Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 6;25:91. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04100-z

Table 2.

The multivariate analysis regarding the correlation between CT signs or other clinical data and poor prognosis at 3 or 12 months post-onset

Risk factors Prognostic indicators at 3-months after onset
All cases (N = 451) Poor Prognosis(N = 214) N(%) or Median(IQR) Good prognosis(N = 237) N(%) or Median(IQR) P OR 95% CI
Swirl sign 92(43.0) 75(31.6) 0.010 2.198 1.827,3.069
Age, years 62.28 ± 11.95 56.50 ± 11.55 0.003 1.042 1.024,1.061
mRS score after ICH 5(1) 4(2) 0.003 1.499 1.212,1.853
Time from CT to onset, hours 2.86 ± 3.07 4.19 ± 3.50 0.018 0.994 0.989,0.999
Ventricular hemorrhage 100(46.7) 78(32.9) 0.003 2.422 2.005,3.386
Risk factors Prognostic indicators at 1 year after onset
All cases (N = 451) Poor Prognosis(N = 199) N(%) or Median(IQR) Good prognosis(N = 252) N(%) or Median(IQR) P OR 95% CI
Island sign 56(28.1) 39(15.5) 0.001 2.666 2.389,3.670
Age, years 62.40 ± 11.87 56.75 ± 11.68 0.003 1.043 1.020,1.067
mRS score after ICH 5(1) 4(2) 0.003 1.524 1.158,2.006
Hematoma expansion 42(25.8) 20(9.9) 0.014 3.572 3.383,4.402

A good prognosis was defined as an mRS score lower than 3, whereas a poor prognosis, including death (score of 6), was indicated by a score of 3 or higher