Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2025 Feb 18;12:RP93099. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93099

Wide transition-state ensemble as key component for enzyme catalysis

Gabriel E Jara 1,, Francesco Pontiggia 2,, Renee Otten 2,§, Roman V Agafonov 2,#, Marcelo A Martí 3,, Dorothee Kern 2,¶,
Editors: Qiang Cui4, Qiang Cui5
PMCID: PMC11835391  PMID: 39963964

Abstract

Transition-state (TS) theory has provided the theoretical framework to explain the enormous rate accelerations of chemical reactions by enzymes. Given that proteins display large ensembles of conformations, unique TSs would pose a huge entropic bottleneck for enzyme catalysis. To shed light on this question, we studied the nature of the enzymatic TS for the phosphoryl-transfer step in adenylate kinase by quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics calculations. We find a structurally wide set of energetically equivalent configurations that lie along the reaction coordinate and hence a broad transition-state ensemble (TSE). A conformationally delocalized ensemble, including asymmetric TSs, is rooted in the macroscopic nature of the enzyme. The computational results are buttressed by enzyme kinetics experiments that confirm the decrease of the entropy of activation predicted from such wide TSE. TSEs as a key for efficient enzyme catalysis further boosts a unifying concept for protein folding and conformational transitions underlying protein function.

Research organism: Other

Introduction

Understanding the underlying physical mechanism of the impressive rate accelerations achieved by enzymes has been a central question in biology. Transition-state (TS) theory has provided the fundamental framework since the rate of a reaction is dictated by the free-energy difference between the ground state and TS (Truhlar, 2015). A wealth of research has led to the general notion that enzymatic rate acceleration is due to the enzymes’ much higher affinity to the TS relative to its substrates. This idea has been supported experimentally by the high affinities measured for transition-state analogs (TSA) relative to substrates, leading to the design of TSA as high-affine enzyme inhibitors (Lienhard, 1973; Schramm, 2007). Since the TS represents a maximum in the free-energy landscape, its structure cannot be determined directly due to its low probability and ephemeral nature, TSA-bound species have been extensively used as structural proxies.

The classic TS theory and structural visualization of enzyme/TSA complexes lead to a current view of quite unique structures on the dividing surface at the maximum in the free-energy landscape. In contrast, it is now generally accepted that proteins are large ensembles of conformations, a concept rooted in pioneering work by Frauenfelder and coworkers for protein function, in analogy to the ensemble/funnel concept of protein folding (Frauenfelder and Wolynes, 1985). Consequently, enzyme–substrate (ES) complexes – experimentally accessible as minima in the free-energy landscape – are composed of a vast ensemble of molecular configurations due to their macromolecular nature. Hence, catalysis by pathing through exclusive TS’s would pose a huge entropic bottleneck/energy barrier for enzyme-catalyzed reactions.

Motivated by this consideration, together with the marginal outcomes in current enzyme design relative to the catalytic power of naturally evolved enzymes, we set out to investigate the atomistic nature of TSs of the chemical step in an enzymatic cycle and its implication for rate acceleration by combining quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) calculations and experiments. We take advantage of the groundbreaking work on TS theory by QM simulation developed in the field (Kamerlin et al., 2013; Masgrau and Truhlar, 2015; Warshel and Bora, 2016; Zinovjev and Tuñón, 2017), well summarized in several reviews (Cui, 2016; Senn and Thiel, 2009; van der Kamp and Mulholland, 2013). We chose a phosphoryl-transfer (P-transfer) reaction due to its impressive enzymatic rate acceleration, as the uncatalyzed reactions have extremely high-energy barriers (Kerns et al., 2015; Lassila et al., 2011). The chemical rationale for these high barriers and reasons as to why P-transfer reactions are ubiquitous in living organisms and are involved in almost all essential biological processes is elegantly discussed in a fundamental paper by Westheimer in 1987: ‘Why nature chose phosphates’ (Westheimer, 1987). The central role of enzyme-catalyzed P-transfer reactions in biology (i.e., genetic code, energy storage, signaling, and compartmentalization) has led to extensive discussions and controversies of how enzymes catalyze these vital reactions so efficiently (Allen and Dunaway-Mariano, 2016; Kamerlin et al., 2013; Kerns et al., 2015; Lassila et al., 2011; Pabis et al., 2016; Westheimer, 1987). Here, we combine QM/MM calculations with experimental temperature- and pH-dependent kinetic studies and X-ray crystallography of adenylate kinase (Adk) to shed light on the question of TS structures for the chemical step in its catalytic cycle. While QM/MM methods have been extensively applied to study enzymatic reactions, yielding accurate and detailed descriptions of the molecular events during catalysis (Acevedo and Jorgensen, 2010; Cheng et al., 2005; Dinner et al., 2001; Hahn et al., 2015; Hirvonen et al., 2020; Karplus and Kuriyan, 2005; Lai and Cui, 2020a; López-Canut et al., 2011; Mones et al., 2013; Palermo et al., 2015; Rosta et al., 2014; Roston et al., 2018; Roston and Cui, 2016; Schwartz and Schramm, 2009; Senn and Thiel, 2009; Turjanski et al., 2009), we test here the reaction free-energy profiles (FEPs) from simulations subsequently by designed experiments. We deliver a revised notion of TS stabilization by the enzyme through our discovery of a structurally broad transition-state ensemble (TSE).

Results

Adk is an extensively studied phosphotransferase that catalyzes the reversible, roughly isoenergetic conversion of two ADP molecules into ATP and AMP (Figure 1A, B), thereby maintaining the cellular concentrations of these nucleotides (Dzeja and Terzic, 2009). It is an essential enzyme found in every cell and organism. Extensive structural, dynamic, and kinetic studies led to a comprehensive picture of the overall Adk reaction mechanism and its underlying energy landscape (Figure 1A; Beckstein et al., 2009; Berry et al., 1994; Berry et al., 2006; Henzler-Wildman et al., 2007; Kerns et al., 2015; Müller et al., 1996; Müller and Schulz, 1992; Wolf-Watz et al., 2004). The conformational change of the AMP- and ATP-lids closing and opening is crucial in the enzymatic cycle: Lid-closing positions the two substrates and the active-site residues for efficient chemistry (i.e., P-transfer) and prohibits the alternative, energetically favorable reaction of phosphoryl hydrolysis (Kerns et al., 2015). Lid-opening, essential for product release, and not P-transfer is the rate-limiting step in the catalytic cycle and Mg2+ accelerates both steps (Kerns et al., 2015). Here, we investigate the actual P-transfer step computationally, followed by experimental testing of our computational results. This chemical step would take about 7000 years without the enzyme (Stockbridge and Wolfenden, 2009) compared to >5000 s−1 with the enzyme (Kerns et al., 2015).

Figure 1. Investigation of the chemical step of phosphoryl transfer by quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) calculations in the enzymatic reaction of adenylate kinase (Adk).

(A) Complete reaction scheme with corresponding illustrative free-energy landscape highlighting the chemical phosphoryl-transfer step (modified from Kerns et al., 2015). Protein structures shown are apo Adk in the open conformation and Adk in the closed conformation with two bound ADP molecules and one Mg2+ atom (active-site arginine side chains are shown in stick representation). (B) Phosphoryl-transfer step is drawn with corresponding distances used to define the reaction coordinate as used in panels D, E. (C) Free-energy profiles for the Adk-catalyzed interconversion of ADP–ADP into ATP–AMP in the absence (blue) and presence of Mg2+ (orange) from QM/MM calculations. AD(T)P is fully charged for the reaction with Mg2+, and singly protonated on one ADP β-oxygen for reaction without Mg2+. The reaction coordinate is defined as the difference between the distance of the leaving oxygen to the transferring phosphorus d(Oleaving − P) and the distance of the attacking oxygen to the transferring phosphorus d(Oattacking − P). Distance between acceptor and leaving oxygens along the reaction coordinate in the presence (E) and in the absence (D) of Mg2+. The transition-state regions in C–E are highlighted in orange and gray, respectively.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) system.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

The QM subsystem is shown in CPK representation and the MM subsystem is in lines representation.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Superposition of the starting model structure for quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) and the crystallographic structure (PDB ID: 4CF7; Kerns et al., 2015) of adenylate kinase (Adk) with two ADP/Mg bound.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) Comparison of ADPs, main amino acids and Mg2+ ion in the active site against the crystallographic model in green (starting structure for QM/MM as ball and stick), (B) zoom-in showing Mg2+ ion coordinated by water molecules and the phosphates, and (C) the Adk backbone of the starting model (cyan) and the crystallographic structure (green) with a backbone RMSD of 0.98 Å.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Forward and backward quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) reactions for adenylate kinase (Adk) with two ADP and Mg2+ bound.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A) Free-energy profile (FEP) for the forward (solid gray line) and backward (solid blue line) reactions for the nonprotonated system in the presence of Mg2+.
The dashed lines are the standard deviation for the forward and backward reactions in gray and blue, respectively. Works profiles obtained for the forward (B) and backward (C) reactions.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4. Forward and backward quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) reactions for adenylate kinase (Adk) with ADP, ADP, and Mg2+ bound.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

(A) Free-energy profile for the forward (solid gray line) and backward (solid blue line) reactions for the monoprotonated system with Mg2+.
The dashed lines are the standard deviation for the forward and backward reactions in gray and blue, respectively. Works profiles obtained for the forward (B) and backward (C) reactions.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5. Forward and backward quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) reactions for adenylate kinase (Adk) with two ADP and without Mg2+ bound.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5.

(A) Free-energy profile for the forward (solid gray line) and backward (solid blue line) reactions for the monoprotonated system without Mg2+.
The dashed lines are the standard deviation for the forward and backward reactions in gray and blue, respectively. Works profiles obtained for the forward (B) and backward (C) reactions.

Figure 1—figure supplement 6. Free-energy profiles for the adenylate kinase (Adk)-catalyzed interconversion of ADP–ADP into ATP–AMP and presence of Mg2+ employing higher-level DFT(PBE) free-energy calculations (see methods for details).

Figure 1—figure supplement 6.

Reaction coordinate is the same as in Figure 1. (A) Superposition of the forward and backward free-energy profiles. (B) The free-energy profile as result of the combination of the forward and backward free-energy profiles. The transparent pink region shows the transition-state region. (C) Distance between acceptor and leaving oxygens along the reaction coordinate in the presence of Mg2+. The transition-state region is highlighted in pink. (D, E) Diagram of (Jencks, 1972; O’Ferrall, 1970) from the simulations, plotting the two P–O distances involved in the P-transfer for the reaction with Mg2+, using DFT level at the quantum-mechanics (QM) region (PT for transferring phosphate). The theoretical transition pathways for a tight, synchronous, and loose transition state are shown in E (as defined in Roston and Cui, 2016).

QM/MM calculations of the P-transfer step in Adk

In order to shed light on the mechanism by which Adk from Aquifex aeolicus catalyzes the phosphoryl-transfer reaction by more than 12 orders of magnitude (Kerns et al., 2015), we performed QM/MM simulations starting with two ADP molecules and Mg2+ bound in the active site. The starting structures for the simulations were prepared using the X-ray structure of Adk in complex with Ap5A (P1,P5-Di(adenosine-5′) pentaphosphate) and coordinated to Zn2+ (2RGX; Henzler-Wildman et al., 2007). ADP–ADP coordinates were built using Ap5A as a template and Zn2+ was replaced by Mg2+. For the QM/MM simulations, the QM region was defined as the diphosphate moiety of both ADP molecules, the Mg2+ ion, plus the four coordinating water molecules. The rest of the system was described at molecular-mechanics level using the AMBER ff99sb force field (Hornak et al., 2006) and was solvated with TIP3P water molecules (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).

The equilibrated starting structures agree well with the X-ray structures of the enzyme bound to Mg2+/ADP (4CF7; Kerns et al., 2015; Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Steered molecular dynamics simulations were run in both the forward (ADP/ADP to ATP/AMP) and reverse direction (ATP/AMP to ADP/ADP) with Mg2+ present in the active site (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). Since it is unknown whether the fully charged or monoprotonated nucleotide (on one β-ADP oxygen) state is the more reactive configuration, we performed QM/MM simulations for both cases. FEPs of the P-transfer were determined using Multiple Steered Molecular Dynamics and Jarzynski’s Relationship (Crespo et al., 2005; Jarzynski, 1997; Ramírez et al., 2014; Figure 1C, Figure 1—figure supplements 35). The results reveal a much smaller free energy of activation for the fully charged nucleotide state (ΔfG of 13 ± 0.9 kcal/mol) relative to monoprotonated state (ΔfG of 23 ± 0.9 kcal/mol) (Table 1); hence, we conclude that this is the most reactive enzyme configuration.

Table 1. Free-energy profile estimates of the free-energy parameters of the reaction, using self-consistent charge-density functional tight-binding (SCC-DFTB) (all values in kcal/mol).

With Mg2+ Without Mg2+ With Mg2+, ADP monoprotonated
ΔG* −6 (1.7) +4 (2.5) +6 (1.9)
ΔfG 13 (0.9) 34 (1.6) 23 (0.9)
ΔbG 20 (0.8) 30 (0.9) 18 (0.9)
ξ(TS) −0.5 to 0.7
0.0 to 0.2
  • −0.2 to 0

  • −0.1

−0.3 to −0.1
Not calculated
ζ(TS) 165 to 190 165 to 180 170 to 180

ξ(TS) is the range of the reaction coordinate in the TSE (in Å); ζ(TS) is the improper dihedral angle of the transferring phosphate in the TS. The estimated errors of the free energies are in parenthesis and are computed as described in Materials and methods.

*

overall reaction free energy.

activation free energy of the forward reaction; activation free energy of the backward reaction.

Values were analyzed by a visual analysis of the multiple steered molecular dynamics (MSMD) trajectories, no committor distribution were calculated.

When the calculations were repeated in the absence of Mg2+ (with the nucleotide monoprotonated, since the fully charged nucleotide state prohibited the reaction), a large increase in the free-energy activation barrier was observed relative to the Mg2+-bound system (Figure 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 5, ΔfG of 34 ± 1.6 kcal/mol), in agreement with expectations from experiments (Kerns et al., 2015). We note that only a lower limit for the overall acceleration by Mg2+ (>105-fold) could be estimated from published results (Kerns et al., 2015), since the P-transfer was too fast to be measured experimentally in the presence of Mg2+.

During revision, we tested the accuracy and robustness of our results from our original QM/MM level of theory by employing higher-level pure DFT(PBE) free-energy calculations similar to the approaches used by Ganguly et al., 2020; Figure 1—figure supplement 6. The results are in excellent agreement with the FEPs obtained before (Figure 1C, E; Figure 2A, C) thus further supporting the computational results.

Figure 2. Mechanism of phosphoryl transfer.

Figure 2.

Diagram of (Jencks, 1972; O’Ferrall, 1970) from the quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) simulations, plotting the two P–O distances involved in the P-transfer for the reaction (A, C) with Mg2+ and (B, D) without Mg2+ (PT for transferring phosphate). The theoretical transition pathways for a tight, synchronous, and loose transition state are shown in C, D (as defined in Roston and Cui, 2016).

The TSE – transferring phosphoryl group delocalized

The nature of the TS of enzyme-catalyzed P-transfer reaction with respect to its associative and dissociative character has been of significant interest and heated debate (Kamerlin et al., 2013; Kamerlin and Wilkie, 2007; Lassila et al., 2011; Roston and Cui, 2016). The definition as well as theoretical and experimental approaches to distinguish between them are rooted in elegant and fundamental work on nonenzymatic P-transfer reactions (Duarte et al., 2015; Hengge, 2002; Hou et al., 2012; Hou and Cui, 2012; Kamerlin et al., 2013; Kerns et al., 2015; Kirby and Nome, 2015; Stockbridge and Wolfenden, 2009). For Adk, a concerted mechanism is observed with no intermediates (Figures 1 and 2). Instead of using the classification of associative versus dissociative character (Lassila et al., 2011), we rather apply the clear definition by Cui and coworkers of a tight versus loose TS for concerted P-transfer reactions as they are unambiguously related to the bond-order in the TS (Lai and Cui, 2020a; Lai and Cui, 2020b; Roston et al., 2018; Roston and Cui, 2016). For Adk, a contraction of the active site is observed while passing through the TSE, as captured by the decrease in the distance between acceptor and leaving group during the transition (Figure 1D, E). In the absence of Mg2+, the acceptor and donor need to be within 4 Å for the reaction to occur (Figure 1D) whereas in the presence of Mg2+ an acceptor–donor distance of 4.5 Å is sufficient (Figure 1E). The character of the TSE can best be seen from the widely used Moore-O’Ferrall–Jencks diagram (Jencks, 1972; O’Ferrall, 1970) that plots the distance from the transferring phosphate to the oxygen of the donor and acceptor, respectively (Figure 2). The TSE changes from tight/synchronous without Mg2+ (meaning high bond-order for both bonds between transferring phosphate to the leaving group and the attacking nucleophile) into loose with Mg2+ (lower bond-order for these two bonds; Figures 2 and 3; Lai and Cui, 2020a; Lai and Cui, 2020b; Roston et al., 2018; Roston and Cui, 2016).

Figure 3. Broad transition-state ensemble (TSE) in fully active enzyme.

(A) Representative snapshots for structure of reactants, transition states, and products in the adenylate kinase (Adk) active site in the presence and absence of magnesium. d(Oattacking − P) and d(Oleaving − P) are shown. Labels in black indicate the length of the bonds involved in the phosphate transfer and in green, the dihedral angle of the phosphoryl group. Superposition of the TSEs reveals a wider TSE with Mg2+ (B) relative to the one without the cation (C) with mean rmsd (± SD) of distances of the central P atom from its ‘average’ position of 0.30 ± 0.11 Å (B) and 0.13 ± 0.06 Å (C). The TSEs are superimposed with the X-ray structure solved with a transition-state analog in green (AMP, AlF4, and ADP) reported in Kerns et al., 2015 (PDB ID: 3SR0). (D) Superposition of two extreme structures out of the large TSE for the enzyme with Mg2+, one where the phosphoryl group is closest to the donor oxygen (blue) and the other closest to the acceptor oxygen (red) highlighting the asymmetric character of TSE members. (E, F) Superposition of most symmetric snapshot from TSE of quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) calculations (ball and stick representation in cyan) with the X-ray structure of transition-state analog (green, PDB ID: 3SR0 Kerns et al., 2015 including coordinating water molecules in F). (G) Zoom into the active site to display the broad TSE in the presence of Mg2+ aided by flexible Arg and Lys side chains in the active site.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Representative snapshots for the reactant, transition state (TS), and product states in the monoprotonated system with Mg2+.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

The labels in black describe the distances that are part of the phosphate transfer and the label in green shows the dihedral angle. Label of the phosphates in orange.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. A representative transition-state structure is compared against the X-ray structure PDB ID: 3SR0 (Kerns et al., 2015).

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

The superposition is showed for: the main active site’s residues the atoms taking part of the reaction and backbone of the adenylate kinase (Adk).
Figure 3—figure supplement 3. Reaction with Mg2+ and fully charged nucleotides.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3.

The change in geometrical parameters along the reaction coordinate is shown for (A) forward and (B) backward reactions. Parameters: distance Oleaving – Ptransferring (red), distance Oattacking – Ptransferring (black), transferring phosphate dihedral angle (light blue), distance Mg2+ – O from transferring phosphate (blue), and distance Mg2+ – O from beta-phosphate of ADPATP-lid (orange). The charge (mulliken charge) variation of different moieties involved in the reaction are shown for (C) forward and (D) backward reactions: Mg2+ (green), alpha-phosphate of ADPATP-lid (red), alpha-phosphate of ADPAMP-lid (orange), beta-phosphate of ADPATP-lid (black), and transferring phosphate (blue). Note that a proton is transiently transferred from one water molecule coordinating the Mg2+ to an oxygen of Pα in ADPAMP-lid (leaving group). In all plots, the free-energy profile (FEP) is shown in the background as light gray dashed line.
Figure 3—figure supplement 4. Reaction without Mg2+.

Figure 3—figure supplement 4.

The change in different geometrical parameters along the reaction coordinate is shown for (A) forward and (B) backward reactions. Parameters shown: distance Oleaving – Ptransferring (red), distance Oattacking – Ptransferring (black), and transferring phosphate dihedral angle (light blue). The charge (mulliken charge) variation of different moieties involved in the reaction are shown for (C) forward and (D) backward reactions: alpha-phosphate of ADPATP-lid (red), alpha-phosphate of ADPAMP-lid (orange), beta-phosphate of ADPATP-lid (black), and transferring phosphate (blue). The distances involving the proton transfer are shown for (E) forward and (F) backward reactions: H – Oattacking (black), H – O of transferring phosphate (red), and H – O of alpha-phosphate of ADPAMP-lid (green). In all plots, the free-energy profile (FEP) is shown in the background as light gray dashed line.
Figure 3—figure supplement 5. Reaction with Mg2+ and protonated in an oxygen of the beta-phosphate of ADPATP-lid.

Figure 3—figure supplement 5.

The change in different geometrical parameters along the reaction coordinate is shown for (A) forward and (B) backward reactions. Parameters shown: distance Oleaving – Ptransferring (red), distance Oattacking – Ptransferring (black), transferring phosphate dihedral angle (light blue), distance Mg2+ – O from transferring phosphate (blue), and distance Mg – O from beta-phosphate of ADPATP-lid (orange). The charge (mulliken charge) variation of different moieties involved in the reaction with Mg2+are shown for (C) forward and (D) backward reactions: Mg2+ (green), alpha-phosphate of ADPATP-lid (red), alpha-phosphate of ADPAMP-lid (orange), beta-phosphate of ADPATP-lid (black), and transferring phosphate (blue). The distances involving the proton transfer are shown for (E) forward and (F) backward reactions: H – Oattacking (black), H – O of transferring phosphate (red), and H – O of alpha-phosphate of ADPAMP-lid (green). In all plots, the free-energy profile (FEP) is shown in the background as light gray dashed line.
Figure 3—figure supplement 6. Representative snapshots for the reactant, transition state (TS), and product states in the system with Mg2+.

Figure 3—figure supplement 6.

The main interactions between the phosphate moieties of the nucleotides and the amino acid side chains in the active site are shown (in gray dashed lines).
Figure 3—figure supplement 7. Representation of the interactions between the nucleotides with the active-site amino acids and Mg2+ in the active site of adenylate kinase (Adk) for a representative snapshot from the transition-state ensemble (TSE).

Figure 3—figure supplement 7.

Figure 3—figure supplement 8. Superposition of reactant (blue), transition state (TS) (red), and product (green) states focusing on the transferring phosphate and the main amino acids assisting phosphoryl transfer, for the system with Mg2+.

Figure 3—figure supplement 8.

Figure 3—figure supplement 9. Committor distribution (histogram) between reaction coordinate values (RC) from −0.2 to 0.3 for the reaction with (A) and without Mg2+ (B).

Figure 3—figure supplement 9.

RC equal to 0.0, 0.1, and 0.2 Å with Mg2+ have a transition state (TS)-like ensemble distribution, whereas only RC equal to −0.1 Å has a TS-like ensemble distribution without Mg2+.

Importantly, from these two-dimensional (Figure 2) and the one-dimensional (Figure 1C) free-energy plots, we noticed a novel striking feature: a large ensemble of conformations in the TS region with vast differences in the position of the transferring phosphate but equal values in free energy for the enzyme with Mg2+ (light blue dots in Figure 2, yellow area in Figure 1C). In other words, the enzyme seems to operate with a wide TSE. In contrast, without Mg2+ fewer conformations seem to comprise the TSE. To dive more into this unexpected computational result and better visualize the TSE, we show zoom-ins of representative TSE snapshots and their superposition (Figure 3, Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Notably, the TSE conformations are distributed along the reaction coordinate. The difference in position of the transferring phosphate along the reaction coordinate within the TSE (about 1 Å with Mg2+; Figure 1c, Figure 2 and Figure 3b) implies that the TSE contains many highly asymmetric conformations, meaning that the transferring phosphate can be much closer to the leaving oxygen than the attacking oxygen and vice versa (Figure 3D). This asymmetry is logically tied with nonplanar configurations of the transferring phosphate (Figure 3D and Table 1).

Comparison of the TSE snapshots for the fully active, Mg2+-bound enzyme obtained from QM/MM with an X-ray structure of the same enzyme in complex with the TSA (ADP–Mg2+–AlF4—AMP) (Kerns et al., 2015) serves as an initial experimental validation of our simulations (Figure 3C, F, Figure 3—figure supplement 2). At the same time, this comparison highlights the power of the QM/MM simulations to investigate the catalytic mechanism, as the TSA-bound X-ray structure seems to imply quite a unique TS conformation, in sharp contrast to the broad TSE discovered in our simulations.

A detailed analysis of the pathways with and without Mg2+ reveals well-known features from other P-transfer enzymes, such as coordinated changes of the Mulliken charge populations coupled with proton transfers (Figure 3—figure supplements 35). Mg2+ achieves its catalytic effect on the chemical step playing several roles. It enables the donor and acceptor phosphates to come close enough to react, thus achieving a reactive conformation. In the absence of Mg2+, a proton must bridge the terminal phosphates to prevent the strong electrostatic repulsion between the two nucleotides. In addition, Mg2+ stabilizes the charge of the transferring phosphate and thereby lowering the enthalpic barrier. Most interestingly, the presence of a cation seems to result in a wide TSE. Structures of the TSE show that Mg2+ is optimally coordinated to the transferring phosphates and water molecules (Figure 3G).

Besides the multifaceted role of Mg2+, our simulations provide insights into the function of the fully conserved arginine residues in the active site for lowering the activation barrier for this chemical reaction (Figure 3—figure supplements 68). R85 appears to arrange the beta-phosphates of the ADPs in the proper position for the reaction to be started. R150 and R161 are involved in anchoring ATP and AMP residues in the backward reaction. These last two residues and R85 interact with the Pα of AMP, stabilizing its negative charge. R36 is near to the alpha-phosphate of AD(M)P along the entire catalytic reaction, stabilizing both the TS and products. Overall, interactions between these arginine side chains and several backbone amides and the Mg2+ with the phosphates of the substrate make up a well-organized, asymmetric active site enabling efficient reversible P-transfer with a wide TSE (Figure 3G).

Umbrella sampling and committor analysis buttress wide TSE for Adk with Mg2+

To verify our computational finding of a wide TSE in the fully assembled enzyme with Mg2+ in contrast to a narrower TSE without a divalent metal, we performed QM/MM umbrella sampling and a committor analysis as described in methods. The umbrella sampling FEPs (Figure 4a–d) corroborate the key difference in the range of the TSE. Noteworthy, the activation free energies are smaller for the umbrella sampling when compared to the multiple steered molecular dynamics (MSMD). The largest difference being that for the reaction in the absence of Mg (Figure 1C). Higher barriers when comparing the results using Jarzynski’s to those obtained with umbrella sampling is not totally unexpected. It is well known that exponential averaging tends to overestimate free-energy barriers, and particularly when they are too high (Park et al., 2003).

Figure 4. Computational testing of wider transition-state ensemble (TSE) for P-transfer step in adenylate kinase (Adk) in the presence of Mg2+ versus no divalent metal.

Figure 4.

(A) Free-energy profiles obtained by umbrella sampling for reactions with and without Mg2+. (B) Comparison of the TSE from multiple steered molecular dynamics (MSMD) and umbrella sampling for runs in the presence of Mg2+. The TSE structures were aligned by atoms of the Pα and O3α atoms from AD(M)P and Pβ and O3β atoms from AD(T)P. (C) First principal component (PC1) and second principal component (PC2) obtained from principal component analysis (PCA) for b. The PCA was calculated using the transferring phosphate atoms, Mg2+ ion, Pα and O3α atoms from AD(M)P and Pβ and O3β atoms from AD(T)P. The TSE structures aligned by atoms of the P–Oleaving and P–Oattacking (see method for details). (D) Commitment plot with the committor probability to products (ATP + AMP) for the reaction with and without Mg2+.

Notably, the calculated difference in activation barriers with and without Mg from these umbrella simulations of about 9.5 kcal/mol is in good agreement with the experimentally determined ones of ≥11 kcal/mol (P-transfer with Mg is >500 s−1 (Kerns et al., 2015) compared to 7.5 × 10−4 s−1 measured here).

A consequent comparative commitment analysis that calculates the probability of reaching either reactants or products displays a very shallow change along the reaction coordinate in the presence of Mg2+, further corroborating a wide TSE for the P-transfer step in the fully active enzyme, in stark contrast to a narrow and steep change in the committors indicative of a narrower TSE without Mg2+ (Figure 4d). The TSE is defined in function of the committor distribution (Figure 3—figure supplement 9), showing the TSE is at −0.1 Å of the reaction coordinate for the reaction without Mg2+. In contrast, the TSE is wider for the reaction with Mg2+ (reaction coordinate values in the range from 0.0 to 0.2 Å; Figure 3—figure supplement 9 and Table 1).

Experimental characterization of the activation parameters of the P-transfer step

We felt the need to additionally experimentally test our major new finding from the QM/MM simulations: a delocalized TSE for the fully active enzyme. This feature would result in a lowering of the entropic barrier for the chemical step, thereby contributing to the enzyme-catalyzed rate enhancement. To avoid the issues of accuracy of QM/MM simulations that are well documented (Acevedo and Jorgensen, 2010; Elstner, 2007; Gaus et al., 2014; Roston et al., 2018), our system has the advantage of comparing the exact same reaction coordinate with the only difference being the presence/absence of a single atom, Mg2+, thereby studying differences rather than absolute values. Since the reaction with Mg2+ (fully active enzyme) revealed a more pronounced delocalization than the reaction in its absence, the divalent cation is predicted to lower the activation entropy. To test this prediction, we experimentally determined the enthalpic and entropic contributions to the chemical reaction barrier in Adk by measuring its temperature dependence in the presence and absence of Ca2+. The experimental trick of replacing Mg2+ with Ca2+ was used since the chemical step with Mg2+ is too fast to be experimentally measured, and previous studies showed that Ca2+ is an appropriate mimic to selectively probe the chemical step (Kerns et al., 2015).

The resulting Eyring plots for the two experiments (Figure 5A) deliver the enthalpic (ΔH of 15.3 ± 0.5 and 16.7 ± 1 kcal/mol) and entropic (ΔS = −5.7 ± 1.6 and −19.1 ± 3.1 cal/mol/K) contributions to the chemical reaction barrier in the presence and absence of Ca2+, respectively. The presence of Ca2+ reduces both barriers considerably. The decrease in the enthalpic barrier by Ca2+, which is even more pronounced with the optimal Mg2+ ion, is not new and has been well established in the literature for P-transfer reactions, including the Adk chemical reaction (Kerns et al., 2015; Pérez-Gallegos et al., 2017; Rosta et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2012). The striking new result, central to this work, is the large decrease in the entropic barrier in the presence of a divalent cation, thereby strongly supporting our key finding of a broader TSE from the QM/MM simulations.

Figure 5. Experimental testing of the computational findings.

Figure 5.

(A, B) Turnover rate constants that represent the chemical step (kchem) under these conditions were measured with 8 mM ADP/Mg2+ by HPLC detection of build-up of ATP and AMP. (A) Temperature dependence of the phosphoryl-transfer step measured in presence of calcium and in absence of divalent any cations, plotted as Eyring plots. Fits to the Eyring equation (dashed lines) result in ΔH = 16.7 ± 1 kcal/mol and ΔS = −19.1 ± 3.1 cal/mol/K without metal, and ΔH = 15.3 ± 0.5 kcal/mol and ΔS = −5.7 ± 1.6 cal/mol/K with Ca2+. (B) pH dependence of kchem measured in the presence of calcium and in absence of any divalent cation.

We were able to further test our QM/MM simulations with a second designed set of experiments by measuring the pH dependence of the P-transfer step. We find that the reaction rate increases with higher pH in the presence of Ca2+, whereas without a metal the opposite trend is observed (Figure 5B). These experimental results match the simulation results: the fully charged nucleotides state was the most reactive in the presence of the metal, whereas the monoprotonated state had a much higher free-energy barrier. In contrast, without metal only the monoprotonated nucleotides were reactive. Notably, at low pH (pH 5), the P-transfer step becomes rate limiting even with Mg2+, allowing for an estimate of the rate enhancement of Mg2+ versus Ca2+ of 24-fold.

Finally, we measured the forward and backward reaction rate constants of several arginine mutants that were identified as important for the P-transfer from the QM/MM simulations: R36K, R85K, R124K, R150K, and R161K (Table 2). The large decrease in the catalytic rate for each single Arg to Lys mutation further highlights the notion of a highly choreographed active site for a well-coordinated P-transfer (Figure 3G), in which arginine residues that are not even directly coordinated to the transferring phosphate play an equally important role.

Table 2. Experimentally determined observed rate constants of the forward and backward chemical reactions for mutant forms of adenylate kinase (Adk) in the presence of Mg2+.

Note that the corresponding rate constants for the phosphoryl transfer in the wild-type protein are too fast to be directly measured and have been estimated to be more than three orders of magnitude faster than in the mutants (Kerns et al., 2015).

AAdk mutant Rate constant (s−1)2 ADP → ATP + AMP Rate constant (s−1)ATP + AMP → 2 ADP
R124K 4.6 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 0.4
R150K 1.3 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.3
R161K 0.4 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.2
R85K 0.3 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.2
R36K 0.8 ± 0.2 14 ± 2

Discussion

Adk is an impressively efficient enzyme, being able to accelerate the P-transfer reaction over a billion times. Previous work showed the complexity of the Adk free-energy landscape for this two-substrate, two-product reaction (Figure 1A), providing direct experimental evidence for the widely accepted concept of a multidimension free-energy landscape with multiple intermediates and transitions states for the full enzymatic cycle, already described and demonstrated by Benkovic and Hammes-Schiffer (Benkovic et al., 2008). Full lid-closure results in an excellent preorientation of the donor and acceptor groups of the two bound nucleotides and the aiding active-site residues in the enzyme/substrate complex, in agreement with the general view of necessary pre-organization in enzyme catalysis. Lid-opening had been identified as the rate-limiting step in the enzymatic cycle (Kerns et al., 2015), and the corresponding TSE for this conformational change (Stiller et al., 2019) and the high-resolution structure of next intermediate, the EP complex before product dissociation, recently been described (Stiller et al., 2022).

For a comprehensive understanding of the complete free-energy landscape of Adk catalysis, we here investigate the key step, catalyzing the actual chemical step of P-transfer. While ES and EP complexes such as Adk bound to ADP/Mg2+ can be structurally characterized by traditional experimental methods as they represent a minimum in the free-energy landscape, the reaction path from substrate to product involving breaking and forming covalent bonds (chemical step) and traversing the crucial TS can only be ‘visualized’ by quantum mechanics-based molecular simulations. The power of such simulations to examine the chemical steps in enzymes, including P-transfer reactions, has been extensively documented (Jin et al., 2017; Lai and Cui, 2020b; Mokrushina et al., 2020; Pérez-Gallegos et al., 2015; Pérez-Gallegos et al., 2017; Roston and Cui, 2016; Valiev et al., 2007). The focus in the literature has been on the comparison of the enzyme-catalyzed and uncatalyzed reaction with respect to the bond character at the transitions state (i.e., associate versus dissociative or tight versus loose) (Admiraal and Herschlag, 1995; Hengge, 2002; Kamerlin et al., 2013; Lassila et al., 2011). QM calculations for uncatalyzed reactions have been well documented in the literature showing narrow and symmetric TSE (Klähn et al., 2006: Wang et al., 2015).

Here, we uncover a central new result that provokes a modified TS theory. Enzymes, due to their macromolecular nature, provide a fundamentally different, advantageous way to catalyze these chemical reactions compared to the uncatalyzed reaction by employing a broad TSE. Many different molecular configurations can be accommodated in the TS region with comparable energies via collective motions, spanning a 1-Å range along the reaction coordinate for the transferring phosphate that travels a total distance of only 2 Å during the P-transfer. This features resemblance the now well-established conformational sampling of proteins in ground states such as ES complexes. Our findings explain why enzymes do not face an entropic bottleneck for catalysis. Furthermore, as enzyme active sites are asymmetric in contrast to the symmetric nature of the solvent for uncatalyzed reactions, we find that the TSE comprises also highly asymmetric conformations. Our findings help to resolve the controversy about the nature of the TS in enzyme-catalyzed P-transfer reactions between theory and experiments (Lassila et al., 2011). The complex nature of the active site of enzymes, in contrast to simple solvent, results in different mechanisms in the enzyme-catalyzed reaction.

We note that a previous QM/MM minimum energy path calculations for a different Adk enzyme, E. coli Adk, using a semiempirical method had proposed a different mechanism with a stable metaphosphate intermediate, reporting an even lower energy for this metaphosphate intermediate than the ES and EP complexes (Shibanuma et al., 2020). In complex systems, such as enzymes, it is possible to observe artificial local minima when using minimum energy path searching strategies due to inadequate sampling (Mendieta-Moreno, 2015; Quesne et al., 2016). From our experimental NMR and X-ray data, we know that such a stable metaphosphate does not exist in Adk-catalyzed reactions, highlighting the importance of experimental verification of simulations as performed here, and the use of extensive sampling with proper thermodynamic treatment.

More recently, another group performed QM/MM simulations for E. coli Adk using the semiempirical AM1/d-phoT method (Nam et al., 2007) and umbrella sampling, and measured and computed rate reduction in the chemical step by similar Arg mutants as reported here (Ojeda-May et al., 2021; Dulko-Smith et al., 2023). In contrast to the paper described above (Shibanuma et al., 2020), their results are in agreement with our data. First, the experimentally measured rate reductions in Ojeda-May et al., 2021; Dulko-Smith et al., 2023 are in full agreement with our results. Second, our activation barriers from umbrella sampling are qualitatively similar to their values, with the obvious differences in the enzyme species (we study the thermophilic Aquifex Adk), and their choice of analyzing the QM/MM simulations in the opposite direction ATP/AMP to 2 ADP molecules. The latter lead them to singly protonate one oxygen on ATP, since this ‘back reaction’ is faster for the monoprotonated state, in agreement with our simulations. This nice agreement in both experiments and computation by our two groups strengthens the validity of reported results.

Intriguingly, the Nam/Wolf-Watz team (Ojeda-May et al., 2021; Dulko-Smith et al., 2023) and our group focus on completely different interpretations of the data! Nam/Wolf-Watz propose an interconnection, synchronization, between the chemical step and lid-opening. This language can be misleading since it can imply that the chemical step directly effects the opening, which of course cannot be the case. There is no ‘memory’ of the chemical step, the energy from the closing/opening step is dissipated within picoseconds. Lid-opening/closing is an energetically fully independent step from the P-transfer step, see our Figure 1A. We agree with the obvious result/interpretation by the authors that the Arg residues in the active site are important for both the P-transfer and the consequent lid-opening, but there is no synchronization between these independent steps. In contrast, we discover here a fundamental concept for rate enhancement by an optimal enzyme, the reduction in the activation entropy by a wide TSE. New experiments were triggered by our finding that then delivered experimental validation of this concept.

A wide TSE agrees with the definition of the TS being a surface on the potential energy surface instead of a saddle as elegantly discussed in a theoretical paper by Nussinov and colleagues (Ma et al., 2000). Our results deliver concrete evidence for this fundamental concept from QM/MM calculations and commitment analysis on Adk that were further buttressed by the consequently designed experiments. Although we have only quantitatively demonstrated this TSE concept here for Adk-catalyzed P-transfer, we hypothesize such mechanism to be more general for enzyme catalysis as it is rooted in the macroscopic nature of proteins. A conformationally spread-out TSE is likely one reason why enzymes are much bigger than a few active-site residues: On the one hand residues remote from the site of the chemical action allow for conformational flexibility without the protein unfolding, on the other hand they allow for increasing the probability of highly choreographed motions along the reaction coordinate (Hammes-Schiffer and Benkovic, 2006; Klinman and Kohen, 2013; Saen-Oon et al., 2008; Schramm and Schwartz, 2018) while reducing excursions into unproductive conformations (Otten et al., 2020). The latter mechanism is directly demonstrated here in the TSE, as the configurations seen in the simulations are along the P-transfer reaction coordinate. We note that we focus here on equilibrium effects and an atomistic description of the TSE, this is not related to the fundamental work on dynamical effects manifested in transmission coefficients due to barrier recrossing (Antoniou and Schwartz, 2016; Zinovjev and Tuñón, 2017). The latter has been quantitatively demonstrated to play a minor role.

A question often being asked is why would nature evolve a conformational step to be rate limiting, as the lid-opening step for Adk? We propose that this is the ‘price’ the enzyme pays for stabilizing the ES complex to enable efficient rate acceleration of the chemical step, and for suppressing detrimental alternate reactions such as phosphate hydrolysis. Release of product requires disassembly of such closed, low-energy structure. These principles have now been directly revealed on an atomic scale for Adk: extensive electrostatic interactions of five Arg and one Lys with the phosphoryl groups to efficiently accelerate the P-transfer step, which then need to be broken for lid-opening to allow product release. The effect of different Arg mutations on the lid-opening has been recently nicely demonstrated (Ojeda-May et al., 2021; Dulko-Smith et al., 2023).

As long as the rate of this conformational transition (kopen) and hence kcat is not limiting for organismal fitness, there is no evolutionary pressure to further enhance it.

The importance of TSE including multiple transition pathways for protein folding (Frauenfelder et al., 2006; Royer, 2008), and more recently for protein conformational transitions within the folded state (Pontiggia et al., 2015; Stiller et al., 2019; Tsai and Nussinov, 2014) has been well documented. TSE in enzyme catalysis of chemical steps where covalent bonds are broken and formed as demonstrated here further promotes a unifying concept of protein folding and function, as the same principal concept of TSE is seen for these different types of conformational changes. Consequently, protein folding and function is embedded in a unifying energy landscape which is simply altered by ligands and solvent.

Materials and methods

Computational setup of the system

The crystal structure of Adk from A. aeolicus in complex with Ap5A coordinated to Zn2+ (PDB ID 2RGX; Henzler-Wildman et al., 2007) was used as model. The Zn2+ ion was replaced by Mg2+ and the ADPs structures were built by modifying the structure of Ap5A, keeping the crystallographic coordination of the cation (2 oxygens from ADPs and 4 waters). For the simulation in low pH and without the magnesium ion, the nucleophilic oxygen of AD(T)P was protonated. Standard protonation states were assigned to all titratable residues (aspartate and glutamate residues are negatively charged, lysines and arginines residues are positively charged). Histidine protonation was assigned favoring formation of hydrogen bonds in the crystal structure. Each protein was immersed in a truncated octahedral box of TIP3P water (Jorgensen et al., 1983) and neutralized with Na+ ions (3–5 ions, depending on the system).

Classical simulation parameters

The parameters used for all protein residues were those corresponding to AMBER force field ff99sb (Hornak et al., 2006). For the non-protein residues, such as ADP and Mg2+, parameters were taken from Meagher et al., 2003; Allnér et al., 2012. All simulations were performed with periodic boundary conditions. Pressure and temperature were kept constant with the Berendsen barostat and thermostat, respectively (Berendsen et al., 1984). The SHAKE algorithm (Ryckaert et al., 1977) was used to keep hydrogen atoms at their equilibrium bond distances, and a 2-fs time step was employed, except for the system without Mg2+ for which it was set to 1 fs. The ADP–ADP system was initially subjected to a classical equilibration protocol, followed by QM/MM equilibration and production simulations. Starting from the classically equilibrated ADP–ADP, the monoprotonated systems with ADPH–ADP was built, by adding the H+and removing a Na+ from the solvent, and subsequently the system without Mg2+ was built by removing the ion and adding two Na+ to the solvent. Each of these systems was again equilibrated classically and then used for forward QM/MM simulations. The backward simulations were equilibrated just using QM/MM simulations because the starting point was the product of the forward SMD simulation with the lowest work at product RC. Classical equilibration followed consisted of: first, 2000 steps of conjugate gradient optimization, followed by 100 ps MD simulation at NVT condition, where the system’s temperature was slowly raised to 300 K; the third step consisted of 100 ps MD simulation at NPT conditions to equilibrate the system’s density. During the temperature and density equilibration process, the protein α-carbon atoms were restrained by a 1 kcal/mol harmonic potential. Finally, non-restrained classical simulation was performed at least for 1 ns at NPT conditions to obtain an equilibrated structure to be used as the QM/MM input.

QM/MM simulations were performed using a 1-fs time step without SHAKE (Ryckaert et al., 1977). To equilibrate the system with the QM/MM hamiltonian, we performed first a conjugate gradient QM/MM optimization, followed by a 50-ps QM/MM MD equilibration process at NVT condition, subsequently each production simulation was performed at NVT condition (at least 100 ps saving coordinates every 1 ps). QM/MM calculations were performed using the additive scheme implemented in the sander module of the AMBER program suite (Case et al., 2005). The quantum (QM) region was treated with the self-consistent charge-density functional tight-binding (SCC-DFTB) approach (Elstner, 2007), usually considered a semiempirical QM method, as implemented in Sander (de M Seabra et al., 2007; Walker et al., 2008). The SCC-DFTB parameter set involving carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphate, and magnesium was employed throughout this study (Cai et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008). All the other atoms were described with AMBER ff99SB force field (Hornak et al., 2006). The interface between the QM and MM portions of the system was treated with the scaled position-link atom method. The electrostatic interactions between the QM and MM regions were treated using electrostatic embedding using a simple mulliken charge–restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) charge interaction. In the case of the van der Waals interactions, these were calculated classically.

The QM region of the complete system consists of the diphosphate moiety of both ADP molecules, one Mg2+ ion, and the four water molecules that coordinate the metal ion in the crystal structure (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).

Free-energy determination strategy using MSMD and Jarzynski’s equation

The FEPs were constructed by performing constant velocity MSMD simulations (i.e., stiff string approximation), and using Jarzynski’s equality (Jarzynski, 1997), which relates equilibrium free-energy values with the irreversible work performed over the system along a user defined reaction coordinate that drives the system from reactants to products. In the present study, the reaction coordinate (ξ) was chosen as:

ξ=d(OleavingP)d(OattackingP) (1)

Calculations were performed using a force constant of 300 kcal/mol/Å and pulling velocities of 0.05 Å ps−1. To reconstruct the FEP of the phosphate transfer reaction, two sets of at least 10 SMD runs were performed starting from equilibrated QM/MM MD structures corresponding to either the system in (1) the Adk/ADP–ADP state (presently defined as forward reaction), and (2) the Adk/ATP–AMP state (backward reaction). Each set of work profiles was used to obtain the corresponding forward and backward FEPs with Jarzynski’s equality (Jarzynski, 1997), and finally the two profiles were combined to obtain the complete curve. Since when using MSMD in combination with Jarzynski’s inequality, the system starts from equilibrium conditions and is driven along the RC further from equilibrium as the reaction proceeds, and therefore the FEP estimate increasingly overestimates the real FEP. The best way to combine forward and backward reactions is performed by keeping the initial segment (and thus lower) FEP of each forward and backward reaction estimates. This strategy was successfully used to obtain enzymatic reaction FEPs in previous works (Crespo et al., 2005; Defelipe et al., 2015).

Along the present work, the ADP in the ATP-lid will be called as AD(T)P and the other, in the AMP-lid, as AD(M)P. The reaction involves the two P–O bonds, one forming and the another breaking, the two bonds sharing the same phosphorus atom from the transferring phosphate (Figure 1B). In the former, an oxygen atom of the AD(T)P reacts and we will name it as Oattacking. The breaking bond is described by the oxygen atom for the AD(M)P and it will be called Oleaving.

Higher-level DFT(PBE) free-energy calculations

The FEP of the ADK with Mg2+ was also computed using a higher level of theory. Here, the QM system was described with PBE functional (Perdew et al., 1996) using a DZVP basis set as implemented in the GPU-based code LIO that works with amber (Nitsche et al., 2014). To take advantage of previous DFTB sampling, five lowest work versus RC profiles of the forward and backward reactions were selected, and segmented in 10 windows or stages. For each window, the FEP at the DFT(PBE) level was computed using SMD with a steering velocity of 0.05 Å/ps. Windows were combined to obtain both forward and backward FEP and the final profile was obtained by joining them. Details of the staged strategy can be found in references (Ozer et al., 2010; Ozer et al., 2012; Ganguly et al., 2020).

Commitment analysis

To verify the true nature of the observed TS we performed a commitment analysis. We first selected 20 structures for each of 11 points along the RC in the TS region (every 0.1 Å from −0.6 to 0.6 Å on the RC). Structures were equilibrated at the corresponding RC position for 5 ps using a harmonic restrain potential of 300 kcal/mol/Å. From the final equilibrated structure, we used the modified Berendsen thermostat (Bussi et al., 2007) to assign random initial velocities, and performed 10 non-restrained simulations. Each simulation was followed and determined whether it reached the reactants or products. Finally, the resulting probability (estimated from the observed frequency) to reach product for each point along the RC was computed.

Umbrella sampling simulations

Finally, to avoid possible bias due to the use of MSMD to obtain the FEP, we also computed the corresponding profile using umbrella sampling. The initial structures for each window were randomly selected from the lowest work MSMD trajectories along the RC. The force constant for the harmonic restraint was set to 300 kcal/mol/Å2, ensuring sufficient confinement without inducing artificial behavior. Windows were separated every 0.1 Å along the whole RC. Each window simulation started with a equilibration run of 60 ps at NPT condition, followed by sampling over a production run of 40 ps, with coordinates recorded at 1 ps intervals and the reaction coordinate values every 1 fs. Simulations were performed at the previously described SCC-DFTB level of theory. The weighted histogram analysis method was employed to reconstruct the free-energy landscape from the individual window simulations (Kumar et al., 1992; Grossfield, 2010).

Principal component analysis

One single trajectory containing the TSE structures of MSMD and umbrella sampling was created by aligning the atoms of the P–Oleaving and P–Oattacking to a reference. The reference was the reactant structure (ADP/ADP). This was done in order to compare the TSEs using the same coordinate system. The principal component analysis was calculated over the transferring phosphate atoms, Mg2+ ion, Pα and O3α atoms from AD(M)P and Pβ and O3β atoms from AD(T)P. Those atoms were selected because they are directly involved in the chemical reaction.

Steady-state kinetics measurements

Steady-state kinetics measurements for A. aeolicus Adk (Adk) were performed at different pH values in the absence of divalent metals (using 50 mM of EDTA) and the presence of Mg2+ or Ca2+. In all cases, the reaction was started by the addition of 8 mM ADP and saturating metal concentrations were used if applicable (32 mM at pH 5 and 8 mM at pH 7 and 9, respectively). The enzyme concentration varied between 30 nM and 200 μM depending on the rate of interconversion; measurements were collected at 25°C. The amount of product was quantified with high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Protein precipitated by quench (30% Trichloroacetic acid,TCA, + 6 M HCl mixture) was separated with Spin-X centrifugal tube filters (Costar), filtered supernatant was diluted to avoid HPLC detector saturation, and the pH was brought to 6.0 to achieve optimal separation. The samples were analyzed on an HPLC system (Agilent Infinity 1260) with a high-precision autosampler (injection error <0.1 μl) and analytical HPLC column ACE (i.d. 2.4 mm, length 250 mm, C18-AR, 5 Å pore size) and separated with isocratic elution with potassium phosphate mobile phase (100 mM, pH 6.1). The observed rate constants were determined from 8 to 15 data points for each temperature and/or pH value using initial rate analysis. The values and uncertainties (SD) shown in Figure 5 and Table 2 were determined from least-squares linear regression. Similarly, values and uncertainties (SD) of ΔH and ΔS were extracted from linear regression of the data points presented in Figure 5A.

Temperature dependence of catalysis and mutant activity

Experiments were essentially performed as described previously (Kerns et al., 2015) and above. In short, the steady-state kinetics measurements were collected at temperatures between 20 and 60°C for the temperature dependency and at 25°C for the mutants. For the temperature dependence, the samples contained 4 mM ADP and equimolar (with nucleotide) concentrations of calcium or 50 mM EDTA. The enzyme concentration was varied between 50 nM to 1 μM (with Ca2+) and 100 to 200 μM (with EDTA); buffer was 100 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, and 80 mM KCl. The amount of product produced over time (10–16 min) was quantified with HPLC and observed rates were extracted as described above. A similar approach was used for the Arg-to-Lys Aadk mutants, where the reaction was measured in both directions starting with either 4 mM ADP or ATP/AMP and equimolar (with nucleotide) concentrations of Mg2+.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) to DK. We thank to 'High-Performance Computing Center' (CeCAR, https://cecar.fcen.uba.ar/) of the Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales at the University of Buenos Aires for the computational resources. We are grateful to the Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), part of the Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM) for accessibility to the High-Performance Computing Cluster and scientific infrastructure.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Marcelo A Martí, Email: marti.marcelo@gmail.com.

Dorothee Kern, Email: dkern@brandeis.edu.

Qiang Cui, Boston University, United States.

Qiang Cui, Boston University, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grant:

  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute to Dorothee Kern.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

D.K. is co-founder of Relay Therapeutics and MOMA Therapeutics.

Author contributions

Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

All the computational data produced in the current study is available in the following repository: ZENODO: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14647770.

The following dataset was generated:

Jara G, Marti MA, Kern D, Pontiggia F, Otten R, Agafonov R. 2025. Wide Transition-State Ensemble as Key Component for Enzyme Catalysis. Zenodo.

References

  1. Acevedo O, Jorgensen WL. Advances in quantum and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations for organic and enzymatic reactions. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2010;43:142–151. doi: 10.1021/ar900171c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Admiraal SJ, Herschlag D. Mapping the transition state for ATP hydrolysis: implications for enzymatic catalysis. Chemistry & Biology. 1995;2:729–739. doi: 10.1016/1074-5521(95)90101-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen KN, Dunaway-Mariano D. Catalytic scaffolds for phosphoryl group transfer. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2016;41:172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allnér O, Nilsson L, Villa A. Magnesium ion-water coordination and exchange in biomolecular simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2012;8:1493–1502. doi: 10.1021/ct3000734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Antoniou D, Schwartz SD. Phase space bottlenecks in enzymatic reactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2016;120:433–439. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b11157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beckstein O, Denning EJ, Perilla JR, Woolf TB. Zipping and unzipping of adenylate kinase: atomistic insights into the ensemble of open<-->closed transitions. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2009;394:160–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benkovic SJ, Hammes GG, Hammes-Schiffer S. Free-energy landscape of enzyme catalysis. Biochemistry. 2008;47:3317–3321. doi: 10.1021/bi800049z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1984;81:3684–3690. doi: 10.1063/1.448118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berry MB, Meador B, Bilderback T, Liang P, Glaser M, Phillips GN. The closed conformation of a highly flexible protein: the structure of E. coli adenylate kinase with bound AMP and AMPPNP. Proteins. 1994;19:183–198. doi: 10.1002/prot.340190304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Berry MB, Bae E, Bilderback TR, Glaser M, Phillips GN. Crystal structure of ADP/AMP complex of Escherichia coli adenylate kinase. Proteins. 2006;62:555–556. doi: 10.1002/prot.20699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2007;126:014101. doi: 10.1063/1.2408420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cai ZL, Lopez P, Reimers JR, Cui Q, Elstner M. Application of the computationally efficient self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method to magnesium-containing molecules. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A. 2007;111:5743–5750. doi: 10.1021/jp071701m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2005;26:1668–1688. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheng Y, Zhang Y, McCammon JA. How does the cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalyze the phosphorylation reaction: an ab initio QM/MM study. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005;127:1553–1562. doi: 10.1021/ja0464084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Crespo A, Martí MA, Estrin DA, Roitberg AE. Multiple-steering QM-MM calculation of the free energy profile in chorismate mutase. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005;127:6940–6941. doi: 10.1021/ja0452830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cui Q. Perspective: Quantum mechanical methods in biochemistry and biophysics. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2016;145:140901. doi: 10.1063/1.4964410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Defelipe LA, Lanzarotti E, Gauto D, Marti MA, Turjanski AG. Protein topology determines cysteine oxidation fate: the case of sulfenyl amide formation among protein families. PLOS Computational Biology. 2015;11:e1004051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de M Seabra G, Walker RC, Elstner M, Case DA, Roitberg AE. Implementation of the SCC-DFTB method for hybrid QM/MM simulations within the amber molecular dynamics package. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A. 2007;111:5655–5664. doi: 10.1021/jp070071l. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dinner AR, Blackburn GM, Karplus M. Uracil-DNA glycosylase acts by substrate autocatalysis. Nature. 2001;413:752–755. doi: 10.1038/35099587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duarte F, Åqvist J, Williams NH, Kamerlin SCL. Resolving apparent conflicts between theoretical and experimental models of phosphate monoester hydrolysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2015;137:1081–1093. doi: 10.1021/ja5082712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dulko-Smith B, Ojeda-May P, Ådén J, Wolf-Watz M, Nam K. Mechanistic basis for a connection between the catalytic step and slow opening dynamics of adenylate kinase. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 2023;63:1556–1569. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dzeja P, Terzic A. Adenylate kinase and AMP signaling networks: metabolic monitoring, signal communication and body energy sensing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2009;10:1729–1772. doi: 10.3390/ijms10041729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Elstner M. SCC-DFTB: what is the proper degree of self-consistency? The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A. 2007;111:5614–5621. doi: 10.1021/jp071338j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Frauenfelder H, Wolynes PG. Rate theories and puzzles of hemeprotein kinetics. Science. 1985;229:337–345. doi: 10.1126/science.4012322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Frauenfelder H, Fenimore PW, Chen G, McMahon BH. Protein folding is slaved to solvent motions. PNAS. 2006;103:15469–15472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607168103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ganguly A, Weissman BP, Giese TJ, Li NS, Hoshika S, Rao S, Benner SA, Piccirilli JA, York DM. Confluence of theory and experiment reveals the catalytic mechanism of the Varkud satellite ribozyme. Nature Chemistry. 2020;12:193–201. doi: 10.1038/s41557-019-0391-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gaus M, Cui Q, Elstner M. Density functional tight binding: application to organic and biological molecules. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. 2014;4:49–61. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Grossfield A. WHAM: an implementation of the weighted histogram analysis method. 2.0.10.1WordPress. 2010 http://membrane.urmc.rochester.edu/wordpress/?page_id=126
  29. Hahn DK, Tusell JR, Sprang SR, Chu X. Catalytic mechanism of mammalian adenylyl cyclase: a computational investigation. Biochemistry. 2015;54:6252–6262. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hammes-Schiffer S, Benkovic SJ. Relating protein motion to catalysis. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2006;75:519–541. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hengge AC. Isotope effects in the study of phosphoryl and sulfuryl transfer reactions. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2002;35:105–112. doi: 10.1021/ar000143q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Henzler-Wildman KA, Thai V, Lei M, Ott M, Wolf-Watz M, Fenn T, Pozharski E, Wilson MA, Petsko GA, Karplus M, Hübner CG, Kern D. Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory. Nature. 2007;450:838–844. doi: 10.1038/nature06410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hirvonen VHA, Mulholland AJ, Spencer J, van der Kamp MW. Small changes in hydration determine cephalosporinase activity of OXA-48 β-Lactamases. ACS Catalysis. 2020;10:6188–6196. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins. 2006;65:712–725. doi: 10.1002/prot.21123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hou G, Cui Q. QM/MM analysis suggests that Alkaline Phosphatase (AP) and nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase slightly tighten the transition state for phosphate diester hydrolysis relative to solution: implication for catalytic promiscuity in the AP superfamily. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134:229–246. doi: 10.1021/ja205226d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hou G, Zhu X, Elstner M, Cui Q. A modified QM/MM Hamiltonian with the Self-Consistent-Charge Density-Functional-Tight-Binding Theory for highly charged QM regions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2012;8:4293–4304. doi: 10.1021/ct300649f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jarzynski C. Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Physical Review Letters. 1997;78:2690–2693. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jencks WP. General acid-base catalysis of complex reactions in water. Chemical Reviews. 1972;72:705–718. doi: 10.1021/cr60280a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jin Y, Richards NG, Waltho JP, Blackburn GM. Metal fluorides as analogues for studies on phosphoryl transfer enzymes. Angewandte Chemie. 2017;56:4110–4128. doi: 10.1002/anie.201606474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1983;79:926–935. doi: 10.1063/1.445869. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kamerlin SCL, Wilkie J. The role of metal ions in phosphate ester hydrolysis. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2007;5:2098–2108. doi: 10.1039/b701274h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kamerlin SCL, Sharma PK, Prasad RB, Warshel A. Why nature really chose phosphate. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. 2013;46:1–132. doi: 10.1017/S0033583512000157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Karplus M, Kuriyan J. Molecular dynamics and protein function. PNAS. 2005;102:6679–6685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408930102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kerns SJ, Agafonov RV, Cho YJJ, Pontiggia F, Otten R, Pachov DV, Kutter S, Phung LA, Murphy PN, Thai V, Alber T, Hagan MF, Kern D. The energy landscape of adenylate kinase during catalysis. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2015;22:124–131. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kirby AJ, Nome F. Fundamentals of phosphate transfer. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2015;48:1806–1814. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Klähn M, Rosta E, Warshel A. On the mechanism of hydrolysis of phosphate monoesters dianions in solutions and proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2006;128:15310–15323. doi: 10.1021/ja065470t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Klinman JP, Kohen A. Hydrogen tunneling links protein dynamics to enzyme catalysis. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2013;82:471–496. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051710-133623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar S, Rosenberg JM, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA. THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. THE method. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 1992;13:1011–1021. doi: 10.1002/jcc.540130812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lai R, Cui Q. Differences in the nature of the phosphoryl transfer transition state in protein phosphatase 1 and alkaline phosphatase: insights from qm cluster models. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2020a;124:9371–9384. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c07863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lai R, Cui Q. What does the brønsted slope measure in the phosphoryl transfer transition state? ACS Catalysis. 2020b;10:13932–13945. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c03764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lassila JK, Zalatan JG, Herschlag D. Biological phosphoryl-transfer reactions: understanding mechanism and catalysis. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2011;80:669–702. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060409-092741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lienhard GE. Enzymatic catalysis and transition-state theory. Science. 1973;180:149–154. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4082.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. López-Canut V, Roca M, Bertrán J, Moliner V, Tuñón I. Promiscuity in alkaline phosphatase superfamily: unraveling evolution through molecular simulations. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133:12050–12062. doi: 10.1021/ja2017575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ma B, Kumar S, Tsai CJ, Hu Z, Nussinov R. Transition-state ensemble in enzyme catalysis: possibility, reality, or necessity? Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2000;203:383–397. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Masgrau L, Truhlar DG. The importance of ensemble averaging in enzyme kinetics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2015;48:431–438. doi: 10.1021/ar500319e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Meagher KL, Redman LT, Carlson HA. Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2003;24:1016–1025. doi: 10.1002/jcc.10262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mendieta-Moreno JI. A practical quantum mechanics molecular mechanics method for the dynamical study of reactions in biomolecules. In Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology. 2015;100:67–68. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mokrushina YA, Golovin AV, Smirnov IV, Chatziefthimiou SD, Stepanova AV, Bobik TV, Zalevsky AO, Zlobin AS, Konovalov KA, Terekhov SS, Stepanov AV, Pipiya SO, Shamborant OG, Round E, Belogurov AA, Jr, Bourenkov G, Makarov AA, Wilmanns M, Xie J, Blackburn GM, Gabibov AG, Lerner RA. Multiscale computation delivers organophosphorus reactivity and stereoselectivity to immunoglobulin scavengers. PNAS. 2020;117:22841–22848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010317117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mones L, Tang WJ, Florián J. Empirical valence bond simulations of the chemical mechanism of ATP to cAMP conversion by anthrax edema factor. Biochemistry. 2013;52:2672–2682. doi: 10.1021/bi400088y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Müller CW, Schulz GE. Structure of the complex between adenylate kinase from Escherichia coli and the inhibitor Ap5A refined at 1.9 A resolution: a model for A catalytic transition state. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1992;224:159–177. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90582-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Müller CW, Schlauderer GJ, Reinstein J, Schulz GE. Adenylate kinase motions during catalysis: an energetic counterweight balancing substrate binding. Structure. 1996;4:147–156. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00018-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nam K, Cui Q, Gao J, York DM. Specific reaction parametrization of the AM1/d hamiltonian for phosphoryl transfer reactions: H, O, and P Atoms. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2007;3:486–504. doi: 10.1021/ct6002466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nitsche MA, Ferreria M, Mocskos EE, González Lebrero MC. GPU accelerated implementation of density functional theory for hybrid QM/MM simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2014;10:959–967. doi: 10.1021/ct400308n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. O’Ferrall RAM. Relationships between E2 and E1cB mechanisms of β-elimination. J. Chem. Soc. B. 1970;0:274–277. doi: 10.1039/J29700000274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ojeda-May P, Mushtaq AU, Rogne P, Verma A, Ovchinnikov V, Grundström C, Dulko-Smith B, Sauer UH, Wolf-Watz M, Nam K. Dynamic connection between enzymatic catalysis and collective protein motions. Biochemistry. 2021;60:2246–2258. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Otten R, Pádua RAP, Bunzel HA, Nguyen V, Pitsawong W, Patterson M, Sui S, Perry SL, Cohen AE, Hilvert D, Kern D. How directed evolution reshapes the energy landscape in an enzyme to boost catalysis. Science. 2020;370:1442–1446. doi: 10.1126/science.abd3623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ozer G, Valeev EF, Quirk S, Hernandez R. Adaptive steered molecular dynamics of the long-distance unfolding of neuropeptide Y. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2010;6:3026–3038. doi: 10.1021/ct100320g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ozer G, Quirk S, Hernandez R. Thermodynamics of decaalanine stretching in water obtained by adaptive steered molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2012;8:4837–4844. doi: 10.1021/ct300709u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pabis A, Duarte F, Kamerlin SCL. Promiscuity in the enzymatic catalysis of phosphate and sulfate transfer. Biochemistry. 2016;55:3061–3081. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Palermo G, Cavalli A, Klein ML, Alfonso-Prieto M, Dal Peraro M, De Vivo M. Catalytic metal ions and enzymatic processing of DNA and RNA. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2015;48:220–228. doi: 10.1021/ar500314j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Park S, Khalili-Araghi F, Tajkhorshid E, Schulten K. Free energy calculation from steered molecular dynamics simulations using Jarzynski’s equality. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2003;119:3559–3566. doi: 10.1063/1.1590311. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters. 1996;77:3865–3868. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Pérez-Gallegos A, Garcia-Viloca M, González-Lafont À, Lluch JM. SP20 phosphorylation reaction catalyzed by protein kinase a: qm/mm calculations based on recently determined crystallographic structures. ACS Catalysis. 2015;5:4897–4912. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Pérez-Gallegos A, Garcia-Viloca M, González-Lafont À, Lluch JM. Understanding how cAMP-dependent protein kinase can catalyze phosphoryl transfer in the presence of Ca 2+ and Sr 2+: A QM/MM study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2017;19:10377–10394. doi: 10.1039/C7CP00666G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Pontiggia F, Pachov DV, Clarkson MW, Villali J, Hagan MF, Pande VS, Kern D. Free energy landscape of activation in a signalling protein at atomic resolution. Nature Communications. 2015;6:7284. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Quesne MG, Borowski T, de Visser SP. Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics modeling of enzymatic processes: caveats and breakthroughs. Chemistry. 2016;22:2562–2581. doi: 10.1002/chem.201503802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Ramírez CL, Zeida A, Jara GE, Roitberg AE, Martí MA. Improving efficiency in smd simulations through a hybrid differential relaxation algorithm. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2014;10:4609–4617. doi: 10.1021/ct500672d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rosta E, Yang W, Hummer G. Calcium inhibition of ribonuclease H1 two-metal ion catalysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136:3137–3144. doi: 10.1021/ja411408x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Roston D, Cui Q. Substrate and transition state binding in alkaline phosphatase analyzed by computation of oxygen isotope effects. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2016;138:11946–11957. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b07347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Roston D, Lu X, Fang D, Demapan D, Cui Q. Analysis of phosphoryl-transfer enzymes with qm/mm free energy simulations. Methods in Enzymology. 2018;607:53–90. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Royer CA. The nature of the transition state ensemble and the mechanisms of protein folding: a review. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2008;469:34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2007.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. Journal of Computational Physics. 1977;23:327–341. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Saen-Oon S, Ghanem M, Schramm VL, Schwartz SD. Remote mutations and active site dynamics correlate with catalytic properties of purine nucleoside phosphorylase. Biophysical Journal. 2008;94:4078–4088. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.121913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Schramm VL. Enzymatic transition state theory and transition state analogue design. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282:28297–28300. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R700018200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Schramm VL, Schwartz SD. Promoting vibrations and the function of enzymes. Emerging Theoretical and Experimental Convergence. Biochemistry. 2018;57:3299–3308. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Schwartz SD, Schramm VL. Enzymatic transition states and dynamic motion in barrier crossing. Nature Chemical Biology. 2009;5:551–558. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Senn HM, Thiel W. QM/MM methods for biomolecular systems. Angewandte Chemie. 2009;48:1198–1229. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Shibanuma Y, Nemoto N, Yamamoto N, Sampei GI, Kawai G. Crystal structure of adenylate kinase from an extremophilic archaeon Aeropyrum pernix with ATP and AMP. Journal of Biochemistry. 2020;168:223–229. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvaa043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Stiller JB, Kerns SJ, Hoemberger M, Cho YJ, Otten R, Hagan MF, Kern D. Probing the transition state in enzyme catalysis by high-pressure nmr dynamics. Nature Catalysis. 2019;2:726–734. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0307-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Stiller JB, Otten R, Häussinger D, Rieder PS, Theobald DL, Kern D. Structure determination of high-energy states in a dynamic protein ensemble. Nature. 2022;603:528–535. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04468-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Stockbridge RB, Wolfenden R. The intrinsic reactivity of ATP and the catalytic proficiencies of kinases acting on glucose, N-acetylgalactosamine, and homoserine: a thermodynamic analysis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284:22747–22757. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.017806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Truhlar DG. Transition state theory for enzyme kinetics. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2015;582:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Tsai CJ, Nussinov R. A unified view of “how allostery works”. PLOS Computational Biology. 2014;10:e1003394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Turjanski AG, Hummer G, Gutkind JS. How mitogen-activated protein kinases recognize and phosphorylate their targets: A QM/MM study. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131:6141–6148. doi: 10.1021/ja8071995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Valiev M, Yang J, Adams JA, Taylor SS, Weare JH. Phosphorylation reaction in cAPK protein kinase-free energy quantum mechanical/molecular mechanics simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2007;111:13455–13464. doi: 10.1021/jp074853q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. van der Kamp MW, Mulholland AJ. Combined quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods in computational enzymology. Biochemistry. 2013;52:2708–2728. doi: 10.1021/bi400215w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Walker RC, Crowley MF, Case DA. The implementation of a fast and accurate QM/MM potential method in Amber. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2008;29:1019–1031. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang C, Huang W, Liao JL. QM/MM investigation of ATP hydrolysis in aqueous solution. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2015;119:3720–3726. doi: 10.1021/jp512960e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Warshel A, Bora RP. Perspective: Defining and quantifying the role of dynamics in enzyme catalysis. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2016;144:180901. doi: 10.1063/1.4947037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Westheimer FH. Why nature chose phosphates. Science. 1987;235:1173–1178. doi: 10.1126/science.2434996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wolf-Watz M, Thai V, Henzler-Wildman K, Hadjipavlou G, Eisenmesser EZ, Kern D. Linkage between dynamics and catalysis in a thermophilic-mesophilic enzyme pair. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2004;11:945–949. doi: 10.1038/nsmb821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Yang Y, Yu H, York D, Elstner M, Cui Q. Description of phosphate hydrolysis reactions with the Self-Consistent-Charge Density-Functional-Tight-Binding (SCC-DFTB) theory. 1. Parameterization. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2008;4:2067–2084. doi: 10.1021/ct800330d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Yang L, Liao RZ, Ding WJ, Liu K, Yu JG, Liu RZ. Why calcium inhibits magnesium-dependent enzyme phosphoserine phosphatase? A theoretical study. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts. 2012;131:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00214-012-1275-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Zinovjev K, Tuñón I. Quantifying the limits of transition state theory in enzymatic catalysis. PNAS. 2017;114:12390–12395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710820114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

Qiang Cui 1

In this potentially important study, the authors report results of QM/MM simulations and kinetic measurements for the phosphoryl-transfer step in adenylate kinase. The results point to the mechanistic proposal that the transition state ensemble is broader in the most efficient form of the enzyme (i.e., in the presence of Mg2+ in the active site) and thus a different activation entropy. With a broad set of computations and experimental analyses, the level of evidence is considered solid by some reviewers. On the other hand, there remain limitations in the computational analyses, especially regarding free energy profiles using different methodologies (shape of free energy profiles with DFTB vs. PBE QM/MM, and barriers with steered MD and umbrella sampling) and the activation entropy, leading some reviewers to the evaluation that the level of evidence is incomplete.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary:

This study investigated the phosphoryl transfer mechanism of the enzyme adenylate kinase, using SCC-DFTB quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations, along with kinetic studies exploring the temperature and pH dependence of the enzyme's activity, as well as the effects of various active site mutants. Based on a broad free energy landscape near the transition state, the authors proposed the existence of wide transition states (TS), characterized by the transferring phosphoryl group adopting a meta-phosphate-like geometry with asymmetric bond distances to the nucleophilic and leaving oxygens. In support of this finding, kinetic experiments were conducted with Ca2+ ions at different temperatures and pH, which revealed a reduced entropy of activation and unique pH-dependence of the catalyzed reaction.

Strengths:

A combined application of simulation and experiments is a strength.

Weaknesses:

The conclusion that the enzyme-catalyzed reaction involves a wide transition state is not sufficiently clarified with some concerns about the determined free energy profiles compared to the experimental estimate. (See Recommendations for the authors.)

Comments on revisions:

While the authors have made some improvements in clarifying the manuscript, questions still remain about their conclusion regarding the wide-TS, which appears this may be a misinterpretation of the simulation results. Also, they should clearly point out the large discrepancies between DFTB QM/MM and PBE QM/MM results (shape of free energy files) and also between steered MD and umbrella sampling results (barriers). Another question is the large change in activation entropy (between the reaction with and without divalent cations). This difference may be difficult to attribute sorely to the difference in the reaction geometries near TS.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary:

The authors report results of QM/MM simulations and kinetic measurements for the phosphoryl-transfer step in adenylate kinase. The main assertion of the paper is that a wide transition state ensemble is a key concept in enzyme catalysis as a strategy to circumvent entropic barriers. This assertion is based on observation of a "structurally wide" set of energetically equivalent configurations that lie along the reaction coordinate in QM/MM simulations, together with kinetic measurements that suggest a decrease of the entropy of activation.

Strengths:

The study combines theoretical calculations and supporting experiments.

Weaknesses:

The current paper hypothesizes a "wide" transition state ensemble as a catalytic strategy and key concept in enzyme catalysis. Overall, it is not clear the degree to which this hypothesis is fully supported by the data. The reasons are as follows:

(1) Enzyme catalysis reflects a rate enhancement with respect to a baseline reaction in solution. In order to assert that something is part of a catalytic strategy of an enzyme, it would be necessary to demonstrate from simulations that the activation entropy for the baseline reaction is indeed greater and the transition state ensemble less "wide". Alternatively stated, when indicating there is a "wide transition state ensemble" for the enzyme system - one needs to indicate that is with respect to the non-enzymatic reaction. However, these simulations were not performed and the comparisons not demonstrated. The authors state "This chemical step would take about 7000 years without the enzyme" making it impossible to measure; nonetheless, the simulations of the nonenzymatic reaction would be fairly straightforward to perform in order to demonstrate this key concept that is central to the paper. Rather, the authors examine the reaction in the absence of a catalytically important Mg ion.

(2) The observation of a "wide conformational ensemble" is not a quantitative measure of entropy. In order to make a meaningful computational prediction of the entropic contribution to the activation free energy, one would need to perform free energy simulations over a range of temperatures (for the enzymatic and non-enzymatic systems). Such simulations were not performed, and the entropy of activation was thus not quantified by the computational predictions. The authors instead use a wider TS ensemble as a proxy for larger entropy, and miss an opportunity to compare directly to the experimental measurements.

Comments on revisions:

Overall, I do not think the authors have been able to quantitatively support their conclusion, and the qualitative support is somewhat weak. This makes the interpretation of the computational results somewhat speculative. Nonetheless, comparison was made for models with and without divalent ions, and the experimental data is valuable.

eLife. 2025 Feb 18;12:RP93099. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93099.4.sa3

Author response

Gabriel Jara 1, Francesco Pontiggia 2, Renee Otten 3, Roman V Agafonov 4, Marcelo Adrian Martí 5, Dorothee Kern 6

The following is the authors’ response to the previous reviews.

Public Reviews:

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Summary:

This study investigated the phosphoryl transfer mechanism of the enzyme adenylate kinase, using SCC-DFTB quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations, along with kinetic studies exploring the temperature and pH dependence of the enzyme's activity, as well as the effects of various active site mutants. Based on a broad free energy landscape near the transition state, the authors proposed the existence of wide transition states (TS), characterized by the transferring phosphoryl group adopting a meta-phosphate-like geometry with asymmetric bond distances to the nucleophilic and leaving oxygens. In support of this finding, kinetic experiments were conducted with Ca2+ ions at different temperatures and pH, which revealed a reduced entropy of activation and unique pH-dependence of the catalyzed reaction.

Strengths:

A combined application of simulation and experiments is a strength.

Weaknesses:

The conclusion that the enzyme-catalyzed reaction involves a wide transition state is not sufficiently clarified with some concerns about the determined free energy profiles compared to the experimental estimate. (See Recommendations for the authors.)

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Summary:

The authors report results of QM/MM simulations and kinetic measurements for the phosphoryl-transfer step in adenylate kinase. The main assertion of the paper is that a wide transition state ensemble is a key concept in enzyme catalysis as a strategy to circumvent entropic barriers. This assertion is based on observation of a "structurally wide" set of energetically equivalent configurations that lie along the reaction coordinate in QM/MM simulations, together with kinetic measurements that suggest a decrease of the entropy of activation.

Thank you for your feedback. The reviewer’s questions are answered below, hoping to clarify them.

Strengths:

The study combines theoretical calculations and supporting experiments.

Weaknesses:

The current paper hypothesizes a "wide" transition state ensemble as a catalytic strategy and key concept in enzyme catalysis. Overall, it is not clear the degree to which this hypothesis is fully supported by the data. The reasons are as follows:

(1) Enzyme catalysis reflects a rate enhancement with respect to a baseline reaction in solution. In order to assert that something is part of a catalytic strategy of an enzyme, it would be necessary to demonstrate from simulations that the activation entropy for the baseline reaction is indeed greater and the transition state ensemble less "wide". Alternatively stated, when indicating there is a "wide transition state ensemble" for the enzyme system - one needs to indicate that is with respect to the non-enzymatic reaction. However, these simulations were not performed and the comparisons not demonstrated. The authors state "This chemical step would take about 7000 years without the enzyme" making it impossible to measure; nonetheless, the simulations of the nonenzymatic reaction would be fairly straight forward to perform in order to demonstrate this key concept that is central to the paper. Rather, the authors examine the reaction in the absence of a catalytically important Mg ion.

Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. QM/MM calculations for uncatalysed phosphoryl-transfer reactions involving either diphosphates or triphosphates have been well documented in the literature showing narrow and symmetric TSE (Klan et al., JACS 2006, 128 (47) 15310-15323; Cui Wang et al., JPCB 2015, 119(9), 3720-3726). We added these references to the revised manuscript.

(2) The observation of a "wide conformational ensemble" is not a quantitative measure of entropy. In order to make a meaningful computational prediction of the entropic contribution to the activation free energy, one would need to perform free energy simulations over a range of temperatures (for the enzymatic and non-enzymatic systems). Such simulations were not performed, and the entropy of activation was thus not quantified by the computational predictions. The authors instead use a wider TS ensemble as a proxy for larger entropy, and miss an opportunity to compare directly to the experimental measurements.

Although we share the reviewers desire to quantify entropies from QM/MM simulations, we agree with discussions in the literature that calculating quantitative entropies from performing QM/MM simulations at different temperatures is not reliable. We therefore felt strongly to stay with a qualitative assessment of entropy differences from our simulations. As the reviewer highlighted, our study combines theoretical calculations and experiments. The entropy of activation is well estimated by the experiments from the experimental accuracy of these temperature-dependent changes in rate constants for the chemical step. Our computational results agree well with the experimental results and were further validated in 2 rounds of reviews/revisions by additional different free energy calculation methods (MSMD and US), plus committor analysis.

Reviewer #3 (Public Review):

Summary:

By conducting QM/MM free energy simulations, the authors aimed to characterize the mechanism and transition state for the phosphoryl transfer in adenylate kinase. The qualitative reliability of the QM/MM results has been supported by several interesting experimental kinetic studies. However, the interpretation of the QM/MM results is not well supported by the current calculations.

Thank you for your feedback. We appreciate the recognition of our experimental validation but understand your concern about the interpretation of our QM/MM results. To address this, we answer the specific questions below and added clearer explanations of the computational approach, including its limitations. We also better aligned the QM/MM results with both experimental data and theoretical expectations to strengthen the overall interpretation.

Strengths:

The QM/MM free energy simulations have been carefully conducted. The accuracy of the semi-empirical QM/MM results was further supported by DFT/MM calculations, as well as qualitatively by several experimental studies.

Weaknesses:

(1) One key issue is the definition of the transition state ensemble. The authors appear to define this by simply considering structures that lie within a given free energy range from the barrier. However, this is not the rigorous definition of transition state ensemble, which should be defined in terms of committor distribution. This is not simply an issue of semantics, since only a rigorous definition allows a fair comparison between different cases - such as the transition state in an enzyme vs in solution, or with and without the metal ion. For a chemical reaction in a complex environment, it is also possible that many other variables (in addition to the breaking and forming P-O bonds) should be considered when one measures the diversity in the conformational ensemble.

In the revised manuscript, the authors included committor analysis. However, the discussion of the result is very brief. In particular, if we use the common definition of the transition state ensemble (TSE) as those featuring the committor around 0.5, the reaction coordinate of the TSE would span a much narrower range than those listed in Table 1. This point should be carefully addressed.

The reviewer is right, the TSE is rigorously defined in terms of the committor distribution. We actually calculated the committor distribution for the reaction with and without Mg. We now added the figure showing the committor distribution for both reactions (Figure 3 – supplement 9). We did not include these results before because the committor distribution histogram would need more points to have a more accurate shape, requiring a high computational cost. We followed the reviewer’s suggestion and updated table 1 with the values from the committor distribution analysis.

(2) While the experimental observation that the activation entropy differs significantly with and without the Ca2+ ion is interesting, it is difficult to connect this result with the "wide" transition state ensemble observed in the QM/MM simulations so far. Even without considering the definition of the transition state ensemble mentioned above, it is unlikely that a broader range of P-O distances would explain the substantial difference in the activation entropy measured in the experiment. Since the difference is sufficiently large, it should be possible to compute the value by repeating the free energy simulations at different temperatures, which would lead to a much more direct evaluation of the QM/MM model/result and the interpretation.

See our answer above about this point.

Recommendations for the authors:

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations For The Authors):

Major comments:

One of the remaining issues with this revision is the assertion of the wide transition states in the presence of Mg2+ ion. When discussing the transition state of phosphoryl transfer reactions, it is important to consider their nature as involving both the cleavage and formation of P-O bonds. While these two events can occur in concert with a single transition state, many studies have shown that one event often precedes the other. Sometimes, there is a slight drop in free energy between the two events, forming a transient intermediate. However, due to its very short lifetime, this intermediate state may not be detectable experimentally. Depending on the sequence of events, the transition state or the transient intermediate may exhibit characteristics of a metaphosphate or phosphorane-like species. Based on the DFTB simulation results presented in the paper, it appears that the reaction forms a metaphosphate-like transition state. In the present reaction, since the two oxygen atoms involved in the reaction are very good leaving groups with similar reactivity, it is not surprising to observe the two events near the TS with very similar relative free energies, and therefore, the free energy profile can be very flat near the TS. This is consistent with the statement that "the transferring phosphate can be much closer to the leaving oxygen than the attacking oxygen and vice versa" on page 9. In my opinion, however, this should not be considered as a wide transition state but rather a consequence of the two events occurring very close to each other along the reaction coordinate. This distinction can be considered a semantic issue, and as long as the authors clearly discuss this issue and clarify the meaning of the TS ensemble, the reviewer is okay with that. In its current form, the statement of the wide TS ensemble may lead to a misleading interpretation of the reaction under study.

An intermediate is clearly defined as a minimum in the free energy landscape. We see no evidence in any of your simulations of a minimum flanked by two transitions states, nor do we see any evidence in our NMR relaxation data or crystal structure ensemble refinement. We report our experimental and computational results, so that the reader can directly interpret the free energy landscapes for this system, avoiding semantics due to language ambiguity.

Second, based on the kinetic study, the free energy of the catalytic reaction is approximately zero. The authors suggest that at pH near 7, the ADP exists as a roughly

50-50 mixture between the singly protonated and fully charged states and consequently, the reaction free energies between the two scenarios cancel each other out. However, this argument is not correct. If [ADP(H)]/[ADP] is close to 1, the two reaction free energies, one with +6 kcal/mol and the other with -6 kcal/mol, imply that the protonation of the products (either ATP or AMP) requires ~12 kcal/mol (i.e., 9 pKa unit shift). Given the symmetric nature of the reaction and the similar pKa values between ATP, ADP versus AMP, such a large shift in the pKa of the product state is not expected, and for the calculated results to be accurate, the pKa shifts in the reactant state versus the product state must be opposite, with a total relative shift of 9 pKa units. This is difficult to understand given the nature of the reaction catalyzed by the adenylate kinase enzyme.

We thank this reviewer for this question, which made us realize that we cannot compare the free energies of our QM/MD simulations with the experimentally determined ADP and ATP/AMP ratios. In the experiment we determine the entire pool of ADP and AMP/ATP bound to the enzyme, but could not distinguish if the protonated and or nonprotonated states are contributing to the measured observed rate constants Kerns, S. et al.,(2015). In the present study, we now discovered that the nonprotonated forms have a lower activation barrier, but the protonated states also contribute to the overall reaction. Therefore, we removed this paragraph from our discussion.

Minor comments:

The difference in the free energy barrier determined by the MSMD and umbrella sampling is not negligible. Considering that umbrella sampling is commonly used in this type of research, the MSMD method appears to overestimate the barrier by more than 3 kcal/mol. Would the TS geometries obtained by umbrella sampling be comparable to those obtained by MSMD?

This is an excellent suggestion, since the umbrella sampling is the more accurate method. The TSE from both methods are indeed comparable, and we added new figure panels about this results to Fig. 4.

Figure 5 shows that the enthalpy of activation is similar for reactions with and without Ca2+. Do the authors expect the enthalpy of activation to decrease when Ca2+ is replaced by Mg2+ without a significant change in the entropy of activation? Any justification?

In Kerns, S. et al.,(2015) we had experimentally determined the dependence of the observed rate of the P-transfer on the nature of the divalent metal, with Mg2+ being by far superior to the other divalent metals. We proposed that this majorly is an effect on the enthalpy of activation, that other divalent metals provide poor orbital overlap, in agreement with published work on P-transfer reactions that show selectivity for a specific metal.

Please provide proper citations for SHAKE and WHAM.

The citations were added.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations For The Authors):

The authors did not really address in the revised manuscript the main points of the previous review, which included examination of non-enzymatic reaction (via simulation, not measurement) and quantification of the connection between the reported wide TS ensemble and the increase in entropy (by additional simulations). The authors should also add reference to the AM1/d-PhoT model of Nam et al. which is now discussed.

QM/MM calculations for uncatazlysed phosphoryl-transfer reactions involving either diphosphates or triphosphates have been well documented in the literature showing narrow and symmetric TSE (Klahn et al., JACS 2006, 128 (47) 15310-15323; Cui Wang et al., JPCB 2015, 119(9), 3720-3726). We added these references to the revised manuscript.

The reference to AM1/d-PhoT model was added.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations For The Authors):

In the revised ms, the authors indeed addressed many of the points raised in the previous round of review. In addition to the issue of TSE and committor mentioned above, another point that needs to be carefully explained is the very significant difference between umbrella sampling results and those in Fig. 1C - especially for the case without Mg2+ - the difference of more than 20 kcal/mol is not something that can be ignored at a qualitative level.

We thank the reviewer for pointing out that the difference in free energy profiles between umbrella sampling (US) and MSMD, especially in the case without Mg2+ needs to be addressed.

We believe that the key reason for this difference lies in the methodological approaches of these techniques.

Umbrella sampling is an equilibrium enhanced sampling method, that allows for a balanced and thorough exploration of the free energy landscape, the MSMD is a non-equilibrium method and estimation depends of the averaging scheme used and the number of trajectories. In the present work, the free energy was estimated using an exponential average. This averaging scheme has a slow convergence, small variance and may overestimate the free energy barrier, specially if the barrier as seen in the absence of Mg is quite high. This factor could explain the significant difference between umbrella sampling and MSMD combined with Jarzynski’s equality.

We have added new panels to Fig. 4 to compare the TSE from the more accurate umbrella sampling to the MSMD simulations, buttressing the validity of our original findings. We revised the manuscript discuss the differences between the MSMD and the umbrella sampling free energy profiles.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Jara G, Marti MA, Kern D, Pontiggia F, Otten R, Agafonov R. 2025. Wide Transition-State Ensemble as Key Component for Enzyme Catalysis. Zenodo. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

    Supplementary Materials

    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All the computational data produced in the current study is available in the following repository: ZENODO: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14647770.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Jara G, Marti MA, Kern D, Pontiggia F, Otten R, Agafonov R. 2025. Wide Transition-State Ensemble as Key Component for Enzyme Catalysis. Zenodo.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES