Table 3.
Relationship between TyG-BMI and GDM risk in different models
| Exposure | Crude model (OR, 95%CI, P) |
Model I (OR, 95%CI, P) |
Model II (OR, 95%CI, P) |
Model III (OR, 95%CI, P) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TyG-BMI | 1.03 (1.02, 1.04) < 0.0001 | 1.03 (1.02, 1.04) < 0.0001 | 1.03 (1.02, 1.04) < 0.0001 | 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) < 0.0001 |
| TyG-BMI tertile | ||||
| T1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| T2 | 2.38 (0.61, 9.35) 0.2132 | 2.36 (0.60, 9.26) 0.2189 | 2.00 (0.50, 7.96) 0.3273 | 1.77 (0.44, 7.12) 0.4187 |
| T3 | 9.84 (2.93, 33.07) 0.0002 | 10.00 (2.96, 33.74) 0.0002 | 5.46 (1.51, 19.75) 0.0096 | 3.73 (0.99, 14.12) 0.0522 |
| P for trend | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.0035 | 0.0322 |
Crude model: unadjusted
Model I: Adjusted for age and parity
Model II: Adjusted for age, parity, AST, LDL, hepatic steatosis, GGT, ALT, and HDL
Model III: Adjusted for age, parity, AST, insulin, LDL, hepatic steatosis, GGT, ALT, and HDL