Table 1.
Complementation of wus-1 Mutant Flowers with Promoter Truncations and Internal Deletion Constructs
| Whorl |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construct | Sepals | Petals | Stamens | Carpels | n |
| HindBst | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 0 | 20 |
| FspBst | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0 | 20 |
| ApaBst | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 5.8 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 0 | 20 |
| ScaBst | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0 | 20 |
| Δ1 | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 5.7 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0 | 20 |
| Δ2 | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.5 ± 1.2 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 20 |
| Δ3 | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 0 | 20 |
| Δ4 | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0 | 18 |
| Δ5 | 4.5 ± 1.0 | 4.4 ± 0.8 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 20 |
| wus-1a | 3.7 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 0.0 ± 0 | 53 |
| Ler | 4.0 ± 0 | 4.0 ± 0 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0 | 20 |
The average floral organ number and the sd in n flowers of the line that showed the best complementation are indicated.
a
Data for wus-1 are taken from Laux et al. (1996).