Skip to main content
BMC Nephrology logoLink to BMC Nephrology
. 2025 Feb 14;26:79. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-03960-4

Commentary: Tolvaptan for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) - an update

Matt Gittus 1,2,, Helen Haley 3, Tess Harris 4, Sarah Borrows 5, Neal Padmanabhan 6, Danny Gale 7, Roslyn Simms 2, Terri Williams 1, Aaron Acquaye 8, Alisa Wong 7, Melanie Chan 9, Eduardo Lee 10, Albert CM Ong 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11827152  PMID: 39953521

Abstract

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) affects up to 70 000 people in the UK and the most common inherited cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). It is generally a late-onset multisystem disorder characterised by bilateral kidney cysts, liver cysts and an increased risk of intracranial aneurysms. Approximately 50% of people with ADPKD reach ESKD by age 60. Disease-associated pain, discomfort, fatigue, emotional distress and, impaired mobility can impact health-related quality of life. The approval of tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, has greatly advanced the care for people with ADPKD, shifting the focus from general chronic kidney disease management to targeted therapeutic approaches. While guidance from NICE and SMC provides a foundational framework, this is not clear or comprehensive enough to offer practical guidance for healthcare professionals in real-world settings. This commentary expands on the previous United Kingdom Kidney Association (UKKA) commentary in 2016 with an updated evidence base, the incorporation of real-world data and expert opinion to provide practical guidance to healthcare professionals. Through co-development with people affected by ADPKD, it now incorporates valuable patient perspectives and offers practical recommendations for the UK kidney community seeking to harmonise the quality of care of all people with ADPKD.

Keywords: Autosomal Dominant polycystic kidney disease, ADPKD, Tolvaptan

Background

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease with an estimated prevalence ranging from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 2500 [15]. Variants in two genes, PKD1 and PKD2, encoding for polycystin-1 or polycystin-2 account for 75–85% and 15–25% of genetically resolved cases respectively [610]. Reduced polycystin function leads to increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate signalling, which is a key driving mechanism for cyst growth and fluid secretion [11, 12]. ADPKD is generally a late-onset multisystem disorder characterised by bilateral kidney cysts, liver cysts and an increased risk of intracranial aneurysms. Less common manifestations include pancreatic cysts, seminal vesicle cysts, and mitral valve prolapse amongst others [13]. Progressive cyst development and growth ultimately leads to kidney dysfunction with approximately 50% of people requiring kidney replacement therapy by age 60 [14]. ADPKD can impose a significant burden on health-related quality of life due to pain, discomfort, fatigue, emotional distress and, limiting daily activities [1518].

Tolvaptan is a short-acting vasopressin 2 receptor antagonist that blocks vasopressin signalling leading to a reduction in cAMP in cystic kidney tissues [19]. The landmark Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (TEMPO) 3:4 trial, conducted between 2007 and 2012, represented a major breakthrough in the management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) [20]. This trial supported the approval of tolvaptan by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) for people with rapidly progressing ADPKD [21, 22]. NICE recommended starting treatment at CKD stages 2–3 [21], while SMC allowed initiation from stages 1–3 [22]. As of February 2023, Otsuka reports that tolvaptan has been licensed in over 43 countries including Australia, the European Union, Japan, and the United States, among others.

Since the 2016 commentary by the UKKA, there have been significant developments including clinical trials [23, 24], post-hoc analysis [25], risk assessment tools [26, 27], broader access to genetic testing, and availability of real-world data, all of which warrant an update to incorporate these advances. For this reason, the following recommendations were prepared on behalf of the UKKA working group for the management of ADPKD with tolvaptan and endorsed by the UKKA.

An update on the efficacy of tolvaptan in ADPKD

In 2017, the TEMPO 4:4 study, an open-label extension of TEMPO 3:4, examined the long-term effects of tolvaptan over 24 months. While tolvaptan effectively maintained kidney function, the reduction in total kidney volume (TKV) was not sustained, possibly due to the non-randomised design and unadjusted baseline characteristics in the study [23]. The Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: An Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in ADPKD (REPRISE) trial enrolled patients aged 18–55 with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 25–65 ml/min/1.73m2 and those aged 56 to 65 years old with a baseline eGFR 25–44 ml/min/1.73m2. At 1-year follow-up, tolvaptan slowed eGFR decline by 1.27 ml/min/1.73m2 in all groups except those aged over 55 years and, with early-stage CKD [28, 29]. Evidence for the effectiveness of tolvaptan among people from ethnic backgrounds other than white was limited; only 4% of study participants in TEMPO 3:4 were described as black compared to over 80% described as white [20]. Further research is needed in people from black and Hispanic ethnic backgrounds since they are reported to reach kidney failure earlier and are less likely to receive a pre-emptive kidney transplant compared to people from a white ethnic background [30].

A retrospective analysis from an expert centre (Mayo Clinic) provided up to 11 years long-term follow-up for 97 people with ADPKD treated with tolvaptan (median 4 years, range 1.1–11.2 years). When compared to matched controls from other studies, the predicted eGFR decline mirrored results from TEMPO 3:4 and REPRISE [29]. Finally, secondary analysis of TEMPO 3:4 showed additional benefits to slowing the decline in kidney function, with a reduction in kidney pain events and urinary tract infections compared to placebo [31].

Practical guide for prescribing tolvaptan

The following steps outline the essential considerations and processes for safely prescribing tolvaptan in the management of ADPKD. These steps have been adjusted from a practical guide published by Chebib et al. [31].

  • A.

    Ensure a confirmed diagnosis of ADPKD.

  • B.

    Confirm eligibility for tolvaptan.

  • C.

    Confirm evidence of rapidly progressive disease or high risk of progression.

  • D.

    Confirm that there are no exclusions.

  • E.

    Consider potential drug interactions.

  • F.

    Initiate and titrate Tolvaptan.

  • G.

    Establish monitoring plan.

  • H.

    Manage side effects and adverse effects associated with tolvaptan.

Ensure a confirmed diagnosis of ADPKD

Recommendation 1: We recommend that all people with ADPKD being considered for tolvaptan should have an established diagnosis of ADPKD through diagnostic imaging and/or genetic testing.

Diagnostic imaging

In atypical cases or when ultrasound findings don’t align with clinical symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) offer greater sensitivity for detecting small cysts (< 5 mm) [32, 33]. In the absence of family history, detecting ≥ 10 cysts per kidney with any imaging modality can be considered diagnostic for ADPKD, in the presence of bilaterally enlarged kidneys and the exclusion of other forms of cystic kidney diseases [34].

Genetic testing

Whole genome sequencing is available through the National Health Service (NHS) Genomic Medicine Service in England [35], the Scottish Strategic Network for Genomic Medicine in Scotland [36], the All Wales Medical Genomics Service in Wales [37] and Belfast City Hospital Clinical Genetics Department in Northern Ireland [38]. Identifying a monoallelic pathogenic variant in a cystic kidney disease gene (most commonly PKD1 or PKD2) can confirm a diagnosis of ADPKD. This is particularly useful in the context of atypical disease or those without a family history (~ 30%). A genetic diagnosis has several clinical applications including risk assessment, family planning, and confirming kidney donor suitability [17].

Confirm eligibility for tolvaptan

Age at initiation

Recommendation 2: We recommend that people with ADPKD being considered for tolvaptan should be aged 18 and above at the time of treatment initiation.

The TEMPO 3:4 and REPRISE trials included participants aged 18-50 [20] and 18-65 [24], respectively. Currently, no large-scale randomised controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in children and adolescents. A phase 3b study of participants aged 4-17 showed a non-significant reduction in height-adjusted annual increase total kidney volume (TKV) and eGFR slope after 12 months of tolvaptan compared to placebo [39]. While there is insufficient data to support tolvaptan use in those under 18, no upper age limit is recommended but age-related kidney function should be considered (see Table 1) [40].

Table 1.

Average measured eGFR by age group in people without CKD from the National Kidney Foundation [41]

Age group (years) Average eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2)
20–29 116
30–39 107
40–49 99
50–59 93
60–69 85
70 + 75

CKD Stage at initiation

Recommendation 3: In England and Wales we recommend initiating tolvaptan in individuals at CKD stage 2–3 (30–89 ml/min/1.73m2). In Scotland, we recommend initiating tolvaptan in individuals at CKD stages 1–3 (≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m2).

Kidney function measurements should be confirmed by two blood tests, at least 72 h apart, and without intercurrent illness. In contrast to the SMC, NICE excludes patients with stage 1 CKD (eGFR ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73m2) due to an unfavourable cost-benefit analysis and non-significant slope in this subgroup although there was a significant reduction in TKV increase [21]. Serial evaluation for patients with stage 1 CKD is recommended, reviewing symptoms and family history, as this subgroup may still experience rapid disease progression.

Confirm evidence of rapidly progressive disease or high risk of progression

Both NICE and SMC require evidence of “rapidly progressing disease” for tolvaptan initiation, but neither defines this term explicitly. The primary method of assessing rapid progression is through annual changes in eGFR. However, because compensatory glomerular hyperfiltration can mask a decline in eGFR in early stages of ADPKD [13, 42], eGFR alone may not capture early kidney damage [13, 43]. Identifying those at risk of rapid progression, even with normal or near-normal kidney function, is critical for timely intervention, including the use of tolvaptan, and enhanced monitoring. An approach to risk assessment is outlined in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Approach to risk assessment for rapid disease progression

Defining rapidly progressive disease

Recommendation 4: We recommend that a definition for evidence of rapid disease progression and eligibility for tolvaptan is a sustained decline in eGFR of ≥ 3 ml/min/1.73m2per year (at least 5 measurements over 4 years).

Progression in ADPKD can vary significantly within and between families [11]. Historical eGFR trends offer the best indication of disease progression. Irazabal et al. (2015) demonstrated that typical annual eGFR declines are 2.63 ml/min/1.73m2 for men and 2.43 ml/min/1.73m2 for women through their modelling of an imaging-based risk classification [26]. The TEMPO 3:4 and REPRISE trials reported an average annual eGFR decline of 3.5 ml/min/1.73m2 [20, 24]. For this reason, we recommend defining rapid progression as an annual decline in eGFR of ≥ 3 ml/min/1.73m2 per year over 4 years, based on at least 5 measurements. Multiple measurements are required to account for the natural day-to-day fluctuations in eGFR [44] and the small subset of people with ADPKD that exhibit non-linear eGFR losses [45]. The previous commentary recommended ≥ 5 ml/min/1.73m2 annual decline but this acute decline is rarely seen amongst people with ADPKD in clinical practice and other acute causes should be considered [20, 23, 24].

There are specific considerations when assessing kidney function in certain populations. In people who may become pregnant, baseline kidney function should be evaluated at least three months post-partum as pregnancy itself can lead to physiological changes in eGFR [46]. In elderly people with suspected rapid eGFR decline, it is important to exclude causes unrelated to ADPKD [40].

Markers of high risk of disease progression

Recommendation 5: We recommend assessment for risk of disease progression if there is a lack of evidence for rapid disease progression based on eGFR criteria. This evidence can be based on diagnostic imaging and/or genetic testing. It can be determined by (a) kidney length ≥ 16.5 cm (≤ 46 years), (b) total kidney volume ≥ 750 ml (TKV) (≤ 50 years), (c) Mayo imaging Class 1-E, (d) PROPKD score > 6.

People with ADPKD who do not have evidence of rapidly progressing disease based on eGFR losses should be evaluated for their risk of rapid disease progression using imaging, clinical and genetic prognostic markers. These markers, which are associated with more severe disease trajectories, can help predict future kidney outcomes before any noticeable decline in eGFR [47, 48].

Risk prediction using imaging modalities

Kidney length: The Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Study of PKD (CRISP) studies found that a kidney length of 16.5 cm (measured by US or MRI) effectively predicts the progression to CKD stage 3a over 8 years in participants younger or equal to 46 years. Ultrasound is preferred due to wider availability, lower cost and fewer restrictions in terms of metallic objects/implanted devices [49]. However, kidney length cannot reliably differentiate between PKD1 or PKD2 variants and its use alone may misclassify people with atypical ADPKD which is often focal but with a smaller number of large kidney cysts [50]. A longitudinal study reported that US height-adjusted mean kidney length > 9.5 cm/m combined with a PKD1 truncating variant, yielded a 100% positive predictive value for rapid progression (annual eGFR decline > 2.5 ml/min/1.73m2) and kidney failure before age 60 [51]. Thus, we recommend that an average kidney length greater than 16.5 cm in those aged 46 or younger can be regarded as evidence of a high risk of progression, in the knowledge that the best use of kidney length as a predictor of rapid progression is in those with typical ADPKD.

Total kidney volume: Extended CRISP study findings demonstrated that a TKV ≥ 600 ml/m predicts the risk of developing ESKD [52]. Trials like TEMPO 3:4 and REPRISE used a TKV ≥ 750 ml as an inclusion criterion for participants aged ≤ 50 years [20, 24]. Furthermore, Japan has adopted a TKV ≥ 750 ml as an approved indication for tolvaptan treatment [53]. Therefore, we recommend that a TKV ≥ 750 ml can be used as a marker of disease burden and high risk of disease progression in individuals aged 50 years or younger. The previous commentary included > 5% change in TKV with 3 measurements over 2–3 years but since this is rarely used in clinical practice in the UK, it has not been included in this commentary.

Mayo imaging classification: When MR or CT imaging is performed, the Mayo Imaging Classification (MIC) category can be determined using TKV, adjusted for age and height. MIC has been validated as a sensitive prognostic marker for people with “typical” ADPKD aged 15–80, helping predict progression to ESKD [26]. People classified as class 1 C-E are considered to be at “high risk” of rapid progression. If height measurements are not available, a single TKV measured by MR imaging ≥ 750 ml can be used as a predictor of rapid disease progression in people with ADPKD aged 18–50 years [11]. People with ADPKD classified as “typical” ADPKD class 1 A-B, “atypical” ADPKD class 2 and TKV < 750 ml are considered to have a low risk of progression [26].

Risk prediction using genetic and clinical factors

Predicting Renal Outcomes in ADPKD (PROPKD) score: The pathogenic variant in ADPKD can predict disease progression, with protein truncating variants in PKD1 linked to early ESKD with a median age 55 compared to missense PKD1 and PKD2 variants with median ages 67 and 79 respectively. The PROPKD score integrates genetic and clinical factors to identify those at risk of early-onset ESKD. A score of < 4 indicates low risk, while scores > 6 suggest high risk for rapid disease progression [27].

Confirm that there are no exclusions

Recommendation 6: We recommend that people with ADPKD should be assessed for potential contraindications/precautions prior to tolvaptan initiation.

Recommendation 7: We do not recommend tolvaptan use in people who are pregnant or breast-feeding.

Recommendation 8: We recommend advising people who may become pregnant of the potential teratogenic risk of tolvaptan and encourage them to use contraception.

Prior to prescribing tolvaptan, it is essential to discuss specific information with patients, as outlined in recommendations by Otsuka. Below is a summary of the contraindications and precautions associated with comorbidities that should be considered [54].

Contraindications

Tolvaptan should not be prescribed if the patient presents with any of the following conditions or signs [54]:

  • Elevated liver enzymes

  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or any of its constituents

  • Volume depletion

  • Uncorrected hypernatraemia (> 145 mmol/L)

  • Inability to perceive or respond to thirst

  • Pregnancy

  • Breastfeeding

  • Anuria

Precautions

If any of the following apply to the patient then tolvaptan may be prescribed with caution along with appropriate monitoring [54]:

  • Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C)

  • Cirrhosis

  • Limited access to water

  • Dehydration

  • Partial obstruction of urinary outflow

  • Fluid and electrolyte imbalance

  • Serum sodium abnormalities

  • Anaphylaxis

  • Lactose and galactose intolerance

  • Diabetes mellitus

  • Elevated uric acid concentration

  • Use of medicines likely to interact with Tolvaptan

Specific considerations in relation to pregnancy

Tolvaptan has been demonstrated to be teratogenic in animal models at maternally toxic doses, approximately 1-4 times the recommended dose of 90 mg/30 mg once daily. Thus, Otsuka recommends that tolvaptan is contraindicated during pregnancy [54, 55]. They recommend using contraception for at least four weeks before starting and for four weeks after stopping tolvaptan. We recommend that people who may become pregnant should be advised of the risks and encouraged to use contraception [55].

Specific considerations in relation to breastfeeding

It is not known whether tolvaptan is excreted in human milk, what effects there are on the breast-fed infant or the effects on milk production. Animal studies have shown the excretion of tolvaptan in milk [55]. Otsuka advises people not to breastfeed while taking tolvaptan and to delay breastfeeding for four weeks after stopping tolvaptan [56].

Consider potential drug interactions

Recommendation 9: We recommend that special care should be given when prescribing Tolvaptan alongside drugs that interfere with the action of CYP3A4.

Recommendation 10: We recommend tolvaptan dose adjustment should be considered with concurrent use of strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors but not with CYP3A4 inducers.

The British National Formulary (BNF) lists the drug interactions that can occur with concurrent use of tolvaptan. Tolvaptan is metabolised by the microsomal P450 drug-metabolising enzyme known as CYP3A4, so tolvaptan levels can be influenced by inhibitors and inducers of this enzyme [57].

Medications can interact with tolvaptan with four main consequences:

  • Increase exposure to tolvaptan

  • Decrease exposure to tolvaptan

  • Increased risk of hyperkalaemia

  • Tolvaptan increases exposure to other medication

Increase exposure to tolvaptan (CYP3A4 inhibitors)

Otsuka advises reducing the dose of tolvaptan with concurrent use of strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors [55]. The advised adjustments are indicated in Table 2 [58].

Table 2.

Tolvaptan dose adjustments for strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors [58, 59]

Dose adjustment
Strong inhibitors Moderate inhibitors
Total daily dose

120 mg

(90 mg + 30 mg)

30 mg once daily

(potential reduction to 15 mg)

60 mg twice daily

(45 mg + 15 mg)

90 mg

(60 mg + 30 mg)

30 mg once daily

(potential reduction to 15 mg)

45 mg twice daily

(30 mg + 15 mg)

60 mg

(45 mg + 15 mg)

15 mg once daily

30 mg twice daily

(15 mg + 15 mg)

Decrease exposure to tolvaptan (CYP3A4 inducers)

Otsuka does not advise dose adjustment of tolvaptan with concurrent use of strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers [59].

Increased risk of hyperkalaemia

Tolvaptan is associated with an acute reduction of extracellular fluid volume which could result in increased serum potassium levels [55, 60]. Certain drugs such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) or aldosterone antagonists can further increase the risk of hyperkalaemia when combined with tolvaptan. There is no published evidence on the optimal timing for monitoring of hyperkalaemia when co-administering tolvaptan with other medications that increase the risk of hyperkalaemia. It is advisable to conduct earlier monitoring, such as one week after initiation, when prescribing multiple medications that may affect potassium levels [61].

Tolvaptan influences the effect of other medications

Tolvaptan may increase the effects of the following medications: digoxin, dabigatran, sulfasalazine and metformin. It may lower the effect of desmopressin, a vasopressin analogue, used to increase clotting factors or control urine output/bedwetting [62].

Initiate and titrate dose of tolvaptan

Recommendation 11: We suggest a starting dose of tolvaptan 45 mg in the morning and 15 mg 6-8 h after the first dose.

Recommendation 12: We suggest doses should be up-titrated based on healthcare professional preference. Some centres increase doses at 28 day intervals in accordance with standard pack sizes of tolvaptan.

Recommendation 13: We suggest titrating to a maximum dosage of 120 mg per day Tolvaptan (90 mg/30 mg) in all patients unless not tolerated or contraindicated.

Tolvaptan in the management ADPKD is administered as a split dose due to its half-life, with a maximum daily dose of 120 mg. This dosing is based on the TEMPO 3:4 trial where 90 mg/30 mg was the highest tolerated dose [20]. Tolvaptan is available in 15 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg and 90 mg preparations [55].

The recommended initial dosing regimen for tolvaptan is 60 mg per day, divided into 45 mg in the morning and 15 mg 6–8 h later. To minimise nocturnal symptoms, patients are advised to take the final dose by 5pm [55]. For individuals with non-traditional working hours, these timings should align with their waking schedule while maintaining the specified interval between doses.

We agree with the manufacturer’s recommendation that the aim should be to up-titrate tolvaptan dose to a maximum of 120 mg (90 mg and 30 mg). In the TEMPO 3:4 trial, tolvaptan was started at 45 mg/15 mg which was up-titrated weekly to 60 mg/30 mg and then 90 mg/30mg [20]. There is no published guidance on the optimal titration regimen with varied practices between kidney units. We recognise the benefits of a pragmatic approach, such as up-titrating the dose of tolvaptan every four weeks based on the 28 tablet pack size of tolvaptan, with adjustments based on patient tolerance. In cases where people taking tolvaptan are not able to tolerate the starting dose of 60 mg daily (45 mg/15 mg), a dose reduction can be considered as an alternative to discontinuation. An example of the approach to titration is summarised in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Dosing regime and titration steps for tolvaptan

According to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) for tolvaptan, co-administration with a high-fat meal may increase the peak concentration of tolvaptan, although this effect has only been established for the 90 mg dose and not for 30 mg or 60 mg doses [63]. While this food effect is generally considered not clinically significant, the manufacturer recommends that the morning dose be taken under fasting conditions, specifically 30 min prior to breakfast. However, other clinical resources do not have this recommendation (BNF [59], Martindale through Medicines Complete [64] and UpToDate Lexidrug [65]). Furthermore, this morning timing in relation to food was not a component of clinical trials. Given the potential impact on patients who may already experience disturbed sleep due to nocturnal aquaretic effects, a pragmatic approach is recommended. We suggest that patients may take the morning dose with or without food, provided they are not consuming a very high-fat meal e.g. a full English breakfast.

Establish a monitoring plan during tolvaptan

Monitoring response to tolvaptan

Recommendation 14: We do not recommend any specific monitoring for tolvaptan treatment response or efficacy.

There are no validated markers to monitor or predict the effect of tolvaptan on eGFR or TKV at an individual level. V2 receptor blockade can be assessed by measuring urine osmolality, but while this reflects adherence, it is not a reliable efficacy marker due to fluid intake variability [66]. Copeptin increases with tolvaptan use, showing potential as a biomarker, but current data is insufficient for clinical application [67]. Comparisons of changes in eGFR and TKV to pre-treatment trends or MIC categories lack validated sensitivity so are not recommended for individual monitoring [20, 23, 24].

Monitoring kidney function and electrolytes

Recommendation 15: We recommend measuring kidney function monthly in line with liver function monitoring. An initial decline of 3–9% in eGFR may be expected when tolvaptan is started which is reversible on cessation.

Recommendation 16: We recommend the timing of the decision to stop tolvaptan when approaching kidney failure is best made between the person with ADPKD and their responsible healthcare professional.

Recommendation 17: Following the initiation of kidney replacement therapy, we recommend that tolvaptan should be stopped.

An initial decline of 3-9% in eGFR may occur after starting tolvaptan, depending on baseline kidney function which is reversible upon cessation [20, 23, 24]. This is similar but less pronounced than with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) [68, 69]. Kidney function is often monitored at least on the same schedule as liver function tests – monthly for the first 18 months then every 3 months thereafter.

Hyperkalaemia can occur with tolvaptan due to the acute reduction in extracellular fluid volume. In general, we suggest following the usual monitoring regime for kidney function monthly. Earlier monitoring at one week after initiation may be advisable where there is a higher risk of hyperkalaemia. Examples include the prescribing of multiple medications that influence potassium levels, CKD stage 3 or higher, aged 60 years or older, certain comorbidities (such as diabetes mellitus or peripheral arterial disease), or a history of hyperkalaemia [61].

The REPRISE trial demonstrated tolvaptan efficacy down to an eGFR of 25 ml/min/1.73m2 [24]. While there are no trials below this threshold, the BNF advises stopping tolvaptan at CKD stage 5 (eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73m2) [59]. We recommend discontinuing tolvaptan when kidney replacement therapy is initiated. The decision to stop tolvaptan earlier as eGFR declines is best made through shared decision-making taking patient preferences, healthcare professional experience and fluid balance considerations into account.

Monitoring liver function

Recommendation 18: We recommend measuring liver function monthly during the first 18 months of treatment then 3 monthly afterwards.

Liver function tests are mandated prior to the initiation of tolvaptan and monthly for 18 months then 3 monthly after that. This is based on the finding of the REPRISE trial that nearly all cases of treatment-associated liver abnormalities occurred within the first 18 months [24]. Advice on managing elevated liver enzymes is covered in the drug-induced liver injury section.

Manage side effects and adverse effects

Recommendation 19: We recommend discussing side effects with patients and providing written patient information prior to initiating tolvaptan.

Recommendation 20: We recommend withholding tolvaptan during periods of acute illness due to the increased risk of dehydration. This can be described as “sick day guidance” as advised for ACEi/ARBs.

Recommendation 21: In the event of suspected side effects or adverse drug reactions, we recommend that all healthcare professionals should submit a report to the Yellow Card Scheme.

Tolvaptan is associated with common and rare side effects, with clinical trials and real-world data indicating an increase in side effect frequency and severity at higher doses [20, 24, 70, 71]. All healthcare professionals involved in patient care have a responsibility to report suspected adverse drug reactions or new side effects. This is to provide an early warning that the safety of a product may require further investigation. Reports can be made using the yellow card website or on the Yellow Card app [72].

The main side effects of tolvaptan and their reported frequencies are summarised in Table 3 based on the study by Raina et al. [70] and the Teva Pharmaceuticals patient information leaflet for tolvaptan [56].

Table 3.

Side effects for tolvaptan by category and reported frequency [56, 70]

graphic file with name 12882_2025_3960_Tab3_HTML.jpg

Aquaretic side effects

As a selective V2 vasopressin receptor antagonist, it competes with vasopressin to bind to the V2 receptor preventing the translocation of aquaporin-2 channels in the kidney collecting duct leading to water excretion [73]. As a result, people taking tolvaptan commonly experience aquaretic side effects such as polyuria, nocturia, pollakiuria, polydipsia, thirst, dehydration and dry mouth [13, 74].

While people with early stage ADPKD stand to benefit most from tolvaptan, they are also more likely to experience these aquaretic side effects due to their relatively better urine concentrating ability compared to those with later stage disease. Thus, they will likely experience more aquaretic side effects reducing tolerability [75].

Some measures may make the aquaretic side effects more manageable:

  • Time-dependent attenuation

  • Dietary changes

  • Pharmacological

Time-dependent attenuation

People with ADPKD are advised to start tolvaptan on a weekend or when not at work, to allow time for adjustment to the aquaretic effects [31]. To minimise nocturia and sleep disturbance, we recommend that the second dose of tolvaptan not be taken too late in the afternoon. If nocturia continues to be a significant issue despite these adjustments, a reduction in the second dose may be considered, though this could reduce the overall efficacy of the treatment.

Dietary changes

Dietary changes that decrease osmolar loads, such as reducing salt and protein intake, may alleviate some of the aquaretic effects of tolvaptan [76, 77]. A lower sodium intake can help reduce natriuresis with the added benefit of improved blood pressure control [75, 77]. High-sodium foods, such as tinned items, instant mixes, condiments, snacks, pre-prepared meals, soft drinks and fast food, should be avoided. Furthermore, salt intake has been associated with accelerated disease progression in ADPKD [78]. We suggest people with ADPKD consume less than 5 g of sodium daily [7779].

In CKD management, excessive protein consumption is discouraged, with KDIGO guidelines recommending 0.8 g/kg/day for adults with an eGFR < 30 ml/min/1 [80]. Theoretically, the lower solute load from a low protein diet may reduce aquaretic side effects but this has not been shown in clinical trials. Studies on protein restriction in people with ADPKD in general, have failed to show any benefits and demonstrated a trend towards increased morbidity at low eGFR levels [78].

The effects of caffeine on natriuresis and diuresis in the context of ADPKD and tolvaptan is not fully understood. Coffee with high caffeine content can induce an acute diuretic effect [81]. Theoretically this may add to the aquaretic effects of tolvaptan but this has not been studied. The effect of caffeine on disease progression has been studied but remains inconclusive. Animal studies have shown that caffeine intake increases cyst growth through phosphodiesterase inhibition and cAMP accumulation [82]. However, caffeine has not been demonstrated to have a significant detrimental effect on disease progression in humans [8385]. At this time, we suggest avoiding excessive caffeine intake, especially later in the day due to the potential impact on sleep quantity and quality.

Pharmacological

Thiazide diuretics have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing polyuria by up to 50% in people with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus; the mechanism behind this paradoxical antidiuretic effect has not been fully elucidated [86]. A small-scale trial has suggested that the mechanism of action of thiazide diuretics may be an option to improve the tolerability of tolvaptan and adherence in the management of ADPKD [87]. At present there is insufficient evidence to recommend their use.

Dehydration

Recommendation 22: We suggest that a clinical assessment should be performed prior to initiation to identify risk factors for dehydration, fluid retention and/or dilution hyponatraemia.

Recommendation 23: We suggest that people with ADPKD, normal thirst and an eGFR > 30 ml/min/1.73m2should be informed of the increased need for hydration throughout the day and to ensure regular access to fluids.

Recommendation 24: We suggest that people with ADPKD and an eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2or those with a clinical contraindication to high fluid intake should drink to thirst and/or follow individualised clinical advice.

Given the need for high compensatory water intake before starting tolvaptan, people with ADPKD should be assessed for potential fluid intake issues and ability to meet the increased fluid requirements alongside their lifestyle and existing comorbidities. People with a compromised capacity to perceive and communicate thirst may be at higher risk of dehydration and hypernatremia. Otsuka advises healthcare professionals to instruct people taking tolvaptan to water when thirsty, and throughout the day and night if awake [55]. In clinical practice, the advice often given to people with ADPKD taking tolvaptan is to match their intake to their urine output, but this can be difficult to measure in practice. Target daily fluid intake volumes are often given but there is no clear evidence for any specific target volume. Best practice would be to personalise fluid intake for individual patients. In cases of reduced kidney function (< 30 ml/min/1.73m2) or comorbidities such as heart failure, we suggest that people on tolvaptan should be advised to drink to thirst or have a lower fluid intake recommendation due to the risk of fluid overload.

People with ADPKD and their healthcare providers should be advised to withhold tolvaptan and increase hydration in the setting of acute illnesses or high insensible fluid losses (e.g. warm weather) to prevent dehydration [31, 88]. This follows “sick day guidance” similar to that recommended for medications like ACEi and ARBs [89]. Tolvaptan should resume, at the dose prior to withholding, 24 h after recovery from the acute illness. Tolvaptan should also be withheld 24–48 h before elective surgery and not resume until patients are able to maintain adequate hydration [31].

Prescribers should be cautious when combining tolvaptan with other medications that increase the risk of hypovolaemia, such as diuretics. It may be appropriate to consider the need and suitability for both medications due to the increased risk of hypovolaemia, hypernatremia and kidney injury. Additionally, although the interaction between tolvaptan and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors is not well studied, there is a theoretical risk of increased diuretic effects and glomerular haemodynamic changes leading to a reduction in eGFR when both medications are used together [90].

Drug-induced liver injury

Recommendation 25: We recommend informing people taking tolvaptan of the risk of liver injury and encouraging them to self-report symptoms.

Recommendation 26: We recommend withholding tolvaptan in the event of suspected drug-induced liver injury to allow time to exclude other causes. It is important to continue monitoring liver enzymes until they return to normal or the individual’s baseline.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can occur after tolvaptan exposure, ranging from asymptomatic elevation in liver enzymes to acute liver failure [91]. People taking tolvaptan should be informed of the potential signs and symptoms of liver injury, as these may develop between clinic visits. We recommend that best practice would be for healthcare teams to review patients with signs or symptoms of liver injury within 48 h.

In the TEMPO 3:4 trial, DILI was identified as a rare side effect with 1.2% of participants discontinuing the trial for this reason [20]. In the extension TEMPO 4:4 trial, liver enzyme levels were monitored monthly for the first 18 months, during which no severe DILI cases were reported [23]. It is important to note that elevated liver enzymes do not always correlate with the extent of liver damage [92]. DILI is commonly defined using adjusted Hy’s law thresholds, characterised by alanine transferase (ALT) levels exceeding three times upper limit of normal and/or bilirubin levels exceeding twice the upper limit of normal in the absence of alternative causes [91, 93]. Timely recognition and withdrawal of tolvaptan is important when managing DILI. We have summarised a potential approach in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Recommendations for evaluation and management of suspected drug-induced liver injury (adapted from Chebib et al. [31] and British Society of Gastroenterology [94])

Investigations for other causes, whilst tolvaptan is withdrawn, may include [94, 95]:

  • Viral hepatitis: Hepatitis A virus antibody (IgM), Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (Anti-HBs), Hepatitis C virus antibody (with polymerase chain (PCR) if positive), Hepatitis E virus antibody (IgM), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody (IgM), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody (IgM)

  • Autoimmune conditions: Antinuclear antibody (ANA), Antimitochondrial antibody (AMA), Smooth muscle antibody (SMA)

  • Iron studies: Ferritin, Transferrin saturation (TSAT)

  • Immunoglobulins: IgA, IgG, IgM

  • Imaging: Ultrasound

Elevated liver enzymes typically return to normal after stopping tolvaptan and severe DILI is rare [20]. Observable changes in liver enzymes may be delayed as the half-life for ALT is around 2 days and bilirubin is 17–21 days [96]. If clinically warranted, the frequency of blood tests should be adjusted based on healthcare professional’s judgement. In people with ADPKD who develop DILI upon resuming tolvaptan, it should be stopped and re-exposure should not be attempted [31].

Electrolyte abnormalities

Higher serum potassium levels can occur with tolvaptan due to an acute reduction in extracellular fluid volume [55, 60]. Higher serum sodium levels were observed in the TEMPO 3:4 trial with a mean increase of less than 2.5 mmol/L at the end of the dose-escalation period [20]. In studies reporting real-world clinical experience [9799] and in the post-hoc analysis of the TEMPO 3:4 trial [100], a reduction in body weight was observed alongside mild elevations in sodium levels, with dehydration suggested as the underlying mechanism for hypernatremia. In such cases, healthcare professionals are advised to assess the individual’s fluid status if hypernatremia is identified during monitoring and to encourage an increase in fluid intake. The committee is not aware of any reports of rapid overcorrection of hyponatraemia. This is unlikely since there is a warning against using tolvaptan in people with serum sodium abnormalities and it is recommended that this is corrected before tolvaptan initiation [54, 59].

Urinary retention

Increased fluid intake necessitated by tolvaptan therapy may result in acute urinary retention in the presence of urinary outflow obstruction e.g. prostatic hypertrophy [101]. A clinical history suggestive of retention should be investigated by conducting a post-void bladder scan and referral to local urology services prior to starting tolvaptan. In these scenarios, a risk-benefit assessment should be undertaken as part of the shared decision-making process.

Other side effects

Urate levels can rise following the initiation of tolvaptan [73]. However, this is rarely significant in clinical practice. In cases of recurrent gout, we would recommend introducing dietary changes and starting allopurinol. If recurrent gout persists, it may be appropriate to consider stopping Tolvaptan.

In the TEMPO 3:4 trial, a higher number of people with ADPKD who received tolvaptan reported skin cancer compared to placebo, predominantly basal cell carcinoma (0.8% versus 0.2%) [20]. However, a causal relationship has not been established and the incidence was less frequent in the TEMPO 4:4 trial [102]. At present there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine monitoring or screening for people taking tolvaptan in the absence of clinical signs or symptoms of skin cancer.

In the TEMPO 3:4 trial, there was an unexpected signal in the adverse events for glaucoma amongst people who received tolvaptan compared to placebo (0.7% versus 0.4%) [20]. Following the trial, Otsuka engaged an independent expert in ophthalmology who did not identify a clear or consistent pattern that would attribute these events to tolvaptan [102]. For this reason, we do not recommend any changes to the NHS recommendation that the general population have their eyes checked every 2 years by an optician. This frequency may be adjusted based on the detection of abnormalities or as advised by their optician or ophthalmologist [103].

Considerations from a patient perspective

Recommendation 27: Based on patients’ perspectives of tolvaptan we suggest that the following factors should be taken into account when Tolvaptan is being considered – impact on lifestyle, occupation, family planning, healthcare appointments.

Recommendation 28: When discussing Tolvaptan with patients, it is recommended to provide a balanced overview of the positives and negatives.

Best practice involves making the decision to initiate tolvaptan through a shared decision-making process. This may include the perspectives of the individual with ADPKD, family members, carers, and healthcare professionals from different clinical backgrounds. When discussing potential side effects, it is important to try and present a balanced overview as well as discuss ways to help manage them. Some patients report that it is helpful to have supporting documents from their medical team to help them advocate for themselves, especially early in their journey on Tolvaptan. Effective communication between the medical team and people with ADPKD about potential side effects is crucial. A balanced presentation of tolvaptan’s benefits and side effects is essential, as both people with ADPKD and healthcare professionals can be influenced by framing effects related to timing, lifestyle, employment and healthcare adjustments [104106].

Positives that might be discussed with people with ADPKD will likely include the slowing of kidney function decline in those with rapid progression [20, 24], delaying the onset of kidney replacement therapy [107], and reducing kidney pain and infections [31]. Negatives discussed with people with ADPKD will likely include an increased thirst and polyuria [20, 24], the risk of liver injury [23], and the need for more monitoring appointments and blood tests.

The following advice has been provided in conjunction with expert patient opinions and those from the Tolvaptan community support group.

Starting the journey with tolvaptan

When people start taking tolvaptan therapy they often experience almost immediate changes in urinary frequency and thirst. Starting tolvaptan on a day when not at work and travel is not requires can ease the adjustment period [31]. Many people report that, over time – typically days to months – they can return to a near-normal lifestyle as they adapt to the aquaretic side effects. However, some may find that the time is not right to start or continue taking tolvaptan due to a limited ability to manage the side effects or attend the regular appointments e.g. temporary mobility issues or carer responsibilities. Additionally, those of childbearing age may opt to delay treatment until they have completed their family. People with ADPKD should be given the opportunity to restart tolvaptan in the future if they remain eligible when reassessed.

Tips for dosing and staying hydrated

To maximise comfort, people should take the morning dose of tolvaptan as early as possible, followed by the second dose 6–8 h later, ideally before 5pm. A pragmatic approach to the Otsuka timing 30 min before the morning meal should be taken. Provided that the meal is not a high-fat meal, such as a full English breakfast, this dose may be taken with or without food. This is important given the already significant impact on sleep patterns. Fluid intake should primarily consist of water to avoid excessive calories from sugary or fatty drinks. Suggestions for increasing hydration include using cold infused teabags or sparkling water to combat thirst especially during hot weather where water loss can be higher. When drinking alcohol, it is important that people taking tolvaptan drink more water than usual as alcoholic beverages may reduce thirst sensation. People taking tolvaptan should aim to match their fluid intake with their urine output, which averages around 6–8 L per day, and spread their fluid intake throughout the day and night. People taking tolvaptan should be informed of the indicators of dehydration (e.g. dizziness, light-headedness and pain) and be aware this means they need to drink more water.

Missing or skipping doses

Discussing “drug holidays” with patients can provide some flexibility during periods of limited restroom access e.g. long journeys or holidays. However, frequent or prolonged “drug holidays” should be discouraged to ensure optimal treatment efficacy.

Eating well to manage side effects

Dietary adjustment might help with side effects. People taking tolvaptan should be advised to minimise processed food and takeaways, cooking from scratch where possible to reduce salt intake. Some people taking tolvaptan report that high salt intake, especially later in the day, can impact their thirst and aquaretic side effects. Eating a larger meal at lunchtime and lighter meals in the evening has been reported by some people taking tolvaptan to help reduce water consumption overnight. Additionally, some people report that reducing red meat intake and having a lighter meal in the evening can lessen water consumption overnight.

Getting a good night’s sleep

To improve sleep quality, people taking tolvaptan should keep ample water accessible at their bedside (around 2 L). Earlier bedtimes should be encouraged given the impact of nocturia. Good practices when attending the bathroom overnight to make it easier to return to sleep could include avoiding turning on lights and looking at clocks, watches or mobile phones.

Navigating daily life

Carrying a letter from their nephrologist, the most senior possible, explaining the need to carry at least two litres of water and access to bathrooms can be helpful, particularly in the workplace or at concerts/theatres/sporting events. The UKKA has a copy of such a letter on the online version of this UKKA commentary. For long-distance travel, it is suggested that people taking tolvaptan can miss tolvaptan doses on the day of the trip as it can be difficult to manage hydration and bathroom breaks. When planning long journeys, people taking tolvaptan should schedule regular stops and consider wearing short, skirts or dresses while driving as this can facilitate easier bathroom access during traffic jams. Keeping wide-opening containers, like old sports water bottles, in the car can help manage emergencies discreetly with other items such as paper towels, a bucket or blankets for privacy. People taking tolvaptan are encouraged to purchase a “Radar key” for access to disabled toilets and obtain a “Just can’t wait” card from the Bladder and Bowel community for quick access to bathroom facilities when needed.

Being aware of drug interactions and implications for medical care

People taking tolvaptan should have a plan of who they should contact outside of clinic times should they develop a new symptom or they are unsure about a potential drug interaction. Given the specialist nature of tolvaptan, it is unlikely that their community healthcare team will be able to manage this alone. People taking tolvaptan should maintain an updated list of contraindicated medications and food. If temporary medications that interact with tolvaptan are required, such as antibiotics, it may be appropriate to withhold tolvaptan during their use. Prior to taking any herbal remedies or supplements, people taking tolvaptan should consult their medical team. When undergoing surgery that needs general anaesthesia, tolvaptan should be stopped for 3–4 beforehand to minimise the risk during fasting. While the side effects described by manufacturers originate from clinical trials, people taking tolvaptan should be aware that if they develop new symptoms, they should contact their medical team. People taking tolvaptan should attend regular dentist appointments to monitor their gum health as tolvaptan can lead to severe dry mouth. A summary of key information should be given to people taking tolvaptan in the form of a local patient information leaflet or manufacturer leaflet should this not exist. Where possible appointments should be supported through drop-in or drive-through phlebotomy services and remote appointments in virtual or telephone clinics.

Balancing work and health

People taking tolvaptan need to attend regular appointments, which can affect their employment, finances and overall quality of life. They should be aware of local and national support e.g. social services, Kidney Care UK grants. Despite protections under the Equality Act 2010 [108], people with ADPKD may face discrimination in the workplace. These issues stem from the often invisible nature of ADPKD and unawareness of the effects of tolvaptan [17]. While some adjustments like access to water and bathroom facilities, are relatively straightforward, others such as nocturia affecting sleep quality may be less obvious and particularly challenging for jobs requiring focus, like driving or operating heavy machinery. Patients may benefit from a letter addressed to their employer from their nephrologist, the most senior possible, which explains the need for regular water access and toilet facilities.

Reasonable workplace adjustments could include: (i) Ensuring easy access to refreshment facilities such as water in the workplace, (ii) Ensuring bathroom facilities are easily accessible and there is no restriction on “bathroom breaks”, (iii) Allowing employees to have flexible working hours if they experience nocturia that affects the quality and duration of their sleep, (iv) Doing things another way such as allowing someone on Tolvaptan to have their desk nearer to the bathroom facilities instead of hot-desking.

Recommendations for kidney units managing ADPKD and initiating tolvaptan

Recommendation 29: Based on the perspectives of the members of the committee working group we suggest the following:

  • Initial assessment and follow-up in a dedicated genetic/ADPKD/tolvaptan clinic where possible

  • Multidisciplinary team input

  • An established pathway for patients with ADPKD on tolvaptan to interact with their kidney unit outside of clinic times

  • A three-dimensional scan should be performed as part of the initial assessment of a person with ADPKD

  • All people with ADPKD should be offered genetic testing where available and appropriate as this could inform patient eligibility for tolvaptan

  • We encourage the registration and monitoring of people with ADPKD through the UKKA RaDaR registry

In a 2018 survey on tolvaptan prescribing practices in the UK, 93% (41 of 44 centres) of the kidney centres surveyed used tolvaptan in the management of people with ADPKD. Tolvaptan was delivered by a mixture of multi-disciplinary teams, a single responsible clinician and multiple independent clinician models. Assessment methods for tolvaptan eligibility in the responding kidney centres included eGFR slope (100%), mean US kidney length (82%), MRI TKV (53%) and genotype (24%). It is important to note that this survey did not include responses from all kidney units in the UK [109]. Since this survey, the landscape of ADPKD management has changed through the more widespread availability of genetic testing in the NHS and the increasing availability of automated methods for measuring TKV [110].

In this section of the commentary, we describe the best practices in the provision of tolvaptan to people with ADPKD in the UK.

Healthcare setting

As mentioned in the aforementioned survey, there exists a variety of models used in the delivery of tolvaptan as part of ADPKD care [109]. We recommend that best practice is likely to involve an initial assessment and follow-up undertaken in a kidney unit located at a secondary or tertiary centre [13]. Ideally, this should be under the supervision of nephrologists with a special interest in ADPKD. We recommend that care, where possible, should be multi-disciplinary in nature.

Imaging

The same survey demonstrated that not all kidney units had access to MRI assessment [109]. We recommend that where possible, an initial three-dimensional MRI or CT scan should be performed as part of the initial assessment of a person with ADPKD in order to have a reliable baseline radiological evaluation of the kidneys and to obtain a total kidney volume (TKV). Considering the small changes in kidney volume between follow-up appointments, volumetric evaluation should not be performed more frequently than every 12 months unless clinically indicated. The increasing availability of automated methods for measuring TKV should make this easier to obtain in the future [110].

Genetic screening

In the aforementioned survey, it was indicated that a limited number of kidney units had access to genetic testing [109]. However, this is likely to have changed given the widespread availability of genetic testing now. All people with ADPKD should be offered genetic testing where appropriate. Genetic testing has the potential for an earlier diagnosis to inform lifestyle changes, initiation of tolvaptan, family planning and living donation information. However, there are potential important legal, insurance and psychosocial issues that can arise from a genetic diagnosis that should be discussed with people suspected of having ADPKD and those close to them prior to testing [17].

RaDaR

The National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR) was developed to collate information from people with certain rare kidney diseases. There are potential benefits for the individual with ADPKD as well as the ADPKD community as a whole for patients to be registered with RaDaR. These include access to relevant information, the potential to contribute to new knowledge, become involved in research studies and attending information events. We recommend that people with ADPKD who are interested should be directed to the RaDaR website.

Conclusion

This commentary offers comprehensive and practical guidance on optimising tolvaptan use in ADPKD care. By integrating up-to-date evidence, real-world insights and patient perspectives, we present actionable recommendations that emphasise patient-centred approaches to optimise outcomes. Through close attention to eligibility criteria, side effect management and patient education, a holistic framework emerges that facilitates adherence and enhances quality of life. Balancing medical guidance with the lived experiences of patients leads to adaptable, practical strategies for initiating tolvaptan, ultimately driving better care for people with ADPKD.

Acknowledgements

This article was prepared on behalf of the UKKA Working Group on Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Further acknowledgements are necessary to those who contributed their expertise to the guidance: Dr Jiehan Chong, Nour Ajjan and Dr Ramu Chimakurthi.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ACEi

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitor

ADPKD

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

ANA

Antinuclear Antibody

AMA

Antimitochondrial Antibody

ARB

Angiotensin Receptor Blocker

BNF

British National Formulary

CAMP

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate

CRISP

Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Study of PKD

CT

Computed Tomography

DILI

Drug Induced Liver Injury

eGFR

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

NHS

National Health Service

NICE

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

PCR

Polymerase Chain Reaction

PROPKD

Predicting Renal Outcomes in ADPKD

REPRISE

Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: an Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in ADPKD

SGLT2i

Sodium-Glucose Transport Protein 2 inhibitors

SMA

Smooth Muscle Antibody

SMC

Scottish Medicines Compendium

SPC

Summary of Product Characteristics

TEMPO

Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and its Outcomes

TKV

Total Kidney Volume

TSAT

Transferrin Saturation

US

Ultrasound

Authors’ contributions

MG drafted the manuscript, produced all images and coordinated the development of the study. HH provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. TH provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. SB provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. NP provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. DG provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. RS provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. TW provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. AA provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. AW provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. MC provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. EL provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. AO conceptualised the study and provided critical revisions and expert guidance on content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No specific funding was provided for this study. However, the lead author, Matt Gittus, is supported by a funded PhD fellowship from THIS. Institute. The funding body had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data or writing of the manuscript.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No ethical approval was sought for this study.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was given by the UKKA.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Tess Harris is deceased.

Contributor Information

Matt Gittus, Email: mjgittus1@sheffield.ac.uk.

Albert CM Ong, Email: a.ong@sheffield.ac.uk.

References

  • 1.Ong ACM, Harris PC. Molecular pathogenesis of ADPKD: the polycystin complex gets complex. Kidney Int. 2005;67(4):1234–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Iglesias CG, Torres VE, Offord KP, Holley KE, Beard CM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of adult polycystic kidney disease, Olmsted County, Minnesota: 1935–1980. Am J Kidney Dis. 1983;2(6):630–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Solazzo A, Testa F, Giovanella S, Busutti M, Furci L, Carrera P, et al. The prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): a meta-analysis of European literature and prevalence evaluation in the Italian province of Modena suggest that ADPKD is a rare and underdiagnosed condition. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Willey CJ, Blais JD, Hall AK, Krasa HB, Makin AJ, Czerwiec FS. Prevalence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in the European Union. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant. 2017;32(8):1356–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Neumann HP, Jilg C, Bacher J, Nabulsi Z, Malinoc A, Hummel B, et al. Epidemiology of autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease: an in-depth clinical study for south-western Germany. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant. 2013;28(6):1472–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rossetti S, Hopp K, Sikkink RA, Sundsbak JL, Lee YK, Kubly V, et al. Identification of gene mutations in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease through targeted resequencing. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(5):915–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heyer CM, Sundsbak JL, Abebe KZ, Chapman AB, Torres VE, Grantham JJ, et al. Predicted mutation strength of nontruncating PKD1 mutations aids genotype-phenotype correlations in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(9):2872–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cornec-Le Gall E, Audrézet MP, Chen JM, Hourmant M, Morin MP, Perrichot R, et al. Type of PKD1 mutation influences renal outcome in ADPKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(6):1006–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peters DJ, Sandkuijl LA. Genetic heterogeneity of polycystic kidney disease in Europe. Contrib Nephrol. 1992;97:128–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hwang Y-H, Conklin J, Chan W, Roslin NM, Liu J, He N, et al. Refining genotype-phenotype correlation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(6):1861–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Harris PC, Torres VE. Polycystic kidney disease, autosomal dominant. 2018.
  • 12.Bergmann C, Guay-Woodford LM, Harris PC, Horie S, Peters DJ, Torres VE. Polycystic kidney disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ong AC, Devuyst O, Knebelmann B, Walz G. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: the changing face of clinical management. Lancet. 2015;385(9981):1993–2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lavu S, Vaughan LE, Senum SR, Kline TL, Chapman AB, Perrone RD, et al. The value of genotypic and imaging information to predict functional and structural outcomes in ADPKD. JCI Insight. 2020;5(15):e138724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oberdhan D, Cole JC, Krasa HB, Cheng R, Czerwiec FS, Hays RD, et al. Development of the autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease impact scale: a new health-related quality-of-life instrument. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;71(2):225–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Suwabe T, Ubara Y, Mise K, Kawada M, Hamanoue S, Sumida K, et al. Quality of life of patients with ADPKD—Toranomon PKD QOL study: cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14(1):179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gittus M, Harris T, Ong AC. Patient perspectives on ADPKD. Adv Kidney Dis Health. 2023;30(3):294–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoover E, Holliday V, Merullo N, Oberdhan D, Perrone RD, Rusconi C, et al. Pain and Health-related quality of life in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: results from a National Patient-Powered Registry. Kidney Med. 2024;6(5):100813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Torres VE, Harris PC. Strategies targeting cAMP signaling in the treatment of polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(1):18–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Gansevoort RT, Grantham JJ, Higashihara E, et al. Tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(25):2407–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Tolvaptan for treating autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (TA358). 2015.
  • 22.Scottish Medicines Consortium. Tolvaptan (SMC No. 1114/1115). 2016.
  • 23.Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Gansevoort RT, Perrone RD, Dandurand A, et al. Multicenter, open-label, extension trial to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of early versus delayed treatment with tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: the TEMPO 4: 4 trial. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant. 2018;33(3):477–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Gansevoort RT, Perrone RD, Koch G, et al. Tolvaptan in later-stage autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1930–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Torres VE, Gansevoort RT, Chapman AB, Perrone RD, Ouyang J, Lee J, et al. A Post Hoc Analysis of Tolvaptan (TOL) efficacy and safety in slowing rate of renal function decline in subjects with very late-stage autosomal Dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): PO1534. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(10S):490. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Irazabal MV, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Osborn SL, Harmon AJ, Sundsbak JL, et al. Imaging classification of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a simple model for selecting patients for clinical trials. J Am Soc Nephrology: JASN. 2015;26(1):160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cornec-Le Gall E, Audrézet M-P, Rousseau A, Hourmant M, Renaudineau E, Charasse C, et al. The PROPKD score: a new algorithm to predict renal survival in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrology: JASN. 2016;27(3):942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ong AC. Tolvaptan slows disease progression in late-stage ADPKD. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(3):146–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Edwards ME, Chebib FT, Irazabal MV, Ofstie TG, Bungum LA, Metzger AJ, et al. Long-term administration of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrology: CJASN. 2018;13(8):1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McGill RL, Saunders MR, Hayward AL, Chapman AB. Health disparities in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;17(7):976–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chebib FT, Perrone RD, Chapman AB, Dahl NK, Harris PC, Mrug M, et al. A practical guide for treatment of rapidly progressive ADPKD with tolvaptan. J Am Soc Nephrology: JASN. 2018;29(10):2458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pei Y, Hwang Y-H, Conklin J, Sundsbak JL, Heyer CM, Chan W, et al. Imaging-based diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrology: JASN. 2015;26(3):746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pei Y, Watnick T. Diagnosis and screening of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010;17(2):140–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chebib FT, Torres VE. Autosomal Dominant polycystic kidney disease: core curriculum 2016. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67(5):792–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.NHS England. The structure of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service 2023. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/genomics/the-structure-of-the-nhs-genomic-medicine-service/.
  • 36.NHS National Services Scotland. SSNGM rare and inherited disease test directory 2023. Available from: https://www.nss.nhs.scot/publications/ssngm-rare-and-inherited-disease-test-directory/.
  • 37.All Wales Medical Genomics Service. All Wales medical genomic service 2023. Available from: https://medicalgenomicswales.co.uk/index.php/download-services.
  • 38.Belfast Health and Social Care Trust. Clinical genetics service 2023. Available from: https://belfasttrust.hscni.net/service/laboratory-services/clinical-genetics/.
  • 39.Mekahli D, Guay-Woodford LM, Cadnapaphornchai MA, Greenbaum LA, Litwin M, Seeman T, et al. Tolvaptan for children and adolescents with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: randomized controlled trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;18(1):36–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Müller R-U, Messchendorp AL, Birn H, Capasso G, Cornec-Le Gall E, Devuyst O, et al. An update on the use of tolvaptan for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: consensus statement on behalf of the ERA Working Group on Inherited Kidney Disorders, the European rare kidney Disease Reference Network and polycystic kidney Disease International. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant. 2022;37(5):825–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.National Kidney Foundation. Diagnostic tests & procedures - Estimated glomerular filtration rate 2022. Available from: https://www.kidney.org/sites/default/files/01-10-8374_2212_patflyer_egfr.pdf.
  • 42.Spithoven EM, Kramer A, Meijer E, Orskov B, Wanner C, Abad JM, et al. Renal replacement therapy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in Europe: prevalence and survival—an analysis of data from the ERA-EDTA Registry. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant. 2014;29(suppl4):iv15–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Messchendorp AL, van Londen M, Taylor JM, de Borst MH, Navis G, Casteleijn NF, et al. Kidney function reserve capacity in early and later stage autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrology: CJASN. 2018;13(11):1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thöni S, Keller F, Denicolò S, Buchwinkler L, Mayer G. Biological variation and reference change value of the estimated glomerular filtration rate in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2022;9:1009358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Alan S, Shen C, Landsittel DP, Grantham JJ, Cook LT, Torres VE, et al. Long-term trajectory of kidney function in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2019;95(5):1253–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cheung KL, Lafayette RA. Renal physiology of pregnancy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2013;20(3):209–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Müller RU, Haas CS, Sayer JA. Practical approaches to the management of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients in the era of tolvaptan. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11(1):62–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schrier RW, Brosnahan G, Cadnapaphornchai MA, Chonchol M, Friend K, Gitomer B, et al. Predictors of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease progression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(11):2399–418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bhutani H, Smith V, Rahbari-Oskoui F, Mittal A, Grantham JJ, Torres VE, et al. A comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging shows that kidney length predicts chronic kidney disease in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2015;88(1):146–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chebib FT, Torres VE. Assessing risk of rapid progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and special considerations for disease-modifying therapy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;78(2):282–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen EW, Chong J, Valluru MK, Durkie M, Simms RJ, Harris PC, et al. Combining genotype with height-adjusted kidney length predicts rapid progression of ADPKD. Nephrol Dialysis Transplantat. 2024;39(6):956–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chapman AB, Bost JE, Torres VE, Guay-Woodford L, Bae KT, Landsittel D, et al. Kidney volume and functional outcomes in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrology: CJASN. 2012;7(3):479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ministry of Health WaLoJ-PRD. Polycystic kidney disease clinical guideline. 2010.
  • 54.Otsuka. Jinarc (tolvaptan) prescribing checklist for treatment initiation (section A) & patient monitoring (section B) 2020. Available from: https://www.hpra.ie/img/uploaded/swedocuments/f75b8830-1618-4094-98f3-b688c0819ef4.pdf.
  • 55.Otsuka. Full prescribing information JYNARQUE. 2009. Available from: https://www.otsuka-us.com/sites/g/files/qhldwo7076/files/media/static/JYNARQUE-PI.pdf.
  • 56.TEVA UK. Tolvaptan TEVA - patient/carer education brochure 2021. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/files/pil.12631.pdf.
  • 57.Shoaf SE, Bricmont P, Mallikaarjun S. Effects of CYP3A4 inhibition and induction on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tolvaptan, a non-peptide AVP antagonist in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;73(4):579–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Monthly Index of Medical Specialties (MIMS). Tolvaptan - Full prescribing info 2024. Available from: https://www.mims.com/hongkong/drug/info/jinarc?type=full.
  • 59.British National Formulary. Tolvaptan - Medicinal forms 2023. Available from: https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/tolvaptan/medicinal-forms/.
  • 60.Otsuka. Product monograph - Jinarc (tolvaptan) 2015. Available from: https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00053695.PDF.
  • 61.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors 2024. Available from: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/heart-failure-chronic/prescribing-information/ace-inhibitors/.
  • 62.TEVA pharmaceuticals. Tolvaptan - package leaflet: information for the user 2023. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/files/pil.12631.pdf.
  • 63.Electronic Medicines Compendium. Tolvaptan TEVA 15 mg + 45 mg tablets 2023. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/12631/smpc/print.
  • 64.Medicines Complete. Medicines complete 2024. Available from: https://www.medicinescomplete.com/log-in/#/browse/martindale.
  • 65.UpToDate T. 2024. Available from: https://store.wolterskluwercdi.com/CDI.
  • 66.Devuyst O, Chapman AB, Gansevoort RT, Higashihara E, Perrone RD, Torres VE, et al. Urine osmolality, response to tolvaptan, and outcome in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: results from the TEMPO 3: 4 trial. J Am Soc Nephrology: JASN. 2017;28(5):1592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gansevoort RT, van Gastel MD, Chapman AB, Blais JD, Czerwiec FS, Higashihara E, et al. Plasma copeptin levels predict disease progression and tolvaptan efficacy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2019;96(1):159–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bakris GL, Weir MR. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor–associated elevations in serum creatinine: is this a cause for concern? Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(5):685–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Holtkamp FA, De Zeeuw D, Thomas MC, Cooper ME, De Graeff PA, Hillege HJ, et al. An acute fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate during treatment with losartan predicts a slower decrease in long-term renal function. Kidney Int. 2011;80(3):282–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Raina R, Houry A, Rath P, Mangat G, Pandher D, Islam M et al. Clinical utility and tolerability of tolvaptan in the treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Drug, healthcare and patient safety. 2022:147 – 59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 71.Higashihara E, Torres VE, Chapman AB, Grantham JJ, Bae K, Watnick TJ, et al. Tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: three years’ experience. Clin J Am Soc Nephrology: CJASN. 2011;6(10):2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Yellow card - Information unknown. Available from: https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/information.
  • 73.Ali Y, Dohi K, Okamoto R, Katayama K, Ito M. Novel molecular mechanisms in the inhibition of adrenal aldosterone synthesis: action of tolvaptan via vasopressin V2 receptor-independent pathway. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176(9):1315–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Blair HA, Tolvaptan. A review in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Drugs. 2019;79(3):303–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kramers BJ, van Gastel MD, Boertien WE, Meijer E, Gansevoort RT. Determinants of urine volume in ADPKD patients using the vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73(3):354–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Amro OW, Paulus JK, Noubary F, Perrone RD. Low-osmolar diet and adjusted water intake for vasopressin reduction in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(6):882–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lambert K, Gardos R, Coolican H, Pickel L, Sung HK, Wang AY, et al. Diet and polycystic kidney disease: nutrients, foods, dietary patterns, and implications for practice. Semin Nephrol. 2023;43(2):151405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kramers BJ, Koorevaar IW, Drenth JPH, de Fijter JW, Neto AG, Peters DJM, et al. Salt, but not protein intake, is associated with accelerated disease progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2020;98(4):989–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tarabzuni O, Tarabzuni O. The effect of dietary intervention on autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients on Tolvaptan and their quality of life. Cureus. 2022;14(5):e25045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Levin A, Stevens PE. Summary of KDIGO 2012 CKD Guideline: behind the scenes, need for guidance, and a framework for moving forward. Kidney Int. 2014;85(1):49–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Seal AD, Bardis CN, Gavrieli A, Grigorakis P, Adams J, Arnaoutis G, et al. Coffee with high but not low caffeine content augments fluid and electrolyte excretion at rest. Front Nutr. 2017;4:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Meca R, Balbo BE, Ormanji MS, Fonseca JM, Iannuzzi LR, Costa ES et al. Caffeine accelerates cystic kidney disease in a Pkd1-deficient mouse model. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2019;52(5):1061–74. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 83.Girardat-Rotar L, Puhan MA, Braun J, Serra AL. Long-term effect of coffee consumption on autosomal dominant polycystic kidneys disease progression: results from the Suisse ADPKD, a prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Nephrol. 2018;31:87–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.McKenzie KA, El Ters M, Torres VE, Harris PC, Chapman AB, Mrug M, et al. Relationship between caffeine intake and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease progression: a retrospective analysis using the CRISP cohort. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Vendramini L, Nishiura J, Baxmann A, Heilberg I. Caffeine intake by patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012;45:834–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kramers BJ, van Gastel MDA, Meijer E, Gansevoort RT. Case report: a thiazide diuretic to treat polyuria induced by tolvaptan. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kramers BJ, Koorevaar IW, van Gastel MD, van Goor H, Hallows KR, Heerspink HL, et al. Effects of hydrochlorothiazide and metformin on aquaresis and nephroprotection by a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist in ADPKD: a randomized crossover trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;17(4):507–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Capelli I, Iacovella F, Ghedini L, Aiello V, Napoletano A, Marconi L, et al. A case report of tolvaptan therapy for ADPKD patients with COVID-19. The need for appropriate counselling for temporary drug discontinuation. In Vivo. 2022;36(4):1994–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Think Kidneys. Sick day guidance in patients at risk of acute kidney injury: a position statement from the Think Kidneys board 2018. Available from: https://www.thinkkidneys.nhs.uk/aki/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/01/Think-Kidneys-Sick-Day-Guidance-2018.pdf.
  • 90.Morioka F, Nakatani S, Uedono H, Tsuda A, Mori K, Emoto M. Short-term dapagliflozin administration in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease—A retrospective single-arm case series study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(19):6341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Alpers DH, Lewis JH, Hunt CM, Freston JW, Torres VE, Li H, et al. Clinical pattern of tolvaptan-associated liver injury in trial participants with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): an analysis of pivotal clinical trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2023;81(3):281–93. e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Attalah E, A GP. Drug-induced liver injury 2023. Available from: https://www.bsg.org.uk/web-education-articles-list/drug-induced-liver-injury/.
  • 93.Watkins PB, Lewis JH, Kaplowitz N, Alpers DH, Blais JD, Smotzer DM, et al. Clinical pattern of tolvaptan-associated liver injury in subjects with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: analysis of clinical trials database. Drug Saf. 2015;38:1103–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Newsome PN, Cramb R, Davison SM, Dillon JF, Foulerton M, Godfrey EM, et al. Guidelines on the management of abnormal liver blood tests. Gut. 2018;67(1):6–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Katarey D, Verma S. Drug-induced liver injury. Clin Med. 2016;16(Suppl 6):s104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Giannini EG, Testa R, Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians. CMAJ. 2005;172(3):367–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Naranjo J, Borrego F, Rocha JL, Salgueira M, Martín-Gomez MA, Orellana C, et al. Real clinical experience after one year of treatment with tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:987092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Yamazaki M, Kawano H, Miyoshi M, Kimura T, Takahashi K, Muto S, et al. Long-Term effects of Tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: predictors of treatment response and safety over 6 years of continuous therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(4):2088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Irazabal MV, Torres VE, Hogan MC, Glockner J, King BF, Ofstie TG, et al. Short-term effects of tolvaptan on renal function and volume in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2011;80(3):295–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Heida JE, Gansevoort RT, Torres VE, Devuyst O, Perrone RD, Lee J, et al. The effect of tolvaptan on BP in polycystic kidney disease: a post hoc analysis of the TEMPO 3: 4 trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(7):1801–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Samsca. Tolvaptan - Effect on fluid balance 2021. Available from: https://www.samsca.com/hyponatremia-heart-failure/efficacy/fluid-balance.
  • 102.European Medicines Agency. Assessment report - Jinarc 2015. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/jinarc-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf.
  • 103.National Health Service. Visiting an opticians 2023. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/opticians/visiting-an-optician/#:~:text=The%20NHS%20recommends%20that%20you,test%20is%20considered%20clinically%20necessary.
  • 104.Popovich I, Szecket N, Nahill A. Framing of clinical information affects physicians’ diagnostic accuracy. Emerg Med J. 2019;36(10):589–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Almashat S, Ayotte B, Edelstein B, Margrett J. Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(1):102–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gong J, Zhang Y, Feng J, Huang Y, Wei Y, Zhang W. Influence of framing on medical decision making. Excli J. 2013;12:20–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Bennett H, McEwan P, Hamilton K, O’Reilly K. Modelling the long-term benefits of tolvaptan therapy on renal function decline in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: an exploratory analysis using the ADPKD outcomes model. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.UK Government. Reasonable adjustments for workers with disabilities or health conditions 2023. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/reasonable-adjustments-for-disabled-workers.
  • 109.Chong J, Harris T, Ong AC. Regional variation in tolvaptan prescribing across England: national data and retrospective evaluation from an expert centre. Clin Kidney J. 2023;16(1):61–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Taylor J, Thomas R, Metherall P, van Gastel M, Cornec-Le Gall E, Caroli A, et al. An Artificial Intelligence Generated Automated Algorithm to measure total kidney volume in ADPKD. Kidney Int Rep. 2024;9(2):249–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from BMC Nephrology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES