Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 4;51(Suppl 2):S64–S73. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad110

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics, Cronbach’s Alphas, and Pearson Correlations

Variable M SD Sk (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
(1) ln(k) Delay −5.73 1.70 −0.05 (0.93)
(2) ln(k) Date −6.10 1.65 0.19 0.91*** (0.93)
(3) Date/Delay Effect 0.37 0.71 0.81 0.27*** −0.15*** (0.25)
(4) Unusual Experiences 3.77 2.57 0.50 0.06* 0.04 0.06 (0.71)
(5) Cognitive Disorganization 4.89 2.96 0.22 0.02 0.03 −0.04 0.40*** (0.77)
(6) Introvertive Anhedonia 2.07 1.80 1.02 0.02 0.04 −0.05 0.09** 0.32*** (0.56)
(7) Impulsive Nonconformity 3.14 1.94 0.57 0.04 0.06 −0.04 0.40*** 0.39*** 0.10** (0.52)
(8) Alcohol (AUDIT) 5.14 4.87 1.41 <0.01 0.03 −0.05 0.02 0.11*** −0.07* 0.25*** (0.77)
(9) Tobacco (ASSIST) 2.84 4.86 1.81 0.11*** 0.10** 0.04 0.22*** 0.16*** 0.02 0.30*** 0.23*** (0.58)

Note. Values in the correlation diagonal represent Cronbach’s alphas, except for the date/delay effect (computed as ln(k) Delay minus ln(k) Date), for which the reliability was estimated using formula 4 from Trafimow.95 Correlations: df = 998. N = 1000. M = mean; SD = standard deviation; Sk = skewness; ln(k) = log-transformed discount rate based on the Monetary Choice Questionnaire.85

*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001 (unadjusted).