TABLE II.

Comparison of All Techniques In Terms of AUC Score, Accuracy, Sensitvity and Specificity

BM	ResNet				ViT				LLM				ESPFormer
	AUC	Acc	Sen	Spe	AUC	Acc	Sen	Spe	AUC	Acc	Sen	Spe	AUC	Acc	Sen	Spe
1	66.8%	61.8%	90.8%	32.9%	76.3%	69.7%	66.5%	72.8%	69.5%	71.5%	80.0%	63.2%	79.8%	74.3%	80.4%	68.2%
2	66.5%	50.0%	99.7%	0.4%	76.2%	70.7%	73.9%	67.5%	69.8%	70.3%	82.8%	57.6%	77.6%	72.8%	78.7%	67.0%
3	69.4%	55.1%	98.4%	11.7%	76.1%	68.6%	69.6%	67.8%	73.2%	74.3%	85.5%	63.1%	59.9%	62.4%	75.6%	49.1%
4	63.0%	57.8%	63.2%	52.4%	76.7%	67.5%	73.5%	61.5%	70.2%	71.2%	82.4%	59.8%	82.7%	75.5%	81.5%	69.5%
5	0.7%	57.4%	29.1%	85.7%	76.1%	68.3%	73.8%	62.7%	71.6%	70.9%	78.9%	62.5%	80.4%	74.0%	80.5%	67.5%
6	72.9%	60.0%	22.9%	97.1%	77.0%	70.3%	76.1%	64.5%	71.1%	71.3%	67.0%	75.5%	74.4%	68.6%	75.5%	61.6%
7	81.1%	53.0%	7.0%	99.0%	71.9%	67.0%	75.2%	58.8%	69.3%	67.6%	84.3%	50.7%	61.6%	60.5%	68.2%	52.7%
8	83.6%	51.0%	2.6%	99.3%	72.0%	65.3%	71.0%	59.4%	70.8%	70.5%	86.5%	54.4%	61.8%	60.8%	69.8%	51.7%
9	79.2%	49.9%	99.6%	0.2%	71.2%	64.7%	69.4%	59.9%	71.8%	73.5%	89.9%	57.5%	59.7%	57.8%	65.4%	50.3%
10	56.4%	50.0%	100.0%	0.0%	41.0%	46.4%	66.8%	26.0%	62.1%	66.6%	67.0%	66.2%	53.4%	53.3%	30.7%	75.8%
11	80.5%	50.0%	100.0%	0.0%	78.7%	71.2%	64.9%	77.5%	87.6%	78.2%	67.7%	88.7%	83.0%	76.6%	20.1%	95.4%
12	50.8%	50.0%	100.0%	0.0%	42.8%	50.1%	63.2%	37.1%	60.4%	64.1%	77.2%	50.8%	53.5%	54.0%	23.0%	84.9%
Avg.	64.2%	53.8%	67.8%	39.9%	69.7%	65.0%	70.3%	59.6%	70.6%	70.8%	79.1%	62.5%	69.0%	65.9%	62.5%	66.1%