Skip to main content
. 2005 Aug 12;33(14):4563–4577. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki767

Table 1.

Sensitivity comparison of indexing algorithms

Budget w = 10 w = 11
Fugu Mouse HHAs Pig HHAs Fugu Mouse HHAs Pig HHAs
HHAs Exons HHAs Exons
S T S T S T S T S T S T S T S T
1 56 68 57 74 2020 2137 6006 5998 48 64 46 69 1856 2060 5930 5949
1.5 69 75 2240 6049 65 71 2158 6027
2 61 69 65 76 2190 2259 6074 6079 51 65 52 72 2089 2208 6044 6034
3 66 69 70 77 2258 2295 6089 6086 56 67 61 74 2186 2248 6067 6079
5 68 69 72 77 2302 2325 6104 6096 61 67 67 75 2256 2286 6083 6084
7 68 69 75 77 2324 2339 6121 6098 63 67 70 75 2283 2312 6105 6089
10 69 69 76 77 2338 2346 6135 6115 66 67 74 75 2301 2320 6118 6092

Shown here are sensitivity results for mouse, fugu and pig using an alignment of baboon, cat, chicken, chimp, cow, dog, human, mouse, pig and rat as a database. For STANDARD and Typhon the number of HHAs overlapped by an alignment is shown for various values of B, the average number of seeds indexed at each position. The columns labeled S show results for STANDARD while the columns labeled T show results for Typhon. For each test the best performing method is shown in bold; we tested seed weights of 10 and 11. HHAs were generated as described in the text by eliminating corresponding annotations with consensus scores <0 There were in total 10 801 HHAs that could potentially be identified for mouse, 852 for fugu and 11 873 for pig. There were 116 exons that could be identified for fugu.