TABLE 1.
Efficacy of bacterial endophytes against GBNV in cowpea (VBN 3)a
| S.no | Bacterial endophytes | Total number of lesions/ leafb,c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre inoculationd | Percent reduction over controle |
Simultaneous inoculationf | Percent reduction over controlg | ||
| 1 | Bacillus amyloliquefaciens | 8.46c (16.90) | 49.04 | 1.8d (7.69) | 89.16 |
| 2 | Bacillus glycinifermentans CNEB17 | 5.26gh (13.26) | 68.31 | 0.93i (5.53) | 94.40 |
| 3 | Bacillus altitudinis BALT | 7.50d (15.88) | 54.82 | 2.0d (8.12) | 87.95 |
| 4 | Bacillus mojavensis CNEB14 | 9.30b (17.74) | 43.98 | 3.36b (10.56) | 79.76 |
| 5 | Bacillus barbaricus NPBR1 | 5.16h (13.13) | 68.92 | 1.36e(6.70) | 91.81 |
| 6 | Bacillus subtilis YEBL5 | 7.23d (15.59) | 56.45 | 1.20gh (6.27) | 92.77 |
| 7 | Bacillus albus YEBN2 | 5.90f (14.05) | 64.46 | 1.06hi (6.35) | 93.61 |
| 8 | Bacillus siamensisYEBN1 | 7.53d (15.92) | 54.64 | 1.26fg (6.58) | 92.41 |
| 9 | Bacillus vallismortis BAVE5 | 4.86hi (12.741) | 70.72 | 1.13hi (6.10) | 92.11 |
| 10 | Bacillus endophyticus BA453 | 5.80fg (13.930) | 65.06 | 1.3ef (6.62) | 90.71 |
| 11 | Bacillus aerophilus CNEB3 | 7.8d (16.217) | 53.01 | 3.06c (10.08) | 78.64 |
| 12 | Brucella melitensis CNEB54 | 4.33i (12.014) | 73.91 | 0.66i (4.67) | 95.39 |
| 13 | Bacillus licheniformis CNEB4 | 4.53i (12.289) | 72.71 | 1.26gh (6.45) | 91.20 |
| 14 | Bacillus velezensis CNEB26 | 4.80hi (12.650) | 71.08 | 1.86d (7.83) | 87.02 |
| 15 | Bacillus tequilensis NPN1 | 6.46e (14.729) | 61.08 | 2.86d (9.71) | 80.00 |
| 16 | Inoculated control | 17a (23.03) | –h | 14.33a (22.15) | – |
| 17 | Uninoculated control | – | – | ||
| CD | 0.623 | 0.823 | |||
| SE (d) | 0.211 | 0.280 | |||
Data were recorded based on total number of lesions/leaf. Values are the mean of 15 plants (3 replications).
Values in the parentheses are arcsine-transformed values.
In a column, means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at 5% level by DMRT.
Efficacy of bacterial endophytes against GBNV upon pre-inoculation.
Percent reduction over control of pre-inoculation studies.
Efficacy of bacterial endophytes against GBNV upon simultaneous inoculation.
Percent reduction over control of simultaneous inoculation studies.
“–” indicates nill, as percent over reduction is compared with untreated control.