Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 14;23:10.18332/tid/200197. doi: 10.18332/tid/200197

Table 2.

Logit regression results on the relationship between adolescent tobacco use types and the occurrence of sexual behavior, South Korea (2018–2022) (N=207964)

Variables Sexual behavior
AOR (95% CI)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Ordinary cigarette 7.85 (7.49–8.23)*** 4.20 (3.94–4.48)***
Liquid e-cigarettes with nicotine 8.21 (7.80–8.64)*** 2.02 (1.87–2.18)***
Cigarette type e-cigarette 9.86 (9.26–10.49)*** 2.17 (2.01–2.34)***
Gender 1.26 (1.19–1.34)*** 1.30 (1.22–1.37)*** 1.46 (1.38–1.54)*** 1.17 (1.10–1.24)***
Age (years) 1.15 (1.09–1.20)*** 1.15 (1.10–1.21)*** 1.15 (1.10–1.21)*** 1.14 (1.09–1.19)***
Economic situation 1.09 (1.06–1.12)*** 1.08 (1.05–1.10)*** 1.07 (1.05–1.10)*** 1.07 (1.04–1.10)***
Academic achievement 0.920 (0.902–0.939)*** 0.903 (0.885–0.921)*** 0.879 (0.862–0.897)*** 0.941 (0.923–0.960)***
Grade 1.18 (1.12–1.25)*** 1.22 (1.16–1.29)*** 1.24 (1.17–1.30)*** 1.19 (1.13–1.25)***
Father’s education level 0.933 (0.898–0.970)*** 0.923 (0.888–0.960)*** 0.912 (0.877–0.948)*** 0.938 (0.902–0.976)***
Mother’s education level 0.928 (0.892–0.965)*** 0.920 (0.884–0.956)*** 0.907 (0.872–0.943)*** 0.928 (0.892–0.966)***
Educational stage 1.12 (1.02–1.24)** 1.07 (0.973–1.18) 1.08 (0.979–1.18) 1.07 (0.970–1.18)
School type 1.07 (1.02–1.12)*** 1.07 (1.02–1.12)*** 1.08 (1.03–1.13)*** 1.07 (1.02–1.12)***
City scale 1.14 (1.04–1.24)*** 1.14 (1.04–1.25)*** 1.10 (1.01–1.20)** 1.12 (1.03–1.23)**
Year FE Yes Yes Yes Yes
City FE Yes Yes Yes Yes
pseudo R2 0.170 0.156 0.138 0.187

AOR: adjusted odds ratio. Models 1 to 3 sequentially display the relationships between various types of tobacco use (ordinary cigarette, liquid e-cigarettes with nicotine, and cigarette type e-cigarette) and the occurrence of sexual behavior. Model 4 includes all three types of tobacco in the analysis. In each model, the covariates are presented, and both time and city fixed effects are included.

**

p<0.05,

***

p<0.01.