Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 6;149(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s00401-025-02860-z

Table 4.

Logistic regression (mIIS subcomponent) ~ age of death + (RHI vs. non-RHI controls)

RHI-AF vs. non-RHI controls (n = 158)
Beta SE Wald χ2 p-value Odds Ratio 95% CI
Infarct/lacune (n = 157) − 0.09 0.37 0.06 0.91 0.91 0.44–1.90
Microinfarct (n = 157) − 0.45 0.35 1.67 0.45 0.64 0.33–1.26
Atherosclerosis (n = 156) 0.14 0.38 0.14 0.91 1.15 0.55–2.44
White matter rarefaction (n = 156) 1.42 0.36 15.26 0.005 4.13 2.03–8.43
Arteriolosclerosis (n = 156) 0.63 0.39 2.68 0.30 1.88 0.88–4.00
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (n = 156) − 0.10 0.35 0.08 0.91 0.91 0.46–1.80
Cerebral microbleeds (n = 157) − 0.53 0.77 0.48 0.90 0.59 0.13–2.64
Hippocampal sclerosis (n = 157) 2.01 0.52 14.87 0.005 7.48 2.69–20.81
Laminar necrosis (n = 157) − 18.43 4480.42 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
RHI-CCS vs. non-RHI controls (n = 98)
Infarct/lacune (n = 96) − 0.06 0.50 0.01 1.00 0.94 0.35–2.54
Microinfarct (n = 96) − 0.58 0.46 1.60 0.38 0.56 0.23–1.38
Atherosclerosis (n = 95) 1.03 0.53 3.75 0.16 2.81 0.99–8.00
White matter rarefaction (n = 95) 1.93 0.55 12.35 0.005 6.88 2.35–20.17
Arteriolosclerosis (n = 96) − 0.08 0.45 0.03 1.00 0.93 0.38–2.24
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (n = 96) − 0.77 0.48 2.59 0.25 0.46 0.18–1.18
Cerebral microbleeds (n = 96) − 1.34 1.15 1.35 0.38 0.26 0.03–2.51
Hippocampal sclerosis (n = 94) 2.19 0.65 11.29 0.005 8.94 2.49–32.10
Laminar necrosis (n = 96) − 18.28 5248.04 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00

Logistic regression model with RHI (RHI-AF or RHI-CCS) versus non-RHI controls as the predictor and each mIIS component as the outcome, controlling for age of death. Each mIIS component was dichotomized to none-mild (0) or moderate to severe (1); hippocampal sclerosis was dichotomized to none-unilaterally present (0) and at minimum, unilateral (laterality not assessed), or bilateral (1). Ns denote number of participants with data for specific variable. All p values are FDR corrected.

SE = standard error, CI = confidence interval, χ2 = Chi-square