Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 28;11:e2740. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2740

Table 2. Comparing performance with baseline models.

Model ML model Weighted-AUCROC Weighted-AUCPR Weighted-F1 MCC ACC
BERT XGB 0.9939 0.9704 0.9312 0.9224 0.9304
KNN 0.9748 0.9222 0.9226 0.9127 0.9217
SVM 0.9940 0.9526 0.9132 0.9030 0.9130
RF 0.9934 0.9644 0.9213 0.9127 0.9217
RoBERTa XGB 0.9930 0.9660 0.9171 0.9077 0.9174
KNN 0.9768 0.9212 0.9216 0.9126 0.9217
SVM 0.9937 0.9672 0.9172 0.9078 0.9174
RF 0.9953 0.9720 0.9213 0.9126 0.9217
LLaMA2 XGB 0.9926 0.9673 0.9312 0.9223 0.9304
KNN 0.9791 0.9325 0.9222 0.9129 0.9217
SVM 0.9945 0.9628 0.9306 0.9225 0.9304
RF 0.9922 0.9639 0.9350 0.9273 0.9348

Note:

Bold indicates the highest performance.