Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 13;28(1):e45. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024002581

Table 3.

Multinomial regression analysis for categories of the nutritional healthfulness index by social development index categories

Nutrition health index category
SDI areas Total sample
(n 1066)
None (reference)
(n 436)
Low
(n 503)
Crude model Adjusted model * High (n 127) Crude model Adjusted model *
n n % n % RRR 95 % CI RRR 95 % CI n % RRR 95 % CI RRR 95 % CI
Low 535 246 45·9 % 225 42·0 % 1 1 64 11·9 % 1 1
Middle 247 102 41·3 % 117 47·3 % 1·25 0·90, 1·72 1·07 0·76, 1·52 28 11·3 % 1·05 0·63, 1·74 1·04 0·61, 1·76
High 284 88 30·9 % 161 56·7 % 2·00 1·45, 2·74 1·98 1·43, 2·74 35 12·3 % 1·52 0·94, 2·46 1·59 0·97, 2·60

Bold values: P < 0.05.

SDI: Social development Index.

NH index: None 0 %, Low >0 % to <51 %, High ≥51 %.

RRR: relative risk ratio.

*

Adjusted model by the total of street food outlets and the total of residents per buffer (continuous variable).