Table 4.

Regression of team performance on team resilience profile (N = 217)

Variables	B	SE	Beta	t	p	95% CI
Team performance
“Mid-range team resilience” subtype	2.172	0.262	0.463	8.297	< 0.001	(1.656, 2.688)
“Best team resilience” subtype	4.495	0.291	0.922	15.468	< 0.001	(3.922, 5.068)
Gender (ref: teams without men)
Teams with men	0.250	0.232	0.046	1.078	0.282	(−0.207, 0.707)
Educational level (ref: team without postgraduate)
Team with postgraduate	−0.138	0.318	−0.019	−0.434	0.665	(−0.766, 0.489)
Satisfaction with salary (ref: team with dissatisfied staff)
Team without dissatisfied staff	0.546	0.206	0.117	2.647	0.009	(0.139, 0.952)
Hospital level (ref: 2 grades hospital)
3 grades hospital	0.433	0.209	0.092	2.071	0.040	(0.021, 0.846)

Reference subtype: “Worst team resilience” subtype (class 1); “Best team resilience” subtype, class 2; “Mid-range team resilience” subtype, class 3; B, unstandardized coefficients, SE standard error, Beta standardized coefficients, CI confidence interval, Gender, educational level, satisfaction with salary and hospital level were controlled as covariates in this model