamate folate contents of leeks, cauliflower, and green beans. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:3473–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Shohag M, Wei Y, Zhang Jet al. Genetic and physiological regulation of folate in pak choi (Brassica rapa subsp. Chinensis) germplasm. J Exp Bot. 2020;71:4914–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Farnham MW, Lester GE, Hassell R. Collard, mustard and turnip greens: effects of genotypes and leaf position on concentrations of ascorbic acid, folate, β-carotene, lutein and phylloquinone. J Food Compos Anal. 2012;27:1–7 [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Bolton-Smith C, Price RJG, Fenton STet al. Compilation of provisional UK database for the phylloquinone (vitamin K1) content of foods. Brit J Nutr. 2000;83:389–99 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Ferland G, Sadowski JA. Vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) content of green vegetables: effects of plant maturation and geographical growth location. J Agric Food Chem. 1992;40:1874–7 [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Basset GJ, Latimer S, Fatihi Aet al. Phylloquinone (vitamin K1): occurrence, biosynthesis and functions. Mini-Rev Med Chem. 2017;17:1028–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Zou L, Tan WK, Du Yet al. Nutritional metabolites in Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis var. parachinensis (choy sum) at three different growth stages: microgreen, seedling and adult plant. Food Chem. 2021;357:129535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Simes DC, Viegas CSB, Araújo Net al. Vitamin K as a diet supplement with impact in human health: current evidence in age-related diseases. Nutrients. 2020;12:138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Schwartz H, Ollilainen V, Piironen Vet al. Tocopherol, tocotrienol and plant sterol contents of vegetable oils and industrial fats. J Food Compos Anal. 2008;21:152–61 [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Guzman I, Yousef GG, Brown AF. Simultaneous extraction and quantitation of carotenoids, chlorophylls, and tocopherols in Brassica vegetables. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:7238–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Michalak M. Plant-derived antioxidants: significance in skin health and the ageing process. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Eggersdorfer M, Wyss A. Carotenoids in human nutrition and health. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2018;652:18–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Maiani G, Periago Castón MJ, Catasta Get al. Carotenoids: actual knowledge on food sources, intakes, stability and bioavailability and their protective role in humans. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:S194–218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Mageney V, Baldermann S, Albach DC. Intraspecific variation in carotenoids of Brassica oleracea var. sabellica. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64:3251–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Lee S, Lee SC, Byun DHet al. Association of molecular markers derived from the BrCRTISO1 gene with prolycopene-enriched orange-colored leaves in Brassica rapa [corrected]. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127:179–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Su T, Yu S, Zhang Jet al. Loss of function of the carotenoid isomerase gene BrCRTISO confers Orange color to the inner leaves of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Plant Mol Biol Report. 2015;33:648–59 [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Mrowicka M, Mrowicki J, Kucharska Eet al. Lutein and Zeaxanthin and their roles in age-related macular degeneration-neurodegenerative disease. Nutrients. 2022;14:827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Nishino H, Murakosh M, Ii Tet al. Carotenoids in cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2002;21:257–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Martins T, Barros AN, Rosa Eet al. Enhancing health benefits through chlorophylls and chlorophyll-rich agro-food: a comprehensive review. Molecules. 2023;28:5344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Mattioli R, Francioso A, Mosca Let al. Anthocyanins: a comprehensive review of their chemical properties and health effects on cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules. 2020;25:3809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Różańska D, Regulska-Ilow B. The significance of anthocyanins in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018;27:135–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Zhao X, Feng P, He Wet al. The prevention and inhibition effect of anthocyanins on colorectal cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;25:4919–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Zhou Y, Zheng J, Li Yet al. Natural polyphenols for prevention and treatment of cancer. Nutrients. 2016;8:515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Podsedek A. Natural antioxidants and antioxidant capacity of brassica vegetables: a review. Lwt-Food Sci Technol. 2007;40:1–11 [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Bahorun T, Luximon-Ramma A, Crozier Aet al. Total phenol, flavonoid, proanthocyanidin and vitamin C levels and antioxidant activities of Mauritian vegetables. J Sci Food Agr. 2004;84:1553–61 [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Yuan Y, Chiu LW, Li L. Transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in red cabbage. Planta. 2009;230:1141–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Wang W, Zhang D, Yu Set al. Mapping the BrPur gene for purple leaf color on linkage group A03 of Brassica rapa. Euphytica. 2014;199:293–302 [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Olsen H, Aaby K, Borge GI. Characterization, quantification, and yearly variation of the naturally occurring polyphenols in a common red variety of curly kale (Brassica oleracea L. convar. Acephala var. sabellica cv. 'Redbor'). J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:11346–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Jaiswal AK, Abu-Ghannam N, Gupta S. A comparative study on the polyphenolic content, antibacterial activity and antioxidant capacity of different solvent extracts of Brassica oleracea vegetables. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2012;47:223–31 [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Prasad M, Joshi S, Narendra Ket al. A comparative study of phytochemical analysis and in vitro antimicrobial activity of three important vegetables from brassicaceae family. International J Res Ayurveda Pharmacy. 2015;6:767–72 [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Heaney R, Weaver C, Hinders Set al. Absorbability of calcium from Brassica vegetables: broccoli, bok choy, and kale. J Food Sci. 1993;58:1378–80 [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Kamchan A, Puwastien P, Sirichakwal PPet al. In vitro calcium bioavailability of vegetables, legumes and seeds. J Food Compos Anal. 2004;17:311–20 [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Lucarini M, Canali R, Cappelloni Met al. In vitro calcium availability from brassica vegetables (Brassica oleracea L.) and as consumed in composite dishes. Food Chem. 1999;64:519–23 [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Binia A, Jaeger J, Hu Yet al. Daily potassium intake and sodium-to-potassium ratio in the reduction of blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hypertens Suppl. 2015;33:1509–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Satheesh N, Workneh FS. Kale: review on nutritional composition, bio-active compounds, anti-nutritional factors, health beneficial properties and value-added products. Cogent Food Agr. 2020;6:1811048 [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Lefsrud M, Kopsell D, Wenzel Aet al. Changes in kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) carotenoid and chlorophyll pigment concentrations during leaf ontogeny. Sci Hortic. 2007;112:136–41 [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Duffield-Lillico AJ, Reid ME, Turnbull BWet al. Baseline characteristics and the effect of selenium supplementation on cancer incidence in a randomized clinical trial: a summary report of the nutritional prevention of cancer trial. Cancer Epidem Biomar. 2002;11:630–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Irion CW. Growing alliums and brassicas in selenium-enriched soils increases their anticarcinogenic potentials. Med Hypotheses. 1999;53:232–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Bañuelos GS. Irrigation of broccoli and canola with boron- and selenium-laden effluent. J Environ Qual. 2002;31:1802–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Xiao Z, Lester GE, Luo Yet al. Assessment of vitamin and carotenoid concentrations of emerging food products: edible microgreens. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:7644–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Samec D, Salopek-Sondi B. Cruciferous (Brassicaceae) vegetables. In: Nabavi SM, Silva AS, eds. Nonvitamin and Nonmineral Nutritional Supplements. Elsevier Inc. Amsterdam, Netherlands. 2019,195–202
  • 123. Hannoufa A, Pillai BV, Chellamma S. Genetic enhancement of Brassica napus seed quality. Transgenic Res. 2014;23:39–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Yu B, Lydiate DJ, Young LWet al. Enhancing the carotenoid content of Brassica napus seeds by downregulating lycopene epsilon cyclase. Transgenic Res. 2008;17:573–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Vles RO, Bijster GM, Timmer WG. Nutritional Evaluation of Low-Erucic-Acid Rapeseed Oils. In: Leonard BJ, ed. Toxicological Aspects of Food Safety. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. New York, USA.1978,23–32 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 126. Cacciola F, Beccaria M, Oteri Met al. Chemical characterization of old cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) seed oil by liquid chromatography and different spectroscopic detection systems. Nat Prod Res. 2016;30:1646–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Murador DC, Mercadante AZ, Rosso VV. Cooking techniques improve the levels of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in kale and red cabbage. Food Chem. 2016;196:1101–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Diamante MS, Vanz Borges C, Minatel IOet al. Domestic cooking practices influence the carotenoid and tocopherol content in colored cauliflower. Food Chem. 2021;340:127901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Phan MAT, Bucknall MP, Arcot J. Effects on intestinal cellular bioaccessibility of carotenoids and cellular biological activity as a consequence of co-ingestion of anthocyanin- and carotenoid-rich vegetables. Food Chem. 2019;286:678–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Garber AK, Binkley NC, Krueger DCet al. Comparison of phylloquinone bioavailability from food sources or a supplement in human subjects. J Nutr. 1999;129:1201–3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Gupta E, Mishra P. Functional food with some health benefits, so called superfood: a review. Curr Nutr Food Sci. 2021;17:144–66 [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Šamec D, Urlić B, Salopek-Sondi B. Kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) as a superfood: review of the scientific evidence behind the statement. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59:2411–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Frede K, Baldermann S. Accumulation of carotenoids in Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis by a high proportion of blue in the light spectrum. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2022;21:1947–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Baenas N, Moreno DA, García-Viguera C. Selecting sprouts of Brassicaceae for optimum phytochemical composition. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:11409–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Vale A, Santos J, Brito Net al. Light influence in the nutritional composition of Brassica oleracea sprouts. Food Chem. 2015;178:292–300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Carvalho SD, Folta KM. Sequential light programs shape kale (Brassica napus) sprout appearance and alter metabolic and nutrient content. Hortic Res. 2014;1:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Hallmann E, Kazimierczak R, Marszałek Ket al. The nutritive value of organic and conventional white cabbage (Brassica Oleracea L. Var. Capitata) and anti-apoptotic activity in gastric adenocarcinoma cells of sauerkraut juice produced Therof. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65:8171–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Kapusta-Duch J, Leszczyńska T, Filipiak-Florkiewicz A. Comparison of total polyphenol contents and antioxidant activity in cruciferous vegetables grown in diversified ecological conditions. Acta Sci Polon-Techn. 2012;11:335–46 [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Geilfus CM, Hasler K, Witzel Ket al. Interactive effects of genotype and N/S-supply on glucosinolates and glucosinolate breakdown products in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). J Appl Bot Food Qual. 2016;89:279–86 [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Hu K, Zhu Z. Effects of different concentrations of sodium chloride on plant growth and glucosinolate content and composition in pakchoi. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9:4428–33 [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Ilahy R, Tlili I, Pék Zet al. Pre-and post-harvest factors affecting glucosinolate content in broccoli. Front Nutr. 2020;7:147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Ferrari G, Renosto F. Regulation of sulfate uptake by excised barley roots in the presence of selenate. Plant Physiol. 1972;49:114–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Mao S, Wang J, Wu Qet al. Effect of selenium-sulfur interaction on the anabolism of sulforaphane in broccoli. Phytochemistry. 2020;179:112499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Kumar S, DePauw RM, Kumar Set al. Breeding and adoption of biofortified crops and their nutritional impact on human health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023;1520:5–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Subramanian P, Kim SH, Hahn BS. Brassica biodiversity conservation: prevailing constraints and future avenues for sustainable distribution of plant genetic resources. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1220134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Faulkner K, Mithen R, Williamson G. Selective increase of the potential anticarcinogen 4-methylsulphinylbutyl glucosinolate in broccoli. Carcinogenesis. 1998;19:605–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Broadley MR, Hammond JP, King GJ. et al. Biofortifying brassica with calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg). Proceedings of the International Plant Nutrition Colloquium XVI. 2009; 1256
  • 148. Van Der Straeten D, Bhullar NK, De Steur Het al. Multiplying the efficiency and impact of biofortification through metabolic engineering. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Tuncel A, Pan C, Sprink Tet al. Genome-edited foods. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2023;1:799–816 [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Cheng F, Mandáková T, Wu Jet al. Deciphering the diploid ancestral genome of the Mesohexaploid Brassica rapa. Plant Cell. 2013;25:1541–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Miao H, Zeng W, Wang Jet al. Improvement of glucosinolates by metabolic engineering in Brassica crops. aBIOTECH. 2021;2:314–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Yang Y, Hu Y, Yue Yet al. Expression profiles of glucosinolate biosynthetic genes in turnip (Brassica rapa var. rapa) at different developmental stages and effect of transformed flavin-containing monooxygenase genes on hairy root glucosinolate content. J Sci Food Agric. 2020;100:1064–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Bai X, Zhang R, Zeng Qet al. The RNA-binding protein BoRHON1 positively regulates the accumulation of aliphatic Glucosinolates in cabbage. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:5314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Wu Q, Mao S, Huang Het al. Chromosome-scale reference genome of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica Plenck) provides insights into glucosinolate biosynthesis. Hortic Res. 2024;11:uhae063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Cai C, Vos RCH, Qian Het al. Metabolomic and transcriptomic profiles in diverse Brassica oleracea crops provide insights into the genetic regulation of Glucosinolate profiles. J Agric Food Chem. 2024;72:16032–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Augustine R, Bisht NC. Biofortification of oilseed Brassica juncea with the anti-cancer compound glucoraphanin by suppressing gsl-alk gene family. Sci Rep-UK. 2016;5:18005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Liu Z, Hirani AH, McVetty PBEet al. Reducing progoitrin and enriching glucoraphanin in Brassica napus seeds through silencing of the gsl-alk gene family. Plant Mol Biol. 2012;79:179–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Liu Z, Liang J, Zheng Set al. Enriching glucoraphanin in Brassica rapa through replacement of BrAOP2.2/BrAOP2.3 with non-functional genes. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Tuan PA, Kim JK, Lee Jet al. Analysis of carotenoid accumulation and expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in different organs of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis). EXCLI J. 2012;11:508–16 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Li L, Paolillo DJ, Parthasarathy MVet al. A novel gene mutation that confers abnormal patterns of beta-carotene accumulation in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis). Plant J. 2001;26:59–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Zhou X, Van Eck J, Li L. Use of the cauliflower or gene for improving crop nutritional quality. Biotechnol Annu Rev. 2008;14:171–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Feng H, Li Y, Liu Zet al. Mapping of or, a gene conferring orange color on the inner leaf of the Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Mol Breeding. 2012;29:235–44 [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Zhang J, Li H, Zhang Met al. Fine mapping and identification of candidate Br-or gene controlling orange head of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Mol Breeding. 2013;32:799–805 [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Su T, Wang W, Li Pet al. Natural variations of BrHISN2 provide a genetic basis for growth-flavour trade-off in different Brassica rapa subspecies. New Phytol. 2021;231:2186–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Li P, Lv S, Zhang Det al. The carotenoid esterification gene BrPYP controls pale-yellow petal color in flowering Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. subsp. parachinensis). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:844140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Ren Y, Han R, Ma Yet al. Transcriptomics integrated with metabolomics unveil carotenoids accumulation and correlated gene regulation in white and yellow-fleshed turnip (Brassica rapa ssp. rapa). Genes (Basel). 2022;13:953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. He Q, Zhang Z, Zhang L. Anthocyanin accumulation, antioxidant ability and stability, and a transcriptional analysis of anthocyanin biosynthesis in purple heading Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64:132–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Heng S, Cheng Q, Zhang Tet al. Fine-mapping of the BjPur gene for purple leaf color in Brassica juncea. Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133:2989–3000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Li X, Gao MJ, Pan HYet al. Purple canola: Arabidopsis PAP1 increases antioxidants and phenolics in Brassica napus leaves. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:1639–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Li H, Zhu L, Yuan Get al. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of an anthocyanin-rich gene, BnaA.PL1, conferring purple leaves in Brassica napus L. Mol Gen Genomics. 2016;291:1523–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Goswami G, Nath UK, Park JIet al. Transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in a high-anthocyanin resynthesized Brassica napus cultivar. J Biol Res-Thessalon. 2018;25:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Chen D, Liu Y, Yin Set al. Alternatively spliced BnaPAP2.A7 isoforms play opposing roles in anthocyanin biosynthesis of Brassica napus L. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Chiu LW, Zhou X, Burke Set al. The purple cauliflower arises from activation of a MYB transcription factor. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:1470–80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Fu H, Chao H, Zhao Xet al. Anthocyanins identification and transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in purple Brassica napus. Plant Mol Biol. 2022;110:53–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Schilbert HM, Schöne M, Baier Tet al. Characterization of the Brassica napus Flavonol synthase gene family reveals Bifunctional Flavonol synthases. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:733762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Wang N, Shi L, Tian Fet al. Assessment of FAE1 polymorphisms in three brassica species using EcoTILLING and their association with differences in seed erucic acid contents. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Jiang M, Zhan Z, Li Het al. Brassica rapa orphan genes largely affect soluble sugar metabolism. Hortic Res. 2020;7:181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Zhang Y, Hu Z, Zhu Met al. Anthocyanin accumulation and molecular analysis of correlated genes in purple kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes L.). J Agric Food Chem. 2015b;63:4160–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Zhang J, Yuan H, Fei Zet al. Molecular characterization and transcriptome analysis of orange head Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Planta. 2015a;241:1381–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Osorio CE. The role of Orange gene in carotenoid accumulation: manipulating Chromoplasts toward a colored future. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Pietta PG. Flavonoids as antioxidants. J Nat Prod. 2000;63:1035–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Raskin I, Ripoll C. Can an apple a day keep the doctor away? Curr Pharm Design. 2004;10:3419–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Karniel U, Koch A, Zamir Det al. Development of zeaxanthin-rich tomato fruit through genetic manipulations of carotenoid biosynthesis. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:2292–303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Menconi J, Perata P, Gonzali S. In pursuit of purple: anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits of the tomato clade. Trends Plant Sci. 2024;29:589–604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Li X, Kim YB, Uddin MRet al. Influence of light on the free amino acid content and γ-aminobutyric acid synthesis in Brassica juncea seedlings. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61:8624–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Siucinska E. Γ-aminobutyric acid in adult brain: an update. Behav Brain Res. 2019;376:112224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Web_Material_uhae302
web_material_uhae302.zip (361.5KB, zip)

Articles from Horticulture Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES