Table 5.
Associations between communication network factors and PrEP-related outcomes among Spanish- and English-speaking Latinx sexual minority men
| PrEP Awareness PR (95% CI)a |
PrEP Use PR (95% CI) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spanish | Model 1b | Model 2b | Model 3b | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|
| ||||||
| Intercept | 0.75 (0.52, 1.08) | 0.82 (0.76, 0.88) | 0.83 (0.72, 0.94) | 0.06 (0.01, 0.31) | 0.29 (0.23, 0.37) | 0.43 (0.30, 0.62) |
| Number of MSM friends | 1 (1, 1) | 1 (0.99, 1) | ||||
| Out to: GLB friends | 0.9 (0.67, 1.21) | 0.94 (0.31, 2.89) | ||||
| Out to: non-GLB friends | 1.07 (0.79, 1.46) | 2.79 (0.77, 10.04) | ||||
| Out to: family | 0.88 (0.75, 1.03) | 0.58 (0.38, 0.87) | ||||
| Out to: healthcare providers | 1.40 (1.11, 1.77) | 3.78 (1.37, 10.47) | ||||
| Church activities | 0.79 (0.65, 0.96) | 0.83 (0.49, 1.40) | ||||
| Cultural activities | 1.01 (0.85, 1.20) | 0.95 (0.48, 1.88) | ||||
| Community activities | 1.14 (0.96, 1.35) | 1.32 (0.68, 2.58) | ||||
| Census Region: Midwest | 1.22 (1.02, 1.45) | 1 (0.56, 1.78) | ||||
| Census Region: South | 0.92 (0.78, 1.09) | 0.5 (0.30, 0.83) | ||||
| Census Region: West | 1.02 (0.85, 1.21) | 0.94 (0.58, 1.53) | ||||
| NCHS Rural-Urban: Medium metro | 0.97 (0.80, 1.17) | 0.38 (0.15, 0.93) | ||||
| NCHS Rural-Urban: Micropolitan | 0.75 (0.49, 1.15) | 0.55 (0.15, 2.01) | ||||
| NCHS Rural-Urban: Small metro | 0.74 (0.53, 1.03) | 0.29 (0.08, 1.11) | ||||
| Observations | 181 | 235 | 280 | 181 | 235 | 280 |
| R 2 | 0.067 | 0.026 | 0.035 | 0.153 | 0.007 | 0.12 |
| PrEP Awareness |
PrEP Use |
|||||
| English | Model 1b | Model 2b | Model 3b | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|
| ||||||
| Intercept | 0.86 (0.71, 1.04) | 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) | 0.99 (0.96, 1.01) | 0.11 (0.04, 0.28) | 0.42 (0.37, 0.48) | 0.48 (0.38, 0.61) |
| Number of MSM friends | 1 (1, 1) | 1 (1, 1) | ||||
| Out to: GLB friends | 1.03 (0.89, 1.21) | 1.37 (0.64, 2.94) | ||||
| Out to: non-GLB friends | 1.06 (0.94, 1.21) | 1.59 (0.91, 2.77) | ||||
| Out to: family | 0.97 (0.91, 1.03) | 0.88 (0.66, 1.18) | ||||
| Out to: healthcare providers | 1.06 (0.99, 1.13) | 2.39 (1.49, 3.82) | ||||
| Church activities | 0.95 (0.89, 1.01) | 0.67 (0.50, 0.89) | ||||
| Cultural activities | 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) | 1.05 (0.83, 1.34) | ||||
| Community activities | 1.05 (1.00, 1.09) | 1.34 (1.06, 1.68) | ||||
| Census Region: Midwest | 1.01 (0.96, 1.05) | 1.21 (0.86, 1.69) | ||||
| Census Region: South | 0.93 (0.89, 0.98) | 0.84 (0.62, 1.14) | ||||
| Census Region: West | 0.95 (0.92, 1.00) | 0.99 (0.75, 1.31) | ||||
| NCHS Rural-Urban: Medium metro | 1.01 (0.96, 1.07) | 0.77 (0.56, 1.04) | ||||
| NCHS Rural-Urban: Micropolitan | 0.93 (0.81, 1.07) | 0.86 (0.53, 1.41) | ||||
| NCHS Rural-Urban: Small metro | 0.94 (0.82, 1.08) | 0.67 (0.38, 1.18) | ||||
| Observations | 441 | 486 | 563 | 441 | 486 | 563 |
| R 2 | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.011 | 0.084 | 0.032 | 0.024 |
a
PR: Prevalence Ratios
b
Model 1 included potential individual-level storytellers, Model 2 included potential meso-level storytellers, and Model 3 included communication action context variables.
c
Rural-urban variable was removed due to empty cells that caused model instability in model estimation