Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 14;36(3):501–512. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07376-y

Table 4.

Associations of a fracture liaison service (FLS) intervention with risk of a second hip fracture and mortality after hip fracture in women and mena

Person-years n HR (95% CI)b p-value HR (95% CI)c p-value HR (95% CI)d p-value
Women
  Second hip fracture No FLS 18,774 732 ref ref ref
FLS 8419 298 0.82 (0.72, 0.95) 0.007 0.83 (0.72, 0.95) 0.007 0.80 (0.69, 0.92) 0.002
  Mortality after hip fracture No FLS 20,177 3538 ref ref ref
FLS 8858 1599 0.97 (0.92, 1.04) 0.40 0.98 (0.93, 1.04) 0.56 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) 0.58
Men
  Second hip fracture No FLS 7901 310 ref ref ref
FLS 3887 133 0.82 (0.72, 0.95) 0.007 0.76 (0.61, 0.94) 0.10 0.74 (0.60, 0.92) 0.007
  Mortality after hip fracture No FLS 8420 1863 ref ref ref
FLS 4078 1056 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) 0.88 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) 0.82 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) 0.86

aHazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for a second hip fracture and mortality by FLS in 16,326 patients with an index hip fractures from 2011 to 2018

bAdjusted for age, sex, and stratified on hospital

cAdjusted for age, sex, marital status, education level, Scandinavian-born, comorbidity, and stratified on hospital

dAdjusted for age, sex, marital status, education level, Scandinavian-born, comorbidity, hospitalization day (in splines with 7 knots), and stratified on hospital