Table 2. The NOS quality evaluation.
Each asterisk (*) represents a score in the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), a tool used to assess the quality of non-randomized controlled studies. High, NOS score > 7 points; low, NOS score < 6 points; moderate, 6–7 points.
| Study | Definition adequate | Represen- tativeness of the cases | Definition of Controls | Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis | Ascertainment of exposure | Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | Non response | Total scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atchade et al. (2020) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Balci et al. (2017) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Chan et al. (2023) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Du et al. (2021) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Fidalgo et al. (2014) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Greite et al. (2022) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Ishikawa, Griesdale & Lohser (2014) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Jacques et al. (2012) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Jing et al. (2021) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Kim et al. (2021) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Liu et al. (2021) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Lu et al. (2023) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
| Rocha et al. (2005) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
| Sikma et al. (2017) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Sang et al. (2021) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Scaravilli et al. (2022) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
| Toyoda et al. (2023) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Xue et al. (2014) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 |
| Zhang Shuai & Jingqing (2020) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |