Skip to main content
Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology
. 2024 May 23;41(1):73–78. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_460_23

Effect of single-dose intravenous lignocaine versus fentanyl on neuromuscular recovery time after general anesthesia in elective pediatric surgery: A randomized controlled pilot study

Mridul Dhar 1, Ruhi Sharma 1,, Yashwant S Payal 1, Vaishali Gupta 1, Jyoti Rawat 1, Sachin Sogal 1
PMCID: PMC11867376  PMID: 40026731

Abstract

Background and Aims:

Intravenous (IV) lignocaine is often used to prevent the airway response to extubation, especially in children to prevent respiratory adverse events. It is known to prolong the duration of action of neuromuscular blocking drugs, but data in children are limited. The primary objective of this study was to compare neuromuscular recovery time with IV lignocaine versus fentanyl, in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia (GA). Secondary objectives included the comparison of clinical parameters and respiratory complications.

Material and Methods:

A randomized double-blind pilot study was conducted in 42 children aged 2–8 years undergoing GA with neuromuscular blockade, who received either 1.5 mg/kg of lignocaine or 0.5 mcg/kg of fentanyl IV, just prior to giving reversal at a train of four (TOF) count of 2–3. Time to achieve a TOF ratio of 0.9 and extubation and hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were noted. Incidences of coughing, bucking, laryngospasm, etc., were also noted. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

Demographic and operative data were similar. Time from reversal to TOF ratio of 0.9 was similar with both lignocaine (6.79 ± 3.03 mins) and fentanyl (6.79 ± 3.31 mins), P = 0.99. Time to extubation was also similar in both groups (8.14 ± 3.31 vs 9.19 ± 2.89 min), P = 0.28. Bucking incidence was higher with fentanyl (23.8%) vs lignocaine (9.5%), P = 0.41.

Conclusions:

Single-dose IV lignocaine administered before reversal did not prolong neuromuscular recovery time compared to fentanyl, with a similar (low) incidence of respiratory events in pediatric patients.

Keywords: Airway, anesthesia recovery, fentanyl, lignocaine, neuromuscular monitoring, peri operative complications

Introduction

More than 40% of patients who undergo surgery under general anesthesia (GA), experience coughing during extubation.[1] Any event of persistent coughing, or breath holding leading to partial or complete airway obstruction and subsequent desaturation, is defined as a respiratory adverse event. Although a protective reflex, continuous coughing increases the reactivity of children’s airways, making them prone to complications like atelectasis, laryngospasm, and hypoxemia.[2] Laryngospasm is a dreaded complication in the pediatric population. Among the various modalities studied extensively, lignocaine has been found to be a safe and effective method for the prevention of coughing and airway response to extubation and hence preventing laryngospasm and other perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAE).[3,4,5]

Some literature suggests that local anesthetic drugs may prolong the duration of action of neuromuscular blocking drugs.[6,7,8,9] Residual muscle weakness is a potential cause of respiratory insufficiency and related complications in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Train-of-four (TOF) ratios <0.9 have been found to be associated with impairment of pharyngeal coordination, force of contraction, and increased risk of aspiration, which may lead to hypoxia and other postoperative respiratory complications.[10]

The use of neuromuscular monitoring has greatly reduced the risks associated with the use of intermediate to long-acting drugs. Yet, its application is still underutilized in most setups, with more reliance on clinical signs for assessing the adequacy of neuromuscular reversal for extubation.[11] In the hands of even a trained anesthesiologist, these clinical signs are not very reliable especially in the pediatric population. More so, data on effect of IV lignocaine on neuromuscular recovery are limited or lacking in the children undergoing elective surgery.

The main aim of the study was to establish safety of IV lignocaine in children in terms of its potential effect on neuromuscular recovery, so that its numerous perioperative uses including for prevention of PRAE as well as for multimodal analgesia may be assessed in future studies as is being done in adults. We hypothesized that a single dose of IV lignocaine given just before giving reversal may prolong the neuromuscular recovery time compared to giving IV fentanyl (as control) in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under GA. For the study, the statistical hypothesis was that lignocaine is not worse than fentanyl in terms of time to neuromuscular recovery. Fentanyl was chosen as a control with the assumption that it does not have any direct effect on neuromuscular junction and would be a more ethical alternative to giving only a placebo for the purpose of decreasing the response to extubation. The primary objective of the study was to compare the recovery times after giving IV lignocaine just prior to reversal versus giving fentanyl. The secondary objectives of the study were to compare the incidence of complications, i.e., cough, bronchospasm, laryngospasm, hypoxemia, etc., between the two groups, and to compare the hemodynamic and respiratory clinical parameters at the time of extubation of the trachea.

Material and Methods

A randomized controlled double-blind pilot study was conducted on pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under GA with neuromuscular blockade. After approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee AIIMS/IEC/22/270 dated 27.05.2022, the trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2022/06/043111). The manuscript was prepared following CONSORT guidelines for randomized trials. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study, after obtaining written informed consent from the parent/guardian. Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Patients aged 2–8 years of both genders with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I and II undergoing surgery under GA with neuromuscular blockade were recruited for the study. Patients with a known allergy to amide local anesthetics, with a known seizure disorder, with a known or expected difficult airway, patients with renal, hepatic, or muscular disorders, and patients taking drugs affecting neuromuscular function were excluded from the study. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Lignocaine group (LG) and fentanyl group (FG).

This was a double-blind study. The physician administering the study drugs and the outcome assessor (a different physician) were blinded. Randomization was done by serially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes concealing the randomization group as determined by computer-generated random numbers. A nurse not involved in the study opened the envelope and prepared the drug in a 5 ml syringe diluted till either 3 ml or 5 ml based on weight of the child. The syringe was labelled by a code to hide the group allocation. Preoperative evaluation and nil per oral instructions were standardized for all patients. On the day of surgery, patients were premedicated with oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg 30–40 min before taking into the operation theater (OT). On arrival in the OT, noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, and neuro-muscular monitors were applied. Neuromuscular monitoring was done at the adductor pollicis (Mindray A7 anesthesia workstation, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-medical Electronics Co. Ltd). The accelerometry transducer was attached to the distal interphalangeal joint of the thumb. The two stimulating electrodes were put on the volar medial side of the forearm over the ulnar nerve just proximal to the wrist crease [Figure 1]. Baseline hemodynamic parameters were noted. In patients with an IV line in situ, induction of anesthesia was done with IV propofol 2 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 mcg/kg. In children with no IV access, inhalational induction was done with 50% oxygen and 8% sevoflurane following, which the IV line was secured and then given IV fentanyl. After calibration of the neuro-muscular monitor, atracurium 0.5 mg/kg was given to facilitate the securing of the airway with an appropriate-sized endotracheal tube (ETT). In all the patients, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane with oxygen and air to achieve a minimum alveolar concentration of 1. Lungs were mechanically ventilated to normocarbia as monitored by capnography. Neuromuscular monitoring was used to guide atracurium dosing to maintain a TOF count of 0–1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Attachment of probes for neuromuscular monitoring of ulnar nerve

On conclusion of surgery, after switching off the sevoflurane, either IV Lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg (in the group LG) or Fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg (in the group FG) was given just before giving reversal (neostigmine 50 mcg/kg and glycopyrrolate 10 mcg/kg at a TOF count of 2–3).[12,13,14] TOF was monitored every 20 s at this time till a TOF ratio of 0.9 was attained. Extubation criteria were a TOF ratio of 0.9 or more along with clinical adequacy of extubation: eye-opening (to calling out name/spontaneous), strong hand grip/or moving or lifting all limbs, generating adequate tidal volume (6–8 ml/kg), regular breathing, and adequate arterial oxygenation (SpO2 > 95% on 40% fiO2). Hemodynamics parameters were noted at the time of giving reversal, at extubation, and 5 min postextubation.

Patients were transferred to the PACU and supplemental oxygen was given by face mask (4–6 L/min) if required. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) was continually measured in the PACU. Any adverse respiratory events (defined as SpO2 < 92% or airway obstruction requiring intervention, i.e., oropharyngeal airway, neck extension, chin lift, or jaw thrust) occurring in the PACU were recorded and managed.

The primary outcome of the study was measured as time from giving the reversal drug to achieving a TOF ratio of 0.9. Time from giving reversal to extubating the trachea was also noted. Any incidence of coughing, bucking, postextubation laryngospasm, bronchospasm, hypoxemia, nausea, vomiting, or any other complications were recorded (from the time of extubation till in PACU). Bucking was defined as a gag response with the ETT in situ. Coughing was defined as a gag response leading to forceful air expulsion with a sharp sound after the ETT was removed.

Sample size calculation: Due to the lack of similar studies conducted in the past for reference values of variance, this study was conducted as an exploratory pilot study with a total initial estimated sample size of 42 patients to be able to detect a difference of an empirical effect size of 0.8 for the time to achieve TOF ratio of 0.9 (one tailed), with 5% alfa error and 80% power. Post-hoc power analysis was performed for the final sample for noninferiority.

Statistical analysis: Data were recorded in MS Excel spreadsheet program. Graph pad Instat (Version 3.05) was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics was expressed in the form of means/standard deviations or medians/ inter quartile range for numerical variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Data were presented graphically wherever appropriate for data visualization. Comparison for continuously distributed data was made using an independent sample t-test when comparing two groups. In nonnormally distributed data, appropriate nonparametric tests in the form of the Mann–Whitney U test were used for these comparisons. The Fisher’s exact test was used for group comparisons of categorical data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study and 42 patients, 21 in each group, were included in the final statistical analysis [Figure 2]. The demographic characteristics were similar in the two groups [Table 1]. Operative findings were also comparable in terms of duration of surgery, type of surgery, total atracurium, and fentanyl consumption during the surgery [Table 2]. The hemodynamic parameters, respiratory rate, and saturation were similar in both the groups at baseline, at the time of administering reversal, at extubation, and 5 min postextubation [Table 3].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CONSORT flow chart

Table 1.

Comparison of demographic data

Characteristics LG (n=21) FG (n=21) P
Age (Years) 4.64±2.28 5.24±2.14 0.389
Height (cm) 87.86±19.85 89.76±19.50 0.755
Weight (Kg) 16.85±6.08 17.79±7.05 0.649
Male 16/21 (76.2%) 16/21 (76.2%) 1.281
Female 5/21 (23.8%) 5/21 (23.8%)

P<0.05 was considered significant, LG: Lignocaine group, and FG: Fentanyl group

Table 2.

Comparison of intraoperative parameters and recovery characteristics

Characteristics LG (n=21) FG (n=21) P
Time to 0.9 TOF (mins) (Intention to treat) 6.62±2.94 6.65±3.28 0.975
Time to 0.9 TOF (mins) (Per-protocol) (n=19 each) 6.79±3.03 6.79±3.31 0.999
Time to extubation (min) 8.14±3.31 9.19±2.89 0.281
Total Fentanyl (mcg) 39.19±21.44 42.14±24.42 0.668
Total atracurium (mg) 11.98±5.71 14.90±7.46 0.162
Duration of surgery (min) 106.67±58.83 107.09±45.67 0.979
Type of surgery 0.232
Abdominal surgery 7 9
Orchidopexy 2 2
Cystoscopy 7 1
Ortho/soft tissue surgery 3 6
Palate/lip 2 1
Penile surgery 0 1
Anal surgery 0 1

P<0.05 was considered significant, TOF: train of four, LG: Lignocaine group, and FG: Fentanyl group

Table 3.

Comparison of hemodynamics and respiratory parameters

Characteristics Time Points LG (n=21) FG (n=21) P
Heart rate Baseline 106±21.02 102.05±19.41 0.530
At reversal 108.85±20.54 117.28±20.48 0.191
At extubation 119.57±20.73 126.71±28.49 0.359
5 min post-extubation 108.80±23.03 119.33±26.17 0.174
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) Baseline 94.52±12.84 98.81±15.56 0.338
At reversal 99.85±10.05 105.71±14.06 0.129
At extubation 107.24±10.52 112.71±13.72 0.155
5 min post-extubation 101.43±14.72 104.76±12.79 0.438
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) Baseline 56.19±11.10 55.95±13.49 0.951
At reversal 50.09±9.52 62.42±11.11 0.303
At extubation 67.47±11.90 67.19±12.33 0.9395
5 min post-extubation 60.76±12.39 63.05±10.45 0.522
Respiratory rate Baseline 20.71±3.29 19.67±4.69 0.408
At extubation 28.71±7.19 26.76±6.95 0.377
5 min post-extubation 23.24±7.61 24±6.01 0.721
SPO2 (%) Baseline 99.28±0.46 99.52±0.51 0.183
At reversal 99.23±0.62 99.23±0.62 0.989
At extubation 99.52±0.51 99.47±0.60 0.908
5 min post-extubation 99.42±0.51 99.57±0.59 0.364

P<0.05 was considered significant, LG: Lignocaine group, and FG: Fentanyl group

In two patients in both groups, clinical conditions and awakening were achieved before reaching a TOF ratio of 0.9 which warranted removing the tube at that point in time. These were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT). The time to achieve a TOF ratio of 0.9 was similar in both groups analyzed by both ITT and per protocol (n = 19 in each group). Time to actual extubation was also similar (8.14 ± 3.31 min in LG vs 9.19 ± 2.89 min in FG [Table 2].

A higher proportion of patients experienced coughing at the time of extubation in the LG [5/21 (23.8%)], while the incidence of bucking was lower [2/21 (9.5%)] compared to FG [5/21 (23.8%)], P = 0.41. One patient in each group suffered laryngospasm and emergence delirium, which were successfully managed [Figure 3].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of incidence of respiratory and other adverse events

Post-hoc power analysis: in the control FG, the mean value of recovery times in terms of time to reach TOF of 0.9 was 6.65 ± 3.28 min. For a noninferiority limit of 3 min for LG compared to FG, with a 5% alpha error, a sample size of 21 in each group of the current study achieved a power of 90%.

Discussion

PRAE are the leading cause of morbidity postoperatively. These include laryngospasm, bronchospasm, atelectasis, coughing, airway obstruction, hypoxia, stridor, and breath holding.[2] Among the drugs in the anesthesiologist’s armamentarium, opioids, alpha agonists, and local anesthetic agents have been abundantly used as adjuvants to GA to reduce the incidence of coughing and bucking at the time of extubation.[15] Additionally, these drugs provide for better hemodynamics and smoother extubation conditions. Literature on adult patients has not come to a consensus on the effect of IV lignocaine on neuromuscular recovery.[6,7,8,9]

The present study was conducted to evaluate if lignocaine given prior to extubation prolongs the time taken to achieve a TOF ratio of 0.9 and time to extubation compared to giving fentanyl in children undergoing elective surgery. Both were found to be similar. Fentanyl was chosen as a comparator agent with the assumption that it does not directly affect neuromuscular recovery, although it may prolong the overall clinical recovery time. A review of the literature by Tung et al.[16] stated that intracuff instillation of lignocaine prolonged the extubation times when it was compared with placebo, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and remifentanil. In an animal model study by Braga et al., local anesthetics were found to show both pre- and postsynaptic effects and caused potentiation of the neuromuscular blockade caused by nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers.[17] Lee et al.[9] investigated the interaction of cisatracurium and rocuronium with lignocaine on rat diaphragm and concluded that lignocaine increases the sensitivity as well as causes recurarization, which was clinically significant. In contrast to the above, Hans et al.[18] reported the time to spontaneous recovery of a TOF ratio ≥0.9 after a single intubating dose of cisatracurium when lignocaine infusion was administered as an adjuvant for surgery was 94 ± 15 min in the control group and 98 ± 16 min in the lignocaine group (P = 0.27), which was found to be insignificant. Most of the above-mentioned studies utilized lignocaine infusions, unlike the present study where a single shot dose was given before reversal.

A survey of the Society of Paediatric Anaesthesia on the use, monitoring, and antagonism of neuromuscular blockade found only 40% of practitioners assess blockade with neuromuscular monitoring in the pediatric population.[19] In the retrospective cohort trial, Klučka J et al.[20] studied 8046 pediatric patients who underwent surgery over one year and found a very low incidence of neuromuscular blockade monitoring (2.5%). The compatibility of existing monitoring devices with pediatric age groups seems to be the most probable reason for this underutilization. In another study, Klucka et al.[21] studied neuromuscular blockade in the pediatric population and found the incidence of the residual blockade to be 48.2% in the operation room and 26.9% in PACU, which is unacceptably high.

The meta-analysis published by Yang et al. states that the use of IV lignocaine perioperatively in adult patients decreased airway complications including coughing and sore throat without any increased risk of harm.[22] Furthermore, studies by Nishino et al. and Christensen et al. found lignocaine to be a safe cough suppressant.[23,24] Studies by Erb and Qi et al. present similar data in children.[4,5] In the present study, 5 out of 21 patients experienced coughing and only 2 patients experienced bucking in the lignocaine group. Similarly, opioids are routinely being used to prevent postoperative airway complications. Kireeti et al. also found low doses of fentanyl given prior to extubation in adults to be beneficial.[14] Three out of 21 patients experienced coughing at extubation and five patients suffered from bucking in the fentanyl group in the current study, which is in keeping with previous literature.

Limitations

This was a single-center pilot study. This result may be extrapolated to only healthy pediatric patients undergoing GA. Future trials may be planned with an appropriate sample size and in the subset of surgeries/children more prone to PRAE.

To conclude, the use of single-dose lignocaine before extubation of the trachea in pediatric patients is not associated with an increase in neuromuscular recovery time compared to fentanyl. Both fentanyl and lignocaine can be safely used in pediatric patients as modalities to prevent perioperative adverse respiratory events. Neuromuscular monitoring should be done in all pediatric patients undergoing surgery with neuromuscular blockade, if technically feasible.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

Nil.

References

  • 1.Lumb AB, Bradshaw K, Gamlin FM, Heard J. The effect of coughing at extubation on oxygenation in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:416–20. doi: 10.1111/anae.12924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wudineh DM, Berhe YW, Chekol WB, Adane H, Workie MM. Perioperative respiratory adverse events among paediatric surgical patients in university hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia;A prospective observational study. Front Paediatr. 2022;10:827663. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.827663. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.827663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mihara T, Uchimoto K, Morita S, Goto T. The efficacy of lignocaine to prevent laryngospasm in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:1388–96. doi: 10.1111/anae.12788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Qi X, Lai Z, Li S, Liu X, Wang Z, Tan W. The efficacy of lignocaine in laryngospasm prevention in paediatric surgery: A network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32308. doi: 10.1038/srep32308. doi:10.1038/srep32308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Keller K, Frei FJ. The effect of intravenous lignocaine on laryngeal and respiratory reflex responses in anaesthetised children. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:13–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07295.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dekornfeld TJ, Steinhaus JE. The effect of intravenously administered lignocaine and succinylcholine on the respiratory activity of dogs. Anaesth Analg. 1959;38:173–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang HS, Lee DM, Lee EJ. Effects of lidocaine on the neuromuscular action of cisatracurium:27. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18:103. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee JH, Lee SI, Lee SC, Choi SR, Rhee WJ. At therapeutic concentration, bupivacaine causes neuromuscular blockade and enhances rocuronium-induced blockade. Korean J Anaesthesiol. 2012;62:468–73. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.5.468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee EJ, Lim YJ, Gwak MJ, Yang HS. Effects of lignocaine on the neuromuscular block of cisatracurium and rocuronium. Korean J Anaesthesiol. 2002;43:348–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cavallone LF, Vannucci A. Review article: Extubation of the difficult airway and extubation failure. Anaesth Analg. 2013;116:368–83. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827ab572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang L, Yang D, Liu C, Zuo Y. Application of neuromuscular monitoring in paediatric anaesthesia: A survey in China. J Perianaesth Nurs. 2020;35:658–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2020.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sanikop C, Bhat S. Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine in prevention of post extubation laryngospasm in children undergoing cleft palate surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2010;54:132–6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.63654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Clivio S, Putzu A, Tramèr MR. Intravenous lidocaine for the prevention of cough: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2019;129:1249–55. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kireeti A, Jonnavithula N, Sundar AS, Prashanth NV, Veronica J. Effect of pre-extubation low-dose fentanyl on attenuation of haemodynamic response and quality of extubation: A prospective randomised trial. Trends Anaesth and Crit Care. 2021;39:44–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brull SJ, Kopman AF. Current status of neuromuscular reversal and monitoring: Challenges and opportunities. Anaesthesiology. 2017;126:173–90. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tung A, Fergusson NA, Ng N, Hu V, Dormuth C, Griesdale DE. Medications to reduce emergence coughing after general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:480–95. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Braga Ade F, Carvalho VH, Braga FS, Rodrigues-Simioni L, Loyola YC, Potério GB. Influence of local anaesthetics on the neuromuscular blockade produced by rocuronium: Effects of lignocaine and 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine on the neuromuscular junction. Rev Bras Anaestesiol. 2009;59:725–34. doi: 10.1016/s0034-7094(09)70097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hans G, Defresne A, Ki B, Bonhomme V, Hans P. Effect of intravenous infusion of lidocaine on spontaneous recovery from cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block: Preliminary results:9AP4–3. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:149. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Faulk DJ, Austin TM, Thomas JJ, Strupp K, Macrae AW, Yaster M. A survey of the society for paediatric anaesthesia on the use, monitoring, and antagonism of neuromuscular blockade. Anaesth Analg. 2021;132:1518–26. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klučka J, Ťoukalková M, Krikava I, Štoudek R, Klabusayová E, Moravská M, et al. Neuromuscular blockade in clinical practice in paediatric anaesthesia: Retrospective cohort trial in a tertiary paediatric anaesthesia centre. Signa Vitae. 2018;14:59–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Klucka J, Kosinova M, Krikava I, Stoudek R, Toukalkova M, Stourac P. Residual neuromuscular block in paediatric anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:e1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.10.001. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2018.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang SS, Wang NN, Postonogova T, Yang GJ, McGillion M, Beique F, et al. Intravenous lignocaine to prevent postoperative airway complications in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:314–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nishino T, Hiraga K, Sugimori K. Effects of IV. lignocaine on airway reflexes elicited by irritation of the tracheal mucosa in humans anaesthetised with enflurane. Br J Anaesth. 1990;64:682–7. doi: 10.1093/bja/64.6.682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Christensen V, Ladegaard-Pedersen HJ, Skovsted P. Intravenous lignocaine as a suppressant of persistent cough caused by bronchoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1978;67:84–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES