Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 14;40(3):380–390. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae120

Table 3.

Raw and weighted aggregate MH coverage gaps from smallest to largest and relative to the raw ordering for each province in Chad for the two weighting scenarios

Province Raw aggregate coverage gap order
(smallest to largest)
GBD-weighted aggregate coverage gap order WHO-weighted aggregate coverage gap order
N’Djamena 1 1 1
Moyen-Chari 2 2 2
Mayo-Kebbi Ouest 3 7↓ 3
Mandoul 4 4 4
Logone Occidental 5 3↑ 5
Mayo-Kebbi Est 6 5↑ 6
Guéra 7 9↓ 9↓
Ouaddaï 8 11↓ 7↑
Logone Oriental 9 6↑ 8↑
Tandjilé 10 8↑ 10
Barh-El-Gazel 11 12↓ 11
Kanem 12 15↓ 14↓
Ennedi Est 13 13 12↑
Hadjer-Lamis 14 20↓ 18↓
Lac 15 16↓ 19↓
Ennedi Ouest 16 17↓ 15↑
Salamat 17 10↑ 13↑
Wadi Fira 18 19↓ 17↑
Sila 19 14↑ 16↑
Chari-Baguirmi 20 18↑ 20
Batha 21 21 22↓
Tibesti 22 22 21↑
Borkou 23 23 23

Down Arrow (↓): the province coverage gap is now larger relative to the raw ordering.

Up Arrow (↑): the province coverage gap is now smaller relative to the raw ordering.

No Arrow: order unchanged relative to the raw ordering.

WHO, weighting based on WHO distribution of causes of maternal death as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section.

GBD, weighting based on GBD distribution of causes of maternal death as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section.