Skip to main content
. 2005 Aug 8;102(33):11799–11804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408945102

Table 2. Effect of the pont:dmyc interaction on eye and ommatidial size.

Genotype Ommatidia, n Ommatidial size, μm2 Area eye discs, μm2 × 103
y w/Y;+/+ 735 ± 18 (5) 246 ± 5 (5) 1.86 ± 0.26 (33)
y w/Y;pont–/+ 748 ± 12 (5) 241 ± 6 (5) 1.74 ± 0.31 (51)
y w/Y;rept–/+ 727 ± 12 (5) 244 ± 5 (5) 1.73 ± 0.19 (20)
y w/Y;rept–/+pont–/+ 726 ± 12 (5) 240 ± 9 (5) nd
dmP0/Y;+/+ 722 ± 18 (5) 217 ± 8 (5) 1.44 ± 0.15 (33)
dmP0/Y;pont–/+ 561 ± 89 (7)* 157 ± 16 (7)* 0.90 ± 0.17 (51)
dmP0/Y;rept–/+ 695 ± 33 (5) 200 ± 5 (5)** 1.51 ± 0.24 (17)
dmP0/Y;rept–/+pont–/+ 532 ± 82 (7)* 162 ± 7 (7)* nd
ey>dmPL35/Y;+/+ 685 ± 35 (5) 194 ± 10 (5) nd
ey>dmPL35/Y;pont–/+ 591 ± 39 (5)* 174 ± 7 (5)** nd
ey>dmPL35/Y;rept–/+ 637 ± 10 (5)** 192 ± 12 (5) nd
ey>dmPL35/Y;rept–/+pont–/+ 583 ± 72 (5)** 156 ± 9 (5)* nd
ey>dm+;+/+ 729 ± 10 (5) 244 ± 8 (4) nd
ey>dm+;UAS-H-dMyc/+ 615 ± 17 (5)* 329 ± 27 (5)* nd
ey>dm+;UAS-M-Pont/+ 737 ± 14 (5) 234 ± 7 (5) nd
ey>dm+;UAS-A-Rept/+ 562 ± 88 (5)* 226 ± 13 (5) nd
ey>dmP0/Y;UAS-lacZ/+ 738 ± 40 (10) 208 ± 16 (10) nd
ey>dmP0/Y;UAS-dMyc/+ 615 ± 90 (10)* 295 ± 11 (10)* nd
ey>dmP0/Y;UAS-M-Pont/+ 754 ± 37 (10) 216 ± 7 (10) nd
ey>dmP0/Y;UAS-A-Rept/+ 535 ± 108 (10)* 201 ± 26 (10) nd
ey>dmP0/Y;pont–/+ 514 ± 34 (4) 169 ± 19 (4) nd
ey>dmP0/Y;pont–/+ UAS-H-dMyc 661 ± 31 (3)* 312 ± 4 (3)* nd
ey>dmP0/Y;pont–/+ UAS-M-Pont 729 ± 46 (3)* 227 ± 5 (3)* nd
ey>dmP0/Y;pont–/+ UAS-A-Rept 198 ± 95 (3)* 167 ± 20 (3) nd

Standard deviations were calculated based on the total number of animals (reported in parentheses). Values differing significantly from their controls (lines 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21 for samples 2–4, 6–8, 10– 12, 14–16, 18–20, and 22–24, respectively) are marked with asterisks. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05. The genotypes are explained in the text. nd, not determined.