Table 3.
Cost effectiveness of MC-RPD, TR-RPD, and CPD for OHIP.
| CD |
FL |
CPD |
ICER CD Vs FL |
ICER CD VS CPD |
ICER FL VS CPD |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | OHIP (Pre-post) | Cost | OHIP (Pre-post) | Cost | OHIP (Pre-post) | ||||
| 1 teeth | 400 | 3 | 3527 | 6 | 5667 | - | −1042.33 | - | - |
| 2 teeth | 400 | 3 | 5299 | 4.5 | 8335 | - | −3266 | - | - |
| 3 teeth | 400 | 2.8 | 5299 | 3 | 8335 | - | −24,495 | - | - |
| 4,5 teeth | 400 | 2 | 7070 | 2 | 11,219 | 5.5 | 0 | 3091.14 | 1185.43 |
| 6 teeth | 600 | 6 | 7070 | 4.5 | 11,219 | 0 | 4313.33 | 1769.83 | 922 |