Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 4;26(10):739–747. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0039

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Participants Who Were Using Advanced Diabetes Technologies Categorized by Treatment Group

  All (n = 45) BGAT group (n = 25) HARPdoc group (n = 20) P valuea
Age, mean (SD) year 55 (14) 53 (14) 58 (14) 0.22
Sex, n (%)       0.79
 Male 19 (42%) 11 (44%) 8 (40%)  
 Female 26 (58%) 14 (56%) 12 (60%)  
Ethnicity, n (%)       0.27
 Caucasian 43 (96%) 25 (100%) 18 (90%)  
 Hispanic 1 (2%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%)  
 Mixed 1 (2%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%)  
Study site, n (%)       0.88
 Bournemouth 5 (11%) 3 (12%) 2 (10%)  
 Joslin 13 (29%) 7 (28%) 6 (30%)  
 London 20 (44%) 12 (48%) 8 (40%)  
 Sheffield 7 (16%) 3 (12%) 4 (20%)  
Duration of diabetes, mean (SD) year 36 (18) 34 (16) 39 (20) 0.35
HbA1c, mean (SD)       0.64
 % 7.3 (1.4) 7.2 (1.4) 7.4 (1.4)  
 mmol/mol 56 (16) 55 (16) 57 (16)  
Advanced diabetes technology used, n (%)       0.39
 Intermittently scanned CGM 12 (27)b 9 (36)b 3 (15)  
 Real-time CGM only 19 (42)b 10 (40)b 9 (45)  
 Real-time CGM with AIDs 15 (33) 7 (28) 8 (40)  
Number of SH events over preceding year, mean (SD) 15 (43) 22 (56) 7 (12) 0.27
Gold score, mean (SD) 5.5 (1.1) 5.3 (1.0) 5.8 (1.2) 0.14
 Missing value, n (%) 1 (2) 0 (0) 1 (5)  
Total A2A score, mean (SD) 11 (6) 10 (5) 13 (7) 0.13
a

To compare the HARPdoc and BGAT groups, Student t-test was conducted for continuous variables and chi-square test was conducted for categorical variables.

b

One participant was using both intermittently scanned and real-time CGM.

A2A, Attitudes to Awareness of Hypoglycemia questionnaire; AID, automated insulin delivery system; BGAT, Blood Glucose Awareness Training; CGM, continuous glucose monitoring system; HARPdoc, Hypoglycemia Awareness Restoration Programme for people with type 1 diabetes and problematic hypoglycemia persisting despite optimized self-care; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1C; SH, severe hypoglycemia.