Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 25;25:61. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01602-7

Table 6.

Impact of rectal artifacts with lesion location on subjective evaluation and DL

PZ TZ
AUC P value AUC P value
no artifact artifact no artifact vs. artifact no artifact artifact no artifact vs. artifact
R1 0.64(0.57–0.70) 0.60(0.51–0.68) 0.43 0.66(0.60–0.71) 0.59(0.52–0.65) 0.23
R2 0.66(0.58–0.72) 0.61(0.52–0.69) 0.5 0.73(0.67–0.77) 0.64(0.57–0.70) 0.08
R3 0.75(0.69–0.81) 0.72(0.64–0.79) 0.49 0.72(0.66–0.76) 0.70(0.64–0.76) 0.93
R4 0.77(0.69–0.83) 0.71(0.65–0.77) 0.32 0.75(0.69–0.79) 0.68(0.62–0.74) 0.25
R5 0.76(0.67–0.82) 0.73(0.66–0.78) 0.62 0.75(0.69–0.79) 0.72(0.66–0.76) 0.63
R6 0.84(0.78–0.88) 0.76(0.68–0.83) 0.09 0.76(0.70–0.80) 0.75(0.69–0.79) 0.98
DL 0.78(0.72–0.83) 0.62(0.53–0.70) 0.003 0.73(0.67–0.77) 0.60(0.53–0.66) 0.011

Data inside parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals. PZ peripheral zone, TZ transitional zone, AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve