Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 28;44:58. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00800-x

Table 3.

Association between tertiles of global and prime diet quality score and the odds of bacterial vaginosis

Variables T1 T2 T3 P trend
OR (CI 95%) OR (CI 95%)
GDQ score (case/control) 63/35 49/46 31/70
Crude Ref. 0.592 (0.332–1.054) 0.246 (0.136–0.444) <0.001
Adjusted Ref. 0.497 (0.240–1.029) 0.219 (0.101–0.475) <0.001
Positive GDQ score (case/control) 58/40 52/49 33/62
Crude Ref. 0.732 (0.418–1.282) 0.367 (0.205–0.658) 0.001
Adjusted Ref. 0.493 (0.238–1.018) 0.235 (0.103–0.533) 0.001
Negative GDQ score (case/control) 53/38 43/35 47/78
Crude Ref. 0.881 (0.478–1.622) 0.432 (0.249–0.750) 0.002
Adjusted Ref. 1.186 (0.560–2.513) 0.550 (0.252–1.202) 0.104
PDQ score (case/control) 61/33 54/54 28/64
Crude Ref. 0.541 (0.307–0.954) 0.237 (0.128–0.437) <0.001
Adjusted Ref. 0.601 (0.300-1.202) 0.277 (0.131–0.583) 0.001
Healthy PDQ score (case/control) 56/49 52/35 35/67
Crude Ref. 1.300 (0.732–2.310) 0.457 (0.261–0.801) 0.007
Adjusted Ref. 1.213 (0.585–2.515) 0.397 (0.185–0.854) 0.014
Unhealthy PDQ score (case/control) 56/41 46/51 41/59
Crude Ref. 0.660 (0.375–1.164) 0.509 (0.289–0.897) 0.02
Adjusted Ref. 0.920 (0.438–1.932) 0.673 (0.276–1.644) 0.383

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; T, tertile; BV, bacterial vaginosis; GDQ, global diet quality, PDQ, prime diet quality

Significant values are presented in bold

Values are expressed as odds ratio (95% CIs)

Obtained from logistic regression analysis

Adjusted model: adjusted for age (years), energy intake (kcal/day), fat intake (g/day), BMI (kg/m2), physical activity (MET/h/day), familial history of BV (yes/no), pregnancy history (yes/no), menstrual cycle (yes/no), smoking history (yes/no), and number of sexual partners in previous month