Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 31;16:1546572. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1546572

Table 2.

Variance analysis of root length of S and R lines.

Time point Treatment S line Comparison with
the control (%)
R line Comparison with
the control (%)
3d CK 3.77 ± 0.54a -67.36 3.02 ± 0.48a -13.18
T 1.23 ± 0.67b 2.62 ± 0.59a
5d CK 5.21 ± 0.68a -61.30 5.32 ± 0.54a -6.85
T 2.02 ± 0.48b 4.95 ± 0.39a
7d CK 8.19 ± 0.44a -54.39 7.93 ± 0.38a -31.02
T 3.73 ± 0.63b 5.47 ± 0.74b

Small letters in the table indicate significant difference between control and aluminum treatment (p < 0.05).