Table 2.
Variance analysis of root length of S and R lines.
| Time point | Treatment | S line | Comparison with the control (%) |
R line | Comparison with the control (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3d | CK | 3.77 ± 0.54a | -67.36 | 3.02 ± 0.48a | -13.18 |
| T | 1.23 ± 0.67b | 2.62 ± 0.59a | |||
| 5d | CK | 5.21 ± 0.68a | -61.30 | 5.32 ± 0.54a | -6.85 |
| T | 2.02 ± 0.48b | 4.95 ± 0.39a | |||
| 7d | CK | 8.19 ± 0.44a | -54.39 | 7.93 ± 0.38a | -31.02 |
| T | 3.73 ± 0.63b | 5.47 ± 0.74b |
Small letters in the table indicate significant difference between control and aluminum treatment (p < 0.05).