Skip to main content
Microbial Cell logoLink to Microbial Cell
. 2025 Feb 20;12:1–8. doi: 10.15698/mic2025.02.841

Paving the way for new antimicrobial peptides through molecular de-extinction

Karen O Osiro 1, Abel Gil-Ley 2, Fabiano C Fernandes 1,3, Kamila B S de Oliveira 2, Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez 4,5,6,7,, Octavio L Franco 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11853161  PMID: 40012704

Abstract

Molecular de-extinction has emerged as a novel strategy for studying biological molecules throughout evolutionary history. Among the myriad possibilities offered by ancient genomes and proteomes, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) stand out as particularly promising alternatives to traditional antibiotics. Various strategies, including software tools and advanced deep learning models, have been used to mine these host defense peptides. For example, computational analysis of disulfide bond patterns has led to the identification of six previously uncharacterized β-defensins in extinct and critically endangered species. Additionally, artificial intelligence and machine learning have been utilized to uncover ancient antibiotics, revealing numerous candidates, including mammuthusin, and elephasin, which display inhibitory effects toward pathogens in vitro and in vivo. These innovations promise to discover novel antibiotics and deepen our insight into evolutionary processes.

Keywords: molecular deextinction, AMPs, encrypted peptides, defensins, bioinformatics, machine learning, deep learning

Abbreviations

AEP - archaic encrypted peptide,

AMP - antimicrobial peptides,

EP - encrypted peptide,

MEP - modern encrypted peptide,

MIC - minimal inhibitory concentration,

ML - machine learning,

NCBI - National Center for Biotechnology Information.

INTRODUCTION

Molecular de-extinction represents a promising area of scientific research that enables the identification, synthesis, and understanding of molecules’ biological functions throughout evolution 1. However, it also raises interesting bioethical and philosophical debates within the scientific community 2. Advances in ancient DNA sequencing methods 3 have increasingly allowed us to access biological data from the past. Ancient DNA sheds light on historical protein-coding sequences that may not exist in our current time or have been changed throughout evolution 4, 5. Furthermore, advancements in computational biology and artificial intelligence 6, 7, 8, 9 have shifted the discovery of promising molecules from a chance-based approach to a more intentional and data-driven methodology.

Among the extensive range of molecules that can be found through proteomics or genomics, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) stand out. AMPs have played crucial roles in the defense mechanisms of animals, evolving over millions of years to protect hosts against various pathogens, thereby ensuring survival in ancient environments 10. These molecules continue to function in the innate immune systems of various organisms today, fighting multiple microorganisms. They can modulate the immune system, disrupt cell membranes, target intracellular processes, and inhibit biofilm formation 11, 12, 13, 14. Despite considerable variability in AMP structures 15, identifying specific features is critical for mining these potential antibiotics, particularly when leveraging computational tools.

However, it is important to highlight the gap between the amount of discovered antimicrobial peptides and those that successfully advance the clinical trials and, finally, reach the market 16. Issues related to stability and toxicity frequently hinder the development cycle, which, in the best-case scenarios, still averages 13 years to be launched 17. The advancement of artificial intelligence and molecular de-extinction offers a valuable opportunity not only to discover new antimicrobials but also to provide accurate in silico predictions, thereby shortening the path to addressing the global antibiotic resistance crisis.

Figure 1 . Workflow for identifying ancient antimicrobial peptides. Genome and proteome data serve as sources for mining ancient AMPs. This mining can be performed using (i) machine learning (ML) methods to generate encrypted peptides (EPs), or (ii) computational tools that identify defensins by analyzing disulfide bond patterns. The activity of these ancient AMPs can be predicted using deep learning (DL) models, and their structures can be elucidated through molecular dynamics simulations or circular dichroism. The predicted AMP activity can be validated through in vitro and in vivo assays. Figure created with BioRender.com.

Figure 1

BIOINFORMATICS TOOLS

Molecular de-extinction employs various methodologies to mine compounds such as AMPs and other peptide antibiotics from extinct organisms (Figure 1). These approaches utilize diverse bioinformatics tools to discover novel AMPs from the genomes and proteomes 1, 18 of extinct organisms. Digital repositories like the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and the Protein Data Bank (PDB) provide access to genomic and proteomic data 19, 20. One current methodology involves identifying AMPs with specific characteristics of β-defensins from the genomes of these organisms 21. Programs such as AUGUSTUS can locate protein-coding genes within genomic sequences obtained from NCBI 21, 22. To refine the identification process, tools such as HMMER 23 and InterPro 24 determine which protein sequences within the selected genomic data belong to the β-defensin protein family. Subsequent structural and physicochemical analyses are conducted to evaluate the potential antimicrobial properties of these proteins. Advanced tools such as AlphaFold 2 25 or AlphaFold 3 26 can accurately predict protein structures, while features such as cationicity and amphipathicity can be analyzed using ExPASy to complement the AMP characterization 21.

A different strategy for molecular de-extinction employs machine learning (ML) models to identify and classify encrypted peptides (EPs) — protein fragments with antimicrobial properties — from the proteomes of extant and extinct organisms 1, 18, 27. The panCleave ML model, for example, applies a pan-protease cleavage site classifier to conduct computational proteolysis, identifying potential EPs within protein sequences 1. This open-source model achieved over 80% accuracy for proteases, with at least 100 observations in the test set. Specifically, for cysteine catalytic types, the average accuracy was 81.3%, based on 1,858 correct predictions out of 2,286 observations, whereas for threonine catalytic types, the accuracy was 34.6%, with 18 out of 52 observations predicted correctly 1. Other genome mining tools, such as ThioFinder 28, RODEO 29, and RiPPMiner-Genome 30, have also been widely used to discover new AMPs in extant organisms 31.

Progress in this field is further demonstrated by the development of the deep learning model APEX (Figure 2), which has been used to mine all extinct organisms as sources of antibiotics 18. This state-of-the-art model consists of a peptide sequence encoder coupled with neural networks for predicting antimicrobial activity, enabling the extraction and classification of peptide antibiotics based on their potential Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) 18. APEX achieved a significant Pearson correlation (>0.3) for predicting species-specific antimicrobial activity, showing correlations between predicted and experimentally validated activities for several strains, including Escherichia coli strains AIC221, AIC222, ATCC 11775; Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606; Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains PAO1 and PA14; and Enterococcus faecium ATCC 700221. Predicting antibiotic activity with advanced artificial intelligence like APEX (Figure 2) brings us closer to mining effective candidates for novel antibiotic alternatives. The antimicrobial activity of these ancient compounds can potentially also be predicted using various deep learning models, such as AMP-Bert 32 or AMPlify 33.

Figure 2 . APEX Model Architecture. The APEX model combines recurrent and attention neural networks to analyze peptide sequences for antimicrobial prediction. The model first extracts physicochemical features of peptide sequences using the AAindex library. These features are processed through a two-layer attention neural network (a1 and a2), enhancing global feature interactions and compressing the representation into a lower-dimensional format. The output of this attention network is then processed by two separate recurrent neural networks (RNNs) (h1 and h2): one predicts species-specific antimicrobial activity (o1), and the other classifies the peptide as antimicrobial (AMP) or non-antimicrobial (non-AMP) (o2). Figure created with BioRender.com.

Figure 2

UNVEILING ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES FROM EXTINCT ORGANISMS

Natural AMPs and other peptide antibiotics can originate from four main processes: (i) genome-encoded peptides 21, 34, (ii) cleavage via proteolysis 27, 35 , (iii) synthesis by non-ribosomal means 36, and (iv) small open reading frames (smORFs) 37, 38. Due to the vast nature of genomic and proteomic databases, molecular de-extinction of AMPs has thus far been driven by strategic exploration to unveil antimicrobials encoded in the genome 21 or encrypted within proteins 1, 18. For instance, six β-defensins were predicted through computational analysis of genomes from extinct and critically endangered species. This prediction was based on intrinsic disulfide bonding patterns (Cys1–Cys5, Cys2–Cys4, and Cys3–Cys6), as well as the characteristic structural features of β-defensins 21, including three antiparallel β-strands and a right-handed α-helix. Two defensins, Ad-AvBD5 and Ad-AvBD10, were identified from Anomalopteryx didiformis, the New Zealand moa that became extinct approximately 600 years ago 39. Three β-defensins (Cs-AvBD1, Cs-AvBD9, and Cs-AvBD10) were derived from Cyanopsitta spixii, Spix’s macaw, which is endemic to Brazil. Additionally, one β-defensin was identified from Diceros bicornis minor, a critically endangered subspecies of the black rhinoceros. Ad-AvBD5, Cs-AvBD1, and Cs-AvBD10 were noted for their high stability in molecular dynamics analyses, displaying cationic charges of +3, +7, and +2, respectively 21.

Using ML to predict patterns of protein cleavage into peptide fragments, we have detected encrypted peptides resulting from proteolysis in Homo sapiens neanderthalensis (Neanderthals) and Homo sapiens subsp. Denisova (Denisovans) 1. Among the 69 archaic protein fragments identified, six showed in vitro antimicrobial activity, four from Neanderthals and two from Denisovans 1. The molecule PDB6I34D-ALQ29, a fragment from Chain D of Neanderthal glycine decarboxylase, displayed broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against both P. aeruginosa and E. coli strains, with MIC values ranging from 32 to 128 mmol.L-1. This archaic encrypted peptide (AEP) possesses a net charge of +5 and an amphiphilicity index of 0.99. Conversely, compound A0A343EQH4-LAM11 (also known as neanderthalin), an AEP with a net charge of 0 and an amphiphilicity index of 0.63, demonstrated significant efficacy in preclinical animal models by reducing bacterial loads by several orders of magnitude against A. baumannii. It was observed that AEPs have lower net charge and normalized hydrophobicity, more basic residues, and fewer acidic residues and polar residues compared to modern encrypted peptides (MEP) 1. The differences in amino acid composition led to distinct physicochemical traits in AEPs, including lower amphiphilicity, a greater tendency toward disordered conformations, and reduced aggregation.

Moreover, the deep learning model, APEX, has facilitated the identification of several ancient encrypted peptides within the proteomes of extinct animals and plants 18. Species such as the New Zealand moa (Anomalopteryx didiformis), the South American giant sloth (Mylodon darwinii), the giant elk (Megaloceros sp.), Grant’s zebra (Equus quagga boehmi), the woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius), the straight-tusked elephant (Elephas antiquus), the ancient sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas), as well as extinct plant species like Magnolia latahensis and Hesperelaea palmeri, revealed peptide molecules with excellent antimicrobial traits. These peptides exhibited low MIC values against some ESKAPE pathogens: Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli 18. Testing these encrypted peptides in two different preclinical mouse models indicated that mammuthusin-2 (MEP), elephasin-2 (AEP), and mylodonin-2 (AEP) possess high potential for antibiotic and anti-infective efficacy. Additionally, mammuthusin-2 exhibited slower degradation kinetics. Notably, although the AEPs and MEPs identified through APEX showed an atypical prevalence of low amphiphilicity and uncharged polar residues, they were primarily characterized by helical structures, resulting in more effective membrane disruption 18. These findings highlight the potential of computational and artificial intelligence tools in uncovering extinct peptides with antimicrobial properties (Table 1).

Table 1. Extinct peptides identified through molecularde-extinction.

Extinction

Species

Name

Peptides sequence

Amino acids

Net charge

Ref.

~600 years ago

Anomalopteryx didiformis

Ad-AvBD5

TRQDCESRGGFCSRGSCPLGITRIGICSLQDFCCRRKMGE

40

3

Ad-AvBD10

VSFADTEECRSQGNFCRPVSCPPVFSVSGSCYGGAMKCCKKEYGQ

45

1

Extinct in the wild in 2000

Cyanopsitta spixii

Cs-AvBD1

NKAQCHREKGFCALLKCPFPYVISGRCTKFTFCCKKGA

38

7

20 a

Cs-AvBD10

DPLFPDTTECKNQGNFCRAGTCPPTFAISGSCHGGLLRCCSKKISS

46

2

Cs-AvBD9

PAYSQVDADTAACRQNRGSCSFVECSSPMVNIGTCRSGKLKCCKXYV

47

3

~40,000 years ago

Homo sapiens neanderthalensis

PDB6I34D- ALQ29

ALQLCYRHNKRRKFFVDPRCHPQTIAVVQ

29

5

A0A384E0N 4-DLI09

DLIERIQAD

9

-2

A0A343EQH 4-LAM11

LAMVIPLWAGA

11

0

10 b

A0A343EQH 0-NVK38

NVKMKWQFEHTKPTPFLPTLITLTTLLLPISPFMLMIL

38

2

~50,000 years ago

Homo sapiens subsp. 'Denisova'

A0A343AZS 4-FMA25

FMAEYTNIIMMNTLTTTIFLGTTYN

25

-1

A0A0S2IB02 -AYT38

AYTTWNILSSAGSFISLTAVMLMIFMIWEAFASKRKVL

38

2

1889

Ara tricolor

AWH62785.1-RLA27

RLATLQLWTINKITKQLMIPLNKPGHK

27

5

~781,000–30,000 years ago

Elephas antiquus

AQU14158.1-LHL12

LHLKILKIIRLL

12

3

AQU14158.1-IFL14

IFLHLKILKIIRLL

14

3

1883

Equus quagga boehmi

ABN79624.1-CVL25

CVLLFSQLPAVKARGTKHRIKWNRK

25

7

ADN88909.1-RAY26

RAYICRKKFLSLRKASIKLQSLVRMK

26

9

1875

Hesperelaea palmeri

CED79820.1-KLL26

KLLRKVLKETKKWVIKSVVFFKKIRK

26

10

1768

Hydrodamalis gigas

AKN52354.1-LYC24

LYCRIYSLVRARGRRLTFRKNISK

24

8

7 c

~103,000 to 42,000 years ago

Lophiomys imhausi maremortum

QYC36821.1-HWI16

HWITINTIKLSISLKI

16

2

~6050–5050 BCE

Mammut americanum

ABQ86189.1-WMT15

WMTIHALKLSLSFKL

15

2

~1.8 million to 12,000 years ago

Mylodon darwinii

AWK29290.1-WFH14

WFHFNSKILLLTGL

14

1

SMQ11516.1-KRK18

KRKRGLKLATALSLNNKF

18

6

SMQ11516.1-KIY25

KIYKKLSTPPFTLNIRTLPKVKFPK

25

7

1952

Pinguinus impennis

ASB29243.1-KFI13

KFILNFKIPISFK

13

3

a List of extinct b-defensinsidentified by software but not validated its activity experimentally.

b List of active AEPs identified by panCleaveand validated experimentally.

c List of active AEPs identified by APEX andvalidated experimentally.

CONCLUSION

Just as the evolutionary loss of AMPs is evident 40, microbial resistance genes also impose significant fitness costs on organisms due to their energy burdens, leading to the eventual loss of some of these genes over time 41. Molecular de-extinction thus emerges as an innovative concept in drug discovery, offering the possibility of uncovering ancient molecules that may exhibit unique mechanisms of action or target sites not addressed by contemporary antibiotics. Reintroducing these ancient antimicrobials paves the way for exploring alternative therapeutic approaches to combat contemporary drug-resistant pathogens. Moreover, AI-driven molecular de-extinction has the potential to enrich our understanding of evolution, ecology, and biodiversity.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez provides consulting services to Invaio Sciences and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards of Nowture S.L., Peptidus, European Biotech Venture Builder, and Phare Bio. He is also a member of the Advisory Board for the Pep-tide Drug Hunting Consortium (PDHC). All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAPDF) and Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (Fundect). Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez holds a Presidential Professorship at the University of Pennsylvania, is a recipient of the Langer Prize by the AIChE Foundation, and acknowledges funding from the IADR Innovation in Oral Care Award, the Procter & Gamble Company, United Thera-peutics, a BBRF Young Investigator Grant, the Nemirovsky Prize, Penn Health-Tech Accelerator Award, the Dean’s Innovation Fund from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsyl-vania, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R35GM138201, and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA; HDTRA1-22-10031, HDTRA1-21-1-0014, and HDTRA1-23-1-0001). All figures were prepared in BioRender.

Contributor Information

Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez, Email: cfuente@upenn.edu.

Octavio L Franco, Email: ocfranco@gmail.com.

References

  1. Ferreira A F L, Osiro K O, Oliveira K B S de, Cardoso M H, Lima L R de, Duque H M, Macedo M L R, Landon C, Fuente-Nunez C de la, Franco O L. Defensins identified through molecular de-extinction. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2024;5(9):102193. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Maasch J R M A, Torres M D T, Melo M C R, Fuente-Nunez C de la. Molecular de-extinction of ancient antimicrobial peptides enabled by machine learning. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31(8):1260–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Torrance A W, Fuente-Nunez C de la. The patentability and bioethics of molecular de-extinction. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42(8):1179–1180. doi: 10.1038/s41587-024-02332-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Essel E, Zavala E I, Schulz-Kornas E, Kozlikin M B, Fewlass H, Vernot B, Shunkov M V, Derevianko A P, Douka K, Barnes I, Soulier M-C, Schmidt A, Szymanski M, Tsanova T, Sirakov N, Endarova E, Mcpherron S P, Hublin J-J, Kelso J, Pääbo S, Hajdinjak M, Soressi M, Meyer M. Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant. Nature. 2023;618(7964):328–332. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06035-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hunter P. Molecular archaeology and machine learning. EMBO Rep. 2022;23(6):e55315. doi: 10.15252/embr.202255315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen N, Nedoluzhko A. Ancient DNA: The past for the future. BMC Genomics. 2023;24(1):23–25. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09396-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wong F, Fuente-Nunez C de la, J J Collins. Leveraging artificial intelligence in the fight against infectious diseases. Science. 2023;381(6654):164–170. doi: 10.1126/science.adh1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Porto W F, Irazazabal L, Alves E S F, Ribeiro S M, Matos C O, Pires Á S, Fensterseifer I C M, Miranda V J, Haney E F, Humblot V, Torres M D T, Hancock R E W, Liao L M, Ladram A, Lu T K, Fuente-Nunez C de la, Franco O L. In silico optimization of a guava antimicrobial peptide enables combinatorial exploration for peptide design. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1490. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03746-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wan F, Wong F, Collins J J, Fuente-Nunez C de la. Machine learning for antimicrobial peptide identification and design. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2024;2(5):392–407. doi: 10.1038/s44222-024-00152-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Torres M D T, Fuente-Nunez C de la. Toward computer-made artificial antibiotics. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;51:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2019.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Islam S, Akhand Mr M, Hasan M. Evolutionary trend of bovine β-defensin proteins toward functionality prediction: A domain-based bioinformatics study. Heliyon. 2023;9(3):e14158. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Browne K, Chakraborty S, Chen R, Willcox M D, Black D S, Walsh W R, Kumar N. A New Era of antibiotics: The clinical potential of antimicrobial peptides. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;21:7047. doi: 10.3390/ijms21197047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cardoso P, Glossop H, Meikle T G, Aburto-Medina A, Conn C E, Sarojini V, Valery C. Molecular engineering of antimicrobial peptides: Microbial targets, peptide motifs and translation opportunities. Biophys Rev. 2021;13(1):35–69. doi: 10.1007/s12551-021-00784-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Catte A, Wilson M R, Walker M, V S Oganesyan. Antimicrobial action of the cationic peptide, chrysophsin-3: A coarse-grained molecular dynamics study. Soft Matter. 2018;14(15):2796–2807. doi: 10.1039/C7SM02152F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuente-Nunez C de la, Cesaro A, Hancock R E W. Antibiotic failure: Beyond antimicrobial resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2023;71:101012. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2023.101012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Koehbach J, D J Craik. The vast structural diversity of antimicrobial peptides. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(7):517–528. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Osiro K O, Hashemi N, Brango-Vanegas J, Oliveira S M D, Franco O L. Emerging peptide-based technology for biofilm control. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2024;24(12):1311–1315. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2430623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cresti L, Cappello G, Pini A. Antimicrobial peptides towards clinical application-A long history to be concluded. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(9):4870. doi: 10.3390/ijms25094870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wan F, Torres M D T, Peng J, Fuente-Nunez C de la. Deep-learning-enabled antibiotic discovery through molecular de-extinction. Nat Biomed Eng. 2024;8(7):854–871. doi: 10.1038/s41551-024-01201-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schoch C L, Ciufo S, Domrachev M, Hotton C L, Kannan S, Khovanskaya R, Leipe D, Mcveigh R, O'Neill K, Robbertse B, Sharma S, Soussov V, Sullivan J P, Sun L, Turner S, I Karsch-Mizrachi. NCBI Taxonomy: A comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database. 2020;2020:baaa062. doi: 10.1093/database/baaa062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fuente-Nunez C de la. AI in infectious diseases: The role of datasets. Drug Resist Updat. 2024;73:101067. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2024.101067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoff K J, Stanke M. WebAUGUSTUS-a web service for training AUGUSTUS and predicting genes in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(W1):123–128. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Potter S C, Luciani A, Eddy S R, Park Y, Lopez R, Finn R D. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W200–W204. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paysan-Lafosse T, Blum M, Chuguransky S, Grego T, Pinto B L, Salazar G A, Bileschi M L, Bork P, Bridge A, Colwell L, Gough J, Haft D H, Letunić I, Marchler-Bauer A, Mi H, Natale D A, Orengo C A, Pandurangan A P, Rivoire C, Sigrist C J A, Sillitoe I, Thanki N, Thomas P D, Tosatto S C E, Wu C H, Bateman A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D418–D427. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jumper J, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596(7873):583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Abramson J, et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 2024;630(8016):493–500. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Torres M D T, Melo M C R, Flowers L, Crescenzi O, Notomista E, Fuente-Nunez C de la. Mining for encrypted peptide antibiotics in the human proteome. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6(1):67–75. doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00801-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li J, Qu X, He X, Duan L, Wu G, Bi D, Deng Z, Liu W, Ou H-Y. ThioFinder: A web-based tool for the identification of thiopeptide gene clusters in DNA sequences. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tietz J I, Schwalen C J, Patel P S, Maxson T, Blair P M, Tai H-C, Zakai U I, Mitchell D A. A new genome-mining tool redefines the lasso peptide biosynthetic landscape. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13(5):470–478. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Agrawal P, Amir S, Deepak, Barua D, Mohanty D. RiPPMiner-Genome: A web resource for automated prediction of crosslinked chemical structures of RiPPs by genome mining. J Mol Biol. 2021;433(11):166887. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kumar N, Bhagwat P, Singh S, Pillai S. A review on the diversity of antimicrobial peptides and genome mining strategies for their prediction. Biochimie. 2024;227(Pt A):99–114. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2024.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee H, Lee S, Lee I, H Nam . AMP-BERT: Prediction of antimicrobial peptide function based on a BERT model. Protein Sci. 2023;32(1):e4529. doi: 10.1002/pro.4529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li C, Sutherland D, Hammond S A, Yang C, Taho F, Bergman L, Houston S, Warren R L, Wong T, Hoang L M N, Cameron C E, Helbing C C. AMPlify: Attentive deep learning model for discovery of novel antimicrobial peptides effective against WHO priority pathogens. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08310-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hazlett L, Wu M. Defensins in innate immunity. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;343(1):175–188. doi: 10.1007/s00441-010-1022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pizzo E, Cafaro V, Donato A Di, Notomista E. Cryptic antimicrobial peptides: Identification methods and current knowledge of their immunomodulatory properties. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(10):1054–1066. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666180327165012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Izoré T, Ho Y T Candace, Kaczmarski J A, Gavriilidou A, Chow K H, Steer D L, Goode R J A, Schittenhelm R B, Tailhades J, Tosin M, Challis G L, Krenske E H, Ziemert N, Jackson C J, Cryle M J. Structures of a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase condensation domain suggest the basis of substrate selectivity. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2511. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22623-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Torres Mdt, Brooks E F, Cesaro A, Sberro H, Gill M O, Nicolaou C, Bhatt A S, De La Fuente-Nunez C. Mining human microbiomes reveals an untapped source of peptide antibiotics. Cell. 2019;187:5453–5467. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Santos-Júnior C D, Torres M D T, Duan Y, Río Á Rodríguez del, Schmidt T S B, Chong H, Fullam A, Kuhn M, Zhu C, Houseman A, Somborski J, Vines A, Zhao X-M, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J, Fuente-Nunez C de la, Coelho L P. Discovery of antimicrobial peptides in the global microbiome with machine learning. Cell. 2024;187(14):3761–3778. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Bunce M, Worthy T H, Phillips M J, Holdaway R N, Willerslev E, Haile J, Shapiro B, Scofield R P, Drummond A, Kamp P J J, A Cooper. The evolutionary history of the extinct ratite moa and New Zealand Neogene paleogeography. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(49):20646–20651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906660106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hanson M A, Lemaitre B, Unckless R L. Dynamic evolution of antimicrobial peptides underscores trade-offs between immunity and ecological fitness. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2620–2620. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim M, Park J, Kang M, Yang J, Park W. Gain and loss of antibiotic resistant genes in multidrug resistant bacteria: One Health perspective. J Microbiol. 2021;59(6):535–545. doi: 10.1007/s12275-021-1085-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbial Cell are provided here courtesy of Shared Science Publishers

RESOURCES