Table 2.
Performance comparison of the PPC-SSAE classifier with other classifiers.
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean, % | St. Dev., % | Mean, % | St. Dev., % | Mean, % | St. Dev., % | |
| PPC-SSAE | 93.1 | 5.0 | 99.5 | 1.8 | 96.8 | 6.4 |
| Spectra-SSAE | 90.1 | 21.0*** | 98.4 | 5.0** | 95.5 | 10.0* |
| PPC-SVM | 81.1 | 32.0** | 97.1 | 14.0*** | 90.0* | 16.0** |
| PPC-Random Forest | 78.0* | 24.6*** | 91.5** | 13.2*** | 85.6*** | 11.6** |
PPC, power-to-power coupling; SSAE, stacked sparse autoencoder; SVM, support vector machine. PPC-SSAE, algorithm based on PPC as a classifying feature and the stacked sparse autoencoder as a classifier; Spectra-SSAE, algorithm based on the EEG spectrum as a classifying feature and the SSAE classifier; PPC-SVM, algorithm based on PPC as a classifying feature and the SVM classifier; PPC-Random Forest, algorithm based on PPC as a classifying feature and the Random Forest classifier. The PPC-SSAE algorithm is compared to all three other algorithms with statistically significant differences indicated by asterisks: p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***) (t-test for the comparison of the mean values, Bonferroni-corrected; Bartlett’s test for the comparison of variances, Matlab function vartestn).