Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 3;136(2):173–185. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0741-y

Table 3.

Prospective randomized brachytherapy studies for primary malignant gliomas

Trial Laperriere et al. 1998 Selker et al. 2002
Technique 125I + EBRT vs. EBRT 125I + EBRT + BCNU vs. EBRT + BCNU
No. of patients 71b vs. 69 133 vs. 137
KPS 70–100 50–100
Histology GBM GBM (123):AA (10):AO (3):MMG (1)
Tumor size/median (cm3) 2.5–158/42.3 1–117/21
Isotope (T/P) 125I (T) 125I (T)
Total dose (median, Gy) 57.22–67.69 (60) 60
Dose rate (median, Gy/h) 0.21–1.25 (0.7) 0.4
Adjuvant therapy EBRT (50 Gy) EBRT (60.2 Gy) + BCNU (1,500 mg/m2, intravenously)
Extent of resection
 Subtotal resection 51 21
 Partial resection 70 210
 Biopsy 19 39
Median survival (weeks) 62.8 vs. 52.8 68.1 (GBM only:64.0) vs. 58.8
Necrosis in specimen (%) 65(92) vs. 60(87) 11 (15) vs. 15 (23)
Rate of severe toxicity related to implanta (%) 4.8 NA
Reoperation rate (%) 31 vs. 33 54 vs. 47
Favorable prognostic factors Age ≤50, KPS ≥90, chemotherapy at recurrence, reoperation at the original tumor site Age ≤54, KPS ≥70, non-GBM histology, male
Recurrence patterns (%)
 Original site 82 vs. 93 NA
 Original site + multifocal 7 vs. 0 NA
 Alive at last observation (%) 8.5 vs. 5.8 NA

T temporary implant, P permanent implant, GBM glioblastoma multiforme, AA anaplastic astrocytoma, AO anaplastic oligodendroglioma, MMG malignant mixed glioma, EBRT external beam radiation, NA not available

aSerious complications defined as hemorrhage, infection, permanent neurological deficit

bOnly 63 of 71 patients actually received implant