Table 5.

A fixed effects linear probability model of the relationship between downsizing and long-term sickness absence, without and with control for work environment factors

	Model 0		Model 1		Model 2		Model 3		Model 4
Downsizing next quarter	−0,004	[−0.019,0.010]	−0,005	[−0.019,0.010]	−0,005	[−0.020,0.010]	−0,004	[−0.019,0.010]	−0,005	[−0.020,0.010]
Downsizing this quarter	−0,004	[−0.019,0.011]	−0,004	[−0.019,0.011]	−0,004	[−0.019,0.011]	−0,004	[−0.019,0.011]	−0,004	[−0.019,0.011]
Downsizing previous quarter	0,02	[−0.000,0.041]	0,02	[−0.001,0.041]	0,02	[−0.001,0.041]	0,02	[−0.000,0.041]	0,02	[−0.001,0.041]
Work environment:
Commitment			−0,002	[−0.011,0.007]					0,001	[−0.009,0.012]
Control					−0.012*	[−0.023,−0.001]			−0,012	[−0.024,0.000]
Role Clarity							−0,005	[−0.021,0.010]	−0,003	[−0.020,0.015]
Control variables:
Salary	0	[−0.000,0.000]	0	[−0.000,0.000]	0	[−0.000,0.000]	0	[−0.000,0.000]	0	[−0.000,0.000]
Multiple job holder	−0,011	[−0.025,0.004]	−0,011	[−0.026,0.004]	−0,011	[−0.025,0.004]	−0,011	[−0.026,0.004]	−0,011	[−0.026,0.004]
Temporary contracts	−0.041***	[−0.054,−0.028]	−0.041***	[−0.054,−0.028]	−0.041***	[−0.054,−0.028]	−0.041***	[−0.054,−0.028]	−0.041***	[−0.054,−0.028]
_cons	0.125***	[0.111,0.139]	0.134***	[0.097,0.170]	0.158***	[0.123,0.193]	0.148***	[0.078,0.217]	0.165***	[0.093,0.237]
	Variance		Variance		Variance		Variance		Variance
sigma_u	0,207		0,207		0,207		0,207		0,207
sigma_e	0,298		0,298		0,298		0,298		0,298
rho	0,325		0,325		0,325		0,325		0,325

N employees 19,173; N observations: 83,570

95% confidence intervals in brackets

Model 0: shows the relationship between downsizing and sickness absence, including control variables

Model 1: Model 0 + control for commitment

Model 2: Model 0 + control for control

Model 3: Model 0 + control for role clarity

Model 4: Model 0+ all three work environment variables (Models 1,2 and 3)

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

***p<0.001