Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 17;25:170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07294-9

Table 3.

Relationship between TyG-BMI and GDM risk in different models

Exposure Crude model
(OR, 95%CI, P)
Model I
(OR, 95%CI, P)
Model II
(OR, 95%CI, P)
Model III
(OR, 95%CI, P)
TyG-BMI 1.03 (1.02, 1.04) < 0.0001 1.03 (1.02, 1.04) < 0.0001 1.03 (1.02, 1.04) < 0.0001 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) < 0.0001
TyG-BMI tertile
T1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
T2 2.38 (0.61, 9.35) 0.2132 2.36 (0.60, 9.26) 0.2189 2.00 (0.50, 7.96) 0.3273 1.77 (0.44, 7.12) 0.4187
T3 9.84 (2.93, 33.07) 0.0002 10.00 (2.96, 33.74) 0.0002 5.46 (1.51, 19.75) 0.0096 3.73 (0.99, 14.12) 0.0522
P for trend < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0035 0.0322

Crude model: unadjusted

Model I: Adjusted for age and parity

Model II: Adjusted for age, parity, AST, LDL, hepatic steatosis, GGT, ALT, and HDL

Model III: Adjusted for age, parity, AST, insulin, LDL, hepatic steatosis, GGT, ALT, and HDL