Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 6;32(3):e70081. doi: 10.1111/ene.70081

TABLE 3.

The effect of covariates on the responsiveness of RNFL and GCIPL to DMTs.

Outcomes RNFL GCIPL
Moderator Estimate 95% CI p k Estimate 95% CI p k
Age 0.03 −0.10 to 0.16 0.60 19 −0.005 −0.05 to 0.04 0.79 17
Female 0.49 −4.29 to 5.27 0.83 19 1.06 −1.09 to 3.21 0.31 19
ON history 0.08 −4.52 to 4.69 0.97 17 0.87 −0.63 to 2.37 0.23 19
Time to active phase 0.09 −0.45 to 0.63 0.73 19 0.02 −0.02 to 0.06 0.30 19
Follow‐up time 0.10 −0.40 to 0.60 0.68 19 0.06 −0.10 to 0.23 0.45 19
Disease duration 0.01 −0.27 to 0.28 0.95 19 −0.02 −0.06 to 0.02 0.33 17
Baseline EDSS score 0.13 −0.82 to 1.08 0.77 19 0.0013 −0.45 to 0.45 0.99 12
Baseline RNFL thickness 0.001 −0.13 to 0.13 0.99 19
Baseline GCIPL thickness −0.02 −0.18 to 0.15 0.85 18
OCT device‐Heidelberg −0.07 −1.08 to 0.94 0.88 19 −0.10 −0.31 to 0.11 0.32 19
OCT device‐stratus −0.69 −8.29 to 6.91 0.85 19
Study quality −0.0005 −0.17 to 0.17 0.99 19 0.003 −0.03 to 0.05 0.86 19

Note: k = number of populations in which the respective moderator variable was reported.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DMT, disease‐modifying therapies; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; GCIPL, ganglion cell‐inner plexiform layer; OCT, optic coherence tomography; ON, optic neuritis; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer.