Abstract
Context
Flavones, the key active components in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), have demonstrated antidepressant activity. Given the numerous animal studies conducted, a systematic analysis is essential to provide a valuable reference for future research.
Object
This study investigated the antidepressant activity of flavones based on animal models and summarized the underlying mechanisms.
Methods
We systematically searched 7 bibliographic Databases as of August 12, 2023, such as Web of Science, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, etc. The meta-analysis was performed using either the random or fixed-effect model, supplemented by trial sequential analysis (TSA). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of evidence.
Results
A total of 25 studies involving 458 mice were included, identifying five flavones (baicalin, baicalein, apigenin, luteolin, vitexin) with antidepressant activity. Compared to the control group, flavones significantly reduced immobility time in forced swimming and tail suspension tests. Flavones also decreased serum and hippocampal levels of interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), reduced nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) levels, and increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels. Relative to the positive group, flavones raised IL-6, sucrose preference rate, and corticosterone (CORT) levels, with no significant differences in other factors. The TSA showed the efficacy of flavones for treating depression with adequate ‘information size’ for the primary outcome.
Conclusions
The results demonstrate that flavones exert protective effects against depression in mice, primarily by stimulating neurotrophic factors and modulating inflammatory pathways. These findings emphasize their potential as promising candidates for the development of novel antidepressant therapies.
Keywords: Depression, flavones, animal studies, meta-analysis, mechanisms
Introduction
Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is one of the most ancient healing systems, boasting a rich history of over two millennia of accumulated knowledge and practical application. TCM is considered a complementary or alternative medical system in most Western countries. It is estimated that millions of patients worldwide use TCM or related practices (Li 2022), ranging from treating the common cold to chronic diseases such as diabetes and ischemic stroke (Shen and Yin 2021; Zhu et al. 2022). It is also worth emphasizing that many contemporary pharmaceuticals originate from herbal and natural sources. For instance, substances like St. John’s wort, curcumin, and oligosaccharides in Morindae Officinalis Radix have demonstrated efficacy in addressing mild depression.
Depression is the most common life-threatening and debilitating mental disorder that features abnormalities in mode and manifests as depressed mood, fatigue, irritability, cognitive impairment, and loss of interest and joy (Hammen 2018). According to the World Health Organization, 300 million people worldwide suffer from depression. Notably, depression has a deleterious impact on human capital, interpersonal interactions, and social activities. It also poses an elevated risk of mortality due to suicide and other comorbid conditions (Herrman et al. 2019). In contemporary medical practice, conventional antidepressant medications are widely used to treat depression. These medications encompass a range of classes, including tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), selective serotonin reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), and selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors. Nevertheless, certain antidepressant drugs exhibit limited effectiveness in treating individuals who are resistant to standard therapies and are associated with significant adverse effects. These adverse effects encompass gastrointestinal disturbances, cardiovascular complications, headaches, and fatigue, which significantly impact patients’ quality of life and adherence to medication regimens (Solmi et al. 2020). Therefore, new treatments must be urgently needed to develop novel therapeutic agents with more effective and fewer side effects to treat depression.
Flavones, which possess a C6-C3-C6 skeleton, mainly originate from plant metabolism and have demonstrated beneficial effects on various aspects of human physiology and health, such as antitumor, antiplatelet, anti-malarial, anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, and antidepressant properties (Khan et al. 2018; Ko et al. 2020; Melrose 2023). TCM has made substantial strides in the treatment of depression while minimizing adverse effects. Numerous animal experiments have been conducted to investigate the antidepressant properties of flavones in the context of depression. Previous meta-analyses (Jia et al. 2023), encompassing a limited number of participants and studies, have suggested that flavonoids may alleviate symptoms of depression and anxiety, specifically targeting clinical patient populations. Additionally, another study has explored the antidepressant mechanisms attributed to flavonoids (Lysrayane et al. 2021). Consequently, this study will undertake a systematic assessment of the effectiveness of flavones in depression-related animal models, thereby offering prospective avenues for subsequent clinical trials.
Materials and methods
In this study, we complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting statement (Page et al. 2021) and registered the study on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration no. CRD42023416795). The PRISMA checklists are available in Appendix Files, Table S1.
Search strategy
A total of seven databases were searched from their inception until March 16, 2023.The English databases include PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Chinese databases include Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang. A combination of MeSH terms, Emtree headings, and keywords was used for ‘depression’, ‘mice’, ‘apigenin’, ‘luteolin’, ‘baicalin’, ‘vitexin’, and ‘baicalein’. The search strategy is presented in Appendix Files, Table S2.
Study selection
Two investigators (W.Q. and M.X.) independently assessed the titles and retrieved the full-text studies in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The inclusion principles are as follows: (i) Animals: Mouse models of depression, without restrictions on age, sex, or duration of disease induction; (ii) Interventions: Treatment with flavone components, without limitations on administration methods, frequency, and dosage; (iii) Two comparison groups were used in this study. One is the model comparison, which was treated with a vehicle, distilled water, or saline after successful depression modeling. The other is the positive medicine comparison, treated with antidepressant drugs after successful depression modeling; (iv) Outcomes: The primary outcomes were behavioral tests of animals, including the tail suspension test (TST), forced swimming test (FST), open field test (OFT), and the sucrose preference test (SPT). The secondary outcomes included pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) levels, interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels, serum corticosterone levels, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) contents, and the level of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB); (v) Studies: The study design included controlled in vivo experiments with a control group, but was not restricted to randomized controls. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) studies lacking data from the depression model group or the antidepressant drugs group; (ii) studies involving flavone combinations with other compounds and treatments or association with other interventions; (iii) studies with duplicate publication or that failed to provide the required outcomes; (iv) studies that were conducted in vitro.
Data extraction
The data, including the characteristics of studies, model, sex, weight, age, number of animals included, dose, time of intervention, and method of administration, was extracted from the included studies by two investigators independently. We first attempted to extract data from tables or figures; when these were not reported, we attempted to extract data from the bar plots of each study through the WebPlotDigitizer program. To comprehensively elucidate the efficacy of all flavones, we selected a regimen involving a higher dosage. We resolved discrepancies through discussion and, if necessary, adjudication by a third investigator (L.Y.Y).
Quality assessment
The risk of bias was independently evaluated by W.Q and M.X using the Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Experimentation (SYRCLE) Risk of Bias tool (Hooijmans et al. 2014). If discrepancies existed, L.Y.Y participated in the evaluation. The domains assessed included sequence generation, baseline characteristics, allocation concealment, random housing, blinding (performance bias), random outcome assessment, blinding (detection bias), incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other sources of bias. Assessment results were categorized as ‘low risk of bias’, ‘high risk of bias’, and ‘unclear risk of bias’.
Statistical analysis
We performed the meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4.1 and Stata 14.0. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were shown for continuous data. Heterogeneity was assessed using the χ2 test and I2 statistics. Due to the lack of significant heterogeneity (p ≥ 0.10, I2 ≤ 50%), a fixed-effect model was used. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted with the primary outcome indicators TST, FST, SPT and OFT utilizing TSA software version 0.9.5.10 to evaluate the reliability of the evidence and to determine if the sample size has reached the desired sample size.
Subgroup and sensitivity analysis
We conducted subgroup analyses based on the type of flavone, dose and method of administration. We assessed publication bias for the primary outcome using funnel plot asymmetry and Egger’s test, provided that more than ten studies were available. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the results by excluding one study per time and repeating the meta-analysis. Stata version 14.0 software was utilized for the publication bias and sensitivity analyses.
GRADE evaluation
Two investigators assessed the quality of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) (Guyatt et al. 2011). We downgraded each outcome based on bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias.
Results
Study selection
After removing duplicate publications, 303 studies were screened by reviewing their titles and abstracts. Ultimately, 37 full texts were assessed for eligibility, of which 25 were selected for further study. A visual description of the study selection process in the PRISMA flowchart in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flowchart.
Characteristics of included studies
Compared to female mice, male mice were more commonly used in these studies, with the number of animals per group ranging from 6 to 12. In these 25 literatures, a total of five depression models were investigated: chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS), chronic mild stress (CMS), corticosterone (CORT), chronic restraint stress (CRS), and lipopolysaccharide-induced depression. Among these, the CUMS model was the most frequently used. Additionally, two of the included studies did not explicitly describe the depression model used (Can et al. 2013; Al-Yamani et al. 2022). For the flavone components with antidepressant activity, baicalin, baicalein, apigenin, luteolin, and vitexin were reported, with baicalin receiving the most attention. Typically, mice were orally administered flavones and antidepressant drugs. The characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| References | Modeling | Sex and Species/ | Group (n) | Weight (g)/age (w) | Intervention Measures |
Drug delivery method | Outcomes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Positive | Flavones | |||||||
| Can et al. 2013 | NR | Male BALB/c | 8 | 30–35/6 | NR | Reb (20 mg/kg) once | Vit (30 mg/kg) once | i. g. | a |
| Liu et al. 2013 | CUMS | Male ICR | 10 | 18–20/NR | NR + CUMS 6w | NR | Lut (6 mg/kg) for 21d + CUMS 6w | i. g. | a, b |
| Li et al. 2015a | LPS | Male ICR | 10 | 18–22/NR | Sal for 7d + LPS (0.5 mg/kg/d) for 7d | Flu (20 mg/kg/d) for 7d + LPS (0.5 mg/kg/d) for 7d | Api (50 mg/kg/d) for 7d + LPS (0.5 mg/kg/d) for 7d | i. p. | a, c, d, e, f, i |
| Li et al. 2015b | CORT | Male ICR | 10 | 18–22/NR | CORT (40 mg/kg/d) for 3w | Flu (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) for 3w | BA (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) for 3w | i. g. | b, c, g, j |
| Sheng et al. 2016 | CORT | Male ICR | 10 | 18–22/NR | Sal for 21d + CORT 3w | Flu (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CORT 3w | BA (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CORT 3w | i. g. | b, c |
| Weng et al. 2016 | CORT | Male ICR | 8 | 24 ± 2/NR | CORT (40 mg/kg/d) for 3w | Flu (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) for 3w | Api (40 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) 3w | i. g. | b, c, g, j |
| Guo et al. 2019 | CUMS | Male ICR | 12 | 18–22/NR | Sal for 21d + CUMS 8w | Flu (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 8w | BA (60 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 8w | i. g. | a, b, c, d, e, f, h |
| Liu et al. 2019a | CUMS | Male SPF ICR | 12 | 18–22/NR | Sal for 21d + CUMS 6w | Flu (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | BA (50 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | i. g. | a, b, c, d, e, f, h, i |
| Liu et al. 2019b | CUMS | Male ICR | 10 | 30 ± 3/NR | Sal for 21d + CUMS 3w | Flu (5.2 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 3w | BA (12 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 3w | i. g. | b, c |
| Lu et al. 2019 | CMS | Male ICR | 10 | 20–25/8 | NR + CUMS 3w | Flu (5.2 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 3w | BA (100 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 3w | i. p. | b, c |
| Zhang et al. 2019a | CORT | Male C57BL/6 | 8 | 18–22/8 | Sal for 28d + CUMS 8w | Flu (18 mg/kg) for 28d + CORT 8w | BA (160 mg/kg/d)for 28d + CORT 8w | i. g. | a, b |
| Zhang et al. 2019b | CUMS | Male ICR | 10 | 23–26/NR | Sal for 21d + CUMS 6 w | Flu (15 mg/kg) for 21d + CUMS 6w | BA (60 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | i. g. | a, c, d |
| Zhang et al. 2019c | CRS | Male BALB/c | 10 | 18–20/6 | NR + CUMS 5w | Flu (25 mg/kg/d) for 14d + CUMS 5w | Api (60 mg/kg/d) for 14d + CUMS 5w | i. g. | c, d |
| Zhong et al. 2019 | CUMS | Male C57BL/6 | 8 | NR/ 7 to 8 | Sal for 21d + CUMS 6w | Flu (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | BA (50 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | i. g. | a, b, c, d, e, f, h |
| Zhao et al. 2020 | CORT | Female C57BL/6J | 10 | 18–22/6 to 8 | Sal for 42d + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) 6w | ES (10 mg/kg) for 21d + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) 6w | BA (60 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) 6w | i. g. | a, b, c, g |
| Jia et al. 2021 | CUMS | Male ICR | 10 | 24 ± 2/7 | Sal for 21d + CUMS 6w | Flu (10 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | BA (50 mg/kg/d)for 21d + CUMS 6w | i. g. | a, c |
| Xiao et al. 2021 | CUMS | Male ICR | 9 | 20–25/7 to 8 | NR+ CUMS 6w | Flu (10 mg/kg) for 21d + CUMS 6w | BA (100 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | i. g. | a, c |
| Alghamdi et al. 2022 | CMS | NR Albino | 8 | 20–25/10 to 14 | Sal for 21d + CUMS 3w | Imipramine (15 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CMS 3w | Api (50 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CMS 3w | i. g. | a, c, g |
| Al-Yamani et al. 2022 | NR | Either sex Albino | 6 | 20–25/ NR |
NR | Flu (30 mg/kg) for three times | Api (50 mg/kg/d) for three times | i. g. | a |
| Liu et al. 2022a | LPS | Male C57BL/6 | 6 | NR/NR | Sal + LPS (5 mg/kg) once | NR | Ba (3 mg/kg) once + LPS (5 mg/kg) once | i. p. | a, b, e, f, h, i |
| Li et al. 2022 | LPS | Male C57BL/6 | 8 | 20 ± 2/8 | 0.5% CMC-Na + LPS (1 mg/kg) 3d | NR | Lut (50 mg/kg) 3d + LPS (1 mg/kg) 3d | i. g. | b, c, e, h |
| Lu et al. 2022 | CUMS | Male C57BL/6N | 9 | 18–20/6 | Sal for 28d + CUMS 10w | Flu (10 mg/kg/d) for 28d + CUMS 10w | BA (10 mg/kg/d) for 28d + CUMS 10w | i. g. | b, c |
| Wang et al. 2023 | CORT | Male ICR | 8 | 26 ± 2/7 | NR + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) 6w | Flu (10 mg/kg) for 21d + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) 6w | BA (50 mg/kg) for 21d + CORT (40 mg/kg/d) 6w | i. g. | a, b, c |
| Jin et al. 2023 | CUMS | Male C57BL/6N | 9 | 16–20/NR | Sal for 21d + CUMS 6w | Flu (20 mg/kg) for 21d + CUMS 6w | BA (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | i. g. | a, c |
| Ma et al. 2023 | CUMS | Male ICR | 10 | 25–30/NR | water or 0.4% DMSO + CUMS 6w | Flu (20 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | BA (60 mg/kg/d) for 21d + CUMS 6w | i. g. | a, c |
Api: Apigenin; Ba: Baicalein; BA: baicalin; CMC-Na: sodium carboxymethyl cellulose; CMS: chronic mild stress; CORT: corticosterone; CRS: chronic restraint stress; CUMS: chronic unpredictable mild stress; DMSO: dimethylsulfoxide; Escitalopram: ES; Flu: fluoxetine; LPS: Lipopolysaccharide; Lut: Luteolin; Reb: Reboxetine; Saline: Sal; Vit: Vitexin; NR: not reported; i. g.: intragastric injection; i. p.:intraperitoneal injection; d: days; w: weeks; n: number.
a: tail suspension test (TST), b: forced swimming test (FST), c: sucrose preference test (SPT), d: open field test (OFT), e: IL-1β, f: TNF-α, g: serum corticosterone levels, h: IL-6, i: NF-kb, j: brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).
Quality assessment of the included studies
In the included literature, only one study described the specific randomization process in detail, while the rest mentioned ‘random’ methods only when allocating the animals (Wang et al. 2023). Twenty-three studies provided detailed descriptions of animal characteristics, ensuring similarity between groups. All studies were rated as unclear for allocation concealment due to the lack of detailed clarification regarding whether the animals were adequately concealed. Based on the descriptions of the experimental animals, the included studies were considered to be at low risk for issues with animal placement randomization. However, all were assessed as having an unclear risk in evaluating randomized outcomes. Experimental performers were blinded in two studies (Guo et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2019). No study described the assessment of outcomes in a randomized manner. Additionally, only four studies detailed the specific method of blinding used to evaluate outcomes (Liu et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019a; Xiao et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2022a). Due to missing data on the number of animals, six studies demonstrated a high risk of attrition bias (Li et al. 2015a; 2015b; Guo et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019a; Liu et al. 2019b; Li et al. 2022). The SYRCLE assessment of the risk of bias is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Risk of bias assessment table. (a) Risk of bias summary. (b) Risk of bias graph.
Outcome measures
Behavioral tests
Seventeen studies involving 308 mice reported on the TST (Can et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2013; Li et al. 2015a; Guo et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019a; 2019b; Zhao et al. 2020; Jia et al. 2021; Xiao et al. 2021; Alghamdi et al. 2022; Al-Yamani et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2022a; Jin et al. 2023; Ma et al. 2023; Wang et al. 2023). The results of the meta-analysis indicated that flavones significantly reduced the immobility time in TST compared with the model group [MD = −44.71 (95% CI: −54.22, −35.21, I2 = 77%; Figure 3)].
Figure 3.
Forest plot for the effect of flavones on the tail suspension test.
A total of 15 studies, including (Liu et al. 2013; Li et al. 2015b; Sheng et al. 2016; Weng et al. 2016; Guo et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2019, 2019; Lu et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019a; Zhao et al. 2020; Li et al. 2022; Lu et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2022a; Wang et al. 2023), involving 278 mice, reported on the FST. The pooled results indicated that flavones significantly reduced the immobility time in the FST compared to the model group [MD = −40.79 (95% CI: −44.64, −36.93, I2 = 31%; Figure 4)].
Figure 4.
Forest plot for the effect of flavones on the forced swimming test.
Twenty studies (Li et al. 2015a, 2015b; Sheng et al. 2016; Weng et al. 2016; Guo et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2019, 2019; Lu et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019b, 2019c; Zhao et al. 2020; Jia et al. 2021; Xiao et al. 2021; Alghamdi et al. 2022; Li et al. 2022; Lu et al. 2022; Jin et al. 2023; Ma et al. 2023; Wang et al. 2023), including 374 mice assessed SPT. The meta-analysis revealed that, compared with the model group, flavones significantly increased the sucrose preference rate in an animal model of depression [MD = 18.55 (95% CI: 13.89, 23.21, I2 = 82%; Figure 5)].
Figure 5.
Forest plot for the effect of flavones on the sucrose preference test.
Four studies involving 80 mice have reported the crossing number (Li et al. 2015a; Guo et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019a). The pooled effects indicate that the administration of flavones was associated with a significant difference when compared to the model group [MD = 32.46 (95% CI: 15.55, 49.37, I2 = 74%; Figure 6a)]; Additionally, three studies recorded the distance travelled (Liu et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019c; Ma et al. 2023), and the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in the distance travelled between the flavones group and the model group [MD = 75.14 (95% CI: −24.74, 175.03, I2 = 62%; Figure 6b)].
Figure 6.
Forest plot for the effect of flavones on the (a) crossing number and (b) distance traveled.
Inflammatory cytokinesl
Three studies reported IL-1β levels in the blood (Liu et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2022a); the results indicated a significant difference in reducing IL-1β levels between the flavone and model groups [MD = −17.74 (95% CI: −25.27, −10.2, I2 = 0%; Appendix Files Figure S1)]. Three studies assessed the IL-1β levels in the hippocampus (pg/mg) (Guo et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019; Li et al. 2022), and the meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in reducing IL-1β levels between flavones and model groups [MD = −14.81 (95% CI: −37.79, 8.16, I2 = 94%; Appendix Files Figure S2)]. Two studies presented IL-1β levels in the hippocampus (pg/ml) (Li et al. 2015a; Liu et al. 2019). The pooled effects showed a significant difference in reducing IL-1β levels between flavones and model groups [MD = −31.63 (95% CI: −48.02, −15.23, I2 = 82%; Appendix Files Figure S3)].
Three studies presented the result of IL-6 levels in the blood (Liu et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2022a); the findings indicated that there was no significant difference in reducing IL-6 levels between the flavone group and the model group [MD = −287.9 (95% CI: −607.32, 31.53, I2 = 95%; Appendix Files Figure S4)]. A meta-analysis of three studies (Guo et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019; Li et al. 2022) revealed a significant difference in the reduction of IL-6 levels in the hippocampus between the flavone group and the model group [MD = −43.68 (95% CI: −80.05, −7.31, I2 = 87%; Appendix Files Figure S5)].
Effect sizes for TNF-α levels were pooled from three studies (Liu et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2022a). The pooled results showed that flavones significantly decreased TNF-α levels in the blood compared with those in the model group [MD = −22.23 (95% CI: −28.5, −15.95, I2 = 37%; Appendix Files Figure S6)]. Two comparisons reported TNF-α levels in the hippocampus (pg/mg) (Guo et al. 2019; Zhong et al. 2019). The pooled effects showed no significant difference between the flavones and model groups [MD = −145.19 (95% CI: −379.98, 89.6, I2 = 96%; Appendix Files Figure S7)]. Two comparisons reported the TNF-α levels in the hippocampus (pg/ml) (Li et al. 2015a; Liu et al. 2019), and the pooled results indicated that the administration of flavones was associated with a significant difference compared to the model group [MD = −41.27 (95% CI: −49.57, −32.97, I2 = 34%; Appendix Files Figure S8)].
Concerning the effect on NF-κB levels in the prefrontal cortex (hippocampus), two studies reported this outcome (Li et al. 2015a; Liu et al. 2019). The pooled result showed that flavones significantly decreased NF-κB levels compared to the model group [MD = −0.23 (95% CI: −0.3, −0.16, I2 = 0%; Appendix Files Figure S9)].
Other indexes
A total of three studies reported CORT levels (Li et al. 2015b; Weng et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2020), and the results demonstrated that there was no significant difference between flavones and the model group [MD = −30.9 (95% CI: −80.39, 18.6, I2 = 96%; Appendix Files Figure S10)].
Meta-analysis of three studies reported BDNF levels (Li et al. 2015b; Weng et al. 2016; Lu et al. 2019), and the results revealed that flavones can increase the BDNF levels in comparison with those in the model group [MD = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.9, I2 = 78%; Appendix Files Figure S11)].
Flavones compared with positive group
Compared with positive group, no significant difference was found between the positive group and the flavones group in reducing TST time [MD = 5.56 (95% CI: −1.83, 12.94, I2 = 64%; Appendix Files Figure S12)], FST time [MD = −0.55 (95% CI: −9.38, 8.27, I2 = 78%; Appendix Files Figure S13)], distance travelled [MD = 3.16 (95% CI: −91.76, 98.07, I2 = 53%; Appendix Files Figure S14)], crossing number [MD = 3.42 (95% CI: −10.84, 17.68, I2 = 51%; Appendix Files Figure S15)], IL-1β in blood level (pg/ml) [MD = 6.5 (95% CI: −1.49, 14.49, I2 = 0%; Appendix Files Figure S16)], IL-1β in hippocampus level (pg/mg) [MD = 1.5 (95% CI: −11.26, 14.27, I2 = 75%; Appendix Files Figure S17)], IL-1β in hippocampus level (pg/ml) [MD = 0.14 (95% CI: −22.07, 22.36, I2 = 67%; Appendix Files Figure S18)], IL-6 in hippocampus level (pg/mg) [MD = 0.59 (95% CI: −12.5, 13.68, I2 = 0%; Appendix Files Figure S19)], TNF-α in blood level (pg/ml) [MD = 6.46 (95% CI: 0.32, 12.61, I2 = 16%; Appendix Files Figure S20)], TNF-α in hippocampus level (pg/mg) [MD = 25.71 (95% CI: −27.9, 79.32, I2 = 70%; Appendix Files Figure S21)], TNF-α in hippocampus level (pg/ml) [MD = −3.88 (95% CI: −18.92, 11.17, I2 = 79%; Appendix Files Figure S22)], NF-kb in blood level (pg/ml) [MD = 0.07 (95% CI: −0.06, 0.2, I2 = 80%; Appendix Files Figure S23)] and BDNF levels [MD = 0.05 (95% CI: −0.08, 0.19, I2 = 34%; Appendix Files Figure S24)].
The pooled result showed that flavones increase IL-6 in blood level (pg/ml) [MD = 9.82 (95% CI: 3.56, 16.09, I2 = 8%; Appendix Files Figure S25)], sucrose preference rate [MD = 2.47 (95% CI: 0.84, 4.1, I2 = 32%; Appendix Files Figure S26)] and CORT levels [MD = −10.48 (95% CI: −19.43, −1.54, I2 = 0%; Appendix Files Figure S27)] in an animal model of depression.
Publication bias
Egger’s test indicated that there was no publication bias with the TST, FST, and SPT in the model group (p = 0.078, p = 0.329, p = 0.980) and the positive group (p = 0.28, p = 0.225, p = 0.195). Since fewer than ten studies were included, a publication bias assessment was not conducted for the other outcomes.
Subgroup and sensitivity analyses
Considering the high heterogeneity in the meta-analyses, we conducted further subgroup analyses based on the type of flavone (vitexin, apigenin, baicalin, baicalein, luteolin), the method of administration (intragastrically vs. intraperitoneally) and the dose. The flavone dosage was categorized into three groups: low (less than 50 mg/kg/day), medium (greater than 50 mg/kg/day and less than 100 mg/kg/day), and high (greater than 100 mg/kg/day). For the TST, FST, and SPT, the subgroup analyses did not reveal significant differences between the flavone group and the model or positive groups based on either the type of flavone, dose and the method of administration.
In assessing the antidepressant effects of flavones compared to the model group, a subgroup analysis of different types of flavones was conducted for the TST. It was observed that the heterogeneity decreased in the baicalin group. The heterogeneity of the TST significantly decreased from 77% to 26%, suggesting that the type of flavone and the dosage were the primary contributors to heterogeneity. However, the heterogeneity of the apigenin group remained high. Similarly, sources of heterogeneity in the SPT results were analyzed, and even after subgroup analysis, the heterogeneity remained high (Figure 7).
Figure 7.
Subgroup analysis of pooled estimates of behavioral tests on the (a) tail suspension test, (b) forced swimming test and (c) sucrose preference test.
On the antidepressant effects of flavones compared with the positive group in meta-analyses, for the TST, the heterogeneity decreased sharply from 63% to 0%, and the results were unaffected by the exclusion of the study by Jin et al. (2023). For the FST, subgroup analyses of the outcomes showed a high degree of heterogeneity (Figure S28).
When we conducted a sensitivity analysis by excluding studies that did not explicitly indicate the missing data, the results of the TST, FST, and SPT remained relatively unchanged, suggesting that the results were stable (Figures S29–S34).
Quality of evidence
Utilizing the GRADE approach, we assessed the quality of evidence for the reported outcomes. In the model group, the evidence quality was classified as moderate (n = 4) and low (n = 12). The findings from the model group are summarized in Table 2, while those from the positive group are detailed in Appendix Files, Tab. S3.
Table 2.
Assessment of quality and summarizing the findings using the GRADE approach.
| Certainty assessment |
No of animals | Effect |
Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcomes | No of studies | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | Flavones /Model | Relative (95% CI) | Absolute | |
| TST | 17 | Seriousa | Not seriousb | Not serious | Not serious | None | 154/154 | – | MD 44.71 lower (54.22 lower to 35.21 lower) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate |
| FST | 15 | Seriousa | Not seriousb | Not serious | Not serious | None | 139/139 | – | MD 40.79 lower (44.64 lower to 36.93 lower) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate |
| SPT | 20 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 187/187 | – | MD 18.55 higher (13.89 higher to 23.21 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| OFT (crossing number) | 4 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 40/40 | – | MD 32.46 higher (15.55 higher to 49.37 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| OFT (distance traveled) | 3 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 30/30 | - | MD 75.14 higher (24.74 lower to 175.03 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| IL-1β levels in blood (pg/ml) | 3 | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | None | 20/20 | - | MD 17.74 lower (25.27 lower to 10.2 lower) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate |
| IL-1β levels in the hippocampus (pg/mg) | 3 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 24/24 | - | MD 14.81 lower (37.79 lower to 8.16 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| IL-1β levels in the hippocampus (pg/ml) | 2 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 12/12 | - | MD 31.63 lower (48.02 lower to 15.23 lower) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| IL-6 levels in the blood (pg/ml) | 3 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 20/20 | - | MD 287.9 lower (607.32 lower to 31.53 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| IL-6 levels in the hippocampus (pg/mg) | 3 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 24/24 | - | MD 43.68 lower (80.05 lower to 7.31 lower) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| TNF-α levels in the blood (pg/ml) | 3 | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | None | 20/20 | - | MD 22.23 lower (28.5 lower to 15.95 lower) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| TNF-α levels in the hippocampus (pg/mg) | 2 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 16/16 | - | MD 145.19 lower (379.98 lower to 89.6 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| TNF-α levels in the hippocampus (pg/ml) | 2 | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | None | 12/12 | - | MD 41.27 lower (49.57 lower to 32.97 lower) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| NF-κB levels in the prefrontal cortex | 2 | Seriousa | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | None | 9/9 | - | MD 0.23 lower (0.3 lower to 0.16 lower) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate |
| CORT levels | 3 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 28/28 | - | MD 30.9 lower (80.39 lower to 18.6 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
| BDNF levels | 3 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not serious | Not serious | None | 21/21 | - | MD 0.65 higher (0.41 higher to 0.9 higher) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low |
Note: High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.
CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference.
The included studies were significantly biased with respect to randomization methods, allocation concealment, blind method, and incomplete outcome dat.
There is no serious inconsistency since the sources of heterogeneity were identified.
Heterogeneity (I2 > 50%, p < 0.05) was found.
Trial sequential analysis
The result of TSA on TST, FST, SPT and OFT (crossing number) showed that the cumulative z-value surpassed both the conventional boundary and the TSA threshold, thereby achieving the Required Information Size (RIS). However, for the distance traveled, the cumulative z-value failed to reach the RIS, though it did cross the TSA boundary value. Despite not achieving the anticipated sample size, clinical efficacy has been established. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of flavones in treating depression in comparison with the model group (Figure 8).
Figure 8.
Trial sequential analysis for (a) tail suspension test, (b) forced swimming test, (c) sucrose preference test, (d) OFT (crossing number) and (e) OFT (distance traveled).
The results of the TSA for TST, SPT, and OFT (crossing number) indicated that the cumulative Z-value surpassed both the conventional boundary and the TSA threshold, thereby achieving the Required Information Size (RIS). For the FST, the software reported that the first information fraction exceeded 100% of the RIS, suggesting that the available sample size was sufficient to provide statistically reliable conclusions. However, for the distance traveled, the cumulative Z-value did not reach the RIS, although it did surpass the TSA boundary value. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of flavones in treating depression in comparison with the model group (Figure 8).
The findings indicate that additional studies are still required to confirm the comparative analysis of flavones and positive control drugs in the treatment of depression (Appendix Files Figure S35).
Discussion
Efficacy of flavones
Globally, depression is one of the leading causes of disability and mobility impairment (Herrman et al. 2019). Depression may be caused by multiple factors, and its complex mechanism makes prevention and treatment challenging (Harmer et al. 2017). Consequently, it is essential to identify more efficacious treatments. Natural compounds have been investigated for their antidepressant properties. Polyphenols like flavones, naturally occurring polyphenols, have been extensively researched for their pharmacological properties, particularly their antidepressant properties. Studies with rodents have shown that they reverse depressive behaviors. Several previous in vivo preclinical studies in animal models and human patients had reported the therapeutic potential of flavones on depression (Al-Yamani et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2023). For instance, A flavonoid-rich fraction from Scutellaria baicalensis, an herb used in traditional Chinese medicine, may provide antidepressant effects (Wang and Gao 2024).
This meta-analysis included 458 mice. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, flavones are effective in a variety of experimental models. We observed that, compared to the model group, flavones demonstrated a significant reduction in immobility time in both FST and TST, increased SPT, elevated locomotor activity, and decreased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, namely IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and NF-κB. These findings collectively suggest that flavones have the potential to significantly ameliorate depressive behavior, with their anti-inflammatory effects emerging as a plausible explanation for the observed protective outcomes.
In our meta-analysis, we observed a pronounced degree of heterogeneity in the primary outcomes, including TST, FST, and SPT, a phenomenon anticipated in animal experimental studies.This heterogeneity has a substantial impact on the robustness and reliability of our analytical results. The results of our subgroup analysis indicate that this high level of heterogeneity could potentially be attributed to variations in the types of flavones used, the doses of administered drugs and the design of animal experiments. The selection of flavones is of paramount importance in this context. Baicalin and its aglycone, baicalein, are flavonoid compounds isolated from the roots of Scutellaria baicalensis. Apigenin is a naturally derived compound that can be found abundantly in fruits and vegetables, while luteolin is widely distributed among plant species. Vitexin, classified as a flavone C-glucoside, is present in nutraceuticals and food items and has garnered attention owing to its potential antidepressant-like effects. These compounds demonstrate prominent biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective properties and antioxidant (Can et al. 2013; Guo et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019c; Li et al. 2022).
According to subgroup analyses, the effects of baicalin, apigenin, luteolin, and vitexin treatments on depressive-like behaviors, as measured by FST and SPT, were not statistically significant compared to the control group. Nonetheless, the collective findings suggest that the administration of flavones demonstrated greater efficacy in alleviating depressive-like symptoms relative to the control group. Conversely, concerning TST, the observed difference in the effectiveness of apigenin in mitigating depressive behaviors in mice compared to the control group did not reach statistical significance. This outcome could potentially be attributed to the limited inclusion of studies. Notably, in two studies involving baicalin, data loss was documented in the reports of TST, FST, and SPT.
We conducted a subgroup analysis to assess the impact of different flavone doses. Our findings indicated that the administration of flavones at low doses did not result in notable improvements in behavioral performance compared to the outcomes observed in the groups receiving medium and high doses relative to the control group. Furthermore, our analysis demonstrated that, compared to the positive control group, interventions involving medium doses of flavones were more effective in improving behavioral outcomes than those using low doses.
However, since the animal models included in the study were all mouse models, we cannot determine whether the findings from these models can be reliably extrapolated to other animal models or clinical studies. Additionally, our study presents inconclusive results when comparing the efficacy of flavone compounds with positive control medications for treating depression, primarily due to the limited sample size of the included trials. Therefore, further evidence from clinical trials is needed to evaluate the efficacy of flavones, and several high-quality studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm our findings. Moreover, analyzing the factors contributing to heterogeneity poses challenges. Due to the limited sample size, accurately identifying the precise causes of the observed high heterogeneity proved complex.
Mechanisms
To date, the mechanism of action of antidepressants is recognized as multifaceted, encompassing increased neurotransmitter levels, receptor activity modulation, alterations in neuroplasticity, exertion of anti-inflammatory effects, and stimulation of neurotrophic factors (Liu et al. 2015; Peng et al. 2015). Each element contributes distinctively to the therapeutic impact of antidepressants, with the potential to operate independently or synergistically to alleviate depressive symptoms. Current research on the antidepressant mechanisms of flavones primarily involves: (1) Elevation of the monoamine, including norepinephrine (NA), 5-HT, and dopamine (DA) pathways, are implicated in depression’s pathophysiology (Dean and Keshavan 2017). Vitexin’s antidepressant efficacy hinges on increased catecholamine levels and interactions with 5-HT1A, dopaminergic D1, D2, and D3 receptors (Can et al. 2013). Additionally, apigenin’s antidepressant effects involve α-adrenergic, dopaminergic, and 5-HT3 serotonergic receptors (Al-Yamani et al. 2022); (2) Anti-inflammatory effects, increasing evidence associates inflammation with depression’s etiology, inducing depressive behaviors (Dean and Keshavan 2017). Baicalin mitigates neuroinflammation and depressive-like symptoms by inhibiting toll-like receptor 4 via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/forkhead box protein O1 (FoxO1) pathway, suppressing high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1)/toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/NF-κB pathways, and regulating N-methyl-D aspartate receptor (NMDAR)/subtype 2B (NR2B)- extracellular regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 to curb inflammation and oxidative stress (Zhong et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2022a). Apigenin reduces nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expressions by activating NF-kB (Li et al. 2015a), while luteolin promotes anti-neuroinflammatory and antidepressant effects by upregulating A20 and Nrf2 (Li et al. 2022); (3) Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, baicalin modulates the HPA axis by reducing serum corticosterone and increasing 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-2 (11β-HSD2) and BDNF in the hippocampus (Li et al. 2015b). It also remodels HPA axis feedback by normalizing glucocorticoid receptor (GR) nuclear translocation (Zhang et al. 2019a) and activates the PI3K/AKT/glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β)/β-catenin pathway (Zhao et al. 2020). (4) Promoting neurogenesis, baicalin has been demonstrated to reverse CUMS-induced reductions in protein kinase B (p-Akt), forkhead box transcription factor (FOXG1), and fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) (Zhang et al. 2019b). BDNF, crucial for neuronal survival, is found to be reduced in the hippocampus of individuals with depression (Peng et al. 2015; Colucci-D’Amato et al. 2020). Additionally, apigenin has been shown to modulate levels of corticosterone and increase BDNF in the hippocampus (Sheng et al. 2016; Weng et al. 2016). Baicalin’s antidepressant effects involve BDNF/ERK/cAMP response element binding (CREB), BDNF/tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB)/ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate (Rac)/LIM kinase (LIMK) pathways (Lu et al. 2019; Jia et al. 2021), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)/glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) (Wang et al. 2023) and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (Xiao et al. 2021); (5) Inhibition of oxidative stress. Various preclinical and clinical trials have shown that oxidative stress may be a potentially important parameter for depression (Alghamdi et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2023). For instance, compared to the control group, apigenin alleviated CMS-induced emotional behaviours in mice by increasing the glutathione level and significantly decreasing malondialdehyde (MDA) and catalase levels in the brain (Alghamdi et al. 2022). Additionally, luteolin diminished MDA levels, while the glutathione peroxidase (GSH) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels were decreased in the hippocampus of CUMS exposed mice and also reduced depression-like behaviours (Liu et al. 2013); (6) Inhibition of neuronal apoptosis, another molecular mechanism that maintains cellular homeostasis, has recently been shown to be associated with the physiology of depression (Wang et al. 2021). Based on several animal depression models, baicalin attenuated the behaviour of depression hippocampal neuronal apoptosis by regulating the silent information regulator sirtuin 1 (SIRT1)/polymerase-1 (PARP1) signaling pathway (Ma et al. 2023) and inducing the expression of calbindin-D28K (Liu et al. 2019); (7) Improvement of mitochondrial dysfunction. Jin et al. discovered that baicalin might enhance nip-like protein (NIX)-mediated mitophagy through direct binding to adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and activating the downstream step of the proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1 (PGC-1) signaling pathway (Jin et al. 2023). This mechanism may contribute to baicalin’s antidepressant effects by upregulating genes related to enzymes in glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle, thereby improving mitochondrial function and increasing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels in the brain. Additionally, findings suggest that apigenin may facilitate autophagy via the AMPK/mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, inducing antidepressive effects in mice subjected to chronic restraint stress (Zhang et al. 2019c). (8) Regulation of the Gut–Brain Axis, emerging preclinical studies have demonstrated that the changes in the composition and function of gut microbiota are associated with the development and progression of depression, primarily via the regulation of the gut-brain axis (Liu et al. 2022b). Research demonstrating that quercetin may exert antidepressant effects by restoring gut microbiota balance thorough its targeted modulation of specific bacterial populations, including Romboutsia, Turicibacter, Faecalibaculum, and Bifidobacterium. Additionally, it may exert its effects by influencing brain metabolism (Li et al. 2024).
Strengths and limitations
This meta-analysis has several strengths. First, compared with previous research, our study is the first preclinical meta-analysis to assess the impact of flavones in combating depression in animal models. As a result of our findings, we can provide practical applications for transforming animal data from the laboratory to the bedside using evidence-based methods. Secondly, we performed a comparative analysis of the antidepressant effects of flavone compounds against both positive drugs and the model group. To further investigate the antidepressant effectiveness, we conducted subgroup analyses with different flavones and doses. Thirdly, we assessed the evidence using the GRADE system for evaluating the quality of evidence.
This meta-analysis has several limitations. Firstly, only a small number of studies with small sample sizes were included. Secondly, the acquisition of original data was incomplete, with some data points obtained using the WebPlotDigitizer program. As a result, there may be errors that could affect the accuracy of the results, potentially leading to measurement bias. Thirdly, the literature quality assessment using the risk of bias tool revealed a lack of high-quality studies, particularly in terms of randomization, blinding methods, and handling of missing data, which may contribute to selection bias. Biased or imprecise results and without rigorous evaluation, some preclinical animal studies supported by clinical research led to costly clinical research and withdrawal from the market afterward. The effects of drugs on human patients with depression can be better predicted in human models of depression that are of higher quality. To provide high-quality evidence, future research should focus on improving experimental methods, modeling approaches, and reporting animal experiments. Therefore, some conclusions in the present study should be interpreted with caution. As a result of this result, we should increase the sample size and standardize the experimental design in future studies to make the results more reliable.
Conclusions
In summary, our findings indicate that flavones can significantly ameliorate depression-like behaviors and enhance neurological function in animals exhibiting depressive symptoms. However, there is still a need for larger animal models and clinical trials to validate the results. Therefore, additional high-quality preclinical trials and clinical studies are essential before flavones can be applied in human treatments.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Gao Tiantian for her invaluable assistance in reviewing and revising the manuscript.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82160860) , the Key research and development projects of Ningxia (2021BEG02040) and the Leading Talent Cultivation Project in Science and Technology of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region’s (2023GKLRLX14).
Authors’ contributions
W.Q., W.H.Q. and L.Y.Y. designed the study; W.Q., L.Y.Y., M.X., Y.C.Y., M.W. and X.C.B. collected the data; W.Q., L.Y.Y., M.X., M.W. and X.C.B. were responsible for data analysis and interpretation; W.Q., W.H.Q. and L.Y.Y. wrote the manuscript; W.H.Q., Y.C.Y., and M.X. revised and reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability statement
All relevant data supporting the findings of this study are included in the main text and supplementary materials. Additional data will be made available on request.
References
- Alghamdi A, Almuqbil M, Alrofaidi MA, Burzangi AS, Alshamrani AA, Alzahrani AR, Kamal M, Imran M, Alshehri S, Mannasaheb BA, et al. 2022. Potential antioxidant activity of apigenin in the obviating stress-mediated depressive symptoms of experimental mice. Molecules. 27(24):9055. doi: 10.3390/molecules27249055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Yamani MJ, Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq S, Alamri AS, Alsanie WF, Alhomrani M, Alsalman AJ, Al Mohaini M, Al Hawaj MA, Alanazi AA, Alanzi KD, et al. 2022. The role of serotonergic and catecholaminergic systems for possible antidepressant activity of apigenin. Saudi J Biol Sci. 29(1):11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Can ÖD, Demir Özkay Ü, Üçel Uİ.. 2013. Anti-depressant-like effect of vitexin in BALB/c mice and evidence for the involvement of monoaminergic mechanisms. Eur J Pharmacol. 699(1-3):250–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colucci-D’Amato L, Speranza L, Volpicelli F.. 2020. Neurotrophic factor BDNF, physiological functions and therapeutic potential in depression, neurodegeneration and brain cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 21(20):7777. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dean J, Keshavan M.. 2017. The neurobiology of depression: an integrated view. Asian J Psychiatr. 27:101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo LT, Wang SQ, Su J, Xu LX, Ji ZY, Zhang RY, Zhao QW, Ma ZQ, Deng XY, Ma SP.. 2019. Baicalin ameliorates neuroinflammation-induced depressive-like behavior through inhibition of toll-like receptor 4 expression via the PI3K/AKT/FoxO1 pathway. J Neuroinflammation. 16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1474-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, et al. 2011. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 64(4):383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammen C. 2018. Risk factors for depression: an autobiographical review. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 14(1):1–28. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harmer CJ, Duman RS, Cowen PJ.. 2017. How do antidepressants work? New perspectives for refining future treatment approaches. Lancet Psychiatry. 4(5):409–418. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30015-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrman H, Kieling C, McGorry P, Horton R, Sargent J, Patel V.. 2019. Reducing the global burden of depression: a lancet-world psychiatric association commission. Lancet. 393(10189):e42–e43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32408-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RB, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW.. 2014. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 14(14):43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia S, Hou Y, Wang D, Zhao X.. 2023. Flavonoids for depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 63(27):8839–8849. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2057914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia ZX, Yang JL, Cao ZQ, Zhao J, Zhang JH, Lu Y, Chu L, Zhang SD, Chen Y, Pei L.. 2021. Baicalin ameliorates chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression through the BDNF/ERK/CREB signaling pathway. Behav Brain Res. 24(414):113463. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin X, Zhu L, Lu S, Li C, Bai M, Xu E, Shen J, Li Y.. 2023. Baicalin ameliorates CUMS-induced depression-like behaviors through activating AMPK/PGC-1α pathway and enhancing NIX-mediated mitophagy in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 5(938):175435. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan H, Perviz S, Sureda A, Nabavi SM, Tejada S.. 2018. Current standing of plant derived flavonoids as an antidepressant. Food Chem Toxicol. 119:176–188. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.04.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ko YH, Kim SK, Lee SY, Jang CG.. 2020. Flavonoids as therapeutic candidates for emotional disorders such as anxiety and depression. Arch Pharm Res. 43(11):1128–1143. doi: 10.1007/s12272-020-01292-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li B, Yan Y, Zhang T, Xu H, Wu X, Yao G, Li X, Yan C, Wu LL.. 2024. Quercetin reshapes gut microbiota homeostasis and modulates brain metabolic profile to regulate depression-like behaviors induced by CUMS in rats. Front Pharmacol. 15:1362464. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1362464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li J. 2022. Traditional Chinese medicine in treating hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 15(3):e008723. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li R, Zhao D, Qu R, Fu Q, Ma S.. 2015a. The effects of apigenin on lipopolysaccharide-induced depressive-like behavior in mice. Neurosci Lett. 594:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li YC, Wang LL, Pei YY, Shen JD, Li HB, Wang BY, Bai M.. 2015b. Baicalin decreases SGK1 expression in the hippocampus and reverses depressive-like behaviors induced by corticosterone. Neuroscience. 17(311):130–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li ZP, Wang QC, Zhang ZH, Zhang X, Wu XT, Li L, Zhang Y, Yu YH.. 2022. A20, as a downstream factor of Nrf2, is involved in the anti-neuroinflammatory and antidepressant-like effects of luteolin. J Funct Foods. 99:105305. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2022.105305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu HT, Lin YN, Tsai MC, Wu YC, Lee MC.. 2022a. Baicalein exerts therapeutic effects against endotoxin-induced depression-like behavior in mice by decreasing inflammatory cytokines and increasing brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels. Antioxidants. 11(5):947. doi: 10.3390/antiox11050947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu L, Dong Y, Shan X, Li L, Xia B, Wang H.. 2019. Anti-depressive effectiveness of baicalin in vitro and in vivo. Molecules. 24(2):326. doi: 10.3390/molecules24020326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu L, Liu C, Wang Y, Wang P, Li Y, Li B.. 2015. Herbal medicine for anxiety, depression and insomnia. Curr Neuropharmacol. 13(4):481–493. doi: 10.2174/1570159x1304150831122734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu L, Wang H, Zhang H, Chen X, Zhang Y, Wu J, Zhao L, Wang D, Pu J, Ji P, et al. 2022b. Toward a deeper understanding of gut microbiome in depression: the promise of clinical applicability. Adv Sci (Weinh). 9(35):e2203707. doi: 10.1002/advs.202203707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X, Liu X, Wang Y, Zeng B, Zhu B, Dai F.. 2023. Association between depression and oxidative balance score: national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2018. J Affect Disord. 15(337):57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.05.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y, Lan N, Liu L, Gou LS, Fu XB, Cui W.. 2013. Improvement effect of luteolin on depression induced by chronic unpredictable mild stress in mice. Lishizhen Med Meter Med Res. 24(6):1382–1384. [Google Scholar]
- Liu YY, Lu Y, Chu L, Guan ZW, Bai WZ, Pei Lin, Zhao YN, Chen YF.. 2019. Effects of Baicalin on expression of calbindin-D28K in hippocampus of depression model mice. Chin J New Drugs Clin Rem. 38(2):107–111. [Google Scholar]
- Lu SF, Li CY, Jin XH, Zhu LL, Shen JD, Bai M, Li YC, Xu ER.. 2022. Baicalin improves the energy levels in the prefrontal cortex of mice exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress. Heliyon. 8(12):e12083. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Y, Sun GQ, Yang F, Guan ZW, Zhang Z, Zhao J, Liu YY, Chu L, Pei L.. 2019. Baicalin regulates depression behavior in mice exposed to chronic mild stress via the Rac/LIMK/cofilin pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 116(5):109054. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lysrayane K, Mateus A, Isaac C.. 2021. Systematic review of the antidepressant activity and associated antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of flavonoids in rodents. Res Soc Dev. 10(12):Cd008851. [Google Scholar]
- Ma Z, Feng D, Rui W, Wang Z.. 2023. Baicalin attenuates chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced hippocampal neuronal apoptosis through regulating SIRT1/PARP1 signaling pathway. Behav Brain Res. 441:114299. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melrose J. 2023. The potential of flavonoids and flavonoid metabolites in the treatment of neurodegenerative pathology in disorders of cognitive decline. Antioxidants. 12(3):663. doi: 10.3390/antiox12030663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, et al. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peng GJ, Tian JS, Gao XX, Zhou YZ, Qin XM.. 2015. Research on the pathological mechanism and drug treatment mechanism of depression. Curr Neuropharmacol. 13(4):514–523. doi: 10.2174/1570159x1304150831120428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen X, Yin F.. 2021. The mechanisms and clinical application of traditional chinese medicine lianhua-qingwen capsule. Biomed Pharmacother. 142(2):111998. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheng JD, Hu CY, Wei Y, Wang L.. 2016. Effects of baicalin on the expression of NT-3 in hippocampus of mice with depression induced by corticosterone. Chin J Ethnomed Ethnophar. 25(20):13–15. [Google Scholar]
- Solmi M, Fornaro M, Ostinelli EG, Zangani C, Croatto G, Monaco F, Krinitski D, Fusar-Poli P, Correll CU.. 2020. Safety of 80 antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-attention-deficit/hyperactivity medications and mood stabilizers in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders: a large scale systematic meta-review of 78 adverse effects. World Psychiatry. 19(2):214–232. doi: 10.1002/wps.20765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang AR, Mi LF, Zhang ZL, Hu MZ, Zhao ZY, Liu B, Li YB, Zheng S.. 2021. Saikosaponin A improved depression-like behavior and inhibited hippocampal neuronal apoptosis after cerebral ischemia through p-CREB/BDNF pathway. Behav Brain Res. 403(5):113138. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C, Gao MQ.. 2024. Research progress on the antidepressant effects of baicalin and its aglycone baicalein: a systematic review of the biological mechanisms. Neurochem Res. 49(1):14–28. doi: 10.1007/s11064-023-04026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z, Cheng YT, Lu Y, Sun GQ, Pei L.. 2023. Baicalin ameliorates corticosterone-induced depression by promoting neurodevelopment of hippocampal via mTOR/GSK3 β pathway. Chin J Integr Med. 29(5):405–412. doi: 10.1007/s11655-022-3590-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weng L, Guo X, Li Y, Yang X, Han Y.. 2016. Apigenin reverses depression-like behavior induced by chronic corticosterone treatment in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 774(6):50–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao ZG, Cao ZQ, Yang JL, Jia ZX, Du YR, Sun GQ, Lu Y, Pei L.. 2021. Baicalin promotes hippocampal neurogenesis via the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in a chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced mouse model of depression. Biochem Pharmacol. 190(2):114594. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Ming S, Chen X, Zhang T, Qian H, Peng S, Ding Y.. 2023. Herbal medicine as adjunctive therapy with antidepressants for post-stroke depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol. 14(14):1180071. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1180071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang K, He MY, Wang F, Zhang HT, Li YT, Yang JY, Wu CF.. 2019a. Revealing antidepressant mechanisms of baicalin in hypothalamus through systems approaches in corticosterone-induced depressed mice. Front Neurosci. 13(2):834. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang RY, Ma ZX, Liu KL, Li YW, Liu DN, Xu LX, Deng XY, Qu R, Ma ZQ, Ma SP.. 2019b. Baicalin exerts antidepressant effects through Akt/FOXG1 pathway promoting neuronal differentiation and survival. Life Sci. 15(221):241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X, Bu H, Jiang Y, Sun G, Jiang R, Huang X, Duan H, Huang Z, Wu Q.. 2019c. The antidepressant effects of apigenin are associated with the promotion of autophagy via the mTOR/AMPK/ULK1 pathway. Mol Med Rep. 20(3):2867–2874. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao F, Tao W, Shang Z, Zhang W, Ruan J, Zhang C, Zhou L, Aiello H, Lai H, Qu R.. 2020. Facilitating granule cell survival and maturation in dentate gyrus with baicalin for antidepressant therapeutics. Front Pharmacol. 2(11):556845. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.556845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhong J, Li G, Xu H, Wang Y, Shi M.. 2019. Baicalin ameliorates chronic mild stress-induced depression-like behaviors in mice and attenuates inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. Braz J Med Biol Res. 52(7):e8434. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20198434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu T, Wang L, Wang LP, Wan Q.. 2022. Therapeutic targets of neuroprotection and neurorestoration in ischemic stroke: applications for natural compounds from medicinal herbs. Biomed Pharmacother. 148:112719. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data supporting the findings of this study are included in the main text and supplementary materials. Additional data will be made available on request.








