Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2025 Feb 21;104(8):e41680. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041680

Assessing the relationship between migraine and sino-nasal symptoms and diseases among Syrian Private University students: A case–control study

Louloua Al Kadri a, Ahmad Nabil Alhouri b,*, Louei Darjazini Nahas c
PMCID: PMC11856896  PMID: 39993086

Abstract

Migraine is a common chronic and disabling condition, diagnosed late in most patients. Furthermore, sino-nasal diseases are severe stressing conditions that can correlate with headaches and migraine. This study aims to assess the relationship between migraine and sino-nasal disorders among Syrian Private University students. A case–control study was conducted among the students of the Syrian Private University in Damascus. Data were obtained using a valid self-administered questionnaire in Arabic to study the prevalence and severity of migraine and sino-nasal diseases using the Migraine Screening Questionnaire and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22. The study included 963 students, of whom 417 were cases who had migraines according to the Migraine Screening Questionnaire, and 546 were controls who did not. The Chi-square test assessed the relationship between case–controls and study variables. P-value was considered at < .05. Out of 963 students, 296 were male and 667 were female, with an average age of 23.8. Most students were from the Faculty of Medicine (27.1%) and were in their final years of study (24%). Most sino-nasal diseases are related to migraine, including nasal obstruction, the need to blow the nose, ear pain, ear fullness, or pain in facial bones. Sino-nasal outcome test score was significantly related to migraine. The severity of sino-nasal symptoms was significantly associated with migraine. The results of this study indicate that the diseases and symptoms of the nose and sinuses are significantly associated with migraine. Healthcare providers must raise awareness about this relationship for further evaluation and research and for early provision of the appropriate advice and treatment to improve patient’s quality of life and minimize disability.

Keywords: headache, migraine, nasal disease, nasal symptoms, otolaryngology, Syrian Private University

1. Introduction

Migraine is a chronic nerve illness that can occur with or without an aura and is characterized by attacks of excruciating headaches as well as autonomic and neural symptoms.[1] Acute migraines have been classified by the World Health Organization as one of the most disabling chronic diseases, along with quadriplegia, psychosis, and dementia.[1] A study conducted about the prevalence of migraine headaches among students of medical faculties at the University of Aleppo showed that 17.6% of the students suffered from migraine headaches, compared to the international prevalence of migraine at 10%.[2] Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is one of the most prevalent nasal disorders that may resemble migraines in terms of symptoms and demographics.[3,4] Nasal septal deviation plays a critical role in increased nasal obstruction symptoms, the aesthetic appearance of the nose, and increased nasal airflow resistance.[5] Allergic rhinitis is a condition characterized by symptomatic nasal inflammation triggered by exposure to allergens, resulting from an IgE-mediated immune response in the nasal membranes.[6] Nasal polyps are benign, inflammatory, and hyperplastic growths on the mucous membranes of the sinuses. Its most common presentation is in patients with CRS.[7] As they affect up to 4% of the population, nasal polyps are recognized as one of the most common nasal inflammatory masses.[8] They usually exhibit symptoms of postnasal drip, nasal obstruction, anosmia, rhinorrhea, and, less frequently, facial pain.[8] Signs and symptoms of acute and CRS are similar, but the difference is in the duration.[9] Rhinosinusitis must have at least 2 symptoms to be diagnosed. One of them must be (i.e., nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion or rhinorrhea) combined with facial pain or pressure and or anosmia.[6] It is diagnosed as a cause of headaches because it is believed that pain above the sinuses must be associated with them.[10] However, migraines and tension headaches often cause frontal headaches, and there is still debate about whether nasal obstruction will cause chronic headaches.[10] Headaches caused by rhinosinusitis are deep and dull, accompanied by a feeling of fullness and heaviness,[10] and are often continuous and rarely intermittent.[6] Migraine headaches and headaches resulting from sinus disturbances are often mixed up due to their similar pain localizations.[5] Furthermore, it was found that migraine headaches are frequently accompanied by symptoms of cranial autonomic symptoms, such as nasal congestion and rhinorrhea.[11] Some patients suffer from nasal congestion and localized pain in facial bones during a migraine attack, resulting from vasodilation in the turbinates.[6] A study indicates that headaches caused by nasal diseases are often secondary to prolonged mucosal contact points and sinus hypoxia following ischemia or pressure caused by the growth of nasal polyps.[12] Therefore, not all headaches accompanied by nasal symptoms are migraines. Even though headaches can occasionally be attributed to rhinosinusitis, up to 90% of suspected sinus headaches fulfill the diagnostic criteria for migraine.[13] According to Schreiber et al, 88% of 2991 individuals who presented to a general practitioner with a sinus headache were diagnosed with migraines.[14] Sinus headaches can also be caused by comorbidities of both disorders, which is not uncommon given the high prevalence of both rhinosinusitis and migraines.[15]

This study aims to assess the relationship between migraine and sino-nasal diseases and symptoms among a sample of students at the Syrian Private University (SPU).

2. Methods and materials

2.1. Study design and participants

This case–control study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the SPU; Institutional Review Board 1-14-23. The inclusion criteria included students at the SPU who were between 18 and 50 years old. The exclusion criteria included students under 18 or over 50 years of age, participants who were not students at SPU, students with acute or chronic illnesses, and students undergoing long-term treatments. Using the sample size calculator, a sample size of 357 was calculated based on a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence factor for a population of 5000 students. Random sampling was used to collect data between January 14, 2023 and March 1, 2023. The study’s objectives were explained to the students in the written form attached to the questionnaire (File S1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/MD/O426). Informed consent was obtained from the students who filled out the questionnaire. They were told that all their responses were anonymously recorded and that responding to all questions was not mandatory. Data were collected via paper-based surveys in Arabic and entered into Excel by the authors. Using the Migraine Screening Questionnaire (MSQ), the students were classified into 2 groups: where the study included 963 students, of whom 417 had migraine (cases), and 546 did not have migraine (controls). Sino-nasal disease and symptoms were mainly assessed by the validated Arabic version of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 2022 (SNOT-22),[16] which studies the presence and severity of different sino-nasal symptoms.

2.2. Questionnaire

The questionnaire consists of 3 parts.

2.2.1. Demographic information, social habits, and medical history

This section included questions about age, gender, faculty, academic year, and social habits such as smoking and alcohol consumption. Additionally, it inquires about the presence of acute or chronic disease, the current use of any long-term treatment, and any past diagnosis of migraine by a healthcare professional.

2.2.2. MSQ of 5 items

It is a questionnaire validated using the Cronbach α test with a score of 0.83, which is used to investigate the presence of migraine headaches. It consists of 5 questions concerning headache intensity and duration of episodes, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia during headache attacks, and the impact of headaches on working life. Each question equaled 1 point, and a final score of 4 or more points was considered positive for migraine. The translated Arabic version used by this study’s questionnaire has a sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.99, according to the study that validates this tool.[16] The questionnaire also included a question about the number of days the participants suffered a headache in the past 2 weeks and a question that rates the headache intensity on a scale of 1 to 10.

2.2.3. The 14-item SNOT-22 results in scale

Participants answered the validated Arabic version of the SNOT-22 scale to determine the severity of nasal and sinus disease and assess nasal, auricular, and facial symptoms. The severity of these diseases is determined by choosing the appropriate answer from these options (no problem, very mild problem, mild problem, moderate problem, severe problem, very severe problem). We also inquired about any past diagnosis by a medical professional of deviated nasal septum, nasal turbinate hypertrophy, allergic rhinitis, chronic or acute sinusitis, or nasal polyposis, in addition to any history of nasal surgery.

2.3. Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25.0, showing numbers and percentages (for categorical variables), averages, and standard deviations (for continuous variables). The MSQ was calculated, where each “yes” answer to one of the scale’s 5 items equals 1 point. A score of 4 or more points would diagnose a migraine headache (migraine). The SNOT-22 score was also calculated, whereby each student would rate each symptom from zero to 5, according to the severity of symptoms. The Chi-square independence test was used to test the independence of qualitative variables, and the independent sample T test was used to assess the relationship between the SNOT-22 scale and cases and controls. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the predictors of migraine severity, using MSQ as the dependent variable. The predictors included the SNOT-22 scale, age (in years), and the presence of chronic or acute sinusitis. The analysis aimed to identify significant predictors of migraine severity while controlling for potential confounding variables. The assumptions of linear regression were tested, including linearity, normality, multicollinearity, and homoscedasticity. The significance level was set at P < .05. Regression coefficients, standardized coefficients, t-values, and confidence intervals were reported to interpret the impact of each predictor. A P-value < .05 was adopted as statistical significance with a confidence interval of 95%. The effect size is determined by subtracting the mean of the treatment group from the mean of the control group and then dividing this difference by the standard deviation of one of the groups.[17] Effect size is classified into 4 categories: trivial, small, moderate, or large, according to specific numerical thresholds: <0.1, between 0.1 and 0.3, between 0.3 and 0.5, and >0.5, respectively.[17]

3. Results

3.1. Sample characteristics

Of 963 students who met the inclusion criteria, 30.7% were male, 69.3% were female, and 63.6% were younger than 25. Most students were studying at the Faculty of Medicine; 27.1% and 24% were in their senior year. Three hundred fifty-two (36.6%) of the sample declared their smoking habit and 73 (7.6%) alcohol consumption (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sample demographic information N = 963.

Variable (N = 963) N (%)
Sex Male 296 (30.7%)
Female 667 (69.3%)
Age 25> 612 (63.6%)
25≥ 350 (36.3%)
Faculty Medicine 261 (27.1%)
Dentistry 169 (17.5%)
Pharmacy 155 (16.1%)
Engineering 228 (23.7%)
Business Administration 150 (15.6%)
Academic year 1st 98 (10.2%)
2nd 125 (13%)
3rd 125 (13%)
4th 207 (21.5%)
5th 177 (18.4%)
6th 231 (24%)
Social habits Smoking 352 (36.6%)
Alcohol consumption 73 (7.6%)

3.2. Characteristics of migraine headaches in students

Thirty-one point nine percent of the students claimed that a medical professional had previously diagnosed them with migraine. Additionally, 54.9% reported experiencing severe and frequent headaches, and 49.9% reported a headache lasting more than 4 hours. In addition, 13.5% evaluated the severity of their headaches during the past 2 weeks as 5 on a scale of 0 to 10 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Migraine characteristics in students.

Variable (N = 963) N (%)
Have you ever been diagnosed with migraine? Yes 307 (31.9%)
No 656 (68.1%)
Do you suffer from severe and frequent headaches? Yes 529 (54.9%)
No 434 (45.1%)
Do you suffer from headaches that last for more than 4 hours? Yes 481 (49.9%)
No 482 (50.1%)
Do you usually suffer from nausea when you have a headache? Yes 374 (38.8%)
No 589 (61.2%)
Does light or noise bother you when you have a headache? Yes 650 (67.5%)
No 313 (32.5%)
Does a headache limit any of your physical or intellectual activities? Yes 678 (70.4%)
No 285 (29.6%)
Number of days with headache in the past 2 weeks <7 days 846 (87.9%)
More than 7 days 117 (12.1%)
On a scale of 0 to 10, how severe is the headache 0 108 (11.2%)
1 23 (2.4%)
2 45 (4.7%)
3 64 (6.6%)
4 99 (10.3%)
5 130 (13.5%)
6 117 (12.1%)
7 155 (16.1%)
8 118 (12.3%)
9 44 (4.6%)
10 60 (6.2%)
Headache severity out of 10 5> 339 (35.2%)
5≤ 624 (64.8%)
Results of Migraine Screening Questionnaire (MSQ) Migraine 417 (43.3%)
None 546 (56.7%)

3.3. Medical and surgical history of students

A 20.9% of the sample mentioned having a history of nasal surgery, compared to 79.1% who did not. Additionally, 37.3% of them have no history of sino-nasal diseases, and 31.4% of the sample suffer from allergic rhinitis (Table 3).

Table 3.

Medical and surgical nasal history of students.

Variable (N = 963) N (%)
History of nasal surgery Yes 201 (20.9%)
No 762 (79.1%)
History of sino-nasal diseases Nasal septum deviation 288 (29.9%)
Nasal turbinate hypertrophy 197 (20.5%)
Allergic rhinitis 302 (31.4%)
Acute or chronic sinusitis 298 (30.9%)
Nasal polyps 23 (2.4%)
No history 359 (37.3%)

3.4. Possible nasal symptoms in the past 2 weeks

19.5% and 17.8% reported suffering to a mild degree from sneezing and nasal blockage, respectively, compared to 32.2% and 32.4% who did not suffer from that, respectively. The majority reported having the following symptoms to a very mild degree: runny nose 19.4%, loss or decreased sense of smell or taste 11.7%, coughing 18.7%, post postnasal discharge 16.7%, thick nasal discharge 16.6%, epistaxis 6.9%, snoring 11.5%, a sense of ear fullness 22.7%, dizziness 19.6%, ear pain 15.8%, and the presence of pressure or pain in the face 14.3% (Table 4).

Table 4.

Possible nasal symptoms during the past 2 weeks.

Symptoms Extremely severe problem Severe problem Moderate problem Mild problem Very mild problem No problem
Need to blow nose 36 (3.7%) 67 (7%) 175 (18.2%) 147 (15.3%) 166 (17.2%) 372 (38.6%)
Sneezing 16 (1.7%) 55 (5.7%) 153 (15.9%) 188 (19.5%) 241 (25%) 310 (32.2%)
Runny nose 15 (1.6%) 45 (4.7%) 114 (11.8%) 146 (15.2%) 187 (19.4%) 456 (47.4%)
Nasal blockage 41 (4.3%) 103 (10.7%) 167 (17.3%) 171 (17.8%) 169 (17.5%) 312 (32.4%)
decreased sense of smell and taste 16 (1.7%) 31 (3.2%) 66 (6.9%) 65 (6.7%) 113 (11.7%) 672 (69.8%)
Coughing 7 (0.7%) 24 (2.5%) 62 (6.4%) 80 (8.3%) 180 (18.7%) 610 (63.3%)
Postnasal discharge (sputum) 22 (2.3%) 51 (5.3%) 120 (12.5%) 103 (10.7%) 161 (16.7%) 506 (52.5%)
Thick nasal discharge 17 (1.8%) 43 (4.5%) 86 (8.9%) 109 (11.3%) 160 (16.6%) 548 (56.9%)
Epistaxis (frequent nose bleed) 5 (0.5%) 12 (1.2%) 28 (2.9%) 61 (6.3%) 66 (6.9%) 791 (82.1%)
Snoring 9 (0.9%) 28 (2.9%) 32 (3.3%) 74 (7.7%) 115 (11.9%) 705 (73.2%)
Ear fullness 30 (3.1%) 49 (5%) 113 (11.7%) 139 (14.4%) 219 (22.7%) 413 (42.9%)
Dizziness 34 (3.5%) 47 (4.9%) 117 (12.1%) 156 (16.2%) 189 (19.6%) 420 (43.6%)
Ear pain 23 (2.4%) 30 (3.1%) 81 (8.4%) 99 (10.3%) 152 (15.8%) 578 (60%)
Facial pain/pressure 51 (5.3%) 51 (5.3%) 104 (10,8%) 116 (12%) 138 (14.3%) 503 (52.2%)

The bold values indicate the highest percentages of sample answers regarding each symptom.

3.5. Case–control investigation

The results showed a statistically significant relationship between cases and controls with demographic factors; most students who suffered from migraine headaches were female, 79.9%, compared to 20.1% being males (P < .001). Most of those who suffered from migraines were under the age of 25 (57.1%), compared to those aged 25 years or older (42.9%) (P < .001) (Table 5).

Table 5.

The relationship between cases and controls in terms of demographic factors and social habits.

Demographic factors and social habits Migraine Chi-square P-value
Cases incidence (%) Controls incidence (%)
Sex Male 84 (20.1%) 212 (38.8%) 38.768 <.001
Female 333 (79.9%) 334 (61.2%)
Age 25> 238 (57.1%) 374 (68.6%) 13.615 <.001
25≥ 179 (42.9%) 171 (31.4%)
Faculty Medicine 68 (16.3%) 193 (35.3%) 46.870 <.001
Dentistry 82 (19.7%) 87 (15.9%)
Pharmacy 87 (20.9%) 68 (12.5%)
Engineering 107 (25.7%) 121 (22.2%)
Business Administration 73 (17.5%) 77 (14.1%)
Academic year 1 47 (11.3%) 51 (9.3%) 5.160 .4
2 49 (11.8%) 76 (13.9%)
3 52 (12.5%) 73 (13.4%)
4 99 (23.7%) 108 (19.8%)
5 79 (18.9%) 98 (17.9%)
6 91 (21.8%) 140 (25.6%)
Social habits Smoking 152 (63.5%) 200 (36.6%) 0.003 .9
Alcohol consumption 23 (5.5%) 50 (9.2%) 4.476 .3

The bold values indicate significant P-values.

The results showed a statistically significant relationship between cases and controls with medical and surgical history: most of the students who had migraines had a history of acute or CRS; significantly, 38.8% compared to the controls, 24.9% (P < .001). Most students who did not suffer from migraines had no history of sino-nasal diseases, significantly 40.8% of controls, compared to 32.6% of cases (P = .009). Most students with migraine headaches had headaches of intensity greater than or equal to 5 out of 10 (92.8%) compared to the controls (43.4%) (P < .001) (Table 6).

Table 6.

The relationship between cases and controls in terms of medical and surgical history.

Medical and surgical history Migraine Chi-square P-value
Cases
incidence (%)
Controls
incidence (%)
History of nasal surgery Yes 329 (78.9%) 433 (79.3%) 0.024 .9
No 88 (21.1%) 113 (20.7%)
History of sino-nasal diseases Nasal Septum deviation 130 (31.2%) 158 (28.9%) 0.565 .5
Nasal turbinate hypertrophy 93 (22.2%) 104 (19%) 1.539 .2
Allergic rhinitis 140 (33.6%) 162 (29.7%) 1.673 .2
Acute or chronic sinusitis 162 (38.8%) 136 (24.9%) 21.502 <.001
Nasal polyps 10 (2.4%) 13 (2.4%) 0.000 >.99
No history 136 (32.6%) 223 (40.8%) 6.847 .009
Previous migraine diagnosis by a medical professional No 162 (38.8%) 493 (90.5%) 289.596 <.001
Yes 255 (61.2%) 52 (9.5%)
Number of days with headache in the past 2 weeks <7 334 (80.1%) 512 (93.8%) 41.436 <.001
More than 7 83 (19.9%) 34 (6.2%)
Headache intensity on a scale from 1 to 10 <5 30 (7.2%) 309 (56.6%) 252.936 <.001
≥5 387 (92.8%) 237 (43.4%)

The bold values indicate significant P-values.

The results showed a statistically significant relationship between cases and controls with nasal symptoms: the students with migraine headaches had significantly severe/very severe nasal obstruction, 19.4%, compared to the 11.5% controls. In contrast, the students in the control group did not suffer from nasal obstruction, and 35.5% of the students in the case group did not suffer from nasal obstruction, compared to 28.3% of the students in the case group (P = .001). Students who had migraine headaches had severe/very severe ear fullness of 10.1%, significantly compared to controls 6.8%. On the other hand, 49.8% of the students in the control group did not suffer from ear fullness, compared to 33.8% of the students in the case group (P < .001). The students in the case group had severe/very severe facial bone pressure or pain at 17.3%, significantly compared to 5.5% of controls. On the other hand, 64.1% of the students in the control group did not suffer from pressure or pain in the facial bones, compared to 36.7% of the students in the case group (P < .001). Students with migraine (cases) suffered from severe/extremely severe feelings of imbalance at 12.2% compared to 5.5% of controls. On the other hand, 52.2% of controls denied any feelings of imbalance compared to 32.4% of cases (P < .001). Students with migraine (cases) suffered from severe/extremely severe ear pain at 7.4% compared to 4% of controls. On the other hand, 65.9 % of controls denied any ear pain compared to 52.3% of cases (P < .001) (Table 7).

Table 7.

The relationship between cases and controls in terms of SNOT-22 factors.

Sino-nasal symptoms Migraine Chi-square P-value
Cases
incidence (%)
Controls
incidence (%)
Need to blow nose No problem 155 (37.2%) 217 (39.7%) 10.143 .01
Very mild/mild 57 (13.7%) 109 (20%)
Moderate 154 (36.9%) 168 (30.8%)
Severe/extremely severe 51 (12.2%) 52 (9.5%)
Sneezing No problem 146 (35%) 164 (30%) 6.995 .08
Very mild/mild 88 (21.1%) 153 (28%)
Moderate 154 (36.9%) 187 (34.2%)
Severe/extremely severe 29 (7%) 42 (7.7%)
Runny nose No problem 188 (45.1%) 268 (49.1%) 7.562 .07
Very mild/mild 73 (17.5%) 114 (20.9%)
Moderate 131 (31.4%) 129 (23.9%)
Severe/extremely severe 25 (6%) 35 (6.4%)
Nasal blockage No problem 118 (28.3%) 194 (35.5%) 16.386 <.001
Very mild/mild 64 (15.3%) 105 (19.2%)
Moderate 154 (36.9%) 184 (33.7%)
Severe/extremely severe 81 (19.4%) 63 (11.5%)
Decreased sense of smell/taste No problem 276 (66.2%) 396 (72.5%) 5.690 .1
Very mild/mild 52 (12.5%) 61 (11.2%)
Moderate 63 (15.1%) 68 (12.5%)
Severe/extremely severe 26 (6.2%) 21 (3.8%)
Coughing No problem 265 (63.5%) 345 (63.5%) 0.142 >.99
Very mild/mild 76 (18.2%) 104 (19%)
Moderate 62 (14.9%) 80 (14.7%)
Severe/extremely severe 14 (3.4%) 17 (3.1%)
Post nasal discharge No problem 207 (49.6%) 299 (54.8%) 3.279 .4
Very mild/mild 70 (16.8%) 91 (16.7%)
Moderate 107 (25.7%) 116 (21.2%)
Severe/extremely severe 33 (7.9%) 40 (7.3%)
Thick nasal discharge No problem 224 (53.7%) 324 (59.3%) 6.828 .08
Very mild/mild 65 (15.6%) 95 (17.4%)
Moderate 99 (23.7%) 96 (17.6%)
Severe/extremely severe 29 (7%) 31 (5.7%)
Epistaxis No problem 342 (82%) 449 (82.2%) 1.153 .8
Very mild/mild 26 (6.2%) 40 (7.3%)
Moderate 40 (9.6%) 49 (9%)
Severe/extremely severe 9 (2.2%) 8 (1.5%)
Snoring No problem 302 (72.4%) 403 (73.8%) 3.265 .4
Very mild/mild 45 (10.8%) 70 (12.8%)
Moderate 50 (12%) 56 (10.3%)
Severe/extremely severe 20 (4.8%) 17 (3.1%)
Ear fullness No problem 141 (33.8%) 272 (49.8%) 30.754 <.001
Very mild/mild 96 (23%) 123 (22.5%)
Moderate 138 (33.1%) 114 (20.9%)
Severe/extremely severe 42 (10.1%) 37 (6.8%)
Dizziness No problem 135 (32.4%) 285 (52.2%) 47.321 <.001
Very mild/mild 83 (19.9%) 106 (19.4%)
Moderate 148 (35.5%) 125 (22.9%)
Severe/extremely severe 51 (12.2%) 30 (5.5%)
Ear pain No problem 218 (52.3%) 360 (65.9%) 19.714 <.001
Very mild/mild 75 (18%) 77 (14.1%)
Moderate 93 (22.3%) 87 (15.9%)
Severe/extremely severe 31 (7.4%) 22 (4%)
Facial pain/pressure No problem 153 (36.7%) 350 (64.1%) 101.705 <.001
Very mild/mild 53 (12.7%) 85 (15.6%)
Moderate 139 (33.3%) 81 (14.8%)
Severe/extremely severe 72 (17.3%) 30 (5.5%)

The bold values indicate significant P-values.

When studying the relationship between cases and controls regarding the average result of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, the results showed statistical significance.

The students with migraine had a significantly greater mean SNOT-22 score of 16.7 than students in the control group, 12.7 (P < .001). The students with migraines and a history of nasal surgery had a significantly greater SNOT-22 mean of 16.9 than those in the control group, which had a mean of 13 (P = .017). The students with migraines and runny noses had a significantly greater SNOT-22 mean of 21.9 than those in the control group at 18.5 (P < .001). The students with migraine and nasal blockage had a significantly greater SNOT-22 mean of 20.4 than those in the control group at 17.2 (P < .001). The students with migraine and decreased sense of taste and smell had a significantly greater SNOT-22 mean of 26.2 than those in the control group at 21.4 (P < .001).

The students with migraine and sneezing had a significantly greater SNOT-22 mean of 20.2 than those in the control group at 16 (P < .001). The students with migraine and coughing had a considerably greater SNOT-22 mean of 23.9 than those in the control group at 18.9 (P < .001) (Table 8).

Table 8.

Assessing the relationship between cases and controls with the sino-nasal outcome test results and its factors.

Migraine T test P-value Effect size
Cases
Mean (SD)
Controls
Mean (SD)
(Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score) 16.7 (11.6) 12.7 (10.8) 5.498 <.001 0.36
History of nasal surgery 16.9 (11.8) 13 (10.5) 2.412 .02 0.35
Need to blow nose 20.9 (11.4) 17.4 (10.6) 3.868 <.001 0.32
Sneezing 20.2 (11.5) 16 (10.8) 4.717 <.001 0.38
Runny nose 21.9 (11.3) 18.5 (11.1) 3.417 <.001 0.3
Nasal blockage 20.4 (11.1) 17.2 (10.6) 3.697 <.001 0.3
Decreased sense of smell/taste 26.2 (11.1) 21.4 (11.4) 3.616 <.001 0.43
Coughing 23.9 (12.2) 18.9 (11.4) 3.877 <.001 0.42
Post nasal discharge 22.4 (11.6) 19.4 (11) 2.772 .006 0.27
Thick nasal discharge 23.9 (11.1) 20.6 (11) 3.022 .003 0.3
Epistaxis 26.9 (12.8) 22.4 (12.3) 2.342 .02 0.36
Snoring 23.9 (11.1) 20.6 (11.1) 3.022 .003 0.3
Ear fullness 23.1 (13.1) 21.1 (12.1) 1.246 .2
Dizziness 20 (11.7) 18.5 (11.3) 1.491 .1
Ear pain 23.1 (12) 20.7 (11.6) 1.977 .05
Facial pain/pressure 20.6 (11.7) 20 (11.7) 548 .6

SD = standard deviation.

The linear regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of migraine severity, as measured by the MSQ total score. The model included 3 predictors: age in years, nasal and sinus disease (assessed by SNOT-22 scale), and the presence of chronic or acute sinusitis. The overall model was statistically significant, F (3, 961) = 35.642, P < .001, with an R-squared value of 0.100, indicating that approximately 10% of the variance in MSQ can be explained by the predictors. The analysis showed that age was also a significant predictor (β = 0.058, P < .001), meaning that each additional year of age is associated with a 0.058 unit increase in MSQ (β = 0.190). The coefficient for “SNOT-22” was significant (β = 0.035, P < .001), indicating that for each unit increase in “SNOT-22,” the MSQ increased by 0.035 units. The standardized coefficient (β = 0.216) suggests a moderate effect size. Individuals with chronic or acute sinusitis had a significant increase in MSQ (β = 0.324, P = .012), with those affected reporting scores that were 0.324 units higher than those without sinusitis (β = 0.082) (Table 9).

Table 9.

Linear regression results for predictors of migraine.

Variable Unstandardized coefficients (β) Standardized coefficients (β) t Sig. 95% confidence interval
(lower–upper)
Age (by year) 0.058 0.190 6.183 <0.001 (0.04–0.07)
SNOT-22 0.035 0.216 6.642 <0.001 (0.02–0.04)
Chronic or acute sinusitis 0.324 0.082 2.525 0.01 (0.07–0.57)

R = 0.316, R² = 0.100, Adjusted R² = 0.097, standard error of the estimate = 1.72975, Durbin–Watson = 1.848.

4. Discussion

Migraine is a significant health challenge that affects a great part of society. As it is often encountered in the community and directly impacts the quality of life, the significance of adequate and proper treatment options increases. Migraine treatment will be achievable by a clear understanding of the pathogenesis.[18] This study aimed to assess the relationship between migraine and sino-nasal symptoms and diseases among a sample of students at the SPU. It included 963 students. The case group consisted of the students who had migraine at 43.3% with an SNOT-22 mean of 16.7 and a standard deviation of (±11.6), and the control group consisted of the students who did not suffer from migraine at 56.7% with an SNOT-22 mean of 12.7 with a standard deviation of (±10.8). It is worth mentioning that 61.2% of the cases claim to have been previously diagnosed with migraine by a medical professional, as opposed to 38.8% of the cases who denied any previous migraine diagnosis; this emphasizes that migraine is an underdiagnosed disease. The majority of cases were females, at 79.9%. The controls showed minimal variance between the sexes, at 38.8% males and 61.2% females. Additionally, 79.1% of the students denied any history of nasal surgery, and 37.3% denied any history of previous sino-nasal disease.

A study revealed that migraine cases occur most commonly in females.[19,20] This agrees with our study, which showed that most of the students who suffered from migraines were females, 79.9%, compared to 20.1% of males.

It was also shown in the same study that the majority of migraine cases occur at ages 30 to 60 years.[19,20] This is contrary to our study in which most of those who suffered from migraine were <25 years old, 57.1%. Compared to 42.9% of those whose age is greater than or equal to 25 years; we can justify that because our sample is college students.

A study conducted in Poland showed that 90% of headaches associated with rhinosinusitis turned out to be migraines upon proper diagnosis,[15] which agrees with the results of this study, where most of the students who suffered from migraines had a history of acute or CRS, significantly 38.8% compared to the controls 24.9%.

In a study conducted in Turkey on 214 migraine patients, of whom 116 (54.2%) were previously diagnosed with rhinosinusitis, 25% of them had an additional symptom.[21] Additionally, another study in Saudi showed that 37% of migraine headache patients had rhinosinusitis compared to 9.9% of otherwise healthy adults (P = .001).[22] Our findings in this study manifest that most students with migraines had a history of acute or CRS; significantly, 38.8% compared to the controls, 24.9% (P < .001).

As previously stated, migraine headaches are frequently accompanied by cranial autonomic symptoms, which can include nasal congestion and a runny nose.[11] On the other hand, nasal congestion and rhinorrhea are one of the key symptoms used in diagnosing rhinosinusitis.[8] Therefore, migraines are often misdiagnosed as headaches caused by rhinosinusitis, “sinus headache.”[23]

In a study conducted in Germany, it was found that facial pain was found in 2.3% of patients with migraines[24]; this agrees with our study with a higher percentage in our study, where the students who suffered from migraine had severe/very severe facial bone pressure or pain at 17.3%, significantly compared to 5.5% controls. In contrast, the students who did not suffer from pressure or pain in the facial bones were in the control group at 64.1%, compared to 36.7% in the case group.

A study showed that 64 out of 90 patients who suffer from ear pain fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for migraine headaches of the International Headache Society.[25] This is consistent with our study, where 47.7% of the students with migraine headaches suffered from earache, compared to 34% of controls. On the other hand, 65.9% of the students in the control group did not suffer from ear pain compared to 52.3% of the students in the case group.

In a study conducted in Georgia, the median of the SNOT-22 scale for people suffering from primary headache syndrome was more than for those suffering from CRS without primary headache syndrome.[26] Two additional studies suggest that subjects who met the diagnostic criteria for migraine and tension-type headache scored higher points on the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test.[23] It agrees with our study, where students who suffered from migraine had a SNOT-22 mean significantly higher at 16.7 compared to students in the control group at 12.7.

A study in Korea showed that nasal septal deviation was accompanied by an increased risk of migraine compared to patients who did not suffer from nasal septal deviation.[27] This is consistent with our study, where the students who had migraine headaches had severe/very severe nasal obstruction at 19.4%, significantly compared to the controls at 11.5%. In contrast, students in the control group did not suffer from nasal obstruction, and 35.5% of the students in the case group did not suffer from nasal obstruction, compared to 28.3% of the students in the control group.

For feelings of disrupted balance, a Brazilian study showed 37% of patients who suffer from migraine without aura had postural symptoms compared to 13% of controls who had postural symptoms,[28] which agrees with our study, where patients who had severe/very severe imbalance feelings were 12.2% in the case group and 5.5% in the control group.

4.1. Limitations

There is difficulty in providing the necessary tools to assess the symptoms and nasal diseases among students objectively. The results of this study are limited to a sample of students from 1 university only, which may only be representative of some university students in Syria. The design of the case report study is subject to recall and bias and does not allow conclusions to be drawn about causation. Furthermore, patient classification using MSQ does not equal specialist assessment; apart from this, imaging tests with specialist evaluation to diagnose sinusitis are more precise than SNOT-22; therefore, future studies should be conducted using objective diagnostic tools.

5. Conclusion

There is a significant relationship between the diseases and symptoms of the nose and sinuses and migraines. These findings suggest that nasal symptoms and sinus conditions should be considered when assessing and managing migraine patients. According to the study, the mean SNOT-22 score is significantly higher in the cases group than in the control group. Furthermore, conducting a study to evaluate nasal symptoms on a sample of migraine patients who attend the neurologist’s clinic may help further assess the relationship between the 2 diseases.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Louloua Al Kadri.

Data curation: Louloua Al Kadri.

Formal analysis: Ahmad Nabil Alhouri.

Investigation: Louloua Al Kadri, Ahmad Nabil Alhouri.

Methodology: Louloua Al Kadri, Ahmad Nabil Alhouri.

Project administration: Louloua Al Kadri.

Software: Ahmad Nabil Alhouri.

Supervision: Louei Darjazini Nahas.

Validation: Louloua Al Kadri, Ahmad Nabil Alhouri.

Visualization: Louloua Al Kadri.

Writing – original draft: Louloua Al Kadri, Ahmad Nabil Alhouri.

Writing – review & editing: Louloua Al Kadri, Ahmad Nabil Alhouri.

Supplementary Material

medi-104-e41680-s001.docx (19.7KB, docx)

Abbreviations:

CRS
chronic rhinosinusitis
MSQ
Migraine Screening Questionnaire
SNOT-22
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 2022
SPU
Syrian Private University

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB: 1-14-23), Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University. Informed consent was obtained from the students who filled out the questionnaire.

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article.

How to cite this article: Al Kadri L, Alhouri AN, Nahas LD. Assessing the relationship between migraine and sino-nasal symptoms and diseases among Syrian Private University students: A case–control study. Medicine 2025;104:8(e41680).

The lead author, Louloua Al Kadri, affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported, that no important aspects of the study have been omitted, and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and if relevant, registered) have been explained.

This manuscript was previously posted to Research Square: doi: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2370915/v3.

Contributor Information

Louloua Al Kadri, Email: loukad98@gmail.com.

Louei Darjazini Nahas, Email: Louei.Nahas@spu.edu.sy.

References

  • [1].Güvenc IA, Acar M, Muluk NB, Kucukcan NE, Cingi C. Is there an association between migraine and allergic rhinitis? Ear Nose Throat J. 2017;96:E18–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Alkarrash MS, Shashaa MN, Kitaz MN, et al. Migraine and tension-type headache among undergraduate medical, dental and pharmaceutical students of University of Aleppo: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Neurol Open. 2021;3:e000211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Schramm SH, Obermann M, Katsarava Z, Diener HC, Moebus S, Yoon MS. Epidemiological profiles of patients with chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache. J Headache Pain. 2013;14:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Smith TL, Litvack JR, Hwang PH, et al. Determinants of outcomes of sinus surgery: a multi-institutional prospective cohort study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142:55–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Kim TK, Jeong JY. Deviated nose: physiological and pathological changes of the nasal cavity. Arch Plast Surg. 2020;47:505–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, et al. European Position Paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020;58(Suppl S29):1–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].del Toro E, Portela J. Nasal polyps. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560746/. Accessed February 12, 2023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Rajguru R. Nasal polyposis: current trends. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;66:16–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Sinusitis - ear, nose, and throat disorders. MSD Manual Professional Edition. https://www.msdmanuals.com/en-nz/professional/ear,-nose,-and-throat-disorders/nose-and-paranasal-sinus-disorders/sinusitis. Accessed June 1, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Silberstein SD. Headaches due to nasal and paranasal sinus disease. Neurol Clin. 2004;22:1–19, v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Straburzynski M, Nowaczewska M, Czapinska-Ciepiela EK, Gryglas-Dworak A, Budrewicz S, Waliszewska-Prosół M. Sinonasal symptoms in migraine without aura: results from the cross-sectional “Migraine in Poland” study. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1321261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Bernichi JV, Rizzo VL, Villa JF, Santos RF, Caparroz FA. Rhinogenic and sinus headache – literature review. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021;42:103113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Migraine or sinus headache? Avoiding the misdiagnosis of facial and head pain. Consultant360. July 25, 2019. https://www.consultant360.com/articles/migraine-or-sinus-headache-avoiding-misdiagnosis-facial-and-head-pain. Accessed May 22, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Schreiber CP, Hutchinson S, Webster CJ, Ames M, Richardson MS, Powers C. Prevalence of migraine in patients with a history of self-reported or physician-diagnosed “sinus” headache. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1769–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Gryglas A. Allergic rhinitis and chronic daily headaches: is there a link? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016;16:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Alaqeel AM, Alaqeel SS, Andijani AI, Demyati EA. Validity and reliability of an Arabic version of the migraine screen questionnaire in the primary care setting for identifying hidden migraine. IJMDC. 2021;5:906–10. [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size – or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4:279–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Arslan HH, Tokgöz E, Yildizoğlu U, Durmaz A, Bek S, Gerek M. Evaluation of the changes in the nasal cavity during the migraine attack. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:e446–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Bonfils P, Halimi P, Le Bihan C, Norès JM, Avan P, Landais P. Correlation between nasosinusal symptoms and topographic diagnosis in chronic rhinosinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114(1 Pt 1):74–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Bidirectional association between asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis: Two longitudinal follow-up studies using a national sample cohort – PMC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7293248/. Accessed February 12, 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Şenbil N, Gürer YKY, Üner C, Barut Y. Sinusitis in children and adolescents with chronic or recurrent headache: a case–control study. J Headache Pain. 2008;9:33–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].AlQarni M, Fayi K, Al-sharif M, Siddiqui A, Alhazzani A. Prevalence of migraine and non-migraine headache and its relation with other diseases in the adults of Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9:1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Straburzyński M, Gryglas-Dworak A, Nowaczewska M, Brożek-Mądry E, Martelletti P. Etiology of ’sinus headache’-moving the focus from rhinology to neurology. A systematic review. Brain Sci. 2021;11:79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Ziegeler C, May A. Facial presentations of migraine, TACs, and other paroxysmal facial pain syndromes. Neurology. 2019;93:e1138–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Sussman S, Zimmerman Z, Chishom T, Reid L, Seyyedi M. Migraine-Associated otalgia: an underappreciated entity. J Audiol Otol. 2022;26:90–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Sharbel DD, Owen HC, Yelverton JC, Li M, Holmes T, Kountakis SE. Symptoms and clinical findings in primary headache syndrome versus chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021;35:308–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Lee KI, In SM, Kim JY, et al. Association of nasal septal deviation with the incidence of anxiety, depression, and migraine: a national population-based study. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0259468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Carvalho GF, Luedtke K, Pinheiro CF, et al. Migraine and balance impairment: Influence of subdiagnosis, otoneurological function, falls, and psychosocial factors. Headache. 2022;62:548–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

medi-104-e41680-s001.docx (19.7KB, docx)

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES