Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 5;24:248. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02886-4

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics of the participants in the intervention and control groups

Demographic
Characteristics
Intervention Group Control Group Sig
n (%) n (%)
Gender Male 23 (54.74) 22 (52.39)

x2 = 0.048

p = 0.827

Female 19 (45.24) 20 (47.61)
Semester 3rd semester 10 (23.80) 13 (30.93)

FET = 1.227

p = 0.890

4th semester 5 (11.90) 3 (7.14)
5th semester 11 (26.20) 9 (21.43)
7th semester 10 (23.80) 11 (26.20)
8th semester 6 (14.30) 6 (14.30)
Marriage status Single 38 (92.86) 40 (95.24)

FET = 0.718

p = 0.676

Married 4 (7.14) 2 (4.76)
Residential status in the dormitory Resident 25 (59.52) 27 (64.29)

x2 = 0.202

p = 0.653

Non-resident 17 (40.48) 15 (35.71)
Financial condition Poor 10 (23.81) 13 (30.95)

x2 = 0.574

p = 0.751

Moderate 18 (42.86) 17 (40.48)
Good 14 (33.33) 12 (28.57)
Level of interest in the academic major None 6 (14.29) 10 (23.80)

x2 = 1.773

p = 0.777

Few 10 (23.80) 7 (16.67)
Moderate 13 (30.95) 11 (26.19)
A significant number 6 (14.29) 7 (16.67)
A large number 7 (16.67) 7 (16.67)
Age Mean 22.42 22.35

t = 0.163

p = 0.871

SD 2.01 1.99
GPA Mean 18.25 18.23

t = 0.116

p = 0.908

SD 0.75 0.77

Note: Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests was employed to compare participants based on qualitative variables. The Independent t-test was used to examine the difference between two independent groups in the variables Age and GPA

Abbreviations: n, number of participants; SD, standard deviation; GPA, grade point average; X2, Chi-square test; FET, Fisher Exact test; t, test statistic; Sig, statistical significance; p, probability-value