Skip to main content
Clinical Kidney Journal logoLink to Clinical Kidney Journal
. 2024 Jul 27;17(9):sfae235. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae235

Aging and chronic kidney disease: epidemiology, therapy, management and the role of immunity

Yukun Tang 1,#, Jipin Jiang 2,#, Yuanyuan Zhao 3,4,#, Dunfeng Du 5,
PMCID: PMC11873799  PMID: 40034487

ABSTRACT

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is now an unquestionable progressive condition that affects more than 10% of the general population worldwide, and has emerged as one of the most important causes of global mortality. It is clear that the prevalence of CKD among the aging population is significantly elevated. It involves a broad range of complex and poorly understood concerns in older adults such as frailty, malnutrition, sarcopenia, and even cognitive and mental dysfunction. In kidneys, renal function such as glomerular filtration, urine concentration and dilution, and homeostasis of sodium and potassium, can be influenced by the aging process. In addition, it is worth noting that CKD and end-stage kidney disease patients often have accompanying activation of immune system and inflammation, involving both the innate and adaptive immune system. Based on this background, in this review article we attempt to summarize the epidemiological characteristics of CKD in the aging population, discuss the immunological mechanisms in aging-related CKD, and furnish the reader with processes for the therapy and management of elderly patients with CKD.

Keywords: aging, chronic kidney disease, immune system, management, therapy

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is now an unquestionable progressive condition that affects more than 10% of the general population worldwide, with a total number of >800 million patients [1]. The data from Global Burden of Disease studies shows that CKD has emerged as one of the most important causes of global mortality [2, 3]. Progressive CKD increases the risk of end-stage of renal disease (ESRD), cardiovascular disease and other lethal complications [4]. To date, there is no effective treatment for CKD until the patients reach a stage requiring renal replacement therapy. It is clear that the prevalence of CKD among the aging population is significantly elevated. In the last century, the improvement of healthcare has led to an increase in the population's age and an extension of life expectancy. The steady increase in the global elderly population poses a significant challenge for healthcare providers in dealing with age-related diseases [5]. Aging is a complex biological process characterized by a gradual decline in physiological functions and an increased susceptibility to diseases [6]. For the kidneys, aging not only leads to functional and structural changes but also significantly increases the risk of age-related kidney diseases due to the decline of the immune system with age. In the past 30 years in the USA, the number of patients over 75 years old with ESRD has tripled, increasing from 7.6% to over 20% [7]. Concurrently, due to the aging population and the rising prevalence of age-related diseases such as hypertension and diabetes, the elderly constitute the fastest growing segment of patients diagnosed with ESRD, and millions of them die due to the lack of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) [8]. ESRD involves a broad range of complex and poorly understood concerns in older adults such as frailty [9], malnutrition [10], sarcopenia [11], and even cognitive and mental dysfunction [12, 13]. Fundamentally, aging is due to cellular degeneration and faulty repair. In kidneys, renal function such as glomerular filtration, urine concentration and dilution, and homeostasis of sodium and potassium, can be influenced by the aging process [14].

It is worth noting that CKD and ESRD patients often have accompanying activation of the immune system and inflammation. In addition, the immune system also actively intervenes in the systemic inflammation present in CKD [15, 16]. In fact, elder adults with chronic organ disorders tend to develop a condition called “inflammaging,” which further increases the susceptibility to chronic disease progression [17], and which involves both the innate and adaptive immune system. For instance, death of tubular cells initiates an innate immune response. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) which are released by necrotic cells activate identical pattern recognition receptors and further guide various types of inflammatory cells to aggravate the progress of cell deaths [18]. Aging of the adaptive immune system is mainly characterized by the loss of naïve T cells which results in a limited T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire [19]. In other words, inflammaging is closely associated with CKD and also age-related comorbidities. While the data shows that in 2050, one in six people in the world will be aged ≥65 years. Therefore, the prevalence of CKD will also be elevated [20].

Based on this background, in this review article, we attempt to summarize the epidemiological characteristics of CKD in the aging population, discuss the immunological mechanisms in aging-related CKD, and furnish the reader with processes for therapy and management of elderly patients with CKD.

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CKD

Definition

According to the KDOQI (Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) guidelines [21], CKD is defined by a reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) without regard to etiology, or by signs of kidney damage such as proteinuria, hematuria or abnormal imaging/biopsy findings. Usually, reduced GFR is defined as GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 [22]. In the past two decades, the detection and monitoring of CKD improved, advocated by various professional organizations. Recently, most studies have used estimated GFR (eGFR, typically estimated from a filtration marker, such as serum creatinine or cystatin C) to determine the presence of CKD, whereas others have combined albuminuria, which is defined as an albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >30 mg/g and decreased eGFR [1]. Usually, a total of five stages of CKD were defined based on the eGFR (Fig. 1). In addition, to differentiate from acute kidney injury (AKI), CKD need include a “chronicity criterion” which is usually present for >90 days/3 months with specific implications for health [23]. Finally, standardized creatinine assays should be used to improve the accuracy of GFR estimates [24].

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

The definition of five stages of CKD.

As previously mentioned, the conventional definition of CKD primarily relies on the identification of albuminuria or a decrease in the eGFR. For many years, the direct eGFR threshold of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 has been widely adopted as the standard for defining CKD [25]. However, this standard does not take into account the natural aging process of the kidneys, and this oversight may affect the accurate diagnosis of kidney disease, particularly in extreme age groups, often leading to the overdiagnosis of kidney disease in the elderly and underdiagnosis in the young [26]. Based on these, some recent opinions support that it is necessary to adjust the diagnostic criteria for CKD for different age groups. They suggest that compared with the fixed threshold diagnostic criteria, age-adapted definition of CKD seems to more accurately reflect the physiological characteristics and renal health status of different age groups [27, 28]. Of cause, it is still an ongoing debate.

It is worth noting that the GFR progressively declines with age [29]. Statistically, the GFR in healthy adults after 60–65 years of age can decline to <60 mL/min/1.73/m2, depending on gender and attained age [30]. Furthermore, in the elderly and some other conditions, the estimating equations of eGFR are relatively inaccurate because of the impact of hypertension and cardiac function [31]. Previous studies confirmed that the prevalence of CKD was notably higher in elderly patients when assessed by plasma iohexol clearance than by creatinine-based eGFR equations [32, 33]. While the mechanism of the declining GFR with healthy aging are still not clearly understood. Chronically low protein intake which can lead to a physiologically reduced GFR may be one main reason [34]. Based on these, it is necessary for a more sensitive indicator or method to estimate kidney function in the aging population.

Epidemiology and risk factors of CKD in elderly

CKD is a progressive disease that affects 10%–12% of the population. Although CKD prevalence depends on the method used to measure eGFR, which can be influenced by a normal physiologic decline with aging, it is well known that the prevalence of CKD is notably higher in elderly. In fact, almost half of adults aged 65–74 years old have five or more chronic health conditions, and this may reach 70% in individuals >85 years [35]. The data from several very large databases showed that the prevalence of CKD in elderly adults aged >65 years was approximately 44% [36, 37]. This is mainly because the structure and function of the kidney are significantly affected by the aging process. Once beyond age 50 years, the adult kidney presents a steepest decline in renal mass [14]. Nitta et al. summarized the morphological and microscopic changes in aging kidney mainly including: (i) fat and fibrosis scarring replacing the normal tissues; (ii) destructive and diffuse glomerular sclerosis; (iii) an increased proportion of globally sclerotic glomeruli; and (iv) increased arteriosclerosis, medial hypertrophy and arteriolar hyalinosis [38].

Many genetic and environmental factors can increase the risk of CKD including the Klotho protein, gender, age, inflammation, altered metabolism, oxidative stress, microvascular damage, unhealthy living habit such as smoking, uremic toxins and kidney injury [39–42]. Notably, many risk factors are associated with aging (Fig. 2). For instance, the Klotho protein regulates many aging-related pathways, and the Klotho-deficient mice present the clinical phenotype of CKD, which also suggests that CKD is part of the diseasome of aging [43, 44]. Oxidative stress also plays a key role in the progression of CKD [45]. It can induce glomerular damage and renal ischemia. In addition, oxidative stress can lead to worsening frailty in elderly patients with CKD [46]. Furthermore, chronic inflammation is a vital risk factor of CKD, while elderly adults usually have chronic inflammation. Specially, some elements in the aging population such as frailty, anorexia of aging, and cognitive impairment are also significantly associated with CKD [47]. Worldwide, in patients with hemodialysis, the prevalence of frailty/pre-frailty varies from 43%–60% to 78% [48]. Cognitive impairment increases the risk of falls, worsening kidney function and mortality of CKD because of nonadherence to medications [49, 50]. These elements lead to the continued increasing number of patients with CKD in the aging population.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

The aging-related and other risk factors of CKD.

Outcomes of CKD in elderly

Substantial evidence has suggested that aging individuals with CKD face a high risk of severe outcomes including geriatric conditions such as functional impairment and cognitive decline, hospitalizations, ESRD and cardiovascular events, and even death (Fig. 3).

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

The clinical outcomes of CKD.

First of all, although CKD itself is a heterogeneous condition encompassing many diseases, it is consistently associated with cardiovascular disease risk and burden [51]. Patients with CKD usually have a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerosis, stroke and so on. A growing body of studies have demonstrated the disproportionate cardiovascular diseases risk incurred in patients with CKD. eGFR and albuminuria are the important biomarkers for increased risk of cardiovascular diseases [52, 53]. In addition, altered metabolism of solutes that accumulate in CKD patients may increase the risk of atherosclerosis [54]. Iron deficiency and anemia are the most common comorbidities in patients with CKD, which are associated with increased cardiovascular diseases–related mortality [55]. In the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, in patients with diabetes and mild-to-moderate CKD, the risk of all-cause mortality was 97% higher, and the risk for cardiovascular mortality was 119% higher than in patients without CKD [56]. On the other hand, the risk of progression to ESRD was increased obviously in patients with CKD. However, a meta-analysis of 11 trials found that intensive blood pressure lowering in people with CKD could reduce the risk of progression to ESRD by 21% [57].

In the older population, patients with CKD are susceptible to systemic musculoskeletal complications, such as sarcopenia and CKD–mineral bone disease [58] because CKD affects bone metabolism through activating vitamin D deficiency, secondary hyperparathyroidism and abnormalities in bone-derived hormones [59]. Therefore, the National Kidney Foundation KDOQI guideline recommends that oral activated vitamin D treatments are given to people with CKD stage 3 and 4. Based on these, kidney transplantation (KT) may be a good choice for patients with CKD. A systematic review of 110 cohort studies found that compared with CKD patients with dialysis, kidney recipients had reduced mortality, cardiovascular events and better reported quality of life [60].

IMMUNITY IN AGING-RELATED CKD

It is clear that the incidence rate of CKD is higher in older individuals. As a life-associated disease, CKD has shared features with other chronic diseases that increase in prevalence with age, including macromolecular damage, low-grade persistent inflammation, cellular senescence and stem cell dysfunction [61]. This chronic inflammatory response which has been named “inflammaging” or “immunosenescence.” Numerous studies found that many risk factors and mechanisms can increase the morbidity and mortality in older patients with CKD and ESRD. However, the mechanism of immunosenescence is still under investigation. Usually, individuals over 50 years old can present immunosenescence, which refers to the immune system changes including diminished immune response and chronic inflammation [62]; it has closely interrelation between the immune system and kidney function (Table 1).

Table 1:

The interrelation between the immune system and kidney function.

Immune system Class Effector molecules
Innate immunity TLRs TLRs: TLR1–5 and 9, MyD88, IRF, IFN-β, TRIF, MAPKs, NF-κB
NLRs NLRP3, IL-1β, IL-18, NOD2, NLRC5
RIG-I-like receptors RIG-I, c-Myc, NF-κB
CTLRs CTLRs
Adaptive immunity Naïve T cells, regular T cells, naïve and memory B cells, memory T cells, Th lymphocytes TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-12, IL-4, IL-5

Immunosenescence

Aging is a complex physiological phenomenon that leads to a variety of changes in multiple systems of the body [63, 64]. The most significant of these changes occur within the immune system, where both intrinsic and extrinsic factors shape the immune response, which undergoes profound alterations with age [65, 66]. In other words, immune responses are age-dependent, with cellular phenotypes and the composition of the immune system changing as a person ages. This is referred to as “immunosenescence,” which exhibits two contrasting characteristics: increased susceptibility to new infections and persistent low-grade systemic inflammation [67]. Consequently, patients with immunosenescence are at a higher risk of developing numerous degenerative diseases, particularly neurodegenerative disorders, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and autoimmune diseases [68–70]. Studies have shown that maintaining immune function can reduce the incidence of diseases and extend life expectancy [71]. Immunosenescence encompasses changes in both the innate and adaptive immune systems.

Innate immune systems

Innate immune response cells

The innate immune system is composed of a variety of cells, including neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells and natural killer (NK) cells [65, 66].

Neutrophils

Neutrophils make up 50%–70% of human white blood cells and play a crucial role in the innate immune system. They are the first cells to arrive at the site of an attack [72, 73]. With age, their numbers in the peripheral blood and bone marrow of the elderly remain stable, but their phagocytic and killing activities are reduced, and they are more susceptible to apoptosis [74].

Monocytes and macrophages

Monocytes express a wide range of pattern recognition receptors and play a key role in innate immune responses. Monocytes are activated upon pathogen stimulation through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), subsequently secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines and presenting antigens, thus exerting various immune effector functions [75]. Macrophages are tissue-resident cells that can phagocytose pathogens and initiate inflammatory signaling cascades. Monocytes and macrophages are considered core components in promoting low-grade chronic inflammation during immunosenescence [76]. Macrophages are thought to have two distinct phenotypes, classical (M1) and alternative (M2), based on their different inflammatory responses and cytokine release, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-12 [65]. The monocyte/macrophage lineage also shows age-related changes, with most effector functions of these cells decreasing with age, including cytotoxicity, intracellular killing and antigen presentation [77, 78]. Recent studies have found an increase in the inflammatory CD14+CD16+ monocyte subset in the elderly, leading to increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in a resting state and reduced production upon stimulation [79]. This is because, although the monocyte population is larger in the elderly, their TLR expression and biological response are impaired, and when stimulated through TLRs, they produce fewer pro-inflammatory cytokines [such as IL-1β and interferon (IFN)-γ] compared with younger cells [80]. Meanwhile, M2 monocytes, marked as anti-inflammatory monocytes, show a significant age-related decrease in healthy elderly individuals [81].

Dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most effective antigen-presenting cells with surface TLRs. Upon antigen stimulation, DCs capture, process and present pathogen antigens through major histocompatibility complex II and release cytokines, thereby activating naïve T cells and initiating adaptive immunity [82]. Several studies have shown age-related impairment in DC antigen presentation and T-cell activation in the elderly, characterized by reduced antigen presentation function, impaired endocytosis and decreased production of chemokines [83–85].

NK cells

NK cells are key cells in the innate immune system for identifying and eliminating virus-infected and abnormal cells, including tumor cells. Based on the expression levels of surface molecules CD56 and CD16, NK cells can be divided into two subgroups: CD56bright cells, an immature subgroup with high proliferative activity and the ability to produce a range of cytokines, such as IFN-γ, TNF-β and IL-10, as well as chemokines like RANTES and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α. In contrast, CD56dim cells are a mature subgroup with higher cytotoxic activity and lower cytokine production capabilities [86]. With aging, the CD56bright subgroup decreases and the CD56dim subgroup increases, which may be due to the degeneration of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow. Although the overall cytotoxicity of NK cells does not significantly decrease in healthy elderly individuals, the activity of each NK cell is reduced compared with younger individuals [65, 87, 88].

Effector molecules of innate immune systems

The innate immunity is characterized by non-specific recognition of self and non-self stimuli through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [62]. PRRs are soluble cell-associated receptors specialized in virus, bacteria and fungi recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). PAMPs and DAMPs activate the inflammatory response through the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines via nuclear factor (NF)-κB and activator protein-1 (AP1) [89]. Once PRRs are activated, they further activate immune cells, the complement system and the coagulation system [90]. Innate immunity plays an important role in many diseases including CKD. For instance, NLRP3 inflammasome, the most widely studied factor in innate immunity, has been demonstrated to be associated with CKD following multiple pathways [91, 92]. In addition, several classes of PRRs including TLRs, C-type lectin receptors, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), retinoic acid-inducible gene-I-like receptors (RIG-I-like receptors) also play key roles in CKD and immunosenescence.

Toll-like receptors

Recently, a total of 11 members of TLRs have been found in humans including TLR1–11, and 13 members in mouse including TLR1–13. Among them, TLR2 and TLR4 are the most widely reported. They are usually promoted by the cytoplasm protein Myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 (MyD88) and further activate NF-κB and the Interferon regulatory factor family (IRF) [90]. Much evidence has demonstrated that TLRs are key factors in aging-related CKD. For instance, it has been demonstrated that activation of TLR3/IFN-β pathway significantly affects the progression of CKD through regulating the expression of RIG-I and melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 (MDA5) protein by a deubiquitinase Cylindromatosis (CYLD) [93]. In addition, in aging cells, the stimulation of TLR3 and TLR4 can induce TIR-domain-containing adapter inducing interferon-β (TRIF)-mediated necroptosis, which is a process regulating cell necrosis. Necroptosis causes to a massive DAMP release and induce relevant tissue inflammation [94]. In fact, TLR2 and TLR4 play a vital role in CKD and other infection-associated renal diseases. Many studies have showed that TLR2 and TLR4 are the most common TLRs activated in CKD [95, 96]. In AKI mice models, lipopolysaccharide can bind to TLR4 and induce proximal tubular paracellular leakage of the glomerular filtrate [97]. TLR4 expression in CKD was positively correlated with IL-6 and monocyte chemoattractant peptide protein 1 (MCP-1) and enhanced the downstream MAPKs, NF-κB and TNF-α expression during the progressive loss of renal function. For TLR2, murine models show that TLR2 is a key mediator of senescence by promoting cell cycle arrest and regulating the induction of acute serum amyloids A1-2 that can function as DAMPs [98]. TLR9 plays as a proinflammatory receptor that mediates the AKI-to-CKD transition through regulated macrophages [99]. A genetic study provides evidence that in the Han Chinese population, those who carry the C and A alleles at SNPs T-1237C and G1635A in the TLR-9 gene appear to be more susceptible to the development of CKD [100]. Furthermore, in aging rat models, TLR1–5 have been found associated with NF-κB signaling activation [101]. Overall, this evidence suggests that TLRs are important in both renal chronic diseases and renal aging.

NOD-like receptors

NOD-like receptors (NLRs) are cytoplasmic soluble proteins acting as PAMP receptors. Among them, NLRP3 is the most widely studied. NLRP3 is also known as the inflammasome and is an intracellular NLR complex. NLRP3 has been demonstrated associated with pyroptosis by the release of cytoplasmic IL-1β and IL-18, triggering necroinflammation [102]. NLRP3 deficiency results in decreased systemic inflammation and reduced immune cell activation. As we know, inflammaging is associated with the accumulation of damage-related molecules. The activation of NLRP3 is induced by many endogenous triggers including damaged mitochondria and reactive oxygen species, and aggregated proteins in the process of inflammaging [103]. A recent genetic study provided evidence about the association between NLRP3 rs10754558 and susceptibility to CKD [104]. Therefore, some small molecule inhibitors targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome are potential agents for the treatment of CKD, such as glibenclamide, under clinical application, which has been demonstrated to inhibit CKD and renal fibrosis [105–107]. In addition, the expression of NOD-containing protein 2 (NOD2), NOD-like receptor family CARD domain containing 5 (NLRC5) and NLRP3 was significantly higher in patients with renal injury and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis [108], which also affect the progress of CKD. As a whole, TLRs and NLRs are activated in CKD via a member of inflammatory pathways, along with a series of immune cells.

RIG-I-like receptors

RIG I-like receptors are cytoplasmic sensors which are activated by viral dsRNA via the production of type I IFN and the activation of DCs. A recent study observed that endogenous retroviruses could active the cytosolic nucleotide sensors such as RIG-I in kidney tubule cells and induce the renal fibroinflammation [109]. Similar studies also showed that RIG-I aggravated renal interstitial fibrosis and CKD via c-Myc-mediated fibroblast activation [110]. Furthermore, in 12-month-old senescence-accelerated mouse models, the downregulation of Klotho and induction of the RIG-I/NF-κB signaling pathway were observed associated with aging-related inflammation and the development of early-stage CKD [111], suggesting that RIG-I plays a key role in renal inflammaging. However, more evidence need to be explored to demonstrate the correlation between RIG-I-like receptors and aging-related CKD.

C-type lectin receptors

C-type lectin receptors (CTLRs) are a class of antigen-uptake receptors mainly expressed by myeloid cells via their carbohydrate-recognition domain for internalization and subsequent presentation to T cells. Recent studies have demonstrated that CTLR dysregulation could lead to the development of autoimmune diseases, virus infection, allergy and cancers [112, 113]. Although no studies have verified the correlation between CTLRs and aging-related CKD, some research showed that CTLRs were associated with inflammaging and renal vasculitis [90].

Adaptive immunity

Unlike the innate immune system, the adaptive immune system generates immunological memory following an initial response to a specific pathogen [62]. The adaptive immune system can lead to an enhanced and rapid response when re-encountering that pathogen. However, in patients with declining kidney function, this system may be characterized by a reduction in the output of naïve T/B cells, an abnormal phenotype in mature cells and an accumulation of memory cells [114]. It is worth noting that patients with CKD and the elderly exhibit similar phenomena in the adaptive immune system, such as premature thymic involution, which leads to a significant decrease in the production of naïve T cells [115, 116]. Although decrease can be partially compensated by peripheral homeostatic proliferation, as age increases, T cells are repeatedly triggered by the same antigens throughout a lifetime of chronic antigen exposure. This leads to a continuous reduction in the naïve T-cell pool, ultimately resulting in a loss of diversity in the TCR repertoire, which causes an increased susceptibility to new infections, a diminished response to vaccinations and a poorer memory for previously encountered pathogens in the elderly [117, 118]. In addition, studies have demonstrated that the number of cells in the CD4 and CD8 compartments and T-cell proliferation decline in the progression from mild renal dysfunction to ERSD [119, 120]. On the other hand, naïve and memory T cells are active in patients with ERSD, and show increased susceptibility to apoptosis [121]. In addition, T-helper (Th) lymphocytes also play a key role in controlling the immune response through producing various cytokines including TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-12 (produced by Th1 cells) and IL-4 and IL-5 (produced by Th2 cells) [122]. The naïve B cells develop to memory B cells once they have been stimulated by antigens, and further differentiate to plasma cells with large amounts of a specific immunoglobulin. All the variations are compatible with the concept of premature immunological ageing.

Immunosenescence and CKD

Immunosenescence is the functional decline of the innate and adaptive immune systems associated with aging. In the state of inflammaging, age-related impairments in immune function can lead to compromised immune protection and persistent low-grade chronic inflammation. This reduces the elderly's effective response to new infections, cancer and endogenous tissue damage, thereby increasing their susceptibility to infections, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and autoimmune diseases [67, 123]. Studies have shown that a long-term, sterile, low-grade inflammatory state is almost universally present in the elderly. While acute inflammation is considered a protective process against harmful pathogens, persistent unresolved inflammation may be detrimental [123, 124]. The most common chronic diseases associated with aging, such as atherosclerosis, obesity, diabetes and neurodegenerative diseases, are all related to a process of low-grade continuous inflammation. Inflammatory aging has also been confirmed as the most significant risk factor for these chronic diseases [125, 126]. Among them, CKD and ESRD are significant chronic diseases posing a severe threat to human survival in the 21st century. According to statistics, more than 1.2 million people died from CKD in 2017, indicating a substantial increase in global age-adjusted prevalence and mortality rates over the past 20 years. The Global Burden of Disease Study reported a 29.3% increase in global CKD prevalence from 1990 to 2017 (range 26.4%–32.6%) [7, 127]. Studies have shown that immunosenescence appears to be more pronounced in patients with kidney disease than in healthy controls, characterized by the accumulation of immunologically senescent cells (such as CD28 T cells, CD14CD16 monocytes) and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [128, 129]. When senescent cells accumulate in the kidney and induce chronic low-grade inflammation, they exacerbate kidney damage, accelerate kidney aging and further increase the susceptibility of the elderly to kidney diseases. In addition, immunosenescence inhibits immune clearance and renal tissue regeneration, increasing the risk of permanent kidney damage, infections and cardiovascular events in patients with kidney disease, worsening prognosis and even affecting the effectiveness of renal replacement therapy [130]. CKD patients often exhibit cellular changes characterized by chronic inflammation, advanced cellular senescence and immune system dysfunction [128]. In the persistent uremic environment of CKD patients, the long-term retention of toxins can lead to chronic inflammation, and premature aging of the immune system may be induced and accelerated [131]. Furthermore, oxidative stress, acidosis, infections and metabolic disorders may accelerate immunosenescence in CKD patients, and subsequently, exacerbated immunosenescence can promote disease progression and increase susceptibility to infections. In summary, age-dependent changes in the immune system associated with aging play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of kidney disease. Therefore, exploring the underlying processes and mechanisms of age-related changes in the immune system and studying the interaction between immunosenescence and kidney disease may provide new avenues and insights for the development of new treatment methods for kidney diseases [114]. The interplay between immunosenescence and the development and progression of chronic kidney disease is detailed in Fig. 4.

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

An interplay between immunosenescence and the development and progression of CKD.

MANAGEMENT FOR ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH CKD

CKD is a progressive and irreversible condition. Once it advances to the stage of ESRD, interventions such as dialysis or KT become necessary. However, these treatments are often costly and not readily accessible [132]. Furthermore, the life expectancy for all age groups on dialysis was found to be shorter compared with that of the general population [133]. Over the years, for slowing or preventing the progression of CKD to ESRD and reducing mortality, we have established various management guidelines to help to optimize the management of patients with CKD. Although numerous management guidelines have been developed by different organizations and expert panels, current guidelines for the management of CKD universally emphasize the importance of early detection and intervention, as well as a multidisciplinary approach. (i) Early detection and intervention are recommended to slow or halt disease progression. The main measures include regular monitoring of kidney function, controlling blood pressure, blood sugar and lipid levels, as well as lifestyle changes such as a healthy diet, regular exercise and smoking cessation. Additionally, medication is advised to manage complications like anemia, bone disease and cardiovascular disease. (ii) The importance of a multidisciplinary approach to treating CKD is highlighted. It is suggested that nephrologists, primary care physicians, dietitians, pharmacists and other healthcar professionals collaborate in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with CKD to provide comprehensive and coordinated management [134, 135]. Relevant research indicates that with proper management and timely intervention, the progression of CKD can be slowed or halted, complications and symptoms can be controlled, the onset of ESRD can be prevented or delayed, and the quality of life and prognosis for patients can be effectively improved [136–138]. Furthermore, although KT has the best health outcome and is the most economical KRT for treating ESRD, the severe supply and demand imbalance caused by organ shortage means that most ESRD patients cannot obtain a transplant opportunity. From 1990 to 2017, the number of global KT recipients with ESRD increased by 34.4% [127]. With the significant increase in demand for KTs, the average age of people on the transplant waiting list is also increasing. Elderly CKD patients often have various chronic diseases and may lose their lives due to various complications during the waiting period. For elderly kidney disease patients, standardized conservative management during the waiting period is very necessary, which can extend the survival period and buy as much time as possible for KT [139]. The main management measures currently recommended are summarized in the Table 2 for reference.

Table 2:

The main management measures currently recommended for elderly patients.

Risk factor management Reducing risk of cardiovascular disease (i) Control blood lipids: it is recommended that patients aged 50 years or older with CKD be treated with a low- to-moderate dose statin regardless of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level.
(ii) Control blood pressure: goal systolic and diastolic blood pressures of <140 mmHg and <90 mmHg, respectively, among adults with CKD based on expert opinion. The KDIGO guidelines further recommend that adults with urine ACR of at least 30 mg/24 h (or equivalent) have systolic and diastolic blood pressures maintained below 130 mmHg and 80 mmHg, respectively
Management of hypertension In diabetic patients with urinary ACR of at least 30 mg/24 h or in any adult, ACE inhibitors or ARBs are recommended, given the associated risk of hyperkalemia and AKI. Dual treatment with ACE inhibitors and ARB is usually avoided. Aldosterone receptor antagonists may also be considered for patients with albuminuria, refractory hypertension or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Management of diabetes mellitus Strict control of blood sugar levels can help prevent or delay the onset of kidney damage; most guidelines recommended a goal hemoglobin A1c of 7.0%
Lifestyle management Exercise regularly
Encourage smoking cessation
Diet management A low-salt, low-phosphorus and low-protein diet is recommended to reduce renal load and control symptoms. For adult patients with stage G4–G5 CKD, protein intake should be reduced to <0.8 g/kg/day, and for other adults with CKD at risk of progression, protein intake should be reduced to <1.3 g/kg per day, with a lower dietary acid load (e.g. eating more fruits and vegetables, eating less than 1.3 g/kg per day). Eating less meat, eggs and cheese may also help prevent kidney damage. For patients with hypertension, proteinuria or fluid overload, a low-sodium diet (usually <2 g per day) is recommended
Drug administration Reduce the use of nephrotoxic drugs
Pay attention to drug dose adjustment, drug metabolism and drug interactions
Regular renal function monitoring and complication management Regular renal function monitoring (i) Once CKD is diagnosed, it is recommended to monitor eGFR and albuminuria at least once a year; (ii) high-risk patients: monitor these measures at least twice a year; (iii) extremely high-risk patients should be monitored at least three times a year (laboratory screening includes measurement of complete blood count, basic metabolic panel, serum albumin, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D and lipid panel)
Treatment complications Anemia Rule out other causes of anemia: iron deficiency, vitamin B12 deficiency, folate deficiency, occult bleeding
Mineral and bone disorder Consider phosphate-lowering therapy (e.g., calcium acetate, sevelamer, iron-based binders) and vitamin D supplementation
Hyperkalemia Low-potassium diet, correction of hyperglycemia and acidemia, consider potassium binders
Metabolic acidosis Oral bicarbonate supplementation (e.g., sodium bicarbonate, baking soda or sodium citrate/citric acid) for values persistently <22 mmol/L
Referral to a nephrologist and timing of KRT KDIGO guidelines recommend that when eGFR falls below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (stage G4) and/or urine ACR increases above 300 mg/24 h (stage A3), patients with CKD should be referred to a nephrologist for timely dialysis and kidney transplant evaluation

ACR, albumin to creatinine ratio; KRT, kidney replacement therapy.

THERAPY FOR ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH CKD

Drugs

Although several drugs and treatments have been discovered in the past 20 years to reduce the risk of CKD progression, no drug class has provided a reduced risk of mortality in patients with CKD or slowed CKD progression [140]. As we known, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been commended as the only agents for patients with CKD and hypertension [141]. Previous Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) and Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) studies showed that ARBs could reduce the risk of the composite renal endpoint by 16% and 20%, respectively [142, 143]. In addition, a randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of Shenyankangfu Tablet (SYKFT), a Chinese patent medicine, in decreasing proteinuria and the slowing the progression of CKD. Compared with the standard drug losartan potassium, which was one of the earliest ARBs used to treat CKD and decrease proteinuria, SYKFT could decrease the proteinuria, with no change in the rate of decrease in the eGFR [144]. For ACE inhibitors, several clinical studies demonstrated that compared with placebo, ACE inhibitors could slow the progression of CKD [145, 146]. In addition, some recent randomized studies investigated that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors could significantly reduce the risk of clinically relevant renal outcomes including loss of kidney function, eGFR decline, worsening of albuminuria, new ESRD, death from renal causes and/or a renal composite outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, only 7%–26% of participants in the studies had an eGFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, so they did not evaluate treatment benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CKD only [147–149]. Subsequent studies showed that SGLT2 could significantly reduce the risk of CKD progression with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) as well as nondiabetic CKD with the anti-diabetic drug dapagliflozin [150–152]. However, as we know, there has been no trial to evaluate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CKD only. In addition, to date, no drug has provided a reduced risk of mortality in patients with CKD only.

Dialysis

Once patients with CKD present kidney failure, patients can choose dialysis including hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The clinical symptoms and signs of kidney failure usually include serositis, acid–base/electrolyte abnormalities and pruritus. In addition, typical uremic symptoms generally occur at a low GFR values ranging between 5 and 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 [153]. Between 1980 and 2012, older patients (aged 65–74 years) initiating dialysis increased by 47% while those aged ≥75 years increased by 300% [154, 155]. While older persons usually have several comorbidities and a physiologically decreased value of eGFR, so there sometimes might be a less tight link between the true disease and the clinical phenotypes. Furthermore, it is worth noting that elderly patients have a higher early mortality rate within 3 months of initiating dialysis than younger patients [156]. This may be because dialysis can worsen cognitive function, which further worsens the quality of life, and increases hospitalizations and poor healthcare outcomes. A large-scale meta-analysis including 13 065 Korean patients (age ≥65 years) with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis showed that a higher risk for death in elderly patients receiving peritoneal dialysis than in those receiving hemodialysis [157]. Though some studies support that peritoneal dialysis has some quality-of-life advantages as it is a home-based treatment, such as fewer hospital visits, not requiring vascular access, avoiding hemodynamic instability and preserving residual function for a long time [158], older dialysis patients are less likely to be treated with peritoneal dialysis. Gadelha et al. performed a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether pre-dialysis resistance training (RT) could improve complications including sarcopenia and inflammatory profile in older patients with CKD [159]. The study found that 24-week RT could significantly improve the sarcopenia status, inflammatory profile and anemia biomarkers. Even so, older dialysis patients differ from younger patients, typically initiating dialysis at lower body mass index and higher eGFR levels, and having more comorbid conditions, and higher admission and mortality rates [160].

Kidney transplantation

For most patients with CKD, KT is the best choice for treatment once the disease progresses to ESRD. KT improves quality of life and life expectancy, and reduces the financial burden in comparison with dialysis [161]. Due to the heightened risk of age-related kidney deterioration and an increased likelihood of comorbidities, the elderly population represents the fastest growing demographic of KT recipients (KTRs) [162]. In fact, recipient age can be an appropriate consideration, and transplant coordinators can allocate “marginal donors” to elderly recipients [35]. Rao et al. observed the outcomes among 5667 individuals aged ≥70 years old over an 18-month period and found that compared with waitlisted patients who received dialysis, the relative risk of death was 56% lower for transplant patients (< .01) [163]. Studies from Australia, the UK and Asia showed similar results [164–166]. Therefore, older patients with ESRD can derive survival and quality-of-life benefits from KT. However, older recipients with KT have a higher risk of cancer, infection and cardiovascular diseases [167]. In addition, these patients have lower rejection rates, more medication side effects and higher mortality [162]. Yoo et al. performed a multicenter cohort study included 3565 KTRs in Korea, and observed that although the death-censored allograft survival rate did not differ between elderly and younger KTRs, the overall survival rate of the elderly KTRs was significantly lower than that in younger group [168]. A recent study from Chadban et al. also observed that, compared with remaining on dialysis, elderly KTRs incurred an increased risk of early post-transplant mortality [169]. Over a median follow-up of 1.7 years, mortality was 38% lower for KTRs (95% confidence interval 0.41–0.94, = .02) compared with patients with dialysis. KTRs may had progressively superior survival rates after 5 years. However, a latest meta-analysis form Artiles et al. appraised the outcomes of KT in patients >70 years old. The data showed that the rate of delayed graft function, acute rejection, death with functioning graft and graft loss were not inferior in elderly recipients [170]. In addition, Hammad et al. analyzed the patient demographic data, and the 1-, 5- and 10-year patient and graft survival rates of patients aged ≥65 years who received KT from living or deceased donors, and found that the outcomes were better in patients who received kidneys from living donors [171]. Therefore, more evidence needs to be collected to evaluate the long-term prognosis in KTRs in elderly population. Overall, although a KT has its advantages in terms of survival, costs and quality of life, existing data show that the life expectancy of transplant patients is one-third shorter compared with the life expectancy of the general population [133]. Based on this, we can say that KT is far from an ideal solution for CKD, and prevention of CKD is key.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent studies have revealed that CKD has become a leading public health problem. It is well known that the prevalence of CKD is notably higher in the elderly. Aging individuals with CKD face a higher risk for severe outcomes such as ESRD, cardiovascular diseases, geriatric conditions and even death. Macromolecular damage, low-grade persistent inflammation, cellular senescence and stem cell dysfunction in the kidney and the vascular system all concur in determining the unique severity of inflammation in CKD and increase in prevalence with age. Chronic inflammatory response is activated including innate and adaptive immunity and plays a key role in CKD and immunosenescence. Patients with CKD can accept the treatment of drugs, dialysis and KT. In the elder population, compared with CKD patients with dialysis, kidney recipients had reduced mortality and cardiovascular events, and better reported quality of life.

Contributor Information

Yukun Tang, Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Wuhan, China.

Jipin Jiang, Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Wuhan, China.

Yuanyuan Zhao, Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Diseases, Wuhan, China.

Dunfeng Du, Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Wuhan, China.

FUNDING

This study was supported by grants from the Health Commission of Hubei Province (Grant No. WJ2021C001), the Key Research and Development Plan of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2022BCA015) and the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Grant No. 2023-PT320-07).

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

Y.Y.Z. performed the work and wrote the manuscript. D.F.D. and Y.Y.Z. revised the manuscript, and directed and supervised the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Kovesdy  CP. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022. Kidney Int Suppl (2011)  2022;12:7–11. 10.1016/j.kisu.2021.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators . Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet  2015;385:117–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rhee  CM, Kovesdy  CP. Epidemiology: spotlight on CKD deaths—increasing mortality worldwide. Nat Rev Nephrol  2015;11:199–200. 10.1038/nrneph.2015.25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lv  JC, Zhang  LX. Prevalence and disease burden of chronic kidney disease. Adv Exp Med Biol  2019;1165:3–15. 10.1007/978-981-13-8871-2_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Greer  SL, Lynch  J, Reeves  A  et al.  Ageing and Health. Cambridge University Press, 2021. 10.1017/9781108973236 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. López-Otín  C, Blasco  MA, Partridge  L  et al.  Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell  2023;186:243–78. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Carney  EF. The impact of chronic kidney disease on global health. Nat Rev Nephrol  2020;16:251. 10.1038/s41581-020-0268-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bello  AK, Nwankwo  E, El Nahas  AM. Prevention of chronic kidney disease: a global challenge. Kidney Int Suppl  2005;68:S11–7. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09802.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Roshanravan  B, Khatri  M, Robinson-Cohen  C  et al.  A prospective study of frailty in nephrology-referred patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis  2012;60:912–21. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.05.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Duenhas  MR, Draibe  SA, Avesani  CM  et al.  Influence of renal function on spontaneous dietary intake and on nutritional status of chronic renal insufficiency patients. Eur J Clin Nutr  2003;57:1473–8. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Foley  RN, Wang  C, Ishani  A  et al.  Kidney function and sarcopenia in the United States general population: NHANES III. Am J Nephrol  2007;27:279–86. 10.1159/000101827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lattanzio  F, Corsonello  A, Abbatecola  AM  et al.  Relationship between renal function and physical performance in elderly hospitalized patients. Rejuvenation Res  2012;15:545–52. 10.1089/rej.2012.1329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pedone  C, Corsonello  A, Bandinelli  S  et al.  Relationship between renal function and functional decline: role of the estimating equation. J Am Med Dir Assoc  2012;13:84.e11–4. 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Epstein  M. Aging and the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol  1996;7:1106–22. 10.1681/ASN.V781106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Diaz-Ricart  M, Torramade-Moix  S, Pascual  G  et al.  Endothelial damage, inflammation and immunity in chronic kidney disease. Toxins (Basel)  2020;12:361. 10.3390/toxins12060361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kato  S, Chmielewski  M, Honda  H  et al.  Aspects of immune dysfunction in end-stage renal disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol  2008;3:1526–33. 10.2215/CJN.00950208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Franceschi  C, Bonafè  M, Valensin  S  et al.  Inflamm-aging. An evolutionary perspective on immunosenescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci  2000;908:244–54. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06651.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sato  Y, Yanagita  M. Immune cells and inflammation in AKI to CKD progression. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol  2018;315:F1501–12. 10.1152/ajprenal.00195.2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Krishna  C, Chowell  D, Gönen  M  et al.  Genetic and environmental determinants of human TCR repertoire diversity. Immun Ageing  2020;17:26. 10.1186/s12979-020-00195-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Alfano  G, Perrone  R, Fontana  F  et al.  Rethinking chronic kidney disease in the aging population. Life (Basel)  2022;12:1724. 10.3390/life12111724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis  2002;39:S1–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Coresh  J, Stevens  LA, Levey  AS. Chronic kidney disease is common: what do we do next?  Nephrol Dial Transplant  2008;23:1122–5. 10.1093/ndt/gfn117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Charles  C, Ferris  AH. Chronic kidney disease. Prim Care  2020;47:585–95. 10.1016/j.pop.2020.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hallan  S, Asberg  A, Lindberg  M  et al.  Validation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula for estimating GFR with special emphasis on calibration of the serum creatinine assay. Am J Kidney Dis  2004;44:84–93. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.03.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Eknoyan  G, Lameire  N, Eckardt  K  et al.  KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int  2013;3:5–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hundemer  GL, Akbari  A, Sood  MM. Has the time come for age-adapted glomerular filtration rate criteria to define chronic kidney disease: how soon is now?  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens  2024;33:318–24. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ma  Y, Lin  J, Xia  P  et al.  Comparison of the profiles of patients defined by age-adapted and fixed threshold CKD criteria: a nationwide, cross-sectional study. Clin Kidney J  2022;15:2312–21. 10.1093/ckj/sfac188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Liu  P, Quinn  RR, Lam  NN  et al.  Accounting for age in the definition of chronic kidney disease. JAMA Intern Med  2021;181:1359–66. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Khan  HU, Latif  SA. What is known to us about renal function of our retired peoples?  Mymensingh Med J  2009;18:36–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Poggio  ED, Rule  AD, Tanchanco  R  et al.  Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with glomerular filtration rates in living kidney donors. Kidney Int  2009;75:1079–87. 10.1038/ki.2009.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Brosnahan  G, Fraer  M. Chronic kidney disease: whom to screen and how to treat, part 1: definition, epidemiology, and laboratory testing. South Med J  2010;103:140–6. 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181c99438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ebert  N, Jakob  O, Gaedeke  J  et al.  Prevalence of reduced kidney function and albuminuria in older adults: the Berlin Initiative Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant  2017;32:997–1005. 10.1093/ndt/gfw079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Schaeffner  ES, Ebert  N, Delanaye  P  et al.  Two novel equations to estimate kidney function in persons aged 70 years or older. Ann Intern Med  2012;157:471–81. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Glassock  RJ, Warnock  DG, Delanaye  P. The global burden of chronic kidney disease: estimates, variability and pitfalls. Nat Rev Nephrol  2017;13:104–14. 10.1038/nrneph.2016.163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Fassett  RG. Current and emerging treatment options for the elderly patient with chronic kidney disease. Clin Interv Aging  2014;9:191–9. 10.2147/CIA.S39763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Stevens  LA, Li  S, Wang  C  et al.  Prevalence of CKD and comorbid illness in elderly patients in the United States: results from the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Am J Kidney Dis  2010;55:S23–33. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Takahashi  S, Okada  K, Yanai  M. The Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) of Japan: results from the initial screening period. Kidney Int Suppl  2010;77:S17–23. 10.1038/ki.2009.539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Nitta  K, Okada  K, Yanai  M  et al.  Aging and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Blood Press Res  2013;38:109–20. 10.1159/000355760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Chen  S, Chen  J, Li  S  et al.  High-fat diet-induced renal proximal tubular inflammatory injury: emerging risk factor of chronic kidney disease. Front Physiol  2021;12:786599. 10.3389/fphys.2021.786599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Elihimas Júnior  UF, Elihimas  HC, Lemos  VM  et al.  Smoking as risk factor for chronic kidney disease: systematic review. J Bras Nefrol  2014;36:519–28. 10.5935/0101-2800.20140074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cozzolino  M, Ciceri  P, Galassi  A. Hyperphosphatemia: a novel risk factor for mortality in chronic kidney disease. Ann Transl Med  2019;7:55. 10.21037/atm.2018.06.50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Buchanan  S, Combet  E, Stenvinkel  P  et al.  Klotho, aging, and the failing kidney. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)  2020;11:560. 10.3389/fendo.2020.00560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Lindberg  K, Amin  R, Moe  OW  et al.  The kidney is the principal organ mediating klotho effects. J Am Soc Nephrol  2014;25:2169–75. 10.1681/ASN.2013111209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hu  MC, Shi  M, Zhang  J  et al.  Klotho deficiency causes vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol  2011;22:124–36. 10.1681/ASN.2009121311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Liguori  I, Russo  G, Curcio  F  et al.  Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases. Clin Interv Aging  2018;13:757–72. 10.2147/CIA.S158513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Walker  SR, Wagner  M, Tangri  N. Chronic kidney disease, frailty, and unsuccessful aging: a review. J Ren Nutr  2014;24:364–70. 10.1053/j.jrn.2014.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Merchant  RA, Vathsala  A. Healthy aging and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Res Clin Pract  2022;41:644–56. 10.23876/j.krcp.22.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. van Loon  IN, Goto  NA, Boereboom  FTJ  et al.  Frailty screening tools for elderly patients incident to dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol  2017;12:1480–8. 10.2215/CJN.11801116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Crowe  K, Quinn  TJ, Mark  PB  et al. ‘Is it removed during dialysis?’-cognitive dysfunction in advanced kidney failure-a review article. Front Neurol  2021;12:787370. 10.3389/fneur.2021.787370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hain  DJ. Cognitive function and adherence of older adults undergoing hemodialysis. Nephrol Nurs J  2008;35:23–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Parikh  NI, Hwang  SJ, Larson  MG  et al.  Cardiovascular disease risk factors in chronic kidney disease: overall burden and rates of treatment and control. Arch Intern Med  2006;166:1884–91. 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Agarwal  R, Pitt  B, Rossing  P  et al.  Modifiability of composite cardiovascular risk associated with chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes with finerenone. JAMA Cardiol  2023;8:732–41. 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Arshad  A, Sarween  N, Sharif  A. Systematic review of cardiovascular outcome trials using new antidiabetic agents in CKD stratified by estimated GFR. Kidney Int Rep  2021;6:2415–24. 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.06.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Schrauben  SJ, Sapa  H, Xie  D  et al. ; CKD Biomarkers Consortium and the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study Investigators . Association of urine and plasma ADMA with atherosclerotic risk in DKD cardiovascular disease risk in diabetic kidney disease: findings from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study. Nephrol Dial Transplant  2023;38:2809–15. 10.1093/ndt/gfad103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. McClellan  WM, Flanders  WD, Langston  RD  et al.  Anemia and renal insufficiency are independent risk factors for death among patients with congestive heart failure admitted to community hospitals: a population-based study. J Am Soc Nephrol  2002;13:1928–36. 10.1097/01.asn.0000018409.45834.fa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Branch  M, German  C, Bertoni  A  et al.  Incremental risk of cardiovascular disease and/or chronic kidney disease for future ASCVD and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: ACCORD trial. J Diabetes Complications  2019;33:468–72. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Lv  J, Ehteshami  P, Sarnak  MJ  et al.  Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on the progression of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ  2013;185:949–57. 10.1503/cmaj.121468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Nakano  Y, Mandai  S, Naito  S  et al.  Effect of osteosarcopenia on longitudinal mortality risk and chronic kidney disease progression in older adults. Bone  2024;179:116975. 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Webster  AC, Nagler  EV, Morton  RL  et al.  Chronic kidney disease. Lancet  2017;389:1238–52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32064-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Tonelli  M, Wiebe  N, Knoll  G  et al.  Systematic review: kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes. Am J Transplant  2011;11:2093–109. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03686.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Evenepoel  P, Stenvinkel  P, Shanahan  C  et al.  Inflammation and gut dysbiosis as drivers of CKD-MBD. Nat Rev Nephrol  2023;19:646–57. 10.1038/s41581-023-00736-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Lee  TH, Chen  JJ, Wu  CY  et al.  Immunosenescence, gut dysbiosis, and chronic kidney disease: interplay and implications for clinical management. Biomed J  2024;47:100638. 10.1016/j.bj.2023.100638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Lipsky  MS, King  M. Biological theories of aging. Dis Mon  2015;61:460–6. 10.1016/j.disamonth.2015.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Robert  L, Fulop  T. Aging. Facts and theories. Preface. Interdiscip Top Gerontol  2014;39:VI–VIII. 10.1159/000358894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Solana  R, Tarazona  R, Gayoso  I  et al.  Innate immunosenescence: effect of aging on cells and receptors of the innate immune system in humans. Semin Immunol  2012;24:331–41. 10.1016/j.smim.2012.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Montgomery  RR, Shaw  AC. Paradoxical changes in innate immunity in aging: recent progress and new directions. J Leukoc Biol  2015;98:937–43. 10.1189/jlb.5MR0315-104R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Yousefzadeh  MJ, Flores  RR, Zhu  Y  et al.  An aged immune system drives senescence and ageing of solid organs. Nature  2021;594:100–5. 10.1038/s41586-021-03547-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Stahl  EC, Brown  BN. Cell therapy strategies to combat immunosenescence. Organogenesis  2015;11:159–72. 10.1080/15476278.2015.1120046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lian  J, Yue  Y, Yu  W  et al.  Immunosenescence: a key player in cancer development. J Hematol Oncol  2020;13:151. 10.1186/s13045-020-00986-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Choi  IY, Lee  C, Longo  VD. Nutrition and fasting mimicking diets in the prevention and treatment of autoimmune diseases and immunosenescence. Mol Cell Endocrinol  2017;455:4–12. 10.1016/j.mce.2017.01.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Martel  J, Ojcius  DM, Wu  CY  et al.  Emerging use of senolytics and senomorphics against aging and chronic diseases. Med Res Rev  2020;40:2114–31. 10.1002/med.21702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Fortin  CF, McDonald  PP, Lesur  O  et al.  Aging and neutrophils: there is still much to do. Rejuvenation Res  2008;11:873–82. 10.1089/rej.2008.0750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Juthani-Mehta  M, Guo  X, Shaw  AC  et al.  Innate immune responses in the neutrophils of community dwelling and nursing home elders. J Aging Sci  2014;2:1000115. 10.4172/2329-8847.1000115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Butcher  S, Chahel  H, Lord  JM. Review article: ageing and the neutrophil: no appetite for killing?  Immunology  2000;100:411–6. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00079.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Fulop  T, Fortin  C, Lesur  O  et al.  The innate immune system and aging: what is the contribution to immunosenescence?  Open Longev Sci  2012;6:121–32. 10.2174/1876326X01206010121 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Prattichizzo  F, Bonafè  M, Olivieri  F  et al.  Senescence associated macrophages and “macroph-aging”: are they pieces of the same puzzle?  Aging (Albany NY)  2016;8:3159–60. 10.18632/aging.101133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Linton  PJ, Thoman  ML. Immunosenescence in monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells: lessons learned from the lung and heart. Immunol Lett  2014;162:290–7. 10.1016/j.imlet.2014.06.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Nyugen  J, Agrawal  S, Gollapudi  S  et al.  Impaired functions of peripheral blood monocyte subpopulations in aged humans. J Clin Immunol  2010;30:806–13. 10.1007/s10875-010-9448-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Seidler  S, Zimmermann  HW, Bartneck  M  et al.  Age-dependent alterations of monocyte subsets and monocyte-related chemokine pathways in healthy adults. BMC Immunol  2010;11:30. 10.1186/1471-2172-11-30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Metcalf  TU, Wilkinson  PA, Cameron  MJ  et al.  Human monocyte subsets are transcriptionally and functionally altered in aging in response to pattern recognition receptor agonists. J Immunol  2017;199:1405–17. 10.4049/jimmunol.1700148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Costantini  A, Viola  N, Berretta  A  et al.  Age-related M1/M2 phenotype changes in circulating monocytes from healthy/unhealthy individuals. Aging (Albany NY)  2018;10:1268–80. 10.18632/aging.101465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Gardner  A, de Mingo Pulido  Á, Ruffell  B. Dendritic cells and their role in immunotherapy. Front Immunol  2020;11:924. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Agrawal  A, Sridharan  A, Prakash  S  et al.  Dendritic cells and aging: consequences for autoimmunity. Expert Rev Clin Immunol  2012;8:73–80. 10.1586/eci.11.77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Agrawal  A, Gupta  S. Impact of aging on dendritic cell functions in humans. Ageing Res Rev  2011;10:336–45. 10.1016/j.arr.2010.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Sridharan  A, Esposo  M, Kaushal  K  et al.  Age-associated impaired plasmacytoid dendritic cell functions lead to decreased CD4 and CD8 T cell immunity. Age (Dordr)  2011;33:363–76. 10.1007/s11357-010-9191-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Ponnappan  S, Ponnappan  U. Aging and immune function: molecular mechanisms to interventions. Antioxid Redox Signal  2011;14:1551–85. 10.1089/ars.2010.3228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Shaw  AC, Goldstein  DR, Montgomery  RR. Age-dependent dysregulation of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol  2013;13:875–87. 10.1038/nri3547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Fulop  T, Le Page  A, Fortin  C  et al.  Cellular signaling in the aging immune system. Curr Opin Immunol  2014;29:105–11. 10.1016/j.coi.2014.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Zoccali  C, Mallamaci  F. Innate immunity system in patients with cardiovascular and kidney disease. Circ Res  2023;132:915–32. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Sepe  V, Libetta  C, Gregorini  M  et al.  The innate immune system in human kidney inflammaging. J Nephrol  2022;35:381–95. 10.1007/s40620-021-01153-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Zheng  Z, Xu  K, Li  C  et al.  NLRP3 associated with chronic kidney disease progression after ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury. Cell Death Discov  2021;7:324. 10.1038/s41420-021-00719-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Wang  M, Lin  X, Yang  X  et al.  Research progress on related mechanisms of uric acid activating NLRP3 inflammasome in chronic kidney disease. Ren Fail  2022;44:615–24. 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2036620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Imaizumi  T, Hayakari  R, Watanabe  S  et al.  Cylindromatosis (CYLD), a deubiquitinase, attenuates inflammatory signaling pathways by activating toll-like receptor 3 in human mesangial cells. Kidney Blood Press Res  2017;42:942–50. 10.1159/000485084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Pasparakis  M, Vandenabeele  P. Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature  2015;517:311–20. 10.1038/nature14191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Gollapudi  P, Yoon  JW, Gollapudi  S  et al.  Leukocyte toll-like receptor expression in end-stage kidney disease. Am J Nephrol  2010;31:247–54. 10.1159/000276764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Grabulosa  CC, Manfredi  SR, Canziani  ME  et al.  Chronic kidney disease induces inflammation by increasing Toll-like receptor-4, cytokine and cathelicidin expression in neutrophils and monocytes. Exp Cell Res  2018;365:157–62. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.02.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Nakano  D, Kitada  K, Wan  N  et al.  Lipopolysaccharide induces filtrate leakage from renal tubular lumina into the interstitial space via a proximal tubular Toll-like receptor 4-dependent pathway and limits sensitivity to fluid therapy in mice. Kidney Int  2020;97:904–12. 10.1016/j.kint.2019.11.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Hari  P, Millar  FR, Tarrats  N  et al.  The innate immune sensor toll-like receptor 2 controls the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Sci Adv  2019;5:eaaw0254. 10.1126/sciadv.aaw0254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Zheng  H, Zhang  Y, Li  L  et al.  Depletion of toll-like receptor-9 attenuates renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis after ischemia-reperfusion injury. Front Cell Dev Biol  2021;9:641527. 10.3389/fcell.2021.641527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Lu  KC, Yang  HY, Lin  YF  et al.  The T-1237C polymorphism of the toll-like receptor-9 gene is associated with chronic kidney disease in a Han Chinese population. Tohoku J Exp Med  2011;225:109–16. 10.1620/tjem.225.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Xi  Y, Shao  F, Bai  XY  et al.  Changes in the expression of the toll-like receptor system in the aging rat kidneys. PLoS One  2014;9:e96351. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Swanson  KV, Deng  M, Ting  JP. The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol  2019;19:477–89. 10.1038/s41577-019-0165-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Latz  E, Duewell  P. NLRP3 inflammasome activation in inflammaging. Semin Immunol  2018;40:61–73. 10.1016/j.smim.2018.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. La Russa  A, Lofaro  D, Montesanto  A  et al.  Association between NLRP3 rs10754558 and CARD8 rs2043211 variants and susceptibility to chronic kidney disease. Int J Mol Sci  2023;24:4184. 10.3390/ijms24044184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Ozaki  E, Campbell  M, Doyle  SL. Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in chronic inflammatory diseases: current perspectives. J Inflamm Res  2015;8:15–27. 10.2147/JIR.S51250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Diwan  V, Gobe  G, Brown  L. Glibenclamide improves kidney and heart structure and function in the adenine-diet model of chronic kidney disease. Pharmacol Res  2014;79:104–10. 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Huang  G, Zhang  Y, Zhang  Y  et al.  Chronic kidney disease and NLRP3 inflammasome: pathogenesis, development and targeted therapeutic strategies. Biochem Biophys Rep  2022;33:101417. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Wang  LY, Sun  XJ, Chen  M  et al.  The expression of NOD2, NLRP3 and NLRC5 and renal injury in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. J Transl Med  2019;17:197. 10.1186/s12967-019-1949-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Dhillon  P, Mulholland  KA, Hu  H  et al.  Increased levels of endogenous retroviruses trigger fibroinflammation and play a role in kidney disease development. Nat Commun  2023;14:559. 10.1038/s41467-023-36212-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Zhou  Z, Ni  J, Li  J  et al.  RIG-I aggravates interstitial fibrosis via c-Myc-mediated fibroblast activation in UUO mice. J Mol Med (Berl)  2020;98:527–40. 10.1007/s00109-020-01879-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Zeng  Y, Wang  PH, Zhang  M  et al.  Aging-related renal injury and inflammation are associated with downregulation of Klotho and induction of RIG-I/NF-κb signaling pathway in senescence-accelerated mice. Aging Clin Exp Res  2016;28:69–76. 10.1007/s40520-015-0371-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Drouin  M, Saenz  J, Chiffoleau  E. C-type lectin-like receptors: head or tail in cell death immunity. Front Immunol  2020;11:251. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Chiffoleau  E. C-type lectin-like receptors as emerging orchestrators of sterile inflammation represent potential therapeutic targets. Front Immunol  2018;9:227. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Chi  M, Tian  Z, Ma  K  et al.  The diseased kidney: aging and senescent immunology. Immun Ageing  2022;19:58. 10.1186/s12979-022-00313-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Palmer  S, Albergante  L, Blackburn  CC  et al.  Thymic involution and rising disease incidence with age. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2018;115:1883–8. 10.1073/pnas.1714478115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Thomas  R, Wang  W, Su  D. Contributions of age-related thymic involution to immunosenescence and inflammaging. Immun Ageing  2020;17:2. 10.1186/s12979-020-0173-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Shanley  DP, Aw  D, Manley  NR  et al.  An evolutionary perspective on the mechanisms of immunosenescence. Trends Immunol  2009;30:374–81. 10.1016/j.it.2009.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Lanna  A, Henson  SM, Escors  D  et al.  The kinase p38 activated by the metabolic regulator AMPK and scaffold TAB1 drives the senescence of human T cells. Nat Immunol  2014;15:965–72. 10.1038/ni.2981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Brinkkoetter  PT, Marinaki  S, Gottmann  U  et al.  Altered CD46-mediated T cell co-stimulation in haemodialysis patients. Clin Exp Immunol  2005;139:534–41. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02705.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Stachowski  J, Pollok  M, Burrichter  H  et al.  Signalling via the TCR/CD3 antigen receptor complex in uremia is limited by the receptors number. Nephron  1993;64:369–75. 10.1159/000187356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Syed-Ahmed  M, Narayanan  M. Immune dysfunction and risk of infection in chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis  2019;26:8–15. 10.1053/j.ackd.2019.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Ando  M, Shibuya  A, Yasuda  M  et al.  Impairment of innate cellular response to in vitro stimuli in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant  2005;20:2497–503. 10.1093/ndt/gfi048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Monti  D, Ostan  R, Borelli  V  et al.  Inflammaging and human longevity in the omics era. Mech Ageing Dev  2017;165:129–38. 10.1016/j.mad.2016.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Franceschi  C, Garagnani  P, Parini  P  et al.  Inflammaging: a new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol  2018;14:576–90. 10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Franceschi  C, Campisi  J. Chronic inflammation (inflammaging) and its potential contribution to age-associated diseases. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci  2014;69 Suppl 1:S4–9. 10.1093/gerona/glu057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Howcroft  TK, Campisi  J, Louis  GB  et al.  The role of inflammation in age-related disease. Aging (Albany NY)  2013;5:84–93. 10.18632/aging.100531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration . Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet  2020;395:709–33. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Betjes  MG, Langerak  AW, van der Spek  A  et al.  Premature aging of circulating T cells in patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int  2011;80:208–17. 10.1038/ki.2011.110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Broux  B, Markovic-Plese  S, Stinissen  P  et al.  Pathogenic features of CD4+CD28- T cells in immune disorders. Trends Mol Med  2012;18:446–53. 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Stavropoulou  E, Kantartzi  K, Tsigalou  C  et al.  Microbiome, immunosenescence, and chronic kidney disease. Front Med (Lausanne)  2021;8:661203. 10.3389/fmed.2021.661203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Meijers  RW, Litjens  NH, de Wit  EA  et al.  Uremia causes premature ageing of the T cell compartment in end-stage renal disease patients. Immun Ageing  2012;9:19. 10.1186/1742-4933-9-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Coresh  J, Selvin  E, Stevens  LA  et al.  Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA  2007;298:2038–47. 10.1001/jama.298.17.2038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Boerstra  BA, Boenink  R, Astley  ME  et al.  The ERA Registry Annual Report 2021: a summary. Clin Kidney J  2023;17:sfad281. 10.1093/ckj/sfad281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Chen  TK, Knicely  DH, Grams  ME. Chronic kidney disease diagnosis and management: a review. JAMA  2019;322:1294–304. 10.1001/jama.2019.14745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Elendu  C, Elendu  RC, Enyong  JM  et al.  Comprehensive review of current management guidelines of chronic kidney disease. Medicine (Baltimore)  2023;102:e33984. 10.1097/MD.0000000000033984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Smekal  MD, Tam-Tham  H, Finlay  J  et al.  Patient and provider experience and perspectives of a risk-based approach to multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease care: a mixed methods study. BMC Nephrol  2019;20:1–12. 10.1186/s12882-019-1269-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Harasemiw  O, Drummond  N, Singer  A  et al.  Integrating risk-based care for patients with chronic kidney disease in the community: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Can J Kidney Health Dis  2019;6:2054358119841611. 10.1177/2054358119841611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Couchoud  CG, Beuscart  J-BR, Aldigier  J-C  et al.  Development of a risk stratification algorithm to improve patient-centered care and decision making for incident elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int  2015;88:1178–86. 10.1038/ki.2015.245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Parajuli  S, Clark  DF, Djamali  A. Is kidney transplantation a better state of CKD? Impact on diagnosis and management. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis  2016;23:287–94. 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Mende  CW. Chronic kidney disease and SGLT2 inhibitors: a review of the evolving treatment landscape. Adv Ther  2022;39:148–64. 10.1007/s12325-021-01994-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Cheung  AK, Chang  TI, Cushman  WC  et al.  KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int  2021;99:S1–87. 10.1016/j.kint.2020.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Brenner  BM, Cooper  ME, De Zeeuw  D  et al.  Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med  2001;345:861–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa011161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Lewis  EJ, Hunsicker  LG, Clarke  WR  et al.  Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med  2001;345:851–60. 10.1056/NEJMoa011303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Wu  J, Duan  S-w, Yang  H-t  et al.  Efficacy and safety of Shenyankangfu Tablet, a Chinese patent medicine, for primary glomerulonephritis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Integr Med  2021;19:111–9. 10.1016/j.joim.2021.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Lancet  2000;355:253–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Jafar  TH, Stark  PC, Schmid  CH  et al.  Progression of chronic kidney disease: the role of blood pressure control, proteinuria, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: a patient-level meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med  2003;139:244–52. 10.7326/0003-4819-139-4-200308190-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Perkovic  V, de Zeeuw  D, Mahaffey  KW  et al.  Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS Program randomised clinical trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol  2018;6:691–704. 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30141-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Wanner  C, Inzucchi  SE, Lachin  JM  et al.  Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med  2016;375:323–34. 10.1056/NEJMoa1515920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Mosenzon  O, Wiviott  SD, Cahn  A  et al.  Effects of dapagliflozin on development and progression of kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: an analysis from the DECLARE–TIMI 58 randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol  2019;7:606–17. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30180-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Perkovic  V, Jardine  MJ, Neal  B  et al.  Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2295–306. 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Heerspink  HJ, Stefánsson  BV, Correa-Rotter  R  et al.  Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med  2020;383:1436–46. 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Bakris  GL, Agarwal  R, Anker  SD  et al.  Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med  2020;383:2219–29. 10.1056/NEJMoa2025845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Brouns  R, De Deyn  PP. Neurological complications in renal failure: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg  2004;107:1–16. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Vandecasteele  SJ, Kurella Tamura  M. A patient-centered vision of care for ESRD: dialysis as a bridging treatment or as a final destination?  J Am Soc Nephrol  2014;25:1647–51. 10.1681/ASN.2013101082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Berger  JR, Hedayati  SS. Renal replacement therapy in the elderly population. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol  2012;7:1039–46. 10.2215/CJN.10411011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Zhao  X, Wang  M, Zuo  L. Early mortality risk in incident Chinese hemodialysis patients: a retrospective cohort study. Ren Fail  2017;39:526–32. 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1337583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Han  SS, Park  JY, Kang  S  et al.  Dialysis modality and mortality in the elderly: a meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol  2015;10:983–93. 10.2215/CJN.05160514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Brown  EA, Finkelstein  FO, Iyasere  OU  et al.  Peritoneal or hemodialysis for the frail elderly patient, the choice of 2 evils?  Kidney Int  2017;91:294–303. 10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Gadelha  AB, Cesari  M, Corrêa  HL  et al.  Effects of pre-dialysis resistance training on sarcopenia, inflammatory profile, and anemia biomarkers in older community-dwelling patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urol Nephrol  2021;53:2137–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Stevens  LA, Viswanathan  G, Weiner  DE. Chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the elderly population: current prevalence, future projections, and clinical significance. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis  2010;17:293–301. 10.1053/j.ackd.2010.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Gandolfini  I, Regolisti  G, Bazzocchi  A  et al.  Frailty and sarcopenia in older patients receiving kidney transplantation. Front Nutr  2019;6:169. 10.3389/fnut.2019.00169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Blosser  CD, Huverserian  A, Bloom  RD  et al.  Age, exclusion criteria, and generalizability of randomized trials enrolling kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation  2011;91:858–63. 10.1097/TP.0b013e31820f42d9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Rao  PS, Merion  RM, Ashby  VB  et al.  Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Transplantation  2007;83:1069–74. 10.1097/01.tp.0000259621.56861.31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Johnson  DW, Herzig  K, Purdie  D  et al.  A comparison of the effects of dialysis and renal transplantation on the survival of older uremic patients. Transplantation  2000;69:794–9. 10.1097/00007890-200003150-00020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Oniscu  GC, Brown  H, Forsythe  JL. How great is the survival advantage of transplantation over dialysis in elderly patients?  Nephrol Dial Transplant  2004;19:945–51. 10.1093/ndt/gfh022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Weng  SF, Shen  YC, Wang  JJ  et al.  Reduced risk of new onset stroke after kidney transplantation in Asian dialysis patients: a propensity score-matched, competing risk study in Taiwan. QJM  2019;112:489–95. 10.1093/qjmed/hcz051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Impedovo  SV, Ditonno  P, Ricapito  V  et al.  Advanced age is not an exclusion criterion for kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc  2013;45:2650–3. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Yoo  K, An  J, Kim  C  et al.  Clinical outcomes in Asian elderly kidney transplant recipients: a multicenter cohort study. Transplant Proc  2015;47:600–7. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Shi  B, Ying  T, Chadban  SJ. Survival after kidney transplantation compared with ongoing dialysis for people over 70 years of age: a matched-pair analysis. Am J Transplant  2023;23:1551–60. 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Artiles  A, Domínguez  A, Subiela  JD  et al.  Kidney transplant outcomes in elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Open Sci  2023;51:13–25. 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Hammad  E, Broering  D, Shah  Y  et al.  Outcomes of kidney transplantation in older recipients. Ann Transplant  2023;28:e938692–1. 10.12659/AOT.938692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research.


Articles from Clinical Kidney Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES