Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 17;25:170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07294-9

Table 4.

Relationship between TyG-BMI and GDM risk in different sensitivity analyses

Exposure Model I (OR, 95%CI, P) Model II (OR, 95%CI, P)
TyG-BMI 1.03 (1.00, 1.06) 0.0375 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) 0.0120
TyG-BMI tertile
 T1 1.0 1.0
 T2 1.83 (0.45, 7.42) 0.3960 1.74 (0.41, 7.43) 0.4522
 T3 2.66 (0.59, 12.01) 0.2033 3.90 (1.00, 15.14) 0.0494
P for trend 0.2000 0.0403

Model I adjusted for age, parity, LDL, insulin, AST, ALT, GGT, hepatic steatosis, and HDL in participants with a pre-pregnancy BMI < 25 kg/m2 (n = 493)

Model II included individuals with grade 0 hepatic steatosis (n = 478), adjusting for age, parity, insulin, LDL, ALT, GGT, AST, and HDL