Abstract
Organophosphates, carbamates and synthetic pyrethroids are commonly used in Thailand to control mosquito vectors; however, long-term use of insecticides in vector control has led to the rapid development of insecticide resistance. In this study, we screened Bacillus thuringiensis strains as biological control agents for potential toxins against mosquito larvae as an additional control tool. Preliminary bioassays conducted on 434 strains demonstrated that 41 strains (11.64%) and 14 strains (3.97%) achieved 100% mortality against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae, respectively. Three strains (JC690, JC691, and JC699) showed toxicity to both mosquito species, compared with the reference Bti strain. Strain JC691 demonstrated the highest efficacy against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus, with an LC50 value of 6.96 × 104 CFU/ml and 1.16 × 103 CFU/ml, respectively. A comparison of LC50 values revealed that JC691 exhibited higher efficacy against Cx. quinquefasciatus than that by Bti (Bti LC50: 8.89 × 10⁴ CFU/ml) but lower efficacy against Ae. aegypti (Bti LC50: 1.99 × 10³ CFU/ml). Scanning electron microscopy revealed that JC690, JC691, and JC699 are rod-shaped, have oval spores, and produce bi-pyramidal crystal proteins. Protein profile analysis using SDS-PAGE demonstrated distinct differences between these Thailand strains (JC690, JC691, and JC699) and the reference Bti strain. All three Thailand strains contained cry1I and cry2A genes, and only JC691 harbored the cry32 gene. Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of cry32 indicated that the partial sequences of cry32 in JC691 from Thailand were distinct from those of other B. thuringiensis strains from different countries. This study demonstrates the potential of JC690, JC691, and JC699 as biocontrol agents for Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus.
Keywords: Biocontrol agents, Bacillus thuringiensis, cry gene, Delta endotoxins, Insecticidal activity, Mosquito control
Graphical abstract
Highlights
-
•
Bacillus thuringiensis strains harbor toxins for the biocontrol of mosquito larvae.
-
•
Three strains (JC690, JC691, and JC699) were toxic to Culex quinquefasciatus.
-
•
Strain JC691 exhibited the highest toxicity towards Aedes aegypti larvae.
-
•
All three Thailand strains contained the cry1I and cry2A genes, whereas only JC691 contained the cry32 gene.
-
•
All three Thailand strains are potential biocontrol agents for Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae.
1. Introduction
Diseases transmitted by mosquitoes are a public health concern responsible for millions of deaths annually (Chilakam et al., 2023). The mosquitoes Aedes aegypti (L., 1762) and Culex quinquefasciatus Say, 1823 are widely distributed worldwide, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions (Juliano and Philip Lounibos, 2005; Kraemer et al., 2015). Although Ae. aegypti is the most important global vector of arboviruses, such as dengue, chikungunya, Zika, and yellow fever (Campos et al., 2020), Cx. quinquefasciatus transmits West Nile virus (Richards et al., 2012), St. Louis encephalitis virus (Diaz et al., 2013), Usutu virus (Clé et al., 2019), and the filarial nematode Wuchereria bancrofti (Cobbold, 1877) (Ant et al., 2020) in various tropical and temperate regions worldwide.
In Thailand, Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus are significant vectors for the transmission of mosquito-borne diseases, such as dengue, filariasis, and chikungunya (Jitpakdi et al., 1998; Triteeraprapab et al., 2000; Pumidonming et al., 2005). Pyrethroid-based space sprays have been used to control adult Aedes spp. and Culex spp. mosquitoes in outbreak areas (Plernsub et al., 2016). However, widespread pyrethroid resistance, driven by kdr and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase mechanisms, has been observed in Cx. quinquefasciatus (Yanola et al., 2015) and Ae. aegypti (Plernsub et al., 2016) populations. Temephos, an organophosphate insecticide, was traditionally recommended for controlling mosquito larvae (WHO, 2012). Nevertheless, susceptibility assays performed on late third-instar to early fourth-instar Ae. aegypti larvae, following WHO guidelines, indicated varying degrees of resistance to this insecticide across Thailand (Saeung et al., 2020). Consequently, the excessive and long-term use of this insecticide has significantly contributed to the rapid emergence of insecticide resistance (Hemingway and Ranson, 2000; Saingamsook et al., 2017; Riveron et al., 2018; Sathantriphop et al., 2020; Nachaiwieng et al., 2021). Therefore, additional measures for mosquito vector control are required.
The use of entomopathogenic bacteria, such as Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus sphaericus, is a viable alternative approach for insect control (Regis et al., 2001). Bacillus thuringiensis is a ubiquitous, gram-positive, rod-shaped, sporulating bacterium distributed worldwide in a diverse range of ecosystems, including soil, water, dead insects, dust from silos, leaves from deciduous trees, diverse conifers, and insectivorous mammals (Höfte and Whiteley, 1989; Roh et al., 2007; Raymond et al., 2010). Several types of insecticidal proteins, known as delta endotoxins, are formed as crystals in bacterial cells during sporulation, including vegetative insecticidal protein toxins and secreted insecticidal proteins (Donovan et al., 2006). Delta endotoxins were categorized into two major types: Cry and Cyt. Cry consists of 79 families and 775 genes, whereas Cyt comprises 8 families and 44 genes (Crickmore et al., 2021; www.bpprc.org).
The larvicidal properties of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) was initially discovered, and it was found to contain six primary toxins: Cry4Aa, Cry4Ba, Cry10Aa, Cry11Aa, Cyt1Aa, and Cyt2Ba (Guerchicoff et al., 1997). Subsequently, various B. thuringiensis strains, producing diverse Cry toxins, namely Cry2, Cry17, Cry19, Cry24, Cry25, Cry27, Cry29, Cry30, Cry32, Cry39, Cry40, Cry44Aa, and Cry54A, have been reported as effective against dipteran insects, including mosquitoes (Wu et al., 1994; Schnepf et al., 1998; Ibarra et al., 2003; Tan et al., 2009; van Frankenhuyzen, 2009).
The mosquitocidal activity of B. thuringiensis is an additive effect of each toxin and involves complex synergistic interactions among the toxins (Ibarra et al., 2003). Several studies have investigated highly effective native strains of B. thuringiensis that target mosquitoes and discovered novel cry genes capable of killing mosquito larvae (Monnerat et al., 2005; Patil et al., 2012; Elleuch et al., 2015; Lobo et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2021; da Costa Fernandes et al., 2022).
In this study, we aimed to identify and select Thailand strains of B. thuringiensis with high larvicidal activity against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus, comparable to Bti strain. To achieve this objective, we characterized the biochemical properties, morphological features, protein profiles, and cry gene content of the selected Thailand strains of B. thuringiensis to assess their suitability as biocontrol agents.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Bacterial strains and preparation of spore-crystal suspensions
A total of 436 strains of B. thuringiensis were obtained from soil samples collected at various locations in Thailand (Attathom et al., 1995; Thaphan et al., 2008). Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti; Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research [TISTR] 500), used as the reference strain, was obtained from TISTR, Bangkok, Thailand. All B. thuringiensis strains were maintained at −20 °C in nutrient broth (NB) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 30% glycerol for long-term storage.
An inoculation loop was used to move colonies of each isolate grown on nutrient agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to 5 ml of the NB medium, which was subsequently incubated at 37 °C for 72 h. Spores and crystals were concentrated and washed several times with ice-cold distilled water. The final bacterial pellet was resuspended in 4 ml 1 mM NaCl solution to create a solution containing a bacterial concentration of 109 colony-forming units (CFUs)/ml and then stored at −20 °C until further analysis.
2.2. Larvicidal bioassays
2.2.1. Experimental mosquito rearing
Eggs of Ae aegypti NIH strain and Cx. quinquefasciatus NIH strain were obtained on filter paper strips from the National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. Mosquito larvae were allowed to hatch in dechlorinated tap water and fed with powdered fish food until they reached the fourth-instar stage, which is the appropriate stage for bioassays according to the World Health Organization guidelines (WHO, 2005). The larvae were maintained in controlled conditions (temperature of 25 ± 2 °C, relative humidity of 70–80%, and a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle) (WHO, 2005) at the Research and Lifelong Learning Center for Urban and Environmental Entomology (RESCUE), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. This protocol used the guidelines of the Thai Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (license No. U1-03015-2559).
2.2.2. Screening and determination of the lethal concentration (LC50)
A two-step procedure was used to evaluate the larvicidal activity of the strains. First, screening was conducted to identify the most effective strains against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus. Secondly, the toxicities of the selected strains were quantified by determining their LC50 values.
For the screening tests, Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae were exposed to a spore-crystal suspension of B. thuringiensis at a concentration of 108 CFU/ml (El-Kersh et al., 2016). Five plastic cups containing 20 fourth-instar mosquito larvae in water at final volume of 100 ml were used. A plastic cup containing larvae without exposure to bacteria was used as a negative control. All experiments were conducted in triplicate under laboratory conditions (temperature of 25 ± 2 °C; relative humidity of 70–80%). Mortality rates were recorded at 24, 48, and 72 h after application of the bacterial suspension. Larvae were considered dead when no sign of movement was observed after prodding them with a sterile stick (Dulmage et al., 1990). Subsequently, B. thuringiensis strains that achieved 100% mortality in both Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus were selected to determine their average LC50 values.
To determine the LC50 values of the selected B. thuringiensis strains, serial dilutions of the spore-crystal suspensions at five concentrations (103, 104, 105, 106 and 107 CFU/ml) were prepared and used for each strain. Five plastic cups containing 20 fourth-instar mosquito larvae at a final volume of 100 ml were used. Cups containing larvae without the addition of B. thuringiensis strains (negative control) and with the addition of the Bti strain (positive control) were prepared. All experiments were conducted in triplicate under the aforementioned laboratory conditions. Mortality rates were recorded at 24, 48, and 72 h after application of the bacterial suspension. Larvicidal bioassays were performed using a completely randomized design with three replications.
2.3. Characterization of B. thuringiensis strains with high toxicity against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus
2.3.1. Biochemical characterization
Bacillus thuringiensis strains were biochemically characterized using the API 50CHB system (BioMérieux, Mérieux Étoile, France), following the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.3.2. Morphological characterization by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Spore-crystal suspensions of B. thuringiensis strains were placed on coverslips and air-dried on aluminum mounts. The samples were subsequently coated with a thin layer of platinum using a sputter coater (Quorum, Q150R ES). Finally, the dry samples were imaged using a Hitachi SU8020 scanning electron microscope (SU8020 FE-SEM, HITACHI, Ltd, Chiyoda City, Tokyo, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 5 kV.
2.3.3. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of Cry and Cyt proteins
Bacillus thuringiensis strains were incubated in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 1% NaCl; pH 7.0) at 30 °C with shaking at 250 r/min for 72 h. Biomass containing spores and crystal proteins was harvested by centrifugation at 6000 rpm, 4 °C for 10 min and subjected to analysis of their protein composition using electrophoresis in 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels (Laemmli, 1970). The gels were stained for 40 min with a 50% ethanol, 10% acetic acid, and 0.1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250 solution, followed by de-staining with a 6.75% glacial acetic acid and 9.45% ethanol solution. The molecular mass of the proteins was determined by comparison with a Precision Plus Protein™ Standard marker (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).
2.3.4. Detection of the cry gene
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to identify the mosquito toxin-coding genes using various oligonucleotide pairs specific for the following genes/gene families: cry1, cry2, cry4, cry10, cry11, cry16, cry17, cry19, cry20, cry24, cry27, cry30, cry32, and cry39 (Bravo et al., 1998; Crickmore et al., 1998; Ibarra et al., 2003). Genomic DNA was extracted using the method of Harwood and Cutting (1990). Plasmid DNA was extracted using a rapid alkaline extraction procedure described by Birnboim and Doly (1979). Amplification was performed under the following conditions: 5 min of denaturation at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles of amplification consisting of 1 min of denaturation at 94 °C, 45 s of annealing at a temperature dependent on the primer set used, and 2 min of extension at 72 °C. For the PCR products, 1% agarose electrophoresis was employed and the PCR product of each detected cry gene was purified using the QIAquick® PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and sent to Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea) for DNA sequencing.
2.3.5. Phylogenetic analysis of partial cry32 sequences
A phylogenetic tree of B. thuringiensis was constructed using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML). The best-fit evolution models of nucleotide substitution based on the Akaike information criterion (Akaike, 1974) for ML and the Bayesian information criterion (Schwarz, 1978) for BI were determined using the Kakusan4 program (Tanabe, 2007). The Treefinder program was used to perform ML analysis with 1000 bootstrap replicates to examine the branch confidence values. Tree topologies with bootstrap values of at least 70% were determined to be sufficiently resolved (Huelsenbeck and Hillis, 1993).
The BI analysis was performed using MrBayes software (version 3.2.6; Ronquist et al., 2012), with a Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MC-MCMC) sampling method. The four-chain MC-MCMC analyses were run twice in parallel for 100,000 generations with trees sampled every 1000 generations. The initial 25% of generations were discarded as “burn-in” samples. The remaining trees were used to investigate consensus tree topology and bipartition posterior probability (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001). A posterior probability value > 0.94 was considered notable support for consensus tree topology (Larget and Simon, 1999). To root the phylogenetic tree, we retrieved two B. thuringiensis cry2A sequences from GenBank (B. thuringiensis cry2Ad4: AM490199.1 and B. thuringiensis T405 cry2Aa: OM995804.1) used as outgroups. These sequences belonged to a more distantly related group and provided a more reliable representation of the cry32 phylogenetic tree.
2.4. Statistical analysis
LC50 values were estimated using Probit analysis (Finney, 1971) in SPSS v.13.0 on larval mortality data for Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae exposed to various B. thuringiensis strain concentrations.
3. Results
3.1. Insecticidal activity
In the preliminary screening of 434 B. thuringiensis strains against mosquito larvae revealed that 352 strains (81.10%) exhibited larvicidal activity against both Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus, 67 strains (15.43%) against Aedes aegypti alone, and 13 strains (2.99%) against Cx. quinquefasciatus alone, when compared with the reference Bti strain. For Ae. aegypti larvae, 41 strains (11.64%) achieved 100% mortality. For Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae, only 14 strains (3.97%) achieved 100% mortality. Nine B. thuringiensis strains, exhibiting 100% mortality against both mosquito species, were selected for LC50 determination (Supplementary file S1: Table S1 and Table S2).
Among these nine B. thuringiensis strains, JC691 demonstrated the highest efficacy against Ae. aegypti, with an LC50 value of 6.96 × 104 CFU/ml. Strains JC690, JC691, and JC699 exhibited high efficacy against Cx. quinquefasciatus, with LC50 values of 7.30 × 103, 1.16 × 103, and 6.58 × 103 CFU/ml, respectively. The results suggested that strain JC691 was the most effective strain overall. However, a comparison of LC50 of JC691 with LC50 of Bti for Ae. aegypti (1.99 × 103 CFU/ml) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (8.89 × 104 CFU/ml) revealed that JC691 demonstrated higher efficacy against Cx. quinquefasciatus than Bti but not against Ae. aegypti (Table 1).
Table 1.
Median lethal concentration (LC50) of Bacillus thuringiensis strains pathogenic to Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti at 72 h post-application.
| Isolate |
Culex quinquefasciatus |
Aedes aegypti |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC50 (CFU/ml) (fiducial limit) | χ2 | P | LC50 (CFU/ml) (fiducial limit) | χ2 | P | |
| JC20 | 5.90 × 105 (4.40 × 105–8.03 × 105) | 14.16 | 0.36 | 3.82 × 107 (1.85 × 107–1.07 × 108) | 9.15 | 0.76 |
| JC411 | 9.60 × 105 (7.36 × 105–1.27 × 106) | 13.74 | 0.39 | 5.78 × 106 (3.74 × 106–9.79 × 107) | 13.21 | 0.43 |
| JC412 | 1.62 × 106 (1.23 × 106–2.17 × 106) | 11.79 | 0.55 | 1.44 × 107 (9.17 × 106–2.60 × 107) | 6.68 | 0.98 |
| JC690 | 7.30 × 103 (4.95 × 103–1.64 × 104) | 15.53 | 0.28 | 5.06 × 106 (3.65 × 106–7.44 × 106) | 7.72 | 0.86 |
| JC691 | 1.16 × 103 (5.42 × 102–2.11 × 103) | 22.01 | 0.06 | 6.96 × 104 (4.47 × 104–1.07 × 105) | 3.38 | 0.99 |
| JC693 | 3.03 × 105 (2.36 × 105–3.91 × 105) | 20.21 | 0.09 | 1.85 × 106 (1.27 × 106–2.84 × 106) | 7.68 | 0.86 |
| JC699 | 6.58 × 103 (4.30 × 103–9.59 × 103) | 19.25 | 0.12 | 1.74 × 106 (1.27 × 106–2.48 × 106) | 13.02 | 0.45 |
| JCPT17 | 6.03 × 105 (4.64 × 105–7.90 × 105) | 10.09 | 0.69 | 3.50 × 106 (2.37 × 106–5.79 × 106) | 12.42 | 0.49 |
| JCPT22 | 2.68 × 105 (2.10 × 105–3.41 × 105) | 17.09 | 0.19 | 1.24 × 106 (8.94 × 105–1.78 × 106) | 10.99 | 0.61 |
| Bti | 8.89 × 104 (5.80 × 103–1.38 × 105) | 10.05 | 0.69 | 1.99 × 103 (1.04 × 103–3.36 × 105) | 15.53 | 0.28 |
3.2. Morphological and biochemical characterization
Morphological analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that JC690, JC691, and JC699 strains are rod-shaped cells capable of producing oval spores and bi-pyramidal crystals (Fig. 1). Biochemical test results for the JC690, JC691, and JC699 strains and Bti strain are listed in Table 2. The biochemical profiles of the JC690, JC691, and JC699 strains exhibited slight differences. JC690 is capable of fermenting D-mannose sugar, JC691 can ferment alpha-methyl-D-mannoside and alpha-methyl-D-glucoside, and JC699 can ferment gluconate sugars. Based on the API kit database and biochemical characteristics, the strains JC690, JC691, and JC699 were identified as B. thuringiensis with shared identities of 99.2, 99.0, and 99.1%, respectively.
Fig. 1.
Scanning electron microscopy of spores and crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis strains JC690 (A), JC691(B), and JC699 (C). Abbreviations: bp, bi-pyramidal crystal; sp, spore.
Table 2.
Biochemical profiles of Bacillus thuringiensis strains JC690, JC691 and JC699 compared with the reference strain B. thuringiensis israelensis.
| Test | JC690 | JC691 | JC699 | israelensis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerol | + | + | + | + |
| Erythritol | – | – | – | – |
| D-Arabinose | – | – | – | – |
| L-Arabinose | – | – | – | – |
| Ribose | + | + | + | + |
| D-xylose | – | – | – | – |
| L-xylose | – | – | – | – |
| Adonitol | – | – | – | – |
| Beta-Methylxyloside | – | – | – | – |
| Galactose | – | – | – | – |
| D-Glucose | + | + | + | + |
| D-Fructose | + | + | + | + |
| D-Mannose | + | – | – | + |
| L-Sorbose | – | – | – | – |
| Rhamnose | – | – | – | – |
| Dulcitol | – | – | – | – |
| Inositol | – | – | – | – |
| Mannitol | – | – | – | – |
| Sorbitol | – | – | – | – |
| Alpha-Methyl-D-mannoside | – | + | – | – |
| Alpha-Methyl –D-glucoside | – | + | – | – |
| N-Acethylglucosamine | + | + | + | + |
| Amygdalin | + | + | + | – |
| Arbutin | + | + | + | + |
| Esculin | + | + | + | + |
| Salicin | + | + | + | + |
| Cellobiose | + | + | + | + |
| Maltose | + | + | + | + |
| Lactose | – | – | – | – |
| Melibiose | – | – | – | – |
| Sucrose | + | + | + | + |
| Trehalose | + | + | + | + |
| Inulin | – | – | – | – |
| Melezitose | – | – | – | – |
| D-Raffinose | – | – | – | – |
| Starch | + | + | + | + |
| Glycogen | + | + | + | + |
| Xylitol | – | – | – | – |
| Βeta-Gentiobiose | – | – | – | – |
| D-Turanose | – | – | – | – |
| D-Lyxose | – | – | – | – |
| D-Tagatose | – | – | – | – |
| D-Fucose | – | – | – | – |
| L-Fucose | – | – | – | – |
| D-Arabitol | – | – | – | – |
| L-Arabitol | – | – | – | – |
| Gluconate | – | – | + | + |
| 2-Ketogluconate | – | – | – | – |
| 5-Ketogluconate | – | – | – | – |
Key: +, positive reaction; –, negative reaction.
3.3. The profile of SDS-PAGE proteins in Bacillus thuringiensis strains
Protein profile analyses using SDS-PAGE revealed that the B. thuringiensis JC690, JC691, and JC699 isolates differed from those of Bti (Fig. 2). JC690 and JC699 exhibited proteins with molecular masses within the range of 20–80 kDa, whereas JC691 contained proteins with molecular masses within the range of 25–150 kDa. Proteins with molecular weights of approximately 65 and 75 kDa were detected in all strains. A well-defined protein band with a molecular mass of 100–150 kDa was observed exclusively for isolate JC691.
Fig. 2.
SDS-PAGE proteins profile in Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Lane 1, B. thuringiensis strain JC690; Lane 2, B. thuringiensis strain JC691; Lane 3, B. thuringiensis strain JC699; Lane 4, B. thuringiensis israelensis; Lane M, molecular mass markers, where numbers on the right indicate the molecular masses of standard marker proteins. Arrows indicate the expected molecular weights (approximately 65, 70 and 130 kDa).
3.4. Determination of cry gene content
PCR analysis of the highly effective strains (JC690, JC691, and JC699), using general and specific primers for cry genes, revealed that all three strains tested positive for cry1I and cry2A in chromosomal DNA, with only JC691 testing positive for cry32. Plasmid DNA analysis showed that cry1I was present in all three strains, whereas cry32 was present only in JC691. All PCR products were cloned, sequenced, and subjected to a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) search using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database.
Sequence comparisons with other cry genes in the database showed that the sequences of cry1I and cry2A from all strains were highly homologous to sequences of cry1I (GenBank: U07642.1) and cry2A (GenBank: DQ341378.1), with shared identities of 98% and 93%, respectively. The cry32 sequences shared 98% identity with that of cry32 (GenBank: GU324274.1). Based on our results, portions of the cry32 sequence were deposited in GenBank under accession no. OQ316632, according to its previously reported toxicity of cry32 to mosquito larvae (van Frankenhuyzen, 2009). Therefore, the genetic structure of cry32 was further examined and compared with available data from other sources.
3.5. Phylogenetic analysis of the partial nucleotide sequence of the cry32 gene
The ML and BI analyses based on the partial cry32 gene of the nuclear genome, showed consistency in tree topologies; thus, only the ML tree is shown (Fig. 3). ML bootstrap values of 100% and a Bayesian posterior probability of 1.0 clearly revealed that B. thuringiensis formed a monophyletic clade. According to the phylogenetic tree, four distinct groups were identified. Notably, the sequence of B. thuringiensis voucher JC691 (GenBank: OQ316632) was clearly separated from that of voucher JC51 (GenBank: KX685157.1).
Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic tree of Bacillus thuringiensis in Thailand based on maximum likelihood analysis of the cry32 gene. Outgroups: B. thuringiensis cry2Ad4: AM490199.1 and B. thuringiensis T405 cry2Aa: OM995804.1) Maximum likelihood (ML bootstrap values) and BI nodal support (posterior probability values) are shown as ML/BI.
4. Discussion
Of the 434 Bacillus thuringiensis strains, JC690, JC691, and JC699 obviously exhibited lower lethal concentration (LC50) values of 1.16–7.30 × 103 CFU/ml against Cx. quinquefasciatus compared with those of Bti (LC50: 8.89 × 104 CFU/ml), demonstrating their potential for controlling this mosquito species. Notably, JC691 was the most toxic to Ae. aegypti (LC50: 6.96 × 104 CFU/ml); however, its efficacy was not as potent as Bti (LC50: 1.99 × 103 CFU/ml). Similarly, Chowanadisai et al. (1995) reported that the strains S-KB1802, S-KB1001, and S-KB2701 were toxic to the larvae of aedine mosquitoes, with LC50 values of 1.28 × 102, 3.59 × 102, and 9.80 × 102 spores/ml, respectively.
Rajchanuwong et al. (2019) reported that B. thuringiensis chanpaisis (JC51) showed promise as a mosquito larvicide, being effective against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus with LC50 values of 1.48 × 104 and 1.0 × 104 CFU/ml, respectively. However, in screening the spore-crystal suspension of 434 Thailand strains of B. thuringiensis, including the reference strain Bti, against culicine mosquito larvae, we observed lower mortality rates for Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus by JC51 at 61.67% and 25%, respectively, compared with their reported 100% mortality for both species. This difference might be influenced by the mosquito strains used because we tested Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus NIH strains, whereas the existing study used the Bora Bora strain (Koou et al., 2014). Additionally, JC51 was first described in 1995, while JC690, JC691, and JC699 are new, not as yet studied strains.
In this study, three Thailand strains JC690, JC691, and JC699 of B. thuringiensis demonstrated lower LC50 than the strains reported to date. For example, the BU55 strain had an LC50 value of 2.20 × 107 CFU/ml against Cx. quinquefasciatus (Roy et al., 2021), and the SB1 strain had LC50 values of 5.82 × 108 CFU/ml and 6.32 × 108 CFU/ml against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae, respectively (Chatterjee et al., 2018).
The spore-crystal mixture is an established technique for evaluating the effectiveness of B. thuringiensis, especially when analyzing extensive sample sets. Several preparations of spore-crystal mixtures of B. thuringiensis strains exhibiting significant larvicidal properties have been isolated from different regions worldwide (Soares-da-Silva et al., 2017; da Costa Fernandes et al., 2022; Nair et al., 2020; Salamun et al., 2021).
Generally, B. thuringiensis strains exhibit insecticidal activity primarily against Lepidoptera (Armengol et al., 2007; Gobatto et al., 2010; Silva et al., 2012) and Coleoptera (Chilcott and Wigley, 1993; Kaelin et al., 1999; Quesada-Moraga et al., 2004) and rarely show mosquitocidal activity. In this study, 4.88% and 3.02% of the tested strains caused mortality of Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae, respectively. A small proportion of the strain actively targeted mosquito larvae and most remained inactive. These findings are consistent with those of several studies conducted in different geographical regions, which have revealed a low occurrence of active mosquitocidal strains (Bernhard et al., 1997; Park et al., 2008; El-Kersh et al., 2014). The low frequency of isolates with the potential for mosquito control may be related to the smaller number of mosquitocidal toxins (Soares-da-Silva et al., 2017) compared with approximately 95 active toxins catalogued for the control of lepidopterans and coleopterans (van Frankenhuyzen, 2009, 2013).
The isolates JC690, JC691, and JC699 were further characterized in terms of their morphological, biochemical, and molecular features, as well as their protein profiles. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that crystal proteins and spores could be differentiated by their shapes: crystal proteins exhibited a bi-pyramidal shape, and spores were spherical. This result is in line with those of existing studies reporting that most B. thuringiensis strains including those from Thailand exhibit a bi-pyramidal crystal morphology (Meadows et al., 1992; Bernhard et al., 1997; Thaphan et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2012). Despite having identical crystal protein shapes, the three strains exhibited variations in the protein crystal size, with JC691 producing larger crystals compared to JC690 and JC699.
The protein profiles of B. thuringiensis strains were analyzed using SDS-PAGE. The molecular weights of the proteins in the strains JC690 and JC699 ranged from 20 to 80 kDa, and those of JC691 ranged from 25 to 150 kDa. Most of these proteins were highly expressed, as illustrated by the SDS-PAGE results.
Protein bands with molecular weights of approximately 65 kDa (Cry1I toxin) and 75 kDa (Cry2A toxin) were observed for all strains. Strain JC691 additionally revealed the presence of a band at approximately 130 kDa, corresponding to the Cry32 toxin. A cluster of bands between 25 and 37 kDa was detected, suggesting the presence of the Cyt1 and Cyt2 toxins (Chow et al., 1989; Juárez-Pérez et al., 2002).
PCR data showed that all toxic strains carried the cry1I and cry2A genes, with bands of approximately 80 and 70 kDa, respectively, corresponding to the size of the protoxin forms of Cry1I and Cry2A toxins (Ruiz de Escudero et al., 2006; Ramalakshmi et al., 2022). The Cry2A protein has been reported to exhibit a wide range of insecticidal toxicities against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus (van Frankenhuyzen, 2009; Liang et al., 2011). In the present study, none of the tested strains produced PCR products of expected sizes for cry4, cry10, cry11, cry16, cry17, cry19, cry20, cry24, cry27, cry30, or cry39 after using the appropriate primers for gene detection. In contrast, cry4 and cry11 genes were detected in approximately 8% of the Mexican strain collection (Bravo et al., 1998) and cry4 genes were the second most abundant in 215 B. thuringiensis strains collected from Israel, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan (Ben-Dov et al., 1997).
However, several studies have reported the absence of specific cry genes in certain B. thuringiensis populations. For instance, Sivaji and Girija (2017) found 20 B. thuringiensis strains isolated from the Western Ghats of Kerala, India, that did not contain cry16, cry17, and cry19 genes. Similarly, Konecka et al. (2014) did not detect cry17, cry18, cry19, cry20, cry22, cry24, cry26, cry27, cry28, cry29, cry30, cry32, cry39, and cry40 genes in 18 B. thuringiensis strains obtained from the intestinal tract of Cydia pomonella larvae. Furthermore, Ibarra et al. (2003) found only cry10, cry17, cry27, and cry30 genes in B. thuringiensis strains from Latin America, with no detection of cry24, cry29, cry32, and cry40 genes.
The absence of certain cry genes in B. thuringiensis populations can be attributed to the genetic diversity within this species. Bacillus thuringiensis comprises numerous strains, each possessing a unique combination of genes, leading to notable variations in the presence or absence of specific cry genes (Tetreau et al., 2021). Furthermore, several cry genes are located on plasmids, which are extrachromosomal DNA molecules (Lereclus et al., 1993). These plasmids can be readily acquired or lost during bacterial growth and reproduction, resulting in variations in gene content across different B. thuringiensis strains (Sarrafzadeh et al., 2007; Fagundes et al., 2011).
The PCR products of cry1I and cry2A, which are commonly found in Asian B. thuringiensis strains (Chak et al., 1994; Ben-Dov et al., 1997; Kim, 2000; Zhang et al., 2000), were detected in all tested strains in this study. High frequencies of cry1 and cry2 have been described in B. thuringiensis samples throughout Thailand (81.3% and 80.6%, respectively) (Thammasittirong and Attathom, 2008).
The toxicity of JC690 and JC699 to Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus is attributed to the presence of cry1I and cry2A genes, which is consistent with findings reported by many researchers (van Frankenhuyzen, 2009; Liang et al., 2011; Ricoldi et al., 2018). Cry1I proteins are toxic to various lepidopteran larvae (Tailor et al., 1992; Gleave et al., 1993; Song et al., 2003; Berretta et al., 2020), coleopteran (Tailor et al., 1992; Martins et al., 2008) and dipteran insects (Crickmore et al., 1998). These toxins target the midgut, binding to the peritrophic membrane and disrupting epithelial cells (Feng et al., 2015). However, the mechanism of Cry1I action on mosquito larvae remains unstudied.
Cry2A toxin is a toxic protein to mosquito larvae, including Aedes aegypti (Liang et al., 2011; Ricoldi et al., 2018) and Culex pipiens (Zghal et al., 2006). The mechanism of Cry2 action on mosquito larvae involves specific and saturable binding of the toxin to brush border membrane vesicles of midgut epithelial cells. This binding precedes membrane insertion, as reported by Hernández-Rodríguez et al. (2008).
Generally, Cry toxin insertion causes the formation of lytic pores in the microvilli of apical membranes (Aronson and Shai, 2001; Bravo et al., 2005). These characteristics result in cell lysis, damage to the midgut epithelium, and the release of cellular content, creating a favorable environment for spore germination. Severe septicemia ultimately leads to insect death (de Maagd et al., 2001; Bravo et al., 2005).
The mosquitocidal activity of isolate JC691 in this study may be due to the presence of protein bands between 25 and 29 kDa which is comparable to Cyt toxins (25–28 kDa). Cyt toxins have been reported to be toxic in the cell membrane of the larval gut (Soberón et al., 2013; Mendoza-Almanza et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the potential role of 25–29 kDa proteins in mosquito larvae mortality remains unclear and requires further investigation.
The presence of cry32 in JC691 and its absence in JC690 and JC699 suggests its potential as the most effective strain against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae. The protein profile of JC691 had molecular masses ranging from 20 to 75 kDa and 140 kDa; nevertheless, only 140 kDa was identical with the Cry32 protein. The Cry32Aa protein is expected to have a molecular mass of 139.2 kDa (Balasubramanian et al., 2002) and is considered toxic to dipteran insects, especially mosquito larvae (van Frankenhuyzen, 2009). This finding is consistent with another study reporting that B. thuringiensis chanpaisis contained only cry32 and exhibited mortality against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Rajchanuwong et al., 2019). Furthermore, the Cry32 protein can act in synergy with Cry toxins to substantially increase their potential as control agents for mosquito populations (Crickmore et al., 1998; Bravo et al., 2006; Jouzani et al., 2008; Ben-Dov, 2014). However, the mode of action of the Cry32 protein remains to be investigated.
The Bacterial Pesticidal Protein Resource Center database currently lists 29 Cry32 proteins (Crickmore et al., 2021). However, only three genes (Cry32Aa1, Cry32Ha1, and Cry32Hb2) have been shown to be toxic to insects (Balasubramanian et al., 2002; Sampson et al., 2013). Therefore, the discovery of Cry32 proteins with toxicity to mosquito strains in this study prompted their selection for further analysis. This analysis included the construction of a phylogenetic tree using information from the NCBI database.
Based on the phylogenetic tree, there were four distinct groups; the largest group was group III, which included non-Thailand strains (strains from China and the USA). The cry32 gene from the Thailand strains JC51 and JC691 formed unique groups, separate from non-Thailand strains and distinct from each other. Accordingly, a full-gene sequence analysis of the cry32 gene, a less frequently studied gene for controlling mosquito larvae, is necessary.
Despite its contributions, this study has limitations. The main limitation of this study was that using spore-crystal suspensions (spores/ml) for LC50 determination limits direct comparison with studies using purified toxin concentrations (mg/ml). Another limitation was the use of laboratory-reared mosquito strains, which might not accurately reflect insecticide resistance levels in field populations. Consequently, further research should prioritize determining LC50 values by using purified B. thuringiensis toxins (mg/ml) against field-collected mosquito populations with known insecticide resistance levels.
5. Conclusions
Among the 434 native strains of B. thuringiensis, three (JC690, JC691, and JC699) harbored cry1I and cry2A, and were most effective against Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae. Notably, cry32 was also detected in the highly effective strain (JC691), which may exhibit synergistic interactions with other cry genes, thus enhancing its larvicidal activity for mosquitoes. These three strains, demonstrating strong mosquito larvicidal activity, are excellent candidates for developing biocontrol products as an alternative to using chemical insecticides for controlling Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus populations in Thailand. The present results provide insights that represent an important step towards enhancing the phylogenetic understanding of the cry gene and its potential application, and the potential application of specific strains of B. thuringiensis as biocontrol agents.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Prakai Rajchanuwong: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Investigation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Sawaporn Peaboon: Methodology, Investigation. Ratchadawan Ngoen-Klan: Software, Data curation, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Atsalek Rattanawannee: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Atirat Noosidum: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Boonhiang Promdonkoy: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Jariya Chanpaisaeng: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap: Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing.
Ethical approval
The study protocol used the guidelines of the Thai Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (license No. U1-03015-2559).
Funding
This research was supported the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute, (KURDI), Bangkok, Thailand (Grant # FF (KU) 52.67).
Declaration of competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This research received support from the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI) (Grant # FF (KU) 52.67). We thank Assistant Professor Akekawat Vitheepradit for providing the SPSS program.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpvbd.2025.100245.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary file.
References
- Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control. 1974;19:716–723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ant T.H., Herd C., Louis F., Failloux A.B., Sinkins S.P. Wolbachia transinfections in Culex quinquefasciatus generate cytoplasmic incompatibility. Insect Mol. Biol. 2020;29:1–8. doi: 10.1111/imb.12604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Armengol G., Escobar M.C., Maldonado M.E., Orduz S. Diversity of Colombian strains of Bacillus thuringiensis with insecticidal activity against dipteran and lepidopteran insects. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007;102:77–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-.2672.2006.03063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aronson A.I., Shai Y. Why Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxins are so effective: Unique features of their mode of action. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001;195:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10489.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Attathom T., Chongrattanameteekul W., Chanpaisang J., Siriyan R. Morphological diversity and toxicity of delta-endotoxin produced by various strains of Bacillus thuringiensis. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1995;85:167–173. [Google Scholar]
- Balasubramanian P., Jayakumar R., Shambharkar P., Unnamalai N., Pandian S.K., Kumaraswami N.S., et al. Cloning and characterization of the crystal protein-encoding gene of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. yunnanensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:408–411. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.1.408-411.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ben-Dov E. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and its dipteran-specific toxins. Toxins. 2014;61:1222–1243. doi: 10.3390/toxins6041222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ben-Dov E., Zaritsky A., Dahan E., Barak Z., Sinai R., Manasherob R., et al. Extended screening by PCR for seven cry-group genes from field-collected strains of Bacillus thuringiensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997;63:4883–4890. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.12.4883-4890.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernhard K., Jarrett P., Meadows M., Butt J., Ellis D.J., Roberts G.M., et al. Natural isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis: Worldwide distribution, characterization, and activity against insect pests. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1997;70:59–68. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1997.4669. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Berretta M.F., Pedarros A.S., Sauka D.H., Pérez M.P., Onco M.I., Benintende G.B. Susceptibility of agricultural pests of regional importance in South America to a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ia protein. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2020;172 doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2020.107354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birnboim H.C., Doly J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;7:1513–1523. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bravo A., Gill S.S., Soberón M. In: Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science. Gilbert L.I., Iatrou K., Gill S.S., editors. Elsevier BV; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2005. Bacillus thuringiensis mechanisms and use; pp. e175–e206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bravo A., Gill S.S., Soberón M. Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon. 2006;49:423–435. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bravo A., Sarabia S., Lopez L., Ontiveros H., Abarca C., Ortiz A., et al. Characterization of cry genes in a Mexican Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998;64:4965–4972. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.4965-4972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campos E.V.R., de Oliveira J.L., Abrantes D.C., Rogério C.B., Bueno C., Miranda V.R., et al. Recent developments in nanotechnology for detection and control of Aedes aegypti-borne diseases. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020;8:102. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chak K.F., Chao D.C., Tseng M.Y., Kao S.S., Tuan S.J., Feng T.Y. Determination and distribution of cry-type genes of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from Taiwan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994;60:2415–2420. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.7.2415-2420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee S., Mukhopadhyay P., Chakraborty D., Dangar K. Characterization and mosquitocidal potency of Bacillus thuringiensis isolate SB1 from the sundarbans mangrove, West Bengal, India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India B Biol. Sci. 2018;88:403–409. doi: 10.1007/s40011-016-0773-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chilakam N., Lakshminarayanan V., Keremutt S., Rajendran A., Thunga G., Poojari P.G., et al. Economic burden of mosquito-borne diseases in low-and middle-income countries: Protocol for a systematic review. JMIR Res. Protocols. 2023;12 doi: 10.2196/50985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chilcott C.N., Wigley P.J. Isolation and toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis from soil and insect habitats in New Zealand. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1993;61:244–247. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1993.1047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chow E., Singh F.J.P., Gill S.S. Binding and aggregation of the 25-kilodalton toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis to cell membranes and alteration by monoclonal antibodies and amino acid modifiers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989;55:2779–2788. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.11.2779-2788.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chowanadisai L., Chanpaisaeng J., Attathom T. Selection of pathogenic bacilli in Thailand, against Aedes aegypti (L) Mosq. Borne Dis. Bull. 1995;22:425–428. [Google Scholar]
- Clé M., Beck C., Salinas S., Lecollinet S., Gutierrez S., Van de Perre P., et al. Usutu virus: A new threat? Epidemiol. Infect. 2019;147:e232. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819001213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crickmore N., Berry C., Panneerselvam S., Mishra R., Connor T.R., Bonning B.C. A structure-based nomenclature for Bacillus thuringiensis and other bacteria-derived pesticidal proteins. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2021;186 doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2020.107438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crickmore N., Zeigler D.R., Feitelson J., Schnepf E., Van Rie J., Lereclus D., et al. Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998;62:807–813. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.3.807-813.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- da Costa Fernandes G., de Prado Costa D.K., de Oliveira N.S., de Sousa E.C.P., Machado D.H.B., Polanczyk R.A., et al. Genetic diversity of Brazilian Bacillus thuringiensis isolates with toxicity against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Sci. Rep. 2022;12:4408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18559-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Maagd R.A., Bravo A., Crickmore N. How Bacillus thuringiensis has evolved specific toxins to colonize the insect world. Trends Genet. 2001;17:193–199. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02237-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diaz L.A., Flores F.S., Beranek M., Rivarola M.E., Almirón W.R., Contigiani M.S. Transmission of endemic St Louis encephalitis virus strains by local Culex quinquefasciatus populations in Cordoba, Argentina. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013;107:332–334. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trt023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donovan W.P., Engleman J.T., Donovan J.C., Baum J.A., Bunkers G.J., Chi D.J., et al. Discovery and characterization of Sip1A: A novel secreted protein from Bacillus thuringiensis with activity against coleopteran larvae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006;72:713–719. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0332-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dulmage H.T., Yousten A.A., Singer S.L., Lacey L.A. World Health Organization; Geneva. Switzerland: 1990. Guidelines for production of Bacillus thuringiensis H-14 and Bacillus sphaericus.https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/61645 [Google Scholar]
- El-Kersh T.A., Ahmed A.M., Al-Sheikh Y.A., Tripet F., Ibrahim M.S., Metwalli A.A. Isolation and characterization of native Bacillus thuringiensis strains from Saudi Arabia with enhanced larvicidal toxicity against the mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) Parasites Vectors. 2016;9:647. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1922-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Kersh T.A., Al-akeel R.A., Al-sheikh Y.A., Alharbi S.A. Isolation and distribution of mosquito-larvicidal cry genes in Bacillus thuringiensis strains native to Saudi Arabia. Trop. Biomed. 2014;31:616–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elleuch J., Tounsi S., Hassen N.B.B., Lacoix M.N., Chandre F., Jaoua S., Zghal R.Z. Characterisation of novel Bacillus thuringiensis isolates against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephridae) J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2015;24:90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fagundes R.B.S., Picoli E.A.T., Lana U.G.P., Valicente F.H. Plasmid patterns of efficient and inefficient strains of Bacillus thuringiensis against Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Neotrop. Entomol. 2011;40:600–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng D., Chen Z., Wang Z., Zhang C., He K., Guo S. Domain III of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ie toxin plays an important role in binding to peritrophic membrane of Asian corn borer. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finney D.J. Cambridge University Press; London, UK: 1971. A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve. Probit Analysis. [Google Scholar]
- Gleave A.P., Williams R., Hedges R.J. Screening by polymerase chain reaction of Bacillus thuringiensis serotypes for the presence of cryV-like insecticidal protein genes and characterization of a cryV gene cloned from B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993;59:1683–1687. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.5.1683-1687.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gobatto V., Giani S.G., Camassola M., Dillon A.J., Specht A., Barros N.M. Bacillus thuringiensis isolates entomopathogenic for Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) and Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Braz. J. Biol. 2010;70:1039–1046. doi: 10.1590/s1519-69842010000500018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guerchicoff A., Ugalde R.A., Rubinstein C.P. Identification and characterization of a previously undescribed cyt gene in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997;63:2716–2721. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.7.2716-2721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harwood C.R., Cutting S.M. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; New York, USA: 1990. Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus. [Google Scholar]
- Hemingway J., Ranson H. Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2000;45:371–391. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernández-Rodríguez C.S., Van Vliet A., Bautsoens N., Van Rie J., Ferré J. Specific binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2A insecticidal proteins to a common site in the midgut of Helicoverpa species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:7654–7659. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01373-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Höfte H., Whiteley H. Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol. Rev. 1989;53:242–255. doi: 10.1128/mr.53.2.242-255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huelsenbeck J.P., Hillis D.M. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 1993;42:247–264. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:754–755. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ibarra J.E., del Rincón M.C., Ordúz S., Noriega D., Benintende G., Monnerat R., et al. Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains from Latin America with insecticidal activity against different mosquito species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:5269–5274. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5269-5274.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jitpakdi A., Choochote W., Panart P., Tookyang B., Panart K., Prajakwong S. Possible transmission of two types of Wuchereria bancrofti in Muang District, Chiang Mai, northern Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health. 1998;29:141–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jouzani G.S., Abad A.P., Seifinejad A., Marzban R., Kariman K., Maleki B. Distribution and diversity of dipteran-specific cry and cyt genes in native Bacillus thuringiensis strains obtained from different ecosystems of Iran. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008;35:83–94. doi: 10.1007/s10295-007-0269-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Juárez-Pérez V., Guerchicoff A., Rubinstein C., Delécluse A. Characterization of Cyt2Bc toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp, medellin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:1228–1231. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1228-1231.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Juliano S.A., Philip Lounibos L. Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: Effects on resident species and on human health. Ecol. Lett. 2005;8:558–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaelin P., Zaugg L., Albertini A.M., Gadani F. Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates on Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) J. Stored Prod. Res. 1999;35:145–158. doi: 10.1016/S0022-474X(98)00040-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim H.S. Comparative study of the frequency, flagellar serotype, crystal shape, toxicity, and cry gene contents of Bacillus thuringiensis from three environments. Curr. Microbiol. 2000;41:250–256. doi: 10.1007/s002840010129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Konecka E., Baranek J., Kaznowski A. Crystalline protein profiling and cry gene detection in Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated during epizootics in Cydia pomonella L. Biol. Lett. 2014;51:83–92. doi: 10.1515/biolet-2015-0008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Koou S.Y., Chong C.S., Vythilingam I., Ng L.C., Lee C.Y. Pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) from Singapore. J. Med. Entomol. 2014;51:170–181. doi: 10.1603/me13113. PMID: 24605467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraemer M.U., Sinka M.E., Duda K.A., Mylne A.Q., Shearer F.M., Barker C.M., et al. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. eLife. 2015;4 doi: 10.7554/eLife.08347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larget B., Simon D.L. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999;16:750–759. [Google Scholar]
- Lee D.W., Je Y.H., Koh Y.H. Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from Korean forest environments. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2012;15:237–239. [Google Scholar]
- Lereclus D., Delecluses A., Lecadet M.M. In: Bacillus thuringiensis an Environmental Biopesticide: Theory and Practice. Entwistle P.F., Cory J.S., Bailey M.J., Higgs S., editors. John Willey & Sons; West Sussex, UK: 1993. Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and genes; pp. 37–70. [Google Scholar]
- Liang H., Liu Y., Zhu J., Peng G., Li S., Wang S., et al. Characterization of cry2-type genes of Bacillus thuringiensis strains from soil isolated of Sichuan basin, China. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011;42:140–146. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822011000100018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lobo K.D.S., Soares-da-Silva J., Silva M.C.D., Tadei W.P., Polanczyk R.A., Pinheiro V.C.S. Isolation and molecular characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis found in soils of the Cerrado region of Brazil, and their toxicity to Aedes aegypti larvae. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2018;62:5–12. [Google Scholar]
- Martins E.S., Aguiar R.W.D.S., Martins N.F., Melatti V.M., Falcão R., Gomes A.C.M.M., et al. Recombinant Cry1Ia protein is highly toxic to cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis Boheman) and fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) Appl. Microbiol. 2008;104:1363–1371. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03665.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meadows M.P., Ellis D.J., Butt J., Jarrett P., Burges H.D. Distribution, frequency, and diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in an animal feed mill. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992;58:1344–1350. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.4.1344-1350.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mendoza-Almanza G., Esparza-Ibarra E.L., Ayala-Luján J.L., Mercado-Reyes M., Godina-González S., Hernández-Barrales M., Olmos-Soto J. The cytocidal spectrum of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: From insects to human cancer cells. Toxins. 2020;12:301. doi: 10.3390/toxins12050301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Monnerat R.G., Dias D.G.S., Silva S.F.D., Martins E.S., Berry C., Falcão R., et al. Screening of Bacillus thuringiensis strains effective against mosquitoes. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2005;40:103–106. [Google Scholar]
- Nachaiwieng W., Yanola J., Chamnanya S., Lumjuan N., Somboon P. Efficacy of five commercial household insecticide aerosol sprays against pyrethroid resistant Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes in Thailand. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2021;178 doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nair K., Al-Thani R., Ginibre C., Chandre F., Alsafran M., Jaoua S. Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated from Qatari soil, synthesizing δ-endotoxins highly active against the disease vector insect Aedes aegypti Bora Bora. Heliyon. 2020;6 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park H.W., Hayes S.R., Mangum C.M. Distribution of mosquitocidal Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus sphaericus from sediment samples in Florida. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2008;11:217–220. doi: 10.1016/j.aspen.2008.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Patil C.D., Patil S.V., Salunke B.K., Salunkhe R.B. Insecticidal potency of bacterial species Bacillus thuringiensis SV2 and Serratia nematodiphila SV6 against larvae of mosquito species Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Culex quinquefasciatus. Parasitol. Res. 2012;110:1841–1847. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2708-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plernsub S., Saingamsook J., Yanola J., Lumjuan N., Tippawangkosol P., Walton C., Somboon P. Temporal frequency of knockdown resistance mutations, F1534C and V1016G, in Aedes aegypti in Chiang Mai city, Thailand and the impact of the mutations on the efficiency of thermal fogging spray with pyrethroids. Acta Trop. 2016;162:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pumidonming W., Polseela P., Maleewong W., Pipitgool V., Poodendaen C. Culex quinquefasciatus in Phitsanulok as a possible vector of nocturnally periodic Wuchereria bancrofti transmission in Myanmar immigrants. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Publ. Health. 2005;36:176–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quesada-Moraga E., García-Tóvar E., Valverde-García P., Santiago-Alvarez C. Isolation, geographical diversity and insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis from soils in Spain. Microbiol. Res. 2004;159:59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2004.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rajchanuwong P., Chanpaisaeng J., Kaewsompong S. Characterization and toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar chanpaisis (H46): A serovar from Thailand. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2019;41:804–812. [Google Scholar]
- Ramalakshmi A., Udayasuriyan V., Balasubramani V. Molecular cloning of a new cry2A-type gene from Bacillus thuringiensis strain Nn10 and its expression studies. Microb. Pathog. 2022;164 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raymond B., Johnston P.R., Nielsen-LeRoux C., Lereclus D., Crickmore N. Bacillus thuringiensis: An impotent pathogen? Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regis L., Silva-Filha M.H., Nielsen-LeRoux C., Charles J.F. Bacteriological larvicides of dipteran disease vectors. Trends Parasitol. 2001;17:377–380. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(01)01953-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards S.L., Anderson S.L., Lord C.C., Smartt C.T., Tabachnick W.J. Relationships between infection, dissemination, and transmission of West Nile virus RNA in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) J. Med. Entomol. 2012;49:132–142. doi: 10.1603/me10280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ricoldi M.C., Figueiredo C.S., Desidério J.A. Toxicity of Cry2 proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. thuringiensis strain T01-328 against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Arq. Inst. Biol. 2018;85 [Google Scholar]
- Riveron J.M., Tchouakui M., Mugenzi L., Menze B.D., Chiang M.C., Wondji C.S. In: Towards Malaria Elimination - a Leap Forward. Manguin S., Dev V., editors. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2018. Insecticide resistance in malaria vectors: An update at a global scale. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Roh J.Y., Choi J.Y., Li M.S., Jin B.R., Je Y.H. Bacillus thuringiensis as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;17:547–559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., et al. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roy M., Chatterjee S., Dangar T.K. Characterization and mosquitocidal potency of a Bacillus thuringiensis strain of rice field soil of Burdwan, West Bengal, India. Microb. Pathog. 2021;158 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz de Escudero I., Estela A., Porcar M., Martínez C., Oguiza J.A., Escriche B., et al. Molecular and insecticidal characterization of a Cry1I protein toxic to insects of the families Noctuidae, Tortricidae, Plutellidae, and Chrysomelidae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:4796–4804. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02861-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saeung M., Ngoen-Klan R., Thanispong K., Muenworn V., Bangs M.J., Chareonviriyaphap T. Susceptibility of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) to temephos in Thailand and surrounding countries. J. Med. Entomol. 2020;57:1207–1220. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saingamsook J., Saeung A., Yanola J., Lumjuan N., Walton C., Somboon P. A multiplex PCR for detection of knockdown resistance mutations, V1016G and F1534C, in pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:465. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2416-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salamun Fatimah, Fauzi A., Praduwana S.N. Larvicidal toxicity and parasporal inclusion of native Bacillus thuringiensis BK5.2 against Aedes aegypti. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2021;32:379–384. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2020-0472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sampson, K.S., Tomso, D.J., Agarwal, S., Nulty, B.M., Campbell, C., 2013. Toxin genes and methods for their use. U.S. Patent 8,461,421 B2. 1498401915761638000-08461421.
- Sarrafzadeh M.H., Bigey F., Capariccio B., Mehrnia M.R., Guiraud J.P., Navarro J.M. Simple indicators of plasmid loss during fermentation of Bacillus thuringiensis. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2007;40:1052–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.08.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sathantriphop S., Paeporn P., Ya-Umphan P., Mukkhun P., Thanispong K., Chansang C., et al. Behavioral action of deltamethrin and cypermethrin in pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): implications for control strategies in Thailand. J. Med. Entomol. 2020;57:1157–1167. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schnepf E., Crickmore N., Van Rie J., Lereclus D., Baum J., Feitelson J., et al. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998;62:775–806. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.3.775-806.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 1978;61:461–464. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2958889 [Google Scholar]
- Silva M.C., Siqueira H.A., Marques E.J., Silva L.M., Barros R., Lima Filho J.V., Silva S.M. Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from northeastern Brazil and their activities against Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2012;22:583–599. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2012.670802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sivaji M., Girija D. Screening and characterization of dipteran-specific cry genes from native Bacillus thuringiensis isolates of Western Ghats, India. Adv. Res. 2017;11:1–9. doi: 10.9734/AIR/2017/32920. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Soares-da-Silva J., Queirós S.G., de Aguiar J.S., Viana J.L., dos Rav Neta M., da Silva M.C., et al. Molecular characterization of the gene profile of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner isolated from Brazilian ecosystems and showing pathogenic activity against mosquito larvae of medical importance. Acta Trop. 2017;176:197–205. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soberón M., López-Díaz J.A., Bravo A. Cyt toxins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis: A protein fold conserved in several pathogenic microorganisms. Peptides. 2013;41:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song F., Zhang J., Gu A., Wu Y., Han L., He K., et al. Identification of cry1I-type genes from Bacillus thuringiensis strains and characterization of a novel cry1I-type gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:5207–5211. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5207-5211.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tailor R., Tippett J., Gibb G., Pells S., Jordan L., Ely S. Identification and characterization of a novel Bacillus thuringiensis δ‐endotoxin entomocidal to coleopteran and lepidopteran larvae. Mol. Microbiol. 1992;6:1211–1217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01560.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan F., Zhu J., Tang J., Tang X., Wang S., Zheng A., Li P. Cloning and characterization of two novel crystal protein genes, cry54Aa1 and cry30Fa1, from Bacillus thuringiensis strain BtMC28. Curr. Microbiol. 2009;58:654–659. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9386-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanabe A.S. KAKUSAN: A computer program to automate the selection of a nucleotide substitution model and the configuration of a mixed model on multilocus data. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2007;7:962–964. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01807.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tetreau G., Andreeva E., Banneville A.S., De Zitter E., Colletier J.P. How does Bacillus thuringiensis crystallize such a large diversity of toxins? Toxins. 2021;13:443. doi: 10.3390/toxins13070443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thammasittirong A., Attathom T. PCR-based method for the detection of cry genes in local isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis from Thailand. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2008;98:121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2008.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thaphan P., Keawsompong S., Chanpaisaeng J. Isolation, toxicity and detection of cry gene in Bacillus thuringiensis isolates in Krabi province, Thailand. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2008;30:597–601. [Google Scholar]
- Triteeraprapab S., Kanjanopas K., Suwannadabba S., Sangprakarn S., Poovorawan Y., Scott A.L. Transmission of the nocturnal periodic strain of Wuchereria bancrofti by Culex quinquefasciatus: Establishing the potential for urban filariasis in Thailand. Epidemiol. Infect. 2000;125:207–212. doi: 10.1017/s0950268899004355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Frankenhuyzen K. Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2009;101:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Frankenhuyzen K. Cross-order and cross-phylum activity of Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal proteins. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2013;114:76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2013.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2005. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides.https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/69101 [Google Scholar]
- WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2012. Global strategy for dengue prevention and control 2012–2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wu D., Johnson J.J., Federici B.A. Synergism of mosquitocidal toxicity between CytA and CryIVD proteins using inclusions produced from cloned genes of Bacillus thuringiensis. Mol. Microbiol. 1994;13:965–972. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu J., Wei L., He J., Fu K., Li X., Jia L., et al. Characterization of a novel Bacillus thuringiensis toxin active against Aedes aegypti larvae. Acta Trop. 2021;223 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yanola J., Chamnanya S., Lumjuan N., Somboon P. Insecticides resistance in the Culex quinquefasciatus populations from northern Thailand and possible resistance mechanisms. Acta Trop. 2015;149:232–238. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zghal R.Z., Tounsi S., Jaoua S. Characterization of a cry4Ba‐type gene of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and evidence of the synergistic larvicidal activity of its encoded protein with Cry2A δ‐endotoxin of B. thuringiensis kurstaki on Culex pipiens (common house mosquito) Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2006;44:19–25. doi: 10.1042/BA20050134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H., Yu Z., Deng W. Isolation, distribution and toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis from warehouses in China. Crop Protect. 2000;9:449–454. doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary file.




