Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 21;8(Suppl 2):S74–S80. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwae043

Table 1.

Outcomes of endotherapy in patients with pancreas divisum and recurrent acute pancreatitis.

Study, year Study type n Classification Endotherapy Technical success (%) Clinical success (%) Follow-up Adverse events
Lans, 199213 RCT 19 RAP 10,
Control 9
Dilatation + stenting NR 90% 28.6 m 0%
Lehman, 199314 P 52 CAP 24
RAP 17
CP 11
MiES + stent NR 26.1%
76.5%
27.3%
1.7 y 15%
Gerke, 200421 R 53 RAP 30
CP 14
CAP 9
MiES + stent NR RAP 43.3%
CP 21.4%
CAP 11.1%
29 m 11.2%
Chacko, 200820 R 57 RAP 27
CP 20
CAP 8
Majority MiES (94%) 86% RAP 76%
CP 42%
CAP 33%
20 m 11.7%
Borak, 200919 R 113 RAP 62
CP 22
CAP 29
MiES + stent NR RAP 53.2%
CP 18.2%
CAP 41.4%
43 m 13.3%
Rustagi, 201322 R 45 RAP 18
CP 7
CAP 13
MiES ± stent (majority) 91.9% RAP 94%
CP 57%
CAP 50%
NR 16.1%
Tringali, 201918 R 48 RAP MiES ± stent NR 72.9% 9.7 y 12.9%
De Jong, 202126 Multicentre, R 81 RAP 66
CP 12
CAP 3
MiES + stent 74.1% RAP 44.4%
CP 33.3%
CAP 33.3%
≥3 m 37%

Abbreviations: CP, chronic pancreatitis; CAP, chronic abdominal pain; MiES, minor papilla sphincterorotomy; NR, nonresponse; RAP, recurrent acute pancreatitis; P, prospective; R, retrospective; RCT, randomized controlled trial.