Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Haematol. 2023 Oct;203(1):79–85. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19068

TABLE 1.

Overview on studies assessing the burden of ITP cited in the article.

Reference Name Patient population Characteristics of the study

Klaasen et al.8 Kids’ ITP Tools (KIT) Children/adolescents 2–17years - ITP disease specific
- Three questionnaires (child 7–17 years; parents on behalf of a child aged 2–17—parent proxy; parents—parent impact)
Mathias et al.9 ITP-Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ) Adults ≥18 years - ITP disease specific
- 44 items, six domains
Cooper et al.10 ITP Life Quality Index (ILQI) Adults ≥18 years - ITP disease specific
- 10 items
Ware et al.12 Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Patients ≤14 years - Generic—to be used in any disease
- 36 items, eight domains
Varni et al.13 Pediatric Quality of Life Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (PedsQL MFS) Children/adolescents 2–18years - Generic—to be used in paediatric cancer
- Three domains
- Children self-report (5–18 years); parent proxy report (2–18 years)
Grace et al.14 Hockenberry Fatigue Scale; Fatigue Scale-Child, FS-C; Fatigue Scale Adolescent, FS-A Children/adolescents 7–17 - Generic
- 10 items for FS-C (7–12 years)
- 13 items for FS-A (13–17 years)
Fisk et al.15 Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) n/a - Generic
- 40 items, three domains
Smets et al.16 Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) n/a - Generic
- 20 items, five domains