Table 4.
Relationship between TyG-BMI and GDM risk in different sensitivity analyses
| Exposure | Model I (OR, 95%CI, P) | Model II (OR, 95%CI, P) |
|---|---|---|
| TyG-BMI | 1.03 (1.00, 1.06) 0.0375 | 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) 0.0120 |
| TyG-BMI tertile | ||
| T1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| T2 | 1.83 (0.45, 7.42) 0.3960 | 1.74 (0.41, 7.43) 0.4522 |
| T3 | 2.66 (0.59, 12.01) 0.2033 | 3.90 (1.00, 15.14) 0.0494 |
| P for trend | 0.2000 | 0.0403 |
Model I adjusted for age, parity, LDL, insulin, AST, ALT, GGT, hepatic steatosis, and HDL in participants with a pre-pregnancy BMI < 25 kg/m2 (n = 493)
Model II included individuals with grade 0 hepatic steatosis (n = 478), adjusting for age, parity, insulin, LDL, ALT, GGT, AST, and HDL