Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 9;30(4):607–629. doi: 10.1007/s10571-009-9486-z

Table 2.

Statistical summaries

Two-way ANOVA effects (statistical significance)
Fig. 3 3A – Age (P < 0.0001) 3B – Age (P = 0.0008)
– Treatment (P > 0.05) – Treatment (P < 0.0001)
– Interaction (P > 0.05) – Interaction (P > 0.05)
3C – Age (P < 0.0001) 3D – Age (P < 0.0004)
– Treatment (P < 0.0001) – Treatment (P < 0.0001)
– Interaction (p = 0.02) – Interaction (P > 0.05)
Fig. 6 6A – Age (P < 0.0001) 6B – Age (p = 0.04)
– Treatment (P < 0.0001) – Treatment (P > 0.05)
– Interaction (P < 0.0001) – Interaction (P < 0.0001)
Fig. 7 7A – Age (P < 0.0001)
– Treatment (P < 0.0001)
– Interaction (P < 0.0001)
Fig. 8 8A – Age (P = 0.0001) 8B – Age (P = 0.0001)
– Treatment (P > 0.05) – Treatment (P < 0.009)
– Interaction (P < 0.0001) – Interaction (P < 0.0001)
8C – Age (P < 0.0001)
– Treatment (P > 0.05)
– Interaction (P = 0.04)
Fig. 10 10A – Phenotype (P > 0.0001) 10B – Phenotype (P > 0.0001)
– Treatment (P > 0.05) – Treatment (P > 0.05)
– Interaction (P < 0.0001) – Interaction (P = 0.02)
10C – Phenotype (P > 0.0001) 10D – Phenotype (P > 0.0001)
– Treatment (P < 0.0001) – Treatment (P > 0.05)
– Interaction (P = 0.004)
– Interaction (P < 0.0001)
Fig. 11 11A – Phenotype (P > 0.05) 11B – Phenotype (P < 0.001)
– Treatment (P < 0.0001) – Treatment (P < 0.0001)
– Interaction (p = 0.009) – Interaction (P > 0.05)
11C – Phenotype (P > 0.05) 11D – Phenotype (P < 0.0001)
– Treatment (P < 0.0001) – Treatment (P > 0.05)
– Interaction (P = 0.0003) – Interaction (P = 0.003)